scholarly journals Advanced Gastric Cancer: Current Treatment Landscape and a Future Outlook for Sequential and Personalized Guide: Swiss Expert Statement Article

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Siebenhüner ◽  
Sara De Dosso ◽  
Daniel Helbling ◽  
Christoforos Astaras ◽  
Petr Szturz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Several treatment possibilities have been investigated, but only a few show clinically meaningful results. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Systemic treatment options for advanced gastric cancer (aGC) have evolved over the recent years, implementing the growing molecular knowledge of this heterogeneous disease. Molecular profiling (at least for HER-2-expression, microsatellite instability status, <i>Epstein-Barr virus</i> expression, and programmed death ligand-1 expression/combined positive score [CPS]) is recommended for all therapy-fit patients prior to the start of a systemic treatment and is crucial for decisions on treatment strategy and drug selection. Various examples like the application of trastuzumab in the HER-2-positive subgroup underline the benefits of this approach starting from the first-line setting. A combination of platinum and fluoropyrimidine remains the first-line chemotherapy backbone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Triplet combinations adding taxanes to the doublet regimen are reserved for certain scenarios. Unfortunately, almost all patients who receive first-line treatment (with or without anti-HER-2 blockade) progress and &#x3c;70% are eligible for a second-line therapy. The addition of monoclonal antibodies has substantially improved outcomes in this setting. As such, ramucirumab has led to significant and clinically meaningful advancements in the second-line treatment. Furthermore, immuno-oncology with checkpoint inhibition and immune stimulation has evolved in the field of aGC. Recent first-line data show a significant survival benefit in aGC patients with a CPS ≥ 5 under immunochemotherapy. Nonetheless, the impact of immunotherapy combinations and immunochemotherapy remains an area of investigation. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> In this review, we highlight recent improvements in the treatment landscape of advanced gastric cancer, the heterogeneity of this disease, and possible personalized targets.

Trastuzumab beyond progression in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A multicenter AGEO study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette Palle ◽  
David Tougeron ◽  
Astrid Pozet ◽  
Emilie Soularue ◽  
Pascal Artru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

94 Background: Trastuzumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first line regimen in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer. However, there is no data concerning continuation of trastuzumab beyond first line progression. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study include all consecutive patients with HER2 + advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma who received after progression of trastuzumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy, a second line chemotherapy with irinotecan, taxane or platinum salt, with or without trastuzumab. The prognostic variables with P values ≤0.10 in univariate analysis were eligible for the Cox multivariable regression model. Results: From August 2007 to March 2015, 104 patients were included (median age, 60.8 years; male, 78.8%; PS 0-1, 71.2%) with advanced (metastatic : 99%) gastric (45.2%) or GEJ (54.8%) cancer. All patients had received first line treatment based on trastuzumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=54; 51.9%) or oxaliplatin (n=50; 48.1%). As second line chemotherapy, 67 patients (64.4%) received FOLFIRI regimen, including 19 who have continued trastuzumab; 23 patients (22.1%) received a taxane regimen (paclitaxel or docetaxel), including 12 with trastuzumab; and 14 patients (13.5%) received a platinum-based chemotherapy (different from that used in first-line), including 8 with trastuzumab. When considering all regimens of second-line chemotherapy, continuation (n=39) versus discontinuation (n=65) of trastuzumab was significantly associated with an increase on PFS (4.4 vs 2.3 months; p=0.002) and OS (12.6 vs 6.1 months; p=0.001). In multivariate Cox model (including ECOG PS, tumor grade, number of metastatic site, and second-line treatment), continuation of trastuzumab was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR=0.56; 95%CI [0.35-0.89]; p=0.01) and OS (HR=0.47; 95%CI [0.28-0.79]; p=0.004). Conclusions: This study suggests that maintenance of trastuzumab plus second line chemotherapy beyond disease progression has clinical benefit in patients with HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer. These results deserve a prospective randomized validation.

