Analysis of Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of CLAG Treatment in Chinese Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Jun Xu ◽  
Xiaolong Tian ◽  
Tingting Lv ◽  
Guolin Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background/Aims: The aim of this work was to investigate the efficacy and predictive factors of CLAG treatment in refractory or relapsed (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Methods: Sixty-seven R/R AML patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and treated by a CLAG regimen: 5 mg/m2/day cladribine (days 1–5), 2 g/m2/day cytarabine (days 1–5), and 300 μg/day filgrastim (days 0–5). The median follow-up duration was 10 months. Results: A total of 57 out of 67 patients were evaluable for remission after CLAG therapy, of whom 57.9% achieved a complete remission (CR) and the overall remission rate was 77.2%. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.0 months, with a 1-year OS of 40.3 ± 6.0% and 3-year OS of 16.7 ± 5.7%. CR at first induction after the initial diagnosis was associated with a favorable CR. Age above 60 years, high risk stratification, second or higher salvage therapy, and bone marrow (BM) blasts ≥42.1% were correlated with an unfavorable CR. Secondary disease, age ≥60 years, high risk stratification, and second or higher salvage therapy were associated with worse OS. Patients developed thrombocytopenia (41, 61%), febrile neutropenia (37, 55%), leukopenia (33, 49%), neutropenia (18, 27%), and anemia (9, 13%). Conclusion: CLAG was effective and well tolerated for R/R AML. BM blasts ≥42.1%, age ≥60 years, high risk stratification, and second or higher salvage therapy were independent factors for a poor prognosis.

Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation during Induction Chemotherapy in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2299-2299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Ehninger ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Christian Thiede ◽  
Thomas Illmer ◽  
Ulrich S. Schuler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Cytogenetic Aberrations ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Objectives: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk cytogenetic aberrations or minor response to the first cycle of induction chemotherapy (IC) the probability of achieving a sustained complete remission is low. Thus early treatment intensification may be warranted in order to achieve long-term disease control. We performed a prospective trial to evaluate whether reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from related or unrelated donors can be performed during the aplastic phase of IC in patients with poor-risk AML. Methods: Seventeen patients (n=17) aged between 17 and 63 years (median 45) with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (n=14, complex, inv3 or t(3;3), t(3;5), −7 or del 7q, +8) or more than 10 % marrow blasts on day 15 after the first cycle of IC (n=3) were included so far. During aplasia a median of thirteen days (range 7–35) after the first (n=8) or second (n=9) cycle of IC patients received 5 x 30 mg/m2 fludarabine i.v. combined with either 8 mg/kg busulfan p.o. (n=4) or 150 mg/m2 melphalan iv. (n=13) followed by allogeneic G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC, n=16) or bone marrow (n=1) from related (n=7) or unrelated (n=10) donors. Nine out of seventeen patients were not in complete remission before conditioning therapy was started. Patients with unrelated grafts received antithymocyte globulin (4 x 10 mg/kg ATG Fresenius). GvHD prophylaxis was performed with cyclosporine A (CSP). Results: All patients engrafted (ANC > 0.5 Gpt/l on day 11, range 8–19, platelets > 50 Gpt/l day 15, range 11–32) and went into remission. Acute GvHD grade II-IV occurred in 8 patients and extensive chronic GvHD was documented in 5 patients with a follow-up of > 100 days. Two patients died while being in remission from infectious complications associated with acute (n=1) or chronic (n=1) GvHD and two patients died during relapse eight and twelve months after PBSC. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range 1–65) thirteen out of seventeen patients (76 %) are alive and in remission. Conclusion: Early allogeneic HSCT as part of primary induction therapy seems to be an effective strategy in AML patients with either poor risk karyotype or minor response to the first induction cycle.

