scholarly journals A Gastric Metastatic Lesion That Resembled Early-Stage Gastric Cancer on Endoscopy during Treatment for Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
pp. 1719-1724
Author(s):  
Yukino Watanabe ◽  
Yoshiya Horimoto ◽  
Yuka Takahashi ◽  
Fumi Murakami ◽  
Masaki Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Gastric Lesion ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Endoscopic Findings ◽  
Systemic Treatments

Breast cancer metastasis to the gastrointestinal tract is relatively rare. Patients with such disease often develop gastrointestinal symptoms, but it is sometimes asymptomatic. Endoscopic findings of gastric metastasis from breast cancer markedly vary from benign to malignant, and even in suspected malignant cases, it is often difficult to differentiate between primary and metastatic disease. We experienced a case in which an endoscopic examination performed during the treatment for metastatic breast cancer resembled an early-stage gastric cancer. A 71-year-old woman underwent curative surgery for right breast cancer 16 years previously. She underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage gastric cancer 5 years ago. Two years ago, she developed metastatic disease in the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes, and endocrine therapy was administered. At the same time, a follow-up endoscopy revealed a new elevated lesion, suspected to be an early-stage gastric cancer. However, histological diagnosis of the biopsy was metastasis of breast cancer. One and a half years later, a follow-up endoscopy revealed a gastric lesion that had reduced in size. She is still alive, having received a variety of systemic treatments. Patients with metastatic breast cancer are experiencing prolonged survival. Thus, follow-up endoscopy should be considered after the diagnosis of gastrointestinal metastasis considering the risk of lethal conditions, such as gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. Our case serves as a reminder to clinicians how difficult it is to determine whether a gastric lesion is primary or metastatic based on endoscopic findings and the importance of communication with endoscopists and pathologists.

Patient preferences for treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a study of women with early-stage breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
R P McQuellon ◽  
H B Muss ◽  
S L Hoffman ◽  
G Russell ◽  
B Craven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Dose

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to elicit preferences for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in women with early-stage breast cancer who were given hypothetical treatment scenarios. We predicted that quality of life, demographic, and treatment variables would have an impact on patient preferences. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifteen patients with stage 1-IIIA breast cancer were interviewed. All patients had either mastectomy or lumpectomy plus radiotherapy as primary treatment. Sixty-seven (58%) had prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were given four clinical scenarios that described a woman with metastatic breast cancer who was stated to have a life expectancy of 18 months. Side effects of the treatment options were systematically varied from low (hormonal therapy) to life-threatening (high-dose experimental therapy) and were consistent with common clinical situations. Patients were asked to select which treatment, with its associated toxicity, they would accept and prefer for a 50% chance of specified increments in life expectancy, ie, 5 years, 18 months, 1 year, 6 months, 1 month, and 1 week. RESULTS Quality of life at the time of interview, previous chemotherapy treatment, and degree of difficulty of previous treatments did not predict patient preferences. The greater the toxicity potential of the treatment, the less likely patients were to accept the treatment, although approximately 15% of patients would prefer high-risk treatment for as little as 1 month of added life expectancy. Between 34% and 82% of patients would prefer different therapies for a 6-month addition to life expectancy, whereas almost all patients would accept treatment for a 5-year increase in length of survival. Younger patients were more willing to assume the risks of treatment for a small increase in life expectancy. Of note, between 54% and 78% of patients would elect to start the different treatments even without symptoms related to metastatic disease. Moreover, 76% of patients would prefer standard treatment or an experimental agent to reduce symptoms or pain, even if such treatment did not prolong life. Additionally, only 10% of patients would allow randomization to a clinical trial comparing high-dose with standard chemotherapy. Participation in the study was not distressing to most patients. CONCLUSION Patients showed clear preferences for specific treatments for metastatic disease when given hypothetical scenarios. There was a wide range of patient preferences for treatment based on risk-benefit assessment, but a substantial percentage of patients would accept the risk of major toxicity for minimal increase in overall survival.

