scholarly journals The Predictive Value of the aCL and Anti-β2GPI at the Time of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis—A Two-Year Prospective Study

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 901
Author(s):  
Katja Perdan-Pirkmajer ◽  
Polona Žigon ◽  
Anja Boc ◽  
Eva Podovšovnik ◽  
Saša Čučnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). According to current APS classification criteria, APS cannot be confirmed until 24 weeks after DVT. This time frame results in frequent discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment before APS is diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the potential predictive value of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) before discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with newly diagnosed DVT were included into a 24-month prospective study. All patients received anticoagulant therapy. aCL and anti-β2GPI were determined at inclusion and every four weeks for the first 24 weeks and then one and two years after inclusion. APS was confirmed in 24/221 (10.9%) patients. At the time of acute DVT 20/24 (83.3%), APS patients had positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI. Two patients had low aCL levels and two were negative at the time of acute DVT but later met APS criteria due to lupus anticoagulant (LA). Our data indicate that negative aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT make further aPL testing unnecessary; however, LA should be determined after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT have a strong positive predictive value for APS and may support therapeutic decisions.

scholarly journals Inconsistencies in the planning of the duration of anticoagulation among outpatients with acute deep-vein thrombosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (02) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Willenberg ◽  
Martin Banyai ◽  
Ulrich Frank ◽  
Thomas Baldi ◽  
Beatrice Amann-Vesti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Limited Duration ◽  
Made In

SummaryThree-month anticoagulation is recommended to treat provoked or first distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), and indefinite-duration anticoagulation should be considered for patients with unprovoked proximal, un-provoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT. In the prospective Out-patient Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Switzerland (OTIS-DVT) Registry of 502 patients with acute objectively confirmed lower extremity DVT (59% provoked or first distal DVT; 41% unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT) from 53 private practices and 11 hospitals, we investigated the planned duration of anticoagulation at the time of treatment initiation. The decision to administer limited-duration anticoagulation therapy was made in 343 (68%) patients with a median duration of 107 (interquartile range 91–182) days for provoked or first distal DVT, and 182 (interquartile range 111–184) days for unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT. Among patients with provoked or first distal DVT, anticoagulation was recommended for <3 months in 11%, ≥3 months in 63%, and for an indefinite period in 26%. Among patients with unprovoked proximal, unprovoked recurrent, or cancer-associated DVT, anticoagulation was recommended for <6 months in 22%, 6–12 months in 38%, and for an indefinite period in 40%. Overall, there was more frequent planning of indefinite-duration therapy from hospital physicians as compared with private practice physicians (39% vs. 28%; p=0.019). Considerable inconsistency in planning the duration of anticoagulation therapy mandates an improvement in risk stratification of outpatients with acute DVT.

scholarly journals Prospective study of deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury not receiving anticoagulant therapy

Spinal Cord ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Matsumoto ◽  
K Suda ◽  
S Iimoto ◽  
K Yasui ◽  
M Komatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Clinical and Functional Assessment after Anticoagulant Therapy of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Involving the Lower Limb

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Ho Huh ◽  
Dong Ik Kim ◽  
Eun Sook Kim ◽  
Byung Boong Lee ◽  
Ji Young Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated with Porcine Plasmin

1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 468-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Storm ◽  
P Ollendorff ◽  
E Drewsen ◽  
P Tang
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Thrombolytic Effect ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryThe thrombolytic effect of pig plasmin was tested in a double blind trial on patients with deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb. Only patients with not more than three days old thrombi were selected for this study. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was made clinically and confirmed by phlebography. Lysofibrin Novo (porcine plasmin) or placebo (porcine plasminogen) was administered intravenously to the patients. The enzyme and the placebo were delivered as lyophilized powder in labelled bottles - the contents of the bottles were unknown to the doctor in charge of the clinical administration of the trial. An initial dose of plasmin/plasminogen of 30 unit per kg body weight given slowly intravenously (1-1% hours infusion) was followed by a maintenance dosis of 15 per cent the initial dose per hour for the following 5-7 hours. In most cases a similar maintenance dosis was given the next day. In all patients heparin was administered after ending the plasmin/plasminogen infusion. The results of the treatment was evaluated clinically as well as by control phlebo- grams the following days.A statistically significant improvement was found in the plasmin treated group compared with the placebo (plasminogen) treated group. Thrombolysis was obtained clinically and phlebographically in 65 per cent of the plasmin treated group, but only in 15 per cent of the control patients were improvements found.This study has thus demonstrated that plasmin treatment according to a standard scheme was able to induce thrombolysis. There were only a few and insignificant side effects. Allergic reactions have not been seen and only very simple tests are required.