Prognostic Impact of 3q21 and 3q26 Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2594-2594
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
Piera Angelillo ◽  
Laura Vicari ◽  
Clelia Criscuolo ◽  
Felicetto Ferrara
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Chromosome 3 ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2594 Background: Abnormalities affecting long arm of chromosome 3 are rare but recurrent in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and are detected in a variable percentage of AML patients according to different series. The 2008 World Health Organization classification recognizes AML with inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) as a distinct subtype characterized by a poor prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation seems to improve outcome in eligible patients with these aberrations. Inappropriate expression of the ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) was demonstrated in virtually all patients with t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) and inv(3)(q21q26.2); as well as in a majority of patients with other 3q26 rearrangements. Other chromosome 3 abnormalities are rarely recognized in AML patients; clinical and prognostic relevance of these alterations is not yet defined. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic impact of chromosome 3 abnormalities on disease characteristics and treatment outcome in AML. Patients and methods: A total of 580 consecutive adult patients were diagnosed with AML at our institution between February 2002 and July 2012. Conventional cytogenetic analysis performed on diagnostic bone marrow samples detected the presence of 3q abnormalities in 16 patients (2.7%). Two patients were lost to follow-up and were not evaluated for survival analysis. Molecular status of FLT3 and NPM1 was also performed and results are available for 10 patients. Median follow-up time for patients in this series was 47 months ( range 6–125). Results: There were 10 male and 6 female patients, the median age being 64.5 years (range 33–81), 10 patients had de novo AML while 6 evolved from a previously diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Karyotype from MDS phase was available in 2 patients; both acquired 3q rearrangement at time of progression to AML. At time of diagnosis median haemoglobin value was 9.0 g/dL (range 4–11); median leucocyte count was 10.5 × 103̂/L (range 2.3 – 431). Median platelet count was 116 × 109̂/L (range 28 – 529), consistently with previous studies, which have shown that these patients present with higher platelet count at diagnosis when compared with no 3q rearranged ones. Regarding cytogenetic features 3 patients had t(3;3)(q21;q26), 3 patients had inv(3) (q21; q26), 3 patients showed a balanced rearrangement involving 3q26, while 6 patients harbored a del3q. One patient showed monosomy 3. Additional chromosomal changes were demonstrated in 5 patients, two of them had a complex karyotype (see Table 1), 3 had a monosomy 7. Thirteen patients out of 14 received intensive induction chemotherapy; complete remission (CR) was achieved in 5 patients (CR rate: 35.7%), the remaining 7 patients were resistant to induction as well as to salvage chemotherapy. Four patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. Median overall survival in this series is 5.5 months (range 0 – 20). At present only one patient is still alive and in CR, 20 months after diagnosis. Median disease free survival (DFS) for patients achieving a CR was 9 months (range 6–20). Median overall survival for patients resistant to first-line therapy was 3 months (range 0–6). Clinical features and treatment outcome of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions: The incidence of 3q abnormalities in our single institution series is 2.4%, in keeping with previous studies. Our findings confirm the association between these alterations and thrombocytosis at diagnosis, preceding MDS or multilineage dysplasia, presence in all FAB subtypes (except M3), association with additional chromosomal abnormalities as well as the poor response to conventional chemotherapy (CR rate 35.7%), and very short DFS in spite of obtaining CR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sequential Chemotherapy Followed By Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation For High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients In First Complete Remission: A Prospective Pilot Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2162-2162
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Marie Y. Detrait ◽  
