scholarly journals Different Prognostic Impact of 24-Hour Mean Blood Pressure and Pulse Pressure on Stroke and Coronary Artery Disease in Essential Hypertension

Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 103 (21) ◽  
pp. 2579-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Verdecchia ◽  
Giuseppe Schillaci ◽  
Gianpaolo Reboldi ◽  
Stanley S. Franklin ◽  
Carlo Porcellati
1973 ◽  
Vol 45 (s1) ◽  
pp. 205s-208s
Author(s):  
H. Storm-Mathisen ◽  
H. Löken ◽  
U. Rian

1. The treatment of high blood pressure with modern drugs seems to improve the prospect of life for all grades of essential hypertension. 2. The fatal complications are more seldom cerebral and more often cardiovascular. Especially in men coronary artery disease seems difficult to prevent. 3. Most remarkable is the great percentage of surviving and symptom-free men and women, especially patients belonging to stage 2 and 3 at registration. 4. Blood pressure reduction therapy seems to reduce the frequency of death directly related to hypertension. The grade of arteriosclerosis does not seem to be influenced to the same degree.


Author(s):  
Michael G. Levin ◽  
Derek Klarin ◽  
Venexia M. Walker ◽  
Dipender Gill ◽  
Julie Lynch ◽  
...  

Objective: We aimed to estimate the effect of blood pressure (BP) traits and BP-lowering medications (via genetic proxies) on peripheral artery disease. Approach and Results: Genome-wide association studies summary statistics were obtained for BP, peripheral artery disease (PAD), and coronary artery disease. Causal effects of BP on PAD were estimated by 2-sample Mendelian randomization using a range of pleiotropy-robust methods. Increased systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure each significantly increased risk of PAD (SBP odds ratio [OR], 1.20 [1.16–1.25] per 10 mm Hg increase, P =1×10 −24 ; diastolic BP OR, 1.27 [1.18–1.35], P =4×10 − 11 ; MAP OR, 1.26 [1.19–1.33], P =6×10 − 16 ; pulse pressure OR, 1.31 [1.24–1.39], P =9×10 − 23 ). The effects of SBP, diastolic BP, and MAP were greater for coronary artery disease than PAD (SBP ratio of Ors, 1.06 [1.0–1.12], P = 0.04; MAP ratio of OR, 1.15 [1.06–1.26], P =8.6×10 − 4 ; diastolic BP ratio of OR, 1.21 [1.08–1.35], P =6.9×10 − 4 ). Considered jointly, both pulse pressure and MAP directly increased risk of PAD (pulse pressure OR, 1.26 [1.17–1.35], P =3×10 − 10 ; MAP OR, 1.14 [1.06–1.23], P =2×10 − 4 ). The effects of antihypertensive medications were estimated using genetic instruments. SBP-lowering via β-blocker (OR, 0.74 per 10 mm Hg decrease in SBP [95% CI, 0.65–0.84]; P =5×10 − 6 ), loop diuretic (OR, 0.66 [0.48–0.91], P =0.01), and thiazide diuretic (OR, 0.57 [0.41–0.79], P =6×10 − 4 ) associated variants were protective of PAD. Conclusions: Higher BP is likely to cause PAD. BP-lowering through β blockers, loop diuretics, and thiazide diuretics (as proxied by genetic variants) was associated with decreased risk of PAD. Future study is needed to clarify the specific mechanisms by which BP influences PAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document