Abstract 428: Cause of Death Among Patients Resuscitated From Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at a Single Urban Academic Hospital

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Li ◽  
Christos Lazaridis ◽  
Fernando D Goldenberg ◽  
Atman Shah ◽  
David Beiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Brain Death ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Neurological Injury ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Approximately 30% of patients resuscitated following Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) survive to hospital admission, but only 10% of these patients survive to hospital discharge. Reasons for in hospital death of these patients is not well known or categorized. Understanding the principle reason for death among successfully resuscitated OHCA patients could guide the development of therapeutic and management strategies Methods: Using a retrospective OHCA cohort database at a single urban academic hospital, death of admitted adult OHCA patients from January 1, 2016 until June 30, 2019 was classified as primarily due to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (WOLST), in-hospital cardiac arrest, or formal declaration of death by neurologic criteria (brain death). Family/caregiver decisions to WOLST were categorized as occurring primarily in the setting of isolated severe neurological injury, multi-organ failure, in hospital cardiac arrest, severe hemodynamic shock, pre-existing comorbidities/terminal health condition, or prior unknown DNR status. Traumatic arrests were excluded. Results: During the study period there were 578 cardiac arrests brought to the emergency department; 291 (50%) patients survived to hospital admission. Of admitted patients, 95 patients (33%) survived to hospital discharge and 194 patients (67%) died. In non-surviving patients, death was attributable to WOLST (77%), brain death 25 (13%), in-hospital cardiac arrest (9%), and failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation on ECMO 1 (1%). Decisions to WOLST by family members were complex and multi-factorial but were determined in the context of poor neurologic prognosis 93 (62%), multi-organ failure 27 (18%), in hospital cardiac arrest 11 (7%), severe shock 11 (7%), unknown prior DNR status 7 (5%), and pre-existing terminal illness 2 (1%). Conclusion: In this single center study, the majority of OHCA patients who survived to hospital admission from the emergency department subsequently died in the hospital due to the severity of their neurological injury in the context of WOLST. Death in the setting of multiorgan failure, re-arrest, or severe hemodynamic shock was less common.

scholarly journals Prehospital determinants of successful resuscitation after traumatic and non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed B G Barnard ◽  
Daniel D Sandbach ◽  
Tracy L Nicholls ◽  
Alastair W Wilson ◽  
Ari Ercole
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Neurological Injury ◽  
Successful Resuscitation ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BackgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is prevalent in the UK. Reported survival is lower than in countries with comparable healthcare systems; a better understanding of outcome determinants may identify areas for improvement.MethodsAn analysis of 9109 OHCA attended in East of England between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2017. Univariate descriptives and multivariable analysis were used to understand the determinants of survival for non-traumatic cardiac arrest (NTCA) and traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). Two Utstein outcome variables were used: survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge.ResultsThe incidence of OHCA was 55.1 per 100 000 population/year. The overall survival to hospital admission was 27.6% (95% CI 26.7% to 28.6%) and the overall survival to discharge was 7.9% (95% CI 7.3% to 8.5%). Survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge were both greater in the NTCA group compared with the TCA group: 27.9% vs 19.3% p=0.001, and 8.0% vs 3.8% p=0.012 respectively.Determinants of NTCA and TCA survival were different, and varied according to the outcome examined. In NTCA, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was associated with survival at discharge but not at admission, and the likelihood of bystander CPR was dependent on geographical socioeconomic status. An air ambulance was associated with increased survival to both hospital admission and discharge in NTCA, but only with survival to admission in TCA.ConclusionNTCA and TCA are clinically distinct entities with different predictors for outcome—future OHCA reports should aim to separate arrest aetiologies. Determinants of survival to hospital admission and discharge differ in a way that likely reflects the determinants of neurological injury. Bystander CPR public engagement may be best focused in more deprived areas.

