Supervised Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension as Early Follow-Up Treatment after Pulmonary Endarterectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Respiration ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 577-588
Author(s):  
Christian Nagel ◽  
Mohammed Nasereddin ◽  
Nicola Benjamin ◽  
Benjamin Egenlauf ◽  
Satenik Harutyunova ◽  
...  
Respiration ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa La Rovere ◽  
Gian Domenico Pinna ◽  
Maurizio Pin ◽  
Claudio Bruschi ◽  
Giovanna Callegari ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4006-4006
Author(s):  
Franco Piovella ◽  
Andrea M. D’Armini ◽  
Marisa Barone ◽  
Vincenzo Emmi ◽  
Chiara Beltrametti ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease which results from obstruction of the major pulmonary arteries by incompletely resolved or organized pulmonary emboli which have become incorporated into the pulmonary artery wall, eventually causing an increase in pulmonary vascular resistances. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice. Careful pre- and post-operative management is essential for a successful outcome following PEA. In 1994, we started in Pavia a program in which members of a multidisciplinary team work in close interaction with the aim of increase experience in the challenging problems these patients present in the evaluative, surgical, and post-operative phases of their care. So far, 134 PEAs have been performed. Preoperatively, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution was respectively 3-II, 56-III, and 75-IV; mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistances were 47 ± 13 mmHg and 1149 ± 535 dynes/sec/cm−5 respectively. The overall operative mortality has been 9.7% (in 2005 mortality rate was 4.5%). At present, 92% of the PEA patients are actively participating in the follow-up study. Follow-up visits are at 3 months after PEA, yearly for the following 5 years, and then at 7, 10, and 15 years postoperatively. Both early and late survivals were excellent. Survival rate at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were respectively of 89.5±2.7%, 87.3±3.0%, and 82.7±3.6%. Survival rates had not changed at 5, 7, and 10 years postoperative. Three months after PEA, 29 (58%) subjects were within NYHA class I, 18 (36%) in class II, and 3 (6%) in class III. At 1-year follow-up, 40 (80%) patients were within NYHA class I, 10 (20%) in class II. A statistically significant difference exists not only between the preoperative and the postoperative data (p <0.0001), but also between the functional status at 3 months and the other two postoperative controls (p <0.001). Table summarizes the results of hemodynamic tests collected at three months, one year and three years on the first 35 patients who completed the follow-up program. Hemodynamic data from 35 patients participating to the Pavia Pulmonary Endarterectomy Program with complete 3-year follow-up. CVP mPAP CO CI PVR PVRI CVP (mmHg) central venous pressure; mPAP (mmHg) mean pulmonary artery pressure; CO (L/min) cardiac output; CI (L/min/m2) cardiac index; PVR (dynes/sec/cm-5) pulmonary vascular resistances; PVRI (dynes/sec/cm-5/m2) pulmonary vascular resistances index; RV-EF (%) right ventricle ejection fraction. RV-EF A: Before-PEA 7±6 48±12 3.3±0.9 1.8±0.5 1125±412 2027±731 15±8 B:Before discharge 5±4 25±10 5.2±1.1 2.9±0.5 289±142 505±234 32±8 C: 3 months 2±2 24±11 5.1±1.4 2.8±0.6 231±198 542±271 32±7 D: 1 year 1±2 23±12 5.0±1.1 2.7±0.6 290±191 531±343 35±8 E: 3 years 2±2 24±12 4.9±1.1 2.6±0.5 317±226 579±393 34±8 p value A vs. B: nsA vs. C, D, and E: <0.0001B vs. C, D and E: <0.05 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E:


2021 ◽  
pp. 021849232110440
Author(s):  
Varun Shetty ◽  
Julius Punnen ◽  
Pooja Natarajan ◽  
Sanjay Orathi ◽  
Basha Khan ◽  
...  