scholarly journals Receptor Discordance of Metastatic Breast Cancer Depending on the Molecular Subtype

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 648-654
Author(s):  
Iris Holzer ◽  
Alex Farr ◽  
Yen Tan ◽  
Christine Deutschmann ◽  
Carmen Leser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Receptor Status

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Almost 30% of all women with early-stage breast cancer develop metastases. Treatment of metastatic disease is often based on the immunohistochemical information of the primary tumor, despite possible discordance of the hormone and Her2 receptor status. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study was to compare the receptor status of the primary tumor with the metastasis, and to evaluate for receptor discordance with regard to the molecular subtype, receptor status, and the localization of the metastases. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed the data of all consecutive women with metastatic breast cancer, who underwent treatment at the Medical University Vienna between 2009 and 2016. Associations were calculated using the χ<sup>2</sup>or Fisher’s exact test; years from primary diagnosis to metastatic disease were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 213 metastatic breast cancer patients, of whom 67 (31.5%) showed a discordant receptor status. Out of 32 patients with luminal A subtype, 14 (43.8%) had a switch of at least one receptor; 27 of 53 patients (50.9%) with luminal B subtype and 21 of 32 patients (65.6%) with Her2+ subtype showed receptor discordance; for triple-negative disease, 5 of 19 patients (36.3%) had a switch of at least one receptor. In 63 samples of bone metastases, 13 (20.6%) had discordant estrogen receptor status (<i>p</i> = 0.04). In 55 samples of bone metastases, 35 (63.3%) had discordant Her2 status (<i>p</i> = 0.002). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our data show high rates of receptor discordance in metastatic breast cancer. Apart from the primary tumor, the immunohistochemical receptor status of the metastasis needs to be verified. This can lead to a change in treatment and prognosis.

CA 125 in the early detection of metastatic breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12015-e12015 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ertl ◽  
V. Heinemann ◽  
D. Laessig ◽  
D. Nagel ◽  
D. Seidel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Marker Combination

e12015 Background: Kinetics of CA 15–3 and CEA have a high specificity in the early detection (= asymptomatic patients) of metastatic breast cancer disease. However, this high specificity is associated with a lack of sensitivity (false-negative results). To decrease the number of false negative (FN) patients, the additional diagnostic potential of CA 125 kinetics was evaluated. Methods: We analysed 1,011 follow-up samples of 95 patients. Forty-seven of these patients showed metastatic recurrence during follow-up. Based on analyses, published previously, a reproducible increase of CA 125, CA 15–3, or CEA ≥100% based on the individual baseline value of each patient was selected as a reliable indicator for metastatic disease. Results: None of the 48 patients with NED had a reproducible increase of either CEA, CA 15–3, or CA125, i.e., all three tumor markers reached a specificity of 100%. At the time of first metastatic disease, the overall sensitivity was 29.8% for CA 125, 44.7% for CA 15–3, and 21.3% for CEA. In 7 patients (14.9%) only CA 125, in 14 patients (29.8%) only CA 15–3 and in 6 patients (12.8%) only CEA increased. In 8 patients (17.0%) more than one marker increased. The sensitivity of the CA 15–3/CEA combination was 59.6% (95%-CI: 45.5%-73.6%). With the additional use of CA 125, the sensitivity could be increased by 14.9% to 74.5% (95%-CI: 62.0–86.9%). The sensitivity of the marker combination was 66.6% for metastases in one site (n = 33) and 100% for metastases in more than one site (n = 14). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that CA 125 increased the sensitivity of the CA 15–3/CEA combination by 14.9% without loss of specificity. The combined use of CA15–3/CEA/CA125 may therefore be helpful for early detection of metastatic disease. The usefulness of this approach is presently verified in a prospective trial. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The ongoing French metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cohort: the example-based methodology of the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME)

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e023568 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pérol ◽  
Mathieu Robain ◽  
Patrick Arveux ◽  
Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier ◽  
Emmanuel Chamorey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Medical Economics ◽  
Disease Treatment