scholarly journals 156 Prehospital determinants of successful resuscitation after traumatic and non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 825.1-825
Author(s):  
Ed Barnard ◽  
Daniel Sandbach ◽  
Tracy Nicholls ◽  
Alastair Wilson ◽  
Ari Ercole
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Successful Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Number Percentage ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Aims/Objectives/BackgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is prevalent in the UK. Reported survival is lower than in countries with comparable healthcare systems; a better understanding of outcome determinants may identify areas for improvement. Aim: to compare differential determinants of survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge for traumatic (TCA) and non-traumatic cardiac arrest (NCTA).Methods/DesignAn analysis of 9109 OHCA in East of England between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2017. Univariate descriptives and multivariable analysis were used to understand the determinants of survival for NTCA and TCA. Two Utstein outcome variables were used: survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge. Data reported as number (percentage), number (percentage (95% CI)) and median (IQR) as appropriate. Continuous data have been analysed with a Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical data have been analysed with a χ2 test. Analyses were performed using the R statistical programming language.Results/ConclusionsThe incidence of OHCA was 55.1 per 100 000 population/year. The overall survival to hospital admission was 27.6% (95%CI 26.7% to 28.6%) and the overall survival to discharge was 7.9% (95%CI 7.3% to 8.5%). Survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge were both greater in the NTCA group compared with the TCA group: 27.9% vs 19.3% p=0.001, and 8.0% vs 3.8% p=0.012 respectively.Determinants of NTCA and TCA survival were different, and varied according to the outcome examined. In NTCA, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was associated with survival at discharge but not at admission, and the likelihood of bystander-CPR was dependent on geographical socioeconomic status.NTCA and TCA are clinically distinct entities with different predictors for outcome and should be reported separately. Determinants of survival to hospital admission and discharge differ in a way that likely reflects the determinants of neurological injury. Bystander CPR public engagement may be best focused in more deprived areas.

scholarly journals Make it two: A case report of dual sequential external defibrillation

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 792-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin R. Bell ◽  
Adam Szulewski ◽  
Steven C. Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Prehospital Setting ◽  
Simultaneous Discharge ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ABSTRACTDual sequential external defibrillation (DSED) is the process of near simultaneous discharge of two defibrillators with differing pad placement to terminate refractory arrhythmias. Previously used in the electrophysiology suite, this technique has recently been used in the emergency department and prehospital setting for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We present a case of successful DSED in the emergency department with neurologically intact survival to hospital discharge after refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF) and review the putative mechanisms of action of this technique.

scholarly journals In-hospital Death Following Successful OHCA Resuscitation: Causes of early and late mortality and the impact of withdrawal of care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Li ◽  
Christos Lazaridis ◽  
Fernando D. Goldenberg ◽  
Atman P. Shah ◽  
Katie Tataris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Neurological Injury ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Categorization System ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractObjectiveIn-hospital mortality in patients successfully resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is high. The factors and timings of these deaths is not well known. To better understand in hospital post-OHCA mortality we developed a novel categorization system of in hospital death and studied the factors and timings associated with these deaths.MethodsThis was a single-centered retrospective observational human study in adult non-traumatic OHCA patients in a university affiliated hospital. Through an expert consensus process, a novel classification system of hospital death was developed.ResultsTwo hundred and forty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Death was categorized as due to withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WOLST) 159 (66.0%), recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest 51 (21.1%), or due to neurological criteria 31 (12.9%). Subcategorization of factors associated with WOLST into 7 categories was done by defined criteria. Inter-reliability of this system was 0.858. 50% of WOLST decisions were due to neurological injury. Early death (≤ 3 days) was associated with recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest and WOLST in the setting of refractory shock or multi-organ injury. Late in-hospital death (> 3 days) was primarily due to WOLST decisions in the setting of isolated neurological injury.ConclusionsOHCA in hospital mortality occurred in a bimodal pattern with early deaths due to recurrent arrest and multiorgan injury while late deaths were due to isolated neurological injury. The majority of deaths occurred in the setting of WOLST decisions. Further study of the influence of these factors on post OHCA survival are needed.

scholarly journals Higher chances of survival to hospital admission after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with previously diagnosed heart disease