Controlled Trial of the Sequential Use of Streptokinase and Ancrod in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Limb

1977 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A Tibbutt ◽  
C. N Chesterman ◽  
E. W Williams ◽  
T Faulkner ◽  
A. A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryTreatment with streptokinase (‘Kabikinase’) was given to 26 patients with venographically confirmed deep vein thrombosis extending into the popliteal vein or above. Treatment was continued for 4 days and the patients were allocated randomly to oral anticoagulant therapy or a course of treatment with ancrod (‘Arvin’) for 6 days followed by oral anticoagulant therapy. The degree of thrombolysis as judged by further venographic examination at 10 days was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The majority of patients showed clinical improvement but there was no appreciable difference between the groups at 3 and 6 months. Haemorrhagic complications were a more serious problem during the period of treatment with ancrod than during the equivalent period in the control group.

Evaluation of a New Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (03) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando D’Angelo ◽  
Gabriella D’Alessandro ◽  
Loredana Tomassini ◽  
Jean Louis Pittet ◽  
G Dupuy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Baseline Testing ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe sensitivity and specificity for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of a new rapid, quantitative and precise (total imprecision < 10%) D-dimer assay suitable for individual measurements (VIDAS D-DIMER, bio-Merieux, France) were evaluated in a consecutive series of 103 in- and out-patients submitted to serial compression ultrasonography (C-US) for the clinical suspicion of DVT (n = 66) or of DVT recurrence (n = 37) and symptoms lasting from 1 to 15 days. DVT was found in 22 patients at baseline testing and no patient with an initially negative C-US developed vein incompressibility at follow up. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms was negatively associated with D-dimer levels both in patients with and in those without DVT. In the entire series of patients, the sensitivity of a positive D-dimer test (≥1.0 Μg/ml) for the presence of DVT was 96% (21/22 patients, 95% confidence interval 75-100%) with a specificity of 75% (64-84%), a negative predictive value of 98% (90-100%), a positive predictive value of 51% (35-67%), and an overall accuracy of 80% (70-87%). A normal D-dimer value (0.22 Μg/ml) was observed in one patient with DVT and symptoms lasting from 15 days. The approach of withholding C-US testing in patients with symptoms lasting from less than 11 days and D-dimer levels below the cut-off value was compared to serial C-US testing alone in a cost-effectiveness analysis subdividing the 66 patients with a first episode according to their clinical pretest probability of DVT. Thrombosis was detected in 6.7% of the patients in the low probability group (n = 15), 16.7% of the patients in the moderate probability group (n = 24), 51.9% of the patients in the high probability group (n = 27) and 8.1% of patients with suspected DVT recurrence. Calculated cost-savings for each DVT diagnosed ranged from 5% in the high pretest probability group to 55% in the low pretest probability group and to 77% in patients with suspected DVT recurrence.The safety of avoiding C-US testing in symptomatic patients with a negative D-dimer test should be evaluated in clinical management studies.

Is Colour Doppler Ultrasound a Sensitive Screening Method in Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis after Hip Surgery ?

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 242-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Magnusson ◽  
Bengt I Eriksson ◽  
Peter Kãlebo ◽  
Ramon Sivertsson
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Colour Doppler ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Colour Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryPatients undergoing orthopedic surgery are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis. One hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement or hip fracture surgery were included in this study. They were surveilled with colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and bilateral ascending contrast phlebography. The prevalence of proximal and distal DVT in this study was 5.8% and 20.3% respectively.CDU has a satisfactory sensitivity in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, especially in the proximal region. These results could not be confirmed in the present study of asymptomatic patients. The sensitivity was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: C.I. 24-91%) and the specificity 99.6% (C.I. 98-100%) for proximal DVT; 53.6% (C.I. 34-73%) and 98% (C.I. 96-99%) respectively for distal thrombi. The overall sensitivity was 58.1% (C.I. 39-75%) and the specificity 98% (C.I. 96-99%). The positive predictive value was 83.3% (C.I. 36-99%) and 75% (C.I. 51-91%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The negative predictive value was 98.9% (C.I. 98-100%) and 94.9% (C.I. 92-98%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The results of this study showed that even with a highly specialised and experienced investigator the sensitivity of CDU was too low to make it suitable for screening purposes in a high risk surgical population.

Predictive Value of Decreasing Antithrombin III in Deep-Vein Thrombosis

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (03) ◽  
pp. 135-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorkild Lund Andreasen
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Coronary Care Unit ◽  
Antithrombin Iii ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
At Iii ◽  
Coronary Care ◽  
Time Of Admission ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryAntithrombin III (At-III) was measured at the time of admission and two days later in 131 patients laid up in a coronary care unit. The patients were examined for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) clinically and by means of 125I-fibrinogen scanning. 19 patients developed DVT. In 11 subjects with and 25 without DVT At-III decreased more than 10%. And in 7 with and 17 without DVT At-III decreased more than 15%. One person with DVT had subnormal At-III. By using decrease of At-III or subnormal initial At-III to predict DVT the following predictive value (PV) were found. Decrease ≤ 10%, PV pos.= 0.32 and PV neg. = 0.93. Decrease ≤ 15%, PV pos. = 0.32 and PV neg. = 0.90. The positive predictive values obtained were too low to let decreasing At-III give occasion for prophylactic anticoagulant treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document