Abstract 01: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants Exhibit Higher Rates of Cardiometabolic Mortality Compared to SNAP Eligible Non-participants and SNAP Ineligible Americans

Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zach Conrad ◽  
Colin Rehm ◽  
Dariush Mozaffarian
Keyword(s):  
Health Disparities ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Nutrition Assistance

Introduction: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest food assistance program for low-income Americans. Investigating mortality in this population is crucial to determining what further efforts are needed to reduce health disparities. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) does not provide mortality data by SNAP participation status, so diet-related mortality according to SNAP eligibility and participation is not well established. Objective: To examine cardiometabolic mortality among SNAP participants, SNAP eligible non-participants, and the SNAP ineligible population. Methods: We used data from the National Health Interview Survey for 499,741 US adults age≥25y from 2000-2009 to assess SNAP eligibility and participation. These data were merged with the NCHS Linked Mortality file (2000-2009) to create a nationally representative cohort. Participants were followed until death or through Dec 31, 2011. Survey-weighted Cox-proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios of cause-specific mortality by SNAP eligibility and participation. Results: Over a mean of 6.8 y of follow-up (maximum 11.9 y), we observed 7408 CHD deaths, 2185 stroke deaths and 1376 diabetes deaths. For all outcomes, in particular diabetes, SNAP participants had highest risk, followed by SNAP eligible non-participants, and then SNAP-ineligible individuals (Figure, panel A). Considerable differences in cause-specific risk of mortality were observed between race/ethnicities among SNAP participants, SNAP eligible non-participants, and the SNAP ineligible population (Figure, panel B). Conclusion: Major health disparities exist between SNAP participants, SNAP eligible non-participants, and SNAP ineligible Americans, as well as by race/ethnicity. Ways to improve health outcomes of SNAP participants, including potential revisions to SNAP programming, are urgently needed to reduce these inequities.

Abstract P316: Multiple Vulnerabilities to Health Disparities and Incident Coronary Heart Disease in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika M Safford ◽  
Laura Pinheiro ◽  
Madeline Sterling ◽  
Joshua Richman ◽  
Paul Muntner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Disparities ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Southeastern Us ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Regards Study

Social determinants contribute to disparities in incident CHD but it is not known if they have an additive effect. We hypothesized that having more socially determined vulnerabilities to health disparities is associated with increased risk of incident CHD in the REGARDS study, a large biracial prospective cohort with physiological and survey measures. Experts adjudicated incident fatal and nonfatal CHD over 10 years of follow-up. Vulnerabilities included black race, low education, low income, and Southeastern US residence. The risks for CHD outcomes associated with 1, 2, and 3+ vs 0 vulnerabilities were calculated with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for medical conditions, functional status, health behaviors, and physiologic variables. Of the 19,645 participants free of CHD at baseline (mean age 64 years, 57% women), 16% had 0 vulnerabilities, 36% had 1, 29% had 2, and 18% had 3+. Increasing numbers of vulnerabilities were associated with higher incidence (Figure) and risk of CHD that attenuated somewhat after multivariable adjustment (Table). These findings may provide a method of risk stratification useful for population health management.

Role of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in Improving Diet Quality: Implications for Nurses

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Victoria M. Pak ◽  
Erin Ferranti ◽  
Ingrid Duva ◽  
Melissa Owen ◽  
Sandra B. Dunbar
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Diet Quality ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Health Goals ◽  
National Public Health ◽  
Nutrition Assistance

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides access to healthy food for low-income individuals and households. Food security, however, does not necessarily achieve higher diet quality for beneficiaries. Diet quality is an important consideration for the development and management of chronic illness, a significant public health concern. In this study, we review incentives and disincentives implemented to improve the diet quality, the evidence on SNAP including benefits, challenges, and the politics of funding. New interventions and policies will be needed in order to improve the overall diet quality of SNAP households. SNAP should align with nutritional science to meet national public health goals. Nurses are trusted advocates for patients and the public and are uniquely positioned to aid in this effort. Informed by evidence, nurses willing to leverage their influence, can lead this needed change.

scholarly journals Dietary Supplement Use among U.S. Children by Family Income, Food Security Level, and Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status in 2011–2014

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinyoung Jun ◽  
Alexandra Cowan ◽  
Janet Tooze ◽  
Jaime Gahche ◽  
Johanna Dwyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Security ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Family Income ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽  
Household Food Security ◽  
Security Level ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Nutrition Assistance

This analysis characterizes use of dietary supplements (DS) and motivations for DS use among U.S. children (≤18 years) by family income level, food security status, and federal nutrition assistance program participation using the 2011–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. About one-third (32%) of children used DS, mostly multivitamin-minerals (MVM; 24%). DS and MVM use were associated with higher family income and higher household food security level. DS use was lowest among children in households participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP; 20%) and those participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC; 26%) compared to both income-eligible and income-ineligible nonparticipants. Most children who used DS took only one (83%) or two (12%) products; although children in low-income families took fewer products than those in higher income families. The most common motivations for DS and MVM use were to “improve (42% or 46%)” or “maintain (34 or 38%)” health, followed by “to supplement the diet (23 or 24%)” for DS or MVM, respectively. High-income children were more likely to use DS and MVM “to supplement the diet” than middle- or low-income children. Only 18% of child DS users took DS based on a health practitioner’s recommendation. In conclusion, DS use was lower among children who were in low-income or food-insecure families, or families participating in nutrition assistance programs.

scholarly journals An Examination of the Adequacy of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Levels: Impacts on Food Insecurity

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Gundersen ◽  
Elaine Waxman ◽  
Amy S. Crumbaugh
Keyword(s):  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Low Income ◽  
The United States ◽  
Food Prices ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Nutrition Assistance ◽  
The Cost

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) serves as the primary tool to alleviate food insecurity in the United States. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in numerous studies, but the majority of SNAP recipients are still food insecure. One factor behind this is the difference in food prices across the country—SNAP benefits are not adjusted to reflect these differences. Using information from Feeding America's Map the Meal Gap (MMG) project, we compare the cost of a meal by county based on the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP)—which is used to set the maximum SNAP benefit—with the cost of the average meal for low-income food-secure households. We find that the cost of the latter meal is higher than the TFP meal for over 99 percent of the counties. We next consider the reduction in food insecurity if, by county, the maximum SNAP benefit level was set to the cost of the average meal for low-income food-secure households. We find that if this approach were implemented, there would be a decline of 50.9 percent in food insecurity among SNAP recipients at a cost of $23 billion.

scholarly journals Poor Dietary Guidelines Compliance among Low-Income Women Eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinyoung Jun ◽  
Sowmyanarayanan Thuppal ◽  
Melissa Maulding ◽  
Heather Eicher-Miller ◽  
Dennis Savaiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Dietary Guidelines ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽  
Supplemental Nutrition ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Low Income Women ◽  
Nutrition Assistance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document