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001805
Author(s):  
Laura Helena van Dongen ◽  
Marieke T Blom ◽  
Sandra C M de Haas ◽  
Henk C P M van Weert ◽  
Petra Elders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Lower Proportion ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Medical Histories ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AimThis study aimed to determine whether patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a pre-OHCA diagnosis of heart disease have higher survival chances than patients without such a diagnosis and to explore possible underlying mechanisms.MethodsA retrospective cohort study in 3760 OHCA patients from the Netherlands (2010–2016) was performed. Information from emergency medical services, treating hospitals, general practitioner, resuscitation ECGs and civil registry was used to assess medical histories and the presence of pre-OHCA diagnosis of heart disease. We used multivariable regression analysis to calculate associations with survival to hospital admission or discharge, immediate causes of OHCA (acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vs non-AMI) and initial recorded rhythm.ResultsOverall, 48.1% of OHCA patients had pre-OHCA heart disease. These patients had higher odds to survive to hospital admission than patients without pre-OHCA heart disease (OR 1.25 (95%CI 1.05 to 1.47)), despite being older and more often having cardiovascular risk factors and some non-cardiac comorbidities. These patients also had higher odds of shockable initial rhythm (SIR) (OR 1.60 (1. 36 to 1.89)) and a lower odds of AMI as immediate cause of OHCA (OR 0.33 (0.25 to 0.42)). Their chances of survival to hospital discharge were not significantly larger (OR 1.16 (0.95 to 1.42)).ConclusionHaving pre-OHCA diagnosed heart disease is associated with better odds to survive to hospital admission, but not to hospital discharge. This is associated with higher odds of a SIR and in a subgroup with available diagnosis a lower proportion of AMI as immediate cause of OHCA.

P2829Arrhythmia burden during long-term follow-up in a large cohort of patients surviving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Caro Codon ◽  
L Rodriguez Sotelo ◽  
J R Rey Blas ◽  
O Gonzalez Fernandez ◽  
S O Rosillo Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Atrial Arrhythmias ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Index Hospital ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Data regarding incidence of ventricular (VA) and atrial arrhythmias (AA) in survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are scarce. Purpose To assess incidence of VA and AA in OHCA patients during long-term follow-up and to identify relevant predictive factors during the index hospital admission. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the Acute Cardiac Care Unit after OHCA from August 2007 to January 2019 and surviving until hospital discharge were included. Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analysis were used to investigate clinical variables related to the incidence of VA and AA. Results The final analysis included 201 patients. Mean age was 57.6±14.2 years and 168 (83.6%) were male. The majority of patients experienced witnessed arrests related to shockable rhythms (176, 87.6%). Thirty-six patients (17.9%) died after a median follow-up of 40.3 months (18.9–69.1), but only 4 presented another cardiac arrest. Eighteen patients (9.0%) suffered new VA and 37 (18.4%) developed atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. History of coronary heart disease [HR 3.59 (1.37–9.42), p=0.010] and non-acute coronary syndrome-related arrhythmia [HR 5.17 (1.18–22.60), p=0.029] were independent predictors of VA during follow-up. The optimal predictive model for atrial arrhythmias included age at the time of OHCA, LVEF at hospital discharge and non-acute coronary syndrome-related arrhythmias (p<0.001). Table 1 Variable Without VA With VA p value Age, mean ± DS, years 57.4±14.2 60.8±14.7 0.336 Male sex, n (%) 150 (83.3) 15 (83.3) 1.000 Coronary heart disease, n (%) 36 (20.0) 11 (61.1) <0.001 Cardiomyopathy, n (%) 27 (15.0) 8 (44.4) 0.006 Shockable rhythm, n (%) 157 (87.2) 16 (88.9) 1.000 ACS-related arrhythmia (Primary VF), n (%) 83 (46.1) 2 (11.1) 0.004 LVEF at hospital discharge (%) 47.5±13.9 38.3±16.5 0.010 Death during follow-up 32 (17.8) 3 (16.7) 0.603 Cardiac arrest during follow-up 2 (1.1) 2 (11.1) 0.042 CV hospital admission during follow-up 39 (21.7) 14 (77.8) <0.001 Atrial arrhythmias during follow-up 28 (15.6) 9 (50.0) <0.001 Figure 1 Conclusions Despite low incidence of recurrent cardiac arrest, OHCA survivors face a high incidence of VA and AA. Several clinical characteristics during index hospital admission may be useful to identify patients at high risk.