Helene Labussiere ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Prospective Pilot Study ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Advances in chemotherapy have improved the prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), however, high-risk patients still have a poor outcome. In this category of patients, the only therapeutic strategy with curative potential remains allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). With the aim to improve the effect of allo-HSCT by sequential use of chemotherapy followed by reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), we conducted a prospective pilot study in high-risk AML patients in first complete remission (CR1). The high-risk population included intermediate II [t(9;11)(p22;q23); MLLT3-MLL, cytogenetic abnormalities not classified as favorable or adverse] and unfavourable patients [inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2); t(6;9)(p23;q34); t(v;11)(v;q23); MLL rearranged, -5 or del(5q); -7; abnl(17p); complex karyotype] (Dohner et al. Blood 2010), secondary AML, and patients requiring 2 induction courses to obtain CR. The chemotherapy sequential regimen consisted in fludarabine 30 mg/m2, high-dose cytarabine 2 g/m2, and amsacrine 100 mg/m2 from days -12 to -9 (FLAMSA). After 3 days of rest, RIC consisted of 4 Gy total-body irradiation (TBI) on day -5, cyclophosphamide (40 mg/kg with HLA-identical sibling, 60 mg/kg for unrelated or mismatched donors) on days -4 and -3, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG, Genzyme) (5 mg/kg total dose) from day -3 to day -1. As a new experimental approach, we replaced TBI by iv. busulfan (BU) (Busilvex, Pierre Fabre) 3.2 mg/kg/d during either 4 or 2 days according to patient age (>55 years) (from day -7 to -4 or from day -5 to -4). Peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSC) were preferred; bone marrow (BM) and cord blood (CB) were also accepted. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis consisted in ciclosporine from day -1, and mycophenolate mofetil (15 mg/kg bid), starting from day 0. In the absence of GvHD, MMF was discontinued by day+50 and ciclosporine was tapered from day +60 to +90. Except for cord blood transplantation, patients received 3 prophylactic increased doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) if they were in CR and GvHD-free at day +120 or 30 days after discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents starting at 1x106 CD3+ cells/kg. Between August 2010 and March 2013, 26 consecutive AML patients in CR1 were included; 11 males and 15 females with a median age at allo-HSCT of 55 years (range: 24-67), 19 (73%) were de novo AML and 7 (27%) secondary AML. According to cytogenetics and molecular markers, 22 (85%) were unfavourable and 4 (15%) were in intermediate II category. Before allo-HSCT, to reach CR1, 20 (77%) patients received one induction chemotherapy and 6 (23%) needed 2 inductions. Cell source was PBSC for 23 (88%) patients, CB for 2 and BM for 1 patient. Donors were 10/10 HLA matched siblings in 9 (35%) patients, 10/10 HLA matched unrelated in 8 (31%) patients and HLA mismatched for the rest of patients [unrelated 9/10 (n=7), CB 4/6 (n=2)]. For ABO compatibility, 13 (50%) were compatible, 5 (19%) had minor incompatibility and 8 (31%) had major incompatibility. For conditioning, 6 (23%) patients received TBI, 13 (50%) received 4 days BU and 7 (27%) received 2 days BU. After transplantation, 23 (88%) patients engrafted, 3 patients died early (1 at day 1 and 1 at day 2 both from septic shock; 1 at day 8 from pneumonia and pericardial effusion). At day 90 post-allo-HSCT, 18 (78%) showed total donor chimerism and 5 (22%) had mixed chimerism and all patients were in CR. There were 6/23 (26%) patients with acute GvHD [2 gr I, 2 gr II and 2 gr III] and 5/23 (22%) chronic GvHD [4 limited and 1 extensive], all before DLI. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range: 0.03-35), the 2-years probability of overall survival (OS) for the whole population was 58% (confidence interval: 47-69) (Figure 1a) and the 2 years cumulative incidence of relapse was 18% (confidence interval: 17-19). At the latest follow-up, 16/23 (70%) engrafted patients were alive, 4/23 (17%) patients relapsed and died later and 3/23 (13%) patients died from transplant related infectious complications. No statistical difference in terms of OS and relapse incidence was found between the 3 types of conditioning, (Figure 1b). FLAMSA-RIC regimen followed by allo-HSCT showed promising results in high-risk CR1 AML patients. Because of some early severe infections, an efficient prophylactic anti-infectious strategy is recommended. The use of BU instead of TBI does not impact on transplant outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Outcome of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Refractory to 1 or 2 Cycles of Induction Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1319-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zarzour ◽  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