A randomized phase II factorial design trial of CPT-11 versus PTX versus each combination with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to S-1: Final results of OGSG0701.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Nishikawa ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Tomono Kawase ◽  
Masahiro Gotoh ◽  
Yutaka Kimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

117 Background: S1 + platinum (SP) is recognized as standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer(AGC), and S1 monotherapy is suggested for frail AGC patients or adjuvant setting in Japan. However, taxane or CPT-11 were often employed as second-line treatment for the patients who were resistant to S1-containing regimen. A retrospective analysis has reported that S1 combination chemotherapy extended overall survival as second-line treatment for AGC. Methods: Patients with AGC who confirmed disease progression by imaging after the first-line therapy with S1 or SP were randomized in four groups; CPT-11 150 mg/m2, day1, q2w (Group A), PTX 80 mg/m2, day1, 8,15, q4w (Group B), CPT-11 80 mg/m2, day1, 15, S-1 80 mg/m2, day1-21, q5w (Group C1), PTX 50 mg/m2,day1, 8, S1 80 mg/m2, day1-14, q3w (Group C2). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Sample size was set at 100 to 120 to achieve 2 months improvement of OS by using CPT-11 or by adding S1 with approximately 80% probability of the correct selection. Results: From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. The OS was 11.3/11.3/14.6/10.5 months(M) (Group A/B/C1/C2), 11.8M in Group A+C1 and 11.1M in Group B+C2 (p=0.922, HR: 0.981 [0.679-1.419]), 11.3M in Group A+B and 11.1M in Group C1+C2 (p=0.808, HR: 0.952 [0.643-1.412]), respectively. The PFS was 3.0/4.4/3.8/3.5M (Group A/B/C1/C2), 3.6M in Group A+C1 and 4.1M in Group B+C2 (p=0.035, HR:0.674 [0.468-0.972]) 3.7M in Group A+B and 3.7M in Group C1+C2 (p=0.931, HR: 1.017 [0.643-1.412]). The ORR was 7.1/16.3/4.5/5.0% (Group A/B/C1/C2), 4.7%[1.7-15.2] in Group A+C1 and 12.7%[5.6-23.5] in Group B+C2 (p=0.241), 11.8%[5.8-20.6] in Group A+B and 4.6%[0.6-16.2] in Group C1+C2 (p=0.572).Major Grade 3/4 toxicity (Group A/B/C1/C2, %), was leukopenia (12/7/5/0), neutropenia (29/16/24/24), nausea (7/2/10/5), diarrhea (5/0/10/0), and fatigue (5/2/10/5). Conclusions: From our results, we do not recommend consecutive use of S1 but CPT-11 or PTX monotherapy as second-line treatment in AGC refractory to S1 or SP. Clinical trial information: 000000677.

scholarly journals The relationship between peripheral neuropathy and efficacy in second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a prospective observational multicenter study protocol (IVY)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Tanioka ◽  
Takeshi Nagasaka ◽  
Futoshi Uno ◽  
Masafumi Inoue ◽  
Hiroyuki Okita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Primary Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Background Paclitaxel is used in second-line conventional chemotherapies to manage patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a known adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Additionally, oxaliplatin which causes irreversible peripheral neuropathy is now commonly used in first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC in Japan. Thus, examining the incidence of peripheral neuropathy with paclitaxel after oxaliplatin is necessary to improve the quality of life and outcomes of patients with advanced GC in the second-line treatment setting. Methods This prospective observational multicenter study, (which we named IVY study), will evaluate the degree of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. A patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to assess CIPN during the second-line treatment. The key eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) unresectable or recurrent GC histologically confirmed to be primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach, 2) age over 20 years, 3) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–2, 4) written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient, 5) progression or intolerance for first-line chemotherapy comprising fluorinated pyrimidine and platinum anticancer drugs (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) for advanced GC. 6) presence of evaluable lesions as confirmed using a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 200 patients is considered to be appropriate for inclusion in this study. Discussion The results of this study will provide some information on CIPN with the sequential usage of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy to paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice. Trial registration This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network’s Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number UMIN000033376 (Registered 11 July 2018).

Efficacy and safety of taxane-monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer refractory to triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1: A multicenter retrospective study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 154-154
Author(s):  
Sadayuki Kawai ◽  
Sakura Iizumi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Yukiya Narita ◽  
Masahiro Tajika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Third Line Treatment