PurposeThe currently ongoing Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) research programme aims at centralising real-life data on oncology care for epidemiological research purposes. We draw on results from the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cohort to illustrate the methodology used for data collection in the ESME research programme.ParticipantsAll consecutive ≥18 years patients with MBC treatment initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres were selected. Diagnostic, therapeutic and follow-up data (demographics, primary tumour, metastatic disease, treatment patterns and vital status) were collected through the course of the disease. Data collection is updated annually.Finding to dateWith a recruitment target of 30 000 patients with MBC by 2019, we currently screened a total of 45 329 patients, and >16 700 patients with a metastatic disease treatment initiated after 2008 have been selected. 20.7% of patients had an hormone receptor (HR)-negative MBC, 73.7% had a HER2-negative MBC and 13.9% were classified as triple-negative BC (ie, HER2 and HR status both negative). Median follow-up duration from MBC diagnosis was 48.55 months for the whole cohort.Future plansThese real-world data will help standardise the management of MBC and improve patient care. A dozen of ancillary research projects have been conducted and some of them are already accepted for publication or ready to be issued. The ESME research programme is expanding to ovarian cancer and advanced/metastatic lung cancer. Our ultimate goal is to achieve a continuous link to the data of the cohort to the French national Health Data System for centralising data on healthcare reimbursement (drugs, medical procedures), inpatient/outpatient stays and visits in primary/secondary care settings.Trial registration numberNCT03275311; Pre-results.

Changes in survival from metastatic breast cancer during the last twenty-years: A population based study in Northern Italy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1125-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cortesi ◽  
C. Cirilli ◽  
I. Rashid ◽  
E. Artioli ◽  
M. Federico
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Relapsed Disease

1125 Background: A significant improvement in overall survival was observed in the last two decades in patients with breast cancer due to early diagnosis and more effective therapies. However, a significant improvement in metastatic setting has been questioned. Our population based study was aimed to investigate the outcome of metastatic breast cancer from 1988 to 2005. Methods: Women with stage IV de novo or relapsed breast cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2005 were identified by the Modena Cancer Registry (MCR). For all patients overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of first distant metastases to the date of death from any cause or last follow-up and compared across groups for four periods of similar duration time: 1988–1993 (A), 1994–1997(B), 1998–2001(C), 2002–2005(D). Results: Among 8,654 patients with breast cancer identified by the MCR, 409 had an initial metastatic disease (4.8%) and 693 (8.4%) had a distant recurrence. Median age at onset was 66 versus 59 years in de novo vs relapsed disease (p = 0.001). Significant differences for postmenopausal age (80% vs 71%) and for positive estrogen receptors (72% vs 63%) were registered in de novo and relapsed disease, respectively (p = 0.001). After a 27 months median follow-up for initial metastatic disease, the five-year OS was 12%, 14%, 9%, and 13% in the A, B, C, and D periods, respectively, (p = 0.5). Conversely, in relapsed breast cancer, after a 29 months median follow-up, a significant survival improvement was observed between the first and the other three periods, being the 5 year-survival rate after recurrence 10%, 22%, 30%, and 25%, respectively (p = 0.001). A survival improvement was seen in the last ten years for relapsed breast cancer using aromatase inhibitors (p < 0.0001) while for initial metastatic disease the same treatment provided a better outcome only in the last 4 years (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Data from our study show that the outcome of initial metastatic breast cancer is still discouraging, despite the availability of several new drugs in recent years. A limited improvement was observed in relapsed breast cancer with the aromatase inhibitors introduction. In any case, the finish line is still far away, and robust investments in basic and translational research are still absolutely necessary. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Incidence of Brain Metastases Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kuksis ◽  
Yizhuo Gao ◽  
William Tran ◽  
Christianne Hoey ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Abstract Background Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are living longer, but development of brain metastases often limits their survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of brain metastases in this patient population. Methods Articles published from January 2000 to January 2020 were compiled from four databases using search terms related to: breast cancer, brain metastasis, and incidence. The overall and per patient-year incidence of brain metastases were extracted from studies including patients with HER2+, triple negative, and hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- MBC; pooled overall estimates for incidence were calculated using random effects models. Results 937 articles were compiled, and 25 were included in the meta-analysis. Incidence of brain metastases in patients with HER2+ MBC, triple negative MBC, and HR+/HER2- MBC was reported in 17, 6, and 4 studies, respectively. The pooled cumulative incidence of brain metastases was 31% for the HER2+ subgroup (median follow-up: 30.7 months, IQR: 24.0 – 34.0), 32% for the triple negative subgroup (median follow-up: 32.8 months, IQR: 18.5 – 40.6), and 15% among patients with HR+/HER2- MBC (median follow-up: 33.0 months, IQR: 31.9 – 36.2). The corresponding incidences per patient-year were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.10 – 0.16) for the HER2+ subgroup, 0.13 (95%CI: 0.09 – 0.20) for the triple negative subgroup, and only 0.05 (95%CI: 0.03 – 0.08) for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. Conclusion There is high incidence of brain metastases among patients with HER2+ and triple negative MBC. The utility of a brain metastases screening program warrants investigation in these populations.