scholarly journals Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality after Recovered Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Proven Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Maria Trepa ◽  
Samuel Bastos ◽  
Marta Fontes-Oliveira ◽  
Ricardo Costa ◽  
André Dias-Frias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Significant Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractIntroductionRecovered Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (rOHCA) population is heterogenous. Few studies focused on outcomes in the rOHCA subgroup with proven significant coronary artery disease (SigCAD). We aimed to characterize this subgroup and study the determinants of in-hospital mortality.MethodsRetrospective study of consecutive rOHCA patients submitted to coronary angiography. Only patients with SigCAD were included.Results60 patients were studied, 85% were male, mean age was 62.6 ± 12.1 years. In-hospital mortality rate was 43.3%. Patients with diabetes and history of stroke were less likely to survive. Significant univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were further analysed separately, according to whether they were present at hospital admission or developed during hospital evolution. At hospital admission, initial non-shockable rhythm, low-flow time>12min, pH<7.25mmol/L and lactates >4.75mmol/L were the most relevant predictors and therefore included in a score tested by Kaplan-Meyer. Patients who had 0/4 criteria had 100% chance of survival till hospital discharge, 1/4 had 77%, 2/4 had 50%, 3/4 had 25%. Patients with all 4 criteria had 0% survival. During in-hospital evolution, a pH<7.35 at 24h, lactates>2mmol/L at 24h, anoxic brain injury and persistent hemodynamic instability proved significant. Patients who had 0/4 of these in-hospital criteria had 100% chance of survival till hospital discharge, 1/4 had 94%, 2/4 had 47%, 3/4 had 25%. Patients with all 4 criteria had 0% survival. Contrarily, CAD severity and ventricular dysfunction didn’t significantly correlate to the outcome.ConclusionClassic prehospital variables retain their value in predicting mortality in the specific group of OHCA with SigCAD. In-hospital evolution variables proved to add value in mortality prediction. Combining these simple variables in risk scores might help refining prognostic prediction in these patients’s subset.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of changes in the cardiac arrest rhythms from the prehospital stage to the emergency department in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients without prehospital returns of spontaneous circulation: A nationwide observational study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257883
Author(s):  
Jae Guk Kim ◽  
Hyungoo Shin ◽  
Jun Hwi Cho ◽  
Hyun Young Choi ◽  
Wonhee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Shock Group ◽  
Electrical Shock ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the changes in cardiac arrest rhythms from the prehospital stage to the ED (emergency department) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without prehospital returns of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods This retrospective analysis was performed using nationwide population-based OHCA data from South Korea between 2012 and 2016. Patients with OHCA with medical causes and without prehospital ROSC were included and divided into four groups according to the nature of their cardiac arrest rhythms (shockable or non-shockable) in the prehospital stage and in the ED: (1) the shockable and shockable (Shock-Shock) group, (2) the shockable and non-shockable (Shock-NShock) group, (3) the non-shockable and shockable (NShock-Shock) group, and (4) the non-shockable and non-shockable (NShock-NShock) group. The presence of a shockable rhythm was confirmed based on the delivery of an electrical shock. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of changes in the cardiac rhythms on patient outcomes. The primary outcome was sustained ROSC in the ED; the secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and good neurological outcomes at hospital discharge. Results After applying the exclusion criteria, 51,060 eligible patients were included in the study (Shock-Shock, 4223; Shock-NShock, 3060; NShock-Shock, 11,509; NShock-NShock, 32,268). The propensity score-matched data were extracted from the six comparative subgroups. For sustained ROSC in the ED, Shock-Shock showed a higher likelihood than Shock-NShock (P <0.01) and NShock-NShock (P <0.01), Shock-NShock showed a lower likelihood than NShock-Shock (P <0.01) and NShock-NShock (P <0.01), NShock-Shock showed a higher likelihood NShock-NShock (P <0.01). For survival to hospital discharge, Shock-Shock showed a higher likelihood than Shock-NShock (P <0.01), NShock-Shock (P <0.01), and NShock-NShock (P <0.01), Shock-NShock showed a higher likelihood than NShock-Shock (P <0.01) and NShock-NShock (P <0.01), of sustained ROSC in the ED. For good neurological outcomes, Shock-Shock showed higher likelihood than Shock-NShock (P <0.01), NShock-Shock (P <0.01), and NShock-NShock (P <0.01), Shock-NShock showed better likelihood than NShock-NShock (P <0.01), NShock-Shock showed a better likelihood than NShock-NShock (P <0.01). Conclusion Sustained ROSC in the ED may be expected for patients with shockable rhythms in the ED compared with those with non-shockable rhythms in the ED. For the clinical outcomes, survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcomes, patients with Shock-Shock showed the best outcome, whereas patients with NShock-NShock showed the poorest outcome and Shock-NShock showed a higher likelihood of achieving survival to hospital discharge with no significant differences in the neurological outcomes compared with NShock-Shock.