154 Background: While taxane-monotherapy following fluoropyrimidine plus platinum is recognized as the standard treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancer, triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS) is another option for first-line therapy in Japan. However, efficacy of taxane after DCS therapy has not been sufficiently evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of taxane-monotherapy after DCS between January 2010 and April 2015 for advanced gastric cancer. The taxane-monotherapy included weekly paclitaxel (PTX) (80 mg/m2, day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) and triweekly nab-PTX (260 mg/m2, day 1). Other selection criteria were: ECOG PS < 2; adequate organ function; no severe ascites; HER2-negative. Results: Thirty of 92 patients who had been treated with DCS received taxane-monotherapy. Fifteen and 15 patients received taxane-monotherapy as the second and third-line treatment, respectively. Patients characteristics of each group (2nd/3rd) were; median age: 64/62 (range 27-75/42-75); ECOG PS ≤ 1: 14/13; number of metastatic sites ≥ 2: 9/12; median taxane-free interval from first-line treatment: 1.6/3.4 (range 0.9-2.3/2.2-8.3) months; median total dose of prior DTX: 349/208 (range 39-844/141-685) mg/m2. Number of patients who received PTX/nab-PTX were 10/5 and 13/2 in the second and third line treatment. Median relative dose intensity of taxane was 96.4% (range 57.6-172.9%) in the second-line, 98.5% (44.0-166.8%) in the third-line group. Response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 37.5% in the second-line, and 0% and 38.5% in the third-line group. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.4 and 5.8 months in the second-line group, and 2.0 and 4.5 months in the third-line. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and anorexia, occurred in 33%, 13% and 13% in the second-line group, and 6.7%, 13% and 6.7% in the third–line group, associated with no treatment related death. Conclusions: It is suggested that taxane-monotherapy has acceptable toxicities but insufficient efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients after DCS therapy.

FLOX regimen (5-FU, folinic acid, oxaliplatin) and FLIRI regimen (5-FU, folinic acid, irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic and locally advanced gastric cancer: A randomized phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Glenjen ◽  
Katrin Hammerling ◽  
Ingunn Hatlevoll ◽  
Rune Småland ◽  
Petra Weber Hauge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
First Line Treatment

71 Background: The Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG) conducted a phase II randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of FLOX and FLIRI as first line treatment in metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer. At progression or unacceptable drug related toxicity, a crossover to the other treatment arm should be done, if second line chemotherapy was indicated. Methods: 66 patients from 6 treatment centers in Norway were randomized to FLOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2, or FLIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2). Both treatments were repeated every second week. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety data. Results: At the present time data from 63 patients are available for analysis. First-line treatment: FLOX (n = 32) versus (v.) FLIRI (n = 31): Complete response (CR) n = 0 in both arms, partial response (PR) n = 16 v. 9, stable disease (SD) n = 12 v. 13, progressive disease (PD) n = 3 v. 6, not assessable for evaluation n = 1 v. 3 patients. RR was 50 % in the FLOX arm v. 29 % in the FLIRI arm, p = not significant (n.s), Pearson Chi-Square test. Median TTP was 5 months (95 % CI 2.2-7.8) v. 4 months (95 % CI 2.2-5.8), p = n.s, median OS was 11 months (95 % CI 9.2-12.8 ) v. 10 months (95 % CI 5.7-14.3), p = n.s, Log Rank test. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Febrile neutropenia was present among 10 % of the patients in the FLOX arm versus 7 % in the FLIRI arm. Second line treatment: 30 patients received second line treatment with FLOX or FLIRI. Data regarding RR, TTP, OS and safety will be updated in December 2011. Conclusions: The FLOX and FLIRI regimens are well tolerated among patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. As first line treatment the FLOX regime had a higher RR of 50% v. 29% for the FLIRI regime, longer TTP; 5 v. 4 months and longer OS 11 v. 10 months, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

scholarly journals Patient profiles as an aim to optimize selection in the second line setting: the role of aflibercept

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. González Astorga ◽  
F. Salvà Ballabrera ◽  
E. Aranda Aguilar ◽  
E. Élez Fernández ◽  
P. García-Alfonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Option ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
First Line Treatment

AbstractColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, it is recommended, as first-line treatment, chemotherapy (CT) based on doublet cytotoxic combinations of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). In addition to CT, biological (targeted agents) are indicated in the first-line treatment, unless contraindicated. In this context, most of mCRC patients are likely to progress and to change from first line to second line treatment when they develop resistance to first-line treatment options. It is in this second line setting where Aflibercept offers an alternative and effective therapeutic option, thought its specific mechanism of action for different patient’s profile: RAS mutant, RAS wild-type (wt), BRAF mutant, potentially resectable and elderly patients. In this paper, a panel of experienced oncologists specialized in the management of mCRC experts have reviewed and selected scientific evidence focused on Aflibercept as an alternative treatment.

scholarly journals P44-4 A case report of four patients received ramucirumab monotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S353
Author(s):  
Kei Onodera ◽  
Akiko Ichiyanagi ◽  
Akari Ueno ◽  
Motohiro Tani ◽  
Shuji Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document