Abstract 352: Predictive Value of Discharge Neurological Outcome Scores Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest for Long-term Neurological Status: A Systematic Review

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Yu Wu ◽  
Amit Chopra ◽  
Shelley McLeod ◽  
Carolyn Ziegler ◽  
Steve Lin

Introduction: Neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are commonly assessed using clinically validated outcome measures such as the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score, and are mainstay for evaluating neurological status at discharge. However, it remains unclear if these measures accurately reflect long-term neurological status after discharge. The primary objective of this systematic review was to better understand the predictive value of discharge neurological outcome scores for long-term neurological status. Methods: Comprehensive electronic searches of Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 2016 were conducted and reference lists were hand-searched.Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective observational studies were included. Our primary outcome was the correlation between discharge or 30 days post-arrest neurologic status and long-term ( > 3 month) neurological outcome score. Preliminary Results: After screening 4,265 titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate, 6 studies including 5 prospective observational studies and 1 RCT were included. Four studies reported long-term follow-up at 6 months post-arrest and 2 studies reported follow-up at 1 year. In the studies with 6-month follow-up, 368/450 patients (82.7%) had favourable short-term neurological scores (CPC 1-2) at discharge or 30 days post-arrest, and 352/445 patients (79.1%) had favourable scores at 6 months post-arrest. In the studies with 1-year follow-up, 67/80 patients (83.8%) had favourable neurological scores at discharge or 30 days post-arrest, and 60/80 patients (75%) patients had favourable neurological scores at 1 year. Conclusion: Long-term neurological outcome scores following OHCA were consistent with short-term outcome at hospital discharge or 30 days post-arrest. Further studies are needed to elucidate more comprehensive prognostic factors for predicting long-term neurological outcome.

2020 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2020-102525
Author(s):  
Stefanos Karanasios ◽  
Vasileios Korakakis ◽  
Rod Whiteley ◽  
Ioannis Vasilogeorgis ◽  
Sarah Woodbridge ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared with other conservative interventions in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) on pain and function.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to grade the certainty of evidence. Self-perceived improvement, pain intensity, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and elbow disability were used as primary outcome measures.Eligibility criteriaRCTs assessing the effectiveness of exercise alone or as an additive intervention compared with passive interventions, wait-and-see or injections in patients with LET.Results30 RCTs (2123 participants, 5 comparator interventions) were identified. Exercise outperformed (low certainty) corticosteroid injections in all outcomes at all time points except short-term pain reduction. Clinically significant differences were found in PFGS at short-term (mean difference (MD): 12.15, (95% CI) 1.69 to 22.6), mid-term (MD: 22.45, 95% CI 3.63 to 41.3) and long-term follow-up (MD: 18, 95% CI 11.17 to 24.84). Statistically significant differences (very low certainty) for exercise compared with wait-and-see were found only in self-perceived improvement at short-term, pain reduction and elbow disability at short-term and long-term follow-up. Substantial heterogeneity in descriptions of equipment, load, duration and frequency of exercise programmes were evident.ConclusionsLow and very low certainty evidence suggests exercise is effective compared with passive interventions with or without invasive treatment in LET, but the effect is small.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018082703.


2022 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 100934
Author(s):  
Ryan Gouveia e Melo ◽  
Carolina Machado ◽  
Daniel Caldeira ◽  
Mariana Alves ◽  
Alice Lopes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document