Abstract 336: Data-driven Classification of Arrest Location for Emergency Department Cardiac Arrests

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Mikati ◽  
Clifton W Callaway ◽  
Patrick J Coppler ◽  
Jonathan Elmer
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Unsupervised Learning ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Large Majority ◽  
Cluster Center ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests differ in epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes. Resuscitation research is inconsistent in how ED arrests are classified. We used unsupervised learning to compare ED arrests to non-ED OHCA and to non-ED IHCA. Hypothesis: Clinical features of ED cardiac arrest patients who achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) are more similar to IHCA than to OHCA. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including all patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who were treated at a single academic medical center from January 2010 to December 2019. We abstracted clinical information from our prospective registry, including the details of arrest location (ED arrests, OHCA, or IHCA); age; sex; initial arrest rhythm; number of doses of epinephrine, bicarbonate and shocks given during the arrest; duration of arrest; most advanced airway placed intra-arrest; number of rearrests; early post-arrest illness severity (Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category: PCAC); and survival to hospital discharge. We used unsupervised learning (K-prototypes) to identify clusters within the OHCA and IHCA cohorts. We determined the number of subgroups using Scree plots. Finally, we assigned individual ED arrest patients the nearest OHCA or IHCA cluster based on the shortest Gower distance from that patient to the nearest cluster center. Results: We included 2,723 patients: 1,709 (63%) OHCA, 642 (23%) IHCA, and 372 (14%) ED arrests. We identified 3 clusters in the OHCA cohort, and 4 clusters in the IHCA cohort. Of the total ED arrest cases, 292 (78%) most closely resembled an IHCA cluster and 80 (22%) most closely resembled an OHCA cluster. The large majority (64%) of ED arrests that were closest to an IHCA cluster survived to hospital discharge; 50% of this subset were awake post-arrest (PCAC I), and 16% were deeply comatose (PCAC IV). In contrast, only 13% of ED arrests that were closest to an OHCA cluster survived to hospital discharge; 65% of this subset were deeply comatose (PCAC IV) and only 5% were awake post arrest (PCAC I). Conclusion: Among cardiac arrest patients with ROSC, the large majority of ED arrests resemble IHCA more than OHCA.

scholarly journals P075: Targeted temperature management was associated with worse outcomes of non-shockable out of hospital cardiac arrest

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S91-S91
Author(s):  
T. Kawano ◽  
B. Grunau ◽  
F. Scheuermeyer ◽  
C. Fordyce ◽  
R. Stenstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Targeted Temperature Management ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: We sought to assess the effect of in-hospital targeted temperature management (TTM) on outcomes of non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial “A Randomized Trial of Continuous Versus Interrupted Chest Compressions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest” (NCT01372748). We included non-traumatic comatose OHCAs with non-shockable rhythm who survived to hospital admission. Outcomes of interest were survival at hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3). We performed multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics to determine the association between TTM and outcomes, compared to no TTM, for the entire cohort as well as for the propensity matched cohort. Results: Of 1,985 OHCAs who survived to hospital admission, 780 (39.3%) were managed with TTM. In TTM patients, 7.3 % patients survived to hospital discharge and 3.9 % had a favorable neurological outcome in contrast to 10.2 % and 6.1 %, respectively, in no TTM patients. Multivariable analyses demonstrated an association between TTM and decreased probability of both outcomes, compared to no TTM (adjusted ORs for survival: 0.67 95% CI 0.48–0.93, and for favorable neurological outcome: 0.57 95% CI 0.37–0.90). Propensity score matched analyses demonstrate the similar results. Conclusion: TTM might decrease the probability of neurologically intact survival for non-shockable OHCAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document