Bhumika J. Patel ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Resistance To Chemotherapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Achieving a complete remission (CR) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline (7+3) remains an important treatment goal associated with better overall survival (OS). Approximately 25-30% of younger, and up to 50% of older patients (pts) fail to achieve CR. AML pts with residual leukemia at day 14 receive a second cycle of the same regimen; whether these pts have worse survival than pts not requiring re-induction is unclear. Information on pts with primary refractory AML and the best treatment strategy in this setting are limited. Methods Pts with newly diagnosed AML treated at our institution between 1/2000 and 1/2015 were included. Pts received standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine for 7 days and an anthracycline for 3 days (7+3). Bone marrow biopsies were obtained at day 14 and a second cycle of the same regimen (7+3 for younger adults, 5+2 for older adults) was given to pts with residual leukemia (blasts > 5%). All responses were assessed at day 30 +/- 5 days post induction. Response was defined as CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or platelet recovery (CRp) per International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria. Cytogenetic risk stratifications were based on CALGB/Alliance criteria. OS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to time of death or last follow up. A panel of 62 gene mutations that have been described as recurrent mutations in myeloid malignancies was used to evaluate whether genomic data can be used to predict response. Results: Among 227 pts with AML, 123 received 7+3 and had clinical and mutational data available. Median age was 60 years (range, 23-82). Median baseline WBC was 8.2 X 109/L (range, 0.3-227), hemoglobin 8.9 g/L (range, 4.7-13.8), platelets 47 X 109/L (range, 9-326), and BM blasts 46% (range, 20-95). Cytogenetic risk groups were: favorable in 12 (10%), intermediate in 68 (56%) [normal karyotype in 44 (36%)], and unfavorable in 42 (34%). A total of 93 pts (76%) responded, 69 (74%) received 1 cycle of induction and 24 (26%) required re-induction at day 14 due to residual leukemia. A total of 39 pts (32%) received allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT): 18 (46%) from a matched sibling donor, 16 (41%) from a matched unrelated donor and 5 (13%) had an umbilical cord transplant. With a median follow up of 13.5 months, the median OS for the entire group was 13 months (m, range, 0.1-120). The median OS for pts who failed 1-2 cycles of 7+3 was significantly worse than pts who responded (median 2.6 vs 16.9 m, p = 0.002). When pts undergoing ASCT were censored, the median OS was 2.3 vs 9.9 m, p= 0.003, respectively. Overall, 33 pts (27%) had residual leukemia at day 14 and received re-induction, 24 (72%) achieved a response at day 30+/- 5 days. The median OS for pts who received re-induction was inferior compared to pts who did not (10.1 vs. 16.1 months, p= 0.02). When pts who received ASCT were censored, the OS was similar (8.5 vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.49, respectively). Among the 30 pts with persistent disease following induction therapy at day 30, 11 (37%) died from induction complications, 6 (20%) received salvage therapy with mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine, 3 (10%) received high dose cytarabine, 2 (7%) received azacitidine, and 8 (27%) received best supportive care. Among pts who received salvage chemotherapy 56% achieved CR and proceeded with ASCT. Two pts had ASCT with residual leukemia and relapsed within 3 m of ASCT. Pts who received ASCT after induction failure had a significantly better OS compared to non-transplant pts (median OS 22.0 vs. 1.4 months, p < 0.001, respectively); however, this benefit was only seen in pts who had ASCT in CR. We then investigated if genomic mutations can predict response or resistance to chemotherapy. Out of the 62 genes tested, only a TP53 mutation was associated with resistance, p = 0.02. Further, pts with TP53 mutations had significantly inferior OS compared to TP53 wild type regardless of ASCT status (1.4 vs 14.8 m, p< 0.001) Conclusion: Pts with newly diagnosed AML who fail induction chemotherapy with a 7+3 regimen have a poor outcome. Re-induction with the same regimen at day 14 for residual leukemia converted most non-responders to responders, but was associated with worse OS. ASCT improves outcome only in pts who achieve CR with salvage therapy. TP53 mutations predicted resistance to chemotherapy with 7+3. Disclosures Carew: Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Sekeres:TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Azacitidine Maintenance after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Feasible in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplasia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5884-5884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽  
Rami Mahfouz ◽  
Ali Bazarbachi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Abnormal Karyotype ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: 5-Azacidine (5-AZA) is a DNA hypomethylating agent with proven clinical activity in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A recent non-randomized study reported promising results with the use of lower doses of 5-AZA as maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is important to note that 5-AZA has an immunomodulatory effect and might enhance the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Here, we report the successful use of 5-AZA maintenance following allogeneic HSCT in patients with high risk AML and MDS. Patients and methods: Nine patients (M=6, F=3; median age=49 (36-65) years ) with high-risk AML (n=6 