Inconsistencies in the planning of the duration of anticoagulation among outpatients with acute deep-vein thrombosis

SummaryThree-month anticoagulation is recommended to treat provoked or first distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), and indefinite-duration anticoagulation should be considered for patients with unprovoked proximal, un-provoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT. In the prospective Out-patient Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Switzerland (OTIS-DVT) Registry of 502 patients with acute objectively confirmed lower extremity DVT (59% provoked or first distal DVT; 41% unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT) from 53 private practices and 11 hospitals, we investigated the planned duration of anticoagulation at the time of treatment initiation. The decision to administer limited-duration anticoagulation therapy was made in 343 (68%) patients with a median duration of 107 (interquartile range 91–182) days for provoked or first distal DVT, and 182 (interquartile range 111–184) days for unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT. Among patients with provoked or first distal DVT, anticoagulation was recommended for <3 months in 11%, ≥3 months in 63%, and for an indefinite period in 26%. Among patients with unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT, anticoagulation was recommended for <6 months in 22%, 6–12 months in 38%, and for an indefinite period in 40%. Overall, there was more frequent planning of indefinite-duration therapy from hospital physicians as compared with private practice physicians (39% vs. 28%; p=0.019). Considerable inconsistency in planning the duration of anticoagulation therapy mandates an improvement in risk stratification of outpatients with acute DVT.

Download Full-text

The Predictive Value of the aCL and Anti-β2GPI at the Time of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis—A Two-Year Prospective Study

Biomedicines ◽

10.3390/biomedicines9080901 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (8) ◽

pp. 901

Author(s):

Katja Perdan-Pirkmajer ◽

Polona Žigon ◽

Anja Boc ◽

Eva Podovšovnik ◽

Saša Čučnik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Anticoagulant Therapy ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Anticoagulation Therapy ◽

Time Frame ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Therapeutic Decisions ◽

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

Deep Vein

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). According to current APS classification criteria, APS cannot be confirmed until 24 weeks after DVT. This time frame results in frequent discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment before APS is diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the potential predictive value of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) before discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with newly diagnosed DVT were included into a 24-month prospective study. All patients received anticoagulant therapy. aCL and anti-β2GPI were determined at inclusion and every four weeks for the first 24 weeks and then one and two years after inclusion. APS was confirmed in 24/221 (10.9%) patients. At the time of acute DVT 20/24 (83.3%), APS patients had positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI. Two patients had low aCL levels and two were negative at the time of acute DVT but later met APS criteria due to lupus anticoagulant (LA). Our data indicate that negative aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT make further aPL testing unnecessary; however, LA should be determined after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT have a strong positive predictive value for APS and may support therapeutic decisions.

Download Full-text

Cessation of anticoagulation therapy following endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000774 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (4) ◽

pp. 331-339 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Tim Sebastian ◽

Rolf P. Engelberger ◽

David Spirk ◽

Lawrence O. Hakki ◽

Frederic A. Baumann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

Stent Placement ◽

Anticoagulation Therapy ◽

Secondary Patency ◽

Clinical Trial Registration ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Extended Duration ◽

Thrombus Removal ◽

Deep Vein ◽

Limited Duration

Summary. Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy (AT) following catheter-based therapy of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with stent placement is unknown. Theoretically, resolving the underlying obstructive iliac vein lesion by a stent may eliminate the main trigger for recurrence, the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and the need for extended-duration AT. Patients and methods: From 113 patients with acute IFDVT who underwent endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement, we compared patency rates and clinical outcomes between 58 patients on limited-duration AT (3–12 month) and 55 patients on extended-duration AT (> 12 months). Results: Mean follow-up duration was 26 ± 18 (range 3–77) months; it was 24 ± 18 (range 3–69) months after cessation of AT in the limited-duration AT group. In comparison to patients with extended-duration AT, patients with limited-duration AT were younger (38 versus 54 years; p < 0.001), more often female (74 % versus 49 %; p = 0.01), and had less often prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) (9 % versus 35 %; p = 0.001). May-Thurner syndrome was more frequent in the limited-duration AT group (66 % versus 38 %; p = 0.004). Overall, primary and secondary patency rates at 24 months were 80 % (95 % CI, 70–87 %) and 95 % (95 % CI, 88–98 %), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Overall, 17 (15 %) patients developed recurrent VTE, of which 14 (82 %) events were thrombotic stent occlusions, and 13 (76 %) events occurred during AT. In the limited-duration AT group, 98 % patients were free from the PTS at two years with a VTE recurrence rate of 3.5 per 100 patient years after cessation of AT. Conclusions: In selected patients with acute IFDVT and patent venous stent, particularly in younger and otherwise healthy patients with May-Thurner syndrome, it appears to be safe to discontinue AT 3–12 months after endovascular treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered on the National Institutes of Health website (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT02433054).

Download Full-text

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated with Porcine Plasmin

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1647715 ◽

1974 ◽

Vol 32 (02/03) ◽

pp. 468-482 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

O Storm ◽

P Ollendorff ◽

E Drewsen ◽

P Tang

Keyword(s):

Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Initial Dose ◽

Treated Group ◽

Allergic Reactions ◽

Double Blind ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Thrombolytic Effect ◽

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

Deep Vein

SummaryThe thrombolytic effect of pig plasmin was tested in a double blind trial on patients with deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb. Only patients with not more than three days old thrombi were selected for this study. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was made clinically and confirmed by phlebography. Lysofibrin Novo (porcine plasmin) or placebo (porcine plasminogen) was administered intravenously to the patients. The enzyme and the placebo were delivered as lyophilized powder in labelled bottles - the contents of the bottles were unknown to the doctor in charge of the clinical administration of the trial. An initial dose of plasmin/plasminogen of 30 unit per kg body weight given slowly intravenously (1-1% hours infusion) was followed by a maintenance dosis of 15 per cent the initial dose per hour for the following 5-7 hours. In most cases a similar maintenance dosis was given the next day. In all patients heparin was administered after ending the plasmin/plasminogen infusion. The results of the treatment was evaluated clinically as well as by control phlebo- grams the following days.A statistically significant improvement was found in the plasmin treated group compared with the placebo (plasminogen) treated group. Thrombolysis was obtained clinically and phlebographically in 65 per cent of the plasmin treated group, but only in 15 per cent of the control patients were improvements found.This study has thus demonstrated that plasmin treatment according to a standard scheme was able to induce thrombolysis. There were only a few and insignificant side effects. Allergic reactions have not been seen and only very simple tests are required.

Download Full-text