Abstract 3108: Clinical Characteristics of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction without Heart Failure in Community-Based Elderly Individuals: The Cardiovascular Health Study

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Pandhi ◽  
Willem J Kop ◽  
John S Gottdiener
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiovascular Health Study ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction without heart failure (HF), also known as asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD), is at least as prevalent in the general population as left ventricular systolic dysfunction with heart failure (HF-LVSD). However, the clinical characteristics of ALVSD have not been well defined in an elderly population. Our aim is to evaluate the clinical features of elderly community-based individuals with ALVSD. The Cardiovascular Health Study is a multicenter cohort study designed to assess cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes in a population 65 years and older. This study quantifies baseline demographic variables and cardiovascular risk factors in participants with ALVSD. Comparisons were made with two reference groups: individuals with HF-LVSD, and those with normal left ventricular systolic function without HF (NL-LVSF). ALVSD was present in 385 of 5152 participants (7.5%) at baseline, whereas HF-LVSD was present in 84 participants (1.6%). Among those with ALVSD, 251 (65.2%) had borderline ejection fraction (EF) (45–54%), and 134 (34.8%) had impaired EF (< 45%). ALVSD was associated with elevated cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities compared to NL-LVSF but lower than those in individuals with HF-LVSD (see table ). Among participants with ALVSD, impaired EF was associated with male sex and higher prevalence of coronary disease and LVH compared with borderline LV function. ALVSD is more common than HF-LVSD in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Furthermore, it is characterized by more cardiac risk factors and comorbidities than those with NL-LVSF, but less than those with HF-LVSD. The severity of systolic dysfunction is associated with comorbid cardiovascular risk factors. ALVSD may identify an important group of individuals at high risk for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between ALVSD, NL-LVSF, and HF-LVSD

scholarly journals Cross sectional study estimating prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in community patients at risk

Heart ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
O W Nielsen ◽  
J Hilden ◽  
C T Larsen ◽  
J F Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
General Practices

OBJECTIVETo examine a general practice population to measure the prevalence of signs and symptoms of heart failure (SSHF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).DESIGNCross sectional screening study in three general practices followed by echocardiography.SETTING AND PATIENTSAll patients ⩾ 50 years in two general practices and ⩾ 40 years in one general practice were screened by case record reviews and questionnaires (n = 2158), to identify subjects with some evidence of heart disease. Among these, subjects were sought who had SSHF (n = 115). Of 357 subjects with evidence of heart disease, 252 were eligible for examination, and 126 underwent further cardiological assessment, including 43 with SSHF.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESPrevalence of SSHF as defined by a modified Boston index, LVSD defined as an indirectly measured left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽ 0.45, and numbers of subjects needing an echocardiogram to detect one case with LVSD.RESULTSSSHF afflicted 0.5% of quadragenarians and rose to 11.7% of octogenarians. Two thirds were handled in primary care only. At ⩾ 50 years of age 6.4% had SSHF, 2.9% had LVSD, and 1.9% (95% confidence interval 1.3% to 2.5%) had both. To detect one case with LVSD in primary care, 14 patients with evidence of heart disease without SSHF and 5.5 patients with SSHF had to be examined.CONCLUSIONSSHF is extremely prevalent in the community, especially in primary care, but more than two thirds do not have LVSD. The number of subjects with some evidence of heart disease needing an echocardiogram to detect one case of LVSD is 14.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document