Background Pulmonary endarterectomy is potential curative therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients. Here, we present our experience with pulmonary endarterectomy spanning 17 years and detail our management strategy. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective study conducted on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy at our centre across 17 years. Results Between 2004 and 2020, 591 patients underwent pulmonary endarterectomy. Amongst them 429 (72.4%) were males with a male to female ratio of 2.6:1, the median age was 38 (range, 14–73) years. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days (IQR, 8–16). Extra corporeal membranous oxygenation was used in 82 (13.9%) patients during/after surgery, out of whom 28 (34.1%) survived. There were 70 (11.8%) in-hospital deaths. Female gender ( p < 0.01), pulmonary artery systolic pressure >100 mmHg ( p < 0.05) and use of extra corporeal membrane oxygenation ( p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The mortality in the first period (2004–2012) was 15.7% which reduced to 9.1% in the later period (2013–2020). The reduction in mortality rate was 42% ( p < 0.05). Following pulmonary endarterectomy, there was a significant reduction in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (86.68 ± 24.38 vs. 39.71 ± 13.13 mmHg; p < 0.001) and improvement in median walk distance as measured by 6-min walk test on follow-up (300 vs. 450 meters; p < 0.001). The median duration of follow-up was 8 months (inter-quartile range: 2–24). Conclusions pulmonary endarterectomy has a learning curve, high pulmonary vascular resistance alone is not a contraindication for surgery. Patients following surgery have improved survival and quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 204589401879135 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Martinez ◽  
C. Wallenhorst ◽  
S. Teal ◽  
A.T. Cohen ◽  
A.J. Peacock

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of unresolved organised pulmonary emboli/thrombi obstructing the major pulmonary arteries. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and risk factors of CTEPH in a cohort with first venous thromboembolism (VTE). This was a population-based cohort study of patients with first VTE and no active cancer in England between 2001 and 2012. CTEPH was assessed using a rigorous case-ascertainment algorithm. Risk factors for CTEPH were studied using a nested case-control approach by matching CTEPH cases to VTE patients without CTEPH. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) of comorbidities were estimated from conditional logistic regression. During 81,413 person-years of follow-up among 23,329 patients with first VTE (mean follow-up 3.5 years; maximum 11.0 years) 283 patients were diagnosed with CTEPH (incidence rate 3.5 per 1000 person-years); cumulative incidence was 1.3% and 3.3% at 2 and 10 years after pulmonary embolism, and 0.3% and 1.3% following deep vein thrombosis (DVT), respectively. Risk factors for CTEPH included age over 70, OR 2.04 (95% CI 1.23 to 3.38), female gender, 1.44 (1.06 to 1.94), pulmonary embolism at first VTE, 3.11 (2.23 to 4.35), subsequent pulmonary embolism and DVT, 3.17 (2.02 to 4.96) and 2.46 (1.34 to 4.51) respectively, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 3.17 (2.13 to 4.73), heart failure 2.52 (1.76 to 3.63) and atrial fibrillation, 2.42 (1.71 to 3.42). CTEPH develops most commonly after pulmonary embolism and less frequently after DVT. Awareness of risk factors may increase referrals to specialised centres for confirmation of CTEPH and initiation of specific treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Lin Zhao ◽  
Ping Yuan ◽  
Qin-Hua Zhao ◽  
Su-Gang Gong ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) still experience reduced exercise capacity despite pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Exercise training improves the exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) in patients with PH, but data on the effects of exercise training on these patients are scarce. The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of exercise training in CTEPH after PEA.Methods: We searched the relevant literature published before January 2020 for the systematic review and meta-analysis using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome was a change in the 6-min walking distance (6 MWD). We also assessed the effect of exercise on the peak oxygen uptake (VO2) or peak VO2/kg, oxygen uptake anaerobic threshold, workload, oxygen pulse, hemodynamics, arterial blood gases, oxygen saturation, N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), quality of life (QoL) and pulmonary function tests.Results: We included 4 studies with 208 exercise-training participants. In the pooled analysis, short-term exercise training can improve the 6 MWD of 58.89 m (95% CI: 46.26–71.52 m, P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant increase in the peak VO2/kg or peak VO2 after exercise training (3.15 ml/min/kg, 95% CI: 0.82–5.48, P = 0.008; 292.69 ml/min, 95% CI: 24.62–560.75, P = 0.032, respectively). After exercise training, the maximal workload and O2 pulse significantly improved. Three months of exercise training increased the right ventricular ejection fraction by 3.53% (95% CI: 6.31–11.94, P &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0) independently of PEA surgery. In addition, NT-proBNP plasma levels significantly improved with exercise training after PEA [weighted mean difference (WMD): −524.79 ng/L, 95% CI: 705.16 to −344.42, P &lt; 0.0001, I2 = 0]. The partial pressure of oxygen and pH improved progressively over 12 weeks of exercise training (WMD: 4 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.01–8.33, P = 0.01; WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.02–0.04, P &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Subscales of the QoL measured by the SF-36 questionnaire had also improved. In addition, exercise training was well-tolerated with a low dropout rate, and no major adverse events occurred during exercise training.Conclusion: Exercise training may be associated with a significant improvement in the exercise capacity and QoL among CTEPH patients after PEA and was proven to be safe. However, more large-scale multicentre studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of exercise training in CTEPH patients after PEA.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42021235275.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document