including 2 abnormal karyotypes) or MDS (n=3 including 1 abnormal karyotype) received 5-AZA as post-transplant maintenance at a dose of 32mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks starting at a median time of 100 (30-210) days post-transplant. All patients were in complete remission at initiation of 5-AZA. A median of 12 cycles (1-18) were delivered. Patients’ characteristics, treatment details, response and side effects are summarized in Table I. Results: After a median follow-up of 19 months post HSCT and 15 months after starting 5-AZA treatment, five patients with normal karyotype are still in CR. Conversely, all three patients with abnormal karyotype rapidly developed disease recurrence while they were receiving 5-AZA after a median of 3 months. Overall, the actuarial 1-year progression free and overall survival rates were 65% and 90%, respectively. 5-AZA was generally well tolerated with only mild thrombocytopenia observed in 2 patients. No clinically evident graft-versus-host disease exacerbation was observed. Conclusion: These results suggest that Low-dose 5-AZA is an effective maintenance therapy post- allogeneic SCT in high-risk AML and MDS particularly when a normal diploid karyotype is present. The relative lack of efficacy in the presence of an abnormal karyotype is intriguing and questions whether these subjects might benefit from higher doses of 5-AZA or other novel therapies within the context of a well-designed clinical trial. Prospective clinical trials and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these observations. Abstract 5884 TABLE I.Patients characteristics and Outcomes After Azacitidine maintenanceSubject #123456789Age at transplant655848433649495851genderMMFMFMFMMDiseaseAMLAMLAMLAMLSecondary AMLSecondary AMLMPD/MDSMDS (RAEB-2)MDS (RAEB-2)cytogeneticnormalnormalT(6,9)normalDel 5normalnormalnormalHypoploidy(43-45)Molecular abnormalityNoneNoneNoneFLT3 ITDNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneDisease status at HSCTCR2CR3CR1CR1RefractoryCR1PRPRCR1Donor typeMRDMRDMRDMRDMUDMRDMRDMRDMRDConditioningFB2+ATGFB3+ATGFB3+ATGFB4+ATGFB3+ATG+ TBI (4Gy)FB4+ATGFB4+ATGFB3+ATGFB2+ATGGVHD prophylaxisCSACSACSACSACSACSACSACSACSA, mycophenolate mofetilTime from HSCT to 5-AZA (days)37701001503021010055104Disease status at 5-AZACRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRnb of cycles12131241218129ToxicityNoneNoneNoneNoneGrade II thrombocytopeniaGrade II thrombocytopeniaNoneNoneNoneGVHD after 5-AZANoNoYesYesYesNoYesNoNoDisease recurrencenonoyesnoyesnononoyesSalvage therapy if recurrenceN/AN/AChemotherapy followed by DLIN/ANoneN/AN/AN/AChemotherapy followed by DLIProgression free survival, months13+24+124+319+21+18+10Status at last follow upCRCRCRCRdiedCRCRCRCRSurvival, months13+24+18+24+519+21+18+34+ Stem cell source for all patients: peripheral blood; CR: complete remission; PR: partial remission; CSA: cyclosporine A; MRD: matched related donor; MUD: matched unrelated donor; PBSC: peripheral blood stem cell; CCR: continuous complete remission; FB4: 5 days fludarabine plus 4 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day); FB3: 5 days fludarabine plus 3 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day); FB2: 5 days fludarabine plus 2 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day) ATG: anti-thymoglobuline; DLI: donor lymphocyte infusion. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine maitenance post HSCT.

scholarly journals A Phase 2 Randomized Study of Low Dose Ara-C with or without Glasdegib (PF-04449913) in Untreated Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Florian H. Heidel ◽  
Michael Heuser ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
P Value ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: The Hedgehog signaling pathway (HhP) is aberrantly activated in leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), promoting cancer stem cell maintenance. HhP inhibition reduces leukemic stem cells. Glasdegib is a potent, selective, oral HhP inhibitor, with activity in pre-clinical and clinical studies. The addition of glasdegib to standard chemotherapy (CT) has an acceptable safety profile and appears to have clinical activity in MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: In this study (NCT01546038), previously untreated AML or high-risk MDS patients (pts) ineligible for intensive CT were randomized 2:1 to receive low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) 20 mg subcutaneously twice a day x 10 days q28 days + oral glasdegib 100 mg daily or LDAC alone for as long as pts received clinical benefit. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The final analysis was conducted after completion of recruitment (Oct 2015) and at least 92 OS events. Results: As of Apr 2016, 132 pts (116 AML, 16 MDS) were randomized to LDAC + glasdegib (n = 88) or LDAC alone (n = 44) (stratified as good/intermediate [int.] vs poor risk) (Table). Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between arms in median age, baseline cytogenetic risk, and diagnosis. Eighty-four pts received LDAC + glasdegib and 41 pts LDAC alone (7 randomized/not treated pts were followed for survival). Median treatment duration was 83 days for LDAC + glasdegib and 47 days for LDAC alone; median follow up was 14.3 months and 12.4 months, respectively. In the glasdegib arm, 12 pts were continuing treatment and 25 were in follow up; in the LDAC arm, 1 pt was on treatment and 5 in follow up. Cytopenias and gastrointestinal toxicities were the adverse events (AEs) occurring more frequently in the LDAC + glasdegib arm. Hh-associated AEs in the glasdegib arm included dysgeusia (23.8%), muscle spasms (20.2%) and alopecia (10.7%). Serious AEs of febrile neutropenia were more frequent in the glasdegib arm, but sepsis rates were lower and pneumonia rates were similar. The most common cause of death was disease progression in both arms. Grade 2-4 QTcF prolongation was more frequent in the LDAC arm. Investigator-reported complete response (CR) rates were numerically higher for LDAC + glasdegib (n = 17, 15%) vs LDAC alone (n = 1, 2.3%), p-value 0.0142. Based on intent to treat analysis of 96 events, median OS (mOS) for LDAC + glasdegib was 8.3 (80% confidence interval [CI] 6.9, 9.9) vs 4.9 months (80% CI 3.5, 6.0) for LDAC alone (HR 0.511, 80% CI 0.386, 0.675; one-sided log rank p-value 0.0020 stratified by cytogenetic risk). For good/int. risk, mOS for LDAC + glasdegib was 12.2 vs 6.0 months for LDAC alone (HR 0.464, p-value 0.0035). For poor risk, mOS for LDAC + glasdegib was 4.4 vs 2.3 months (HR 0.575, p-value 0.0422). In AML pts, mOS for LDAC + glasdegib was 8.3 vs 4.3 months for LDAC alone (HR 0.462, p-value 0.0004). Conclusions: The addition of glasdegib to LDAC for AML and high-risk MDS pts improved OS compared with LDAC alone. The improvement was consistent among subgroups, particularly in good/int. risk pts. Treatment was associated with an acceptable safety profile. The addition of glasdegib to LDAC may be a treatment option for pts with AML or high-risk MDS. Disclosures Cortes: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Heuser:Tetralogic: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Bayer Pharma AG: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Research Funding; BerGenBio: Research Funding. Fiedler:Gilead: Other: Travel; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad/Incyte: Consultancy; Teva: Other: Travel; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kolltan: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; GSO: Other: Travel. Smith:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Robak:Pfizer: Research Funding. Montesinos Fernandez:Gamida Cell: Consultancy. Ma:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shaik:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zeremski:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Connell:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chan:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Prospective Evaluation of Azacitidine Maintenance Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5476-5476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harinder Gill ◽  
Albert Kwok Wai Lie ◽  
Yok Lam Kwong ◽  
Anskar Y.H. Leung
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction and aim. Relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major cause of treatment failure and is associated with a poor prognosis. Overall survivals are around 50% at 5 years following allogeneic HSCT in intermediate and high risk AML. Survivals remain less than 20% in poor-risk and very poor-risk patients based on the cytogenetic profile. Thus, prevention of relapse following allogeneic HSCT remains an unmet clinical need. Low-dose azacitidine maintenance post-HSCT has been shown to augment graft-versus-leukemia effect and may prolong survivals. We aim to prospectively evaluate the effect of azacitidine maintenance following allogeneic HSCT in high risk AML and MDS. Method. Consecutive patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in remission following first allogeneic HSCT or second allogeneic HSCT (from the original donor) were recruited. High risk AML in this study comprised patients with poor risk karyotype, secondary AML transformed from underlying MDS, presence of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3 -ITD) and non-remission before HSCT. Azacitidine was administered at 100mg daily for 3 days per cycle every 28 days until progression or a maximum of 8 cycles. The clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics were determined. The occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was determined. DNA chimerism was determined in the bone marrow before the initiation of azacitidine, after 4th and 8th cycles of azacitidine and at 1 year. DNA chimerism was determined by quantification of polymorphic short tandem repeat sequences. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. Thirty-four patients with high-risk AML (N=31) and MDS (N=3) were recruited. The median duration of follow-up was 14 months (range: 2 - 44 months). Twenty-two patients received azacitidine maintenance after first allogeneic HSCT, whereas 12 patients received azacitidine maintenance after a second allogeneic HSCT from the same donor following relapse from a first allogeneic HSCT For patients receiving azacitidine after first HSCT, at a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range: 5- 36 months), the median PFS was not reached, and the median OS was 32 months (95% confidence interval [C.I.]: 24.85-39.15). The 24-month PFS and OS were 66.1% and 73.2% respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 7 (31.8%) and 17 patients (77%). For patients receiving azacitidine after second HSCT, at a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 9 - 46 months), the median PFS and OS were 9 months (95% C.I.:6.94-11.04) and 14 months (range: 11.77 - 16.23 months). The 24-month PFS and OS were 25% and 14% respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 1 (8.3%) and 5 (41.7%) patients respectively. In both groups, 100% donor chimerism was achieved during azacitidine maintenance. Conclusion. Azacitidine maintenance following first allogeneic HSCT resulted in favorable 2-year survivals in selected patients with high-risk AML and MDS. Nevertheless, survivals were poor despite azacitidine maintenance after second allogeneic HSCT from the same donor. Full donor chimerism was maintained during azacitidine maintenance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Analysis of FLT3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: correlation to cytogenetics, FAB subtype, and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Martin Dugas ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Peter Staib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Length Mutations ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract FLT3 length mutation (FLT3-LM) is a molecular marker potentially useful for the characterization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To evaluate the distribution of FLT3-LM within biologic subgroups, we screened 1003 patients with AML at diagnosis for this mutation. FLT3-LM was found in 234 (23.5%) of all patients and thus is the most frequent mutation in AML described so far. Of all positive patients, 165 (70.5%) revealed a normal karyotype. Of the 69 patients with chromosome aberrations, 24 (34.8%) had a t(15;17). The mutation was rare in AML with t(8;21), inv(16) 11q23 rearrangements, and complex karyotypes. FLT3-LM was not distributed equally within different French-American-British (FAB) subtypes and was correlated with a high peripheral blood count in FAB M1, M2, and M4 (P &lt; .0001). In addition, the median age of patients with the mutation was lower (54.9 vs 57.6 years;P = .043), and, at a ratio of 1.36:1 (P = .023), the mutation was more frequent in females than in males. Within the AMLCG study, FLT3-LM was of intermediate prognostic significance. The complete remission rate of 70.3% in patients with FLT3-LM was similar to that (70.4%) in patients without FLT3-LM. Overall survival was not different between patients with or without FLT3-LM. In contrast, patients with FLT3-LM had a significantly shorter event-free survival (7.4 vs 12.6 months;P = .0072) because of a higher relapse rate. Besides the importance of FLT3-LM for biologic and clinical characterization of AML, we show its value as a marker for disease monitoring based on 120 follow-up samples of 34 patients.

Fludarabine and cytosine are less effective than standard ADE chemotherapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, and addition of G-CSF and ATRA are not beneficial: results of the MRC AML-HR randomized trial

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 4614-4622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Milligan ◽  
Keith Wheatley ◽  
Timothy Littlewood ◽  
Jenny I. O. Craig ◽  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
All Trans Retinoic Acid ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractThe optimum chemotherapy schedule for reinduction of patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (relapsed, resistant/refractory, or adverse genetic disease) is uncertain. The MRC AML (Medical Research Council Acute Myeloid Leukemia) Working Group designed a trial comparing fludarabine and high-dose cytosine (FLA) with standard chemotherapy comprising cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE). Patients were also randomly assigned to receive filgrastim (G-CSF) from day 0 until neutrophil count was greater than 0.5 × 109/L (or for a maximum of 28 days) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for 90 days. Between 1998 and 2003, 405 patients were entered: 250 were randomly assigned between FLA and ADE; 356 to G-CSF versus no G-CSF; 362 to ATRA versus no ATRA. The complete remission rate was 61% with 4-year disease-free survival of 29%. There were no significant differences in the CR rate, deaths in CR, relapse rate, or DFS between ADE and FLA, although survival at 4 years was worse with FLA (16% versus 27%, P = .05). Neither the addition of ATRA nor G-CSF demonstrated any differences in the CR rate, relapse rate, DFS, or overall survival between the groups. In conclusion these findings indicate that FLA may be inferior to standard chemotherapy in high-risk AML and that the outcome is not improved with the addition of either G-CSF or ATRA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document