scholarly journals Staging Investigations in Asymptomatic Early Breast Cancer Patients at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2190-2198
Author(s):  
Dalia Kamel ◽  
Veronica Youssef ◽  
Wilma M. Hopman ◽  
Mihaela Mates
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Cancer Centre ◽  
Radiological Staging

Background: In 2012, the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) identified five key opportunities in oncology to improve patient care, recommending against imaging tests for the staging of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) at low risk for metastases. Similarly, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline does not support radiological staging in asymptomatic EBC (aEBC). The purpose of this study was to assess local practice and outcomes of staging investigations (SIs) in aEBC at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: A retrospective electronic and paper chart review was undertaken to identify all aEBC patients treated at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients with pathological staging of T1-T2 and N0-1 with any receptor status were included. We collected patient demographics, treatment and pathologic tumor characteristics. The use and outcomes of initial and follow-up SIs were recorded. Data were analyzed to determine associations between the use of SIs and clinical characteristics (chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests). Results: From 2012 to 2014, 295 asymptomatic EBC patients were identified. The mean age was 64, 81% were postmenopausal and 76% had breast conserving surgery. Stage distribution was as follows: stage I 42%, stage IIA 37% and stage IIB 21%. Receptor status was as follows: ER+ 84%, HER2+ 13% and triple negative 12%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 36%, Trastuzumab by 10% and endocrine therapy by 76% of patients. Baseline SIs were performed in 168 patients (57%) for a total of 332 tests. Overt metastatic disease was found in five patients (one bone scan and four CT scans). Seventy-one out of the 168 patients (42%) who received initial staging imaging underwent 138 follow-up imaging tests, none of which were diagnostic for metastases. Nine patients with suspicious CT findings underwent biopsies, of which four were malignant (one metastatic breast cancer and three new primaries). Factors significantly associated with SI were as follows: younger age (p = 0.001), premenopausal status (p = 0.01), T2 stage (p < 0.001), N1 stage (p < 0.001), HER2 positive (p < 0.001), triple negative status (p = 0.007) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over a 3-year period at our institution, more than 50% of aEBC patients underwent a total of 470 initial and follow-up staging tests, yielding a cancer diagnosis (metastatic breast cancer or second primary cancer) in four patients. We, therefore, conclude that routine-staging investigations in aEBC patients have low diagnostic value, supporting current guidelines that recommend against the routine use of SI in this population.

scholarly journals Post-surgical depressive symptoms and long-term survival in non-metastatic breast cancer patients at 11-year follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Antoni ◽  
Jamie M. Jacobs ◽  
Laura C. Bouchard ◽  
Suzanne C. Lechner ◽  
Devika R. Jutagir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals Risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers following incident non-metastatic breast cancer: a Danish population-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancers ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document