Abstract 130: Mechanical, Team-focused, Video-Reviewed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Trends in Survival to Discharge and Cardiac Arrest Performance Measures

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rolston ◽  
Timmy Li ◽  
Casey Owens ◽  
Ghania Haddad ◽  
Timothy Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Annual Trend ◽  
Video Review ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Annual Trends ◽  
Mechanical Cpr

Background: Our previous research demonstrated an improvement in ROSC after implementing a bundle including mechanical, team-focused, video-reviewed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (MTV-CPR) for cardiac arrest patients in our ED. The aims of this study are to assess trends in cardiac arrest outcomes and improvements in cardiac arrest performance measures after the implementation of our MTV-CPR intervention. Methods: In 2018, our ED began using mechanical CPR; a new team-focused strategy with nurse led ACLS; and biweekly video-review of cardiac arrests. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the annual trend in survival to discharge from 2017 (the year before implementing MTV-CPR) through 2019. Secondary outcomes included ROSC and survival to admission. The Cochrane-Armitage test was used to evaluate annual trends in outcomes over the 3-year study period. We also sought to determine if an improvement in cardiac arrest performance measures occurred over the two years of our MTV-CPR intervention using Wilcoxon rank sum and two-sample t-tests. Cardiac arrest performance measures are listed in the table. Results: The groups were similar at baseline over the 3-year study period. 291 patients were included in the study (96 in 2017, 96 in 2018, and 99 in 2019). Survival to discharge improved from 3.1% in 2017 to 5.2% in 2018 to 10.1% in 2019 (p= 0.043); ROSC improved from 26% to 41.7% to 40.4% (p=0.038); survival to admission went from 19.8% to 25% to 29.3% but was not significantly different (p=0.124). Results for cardiac arrest performance measures are reported in the table. There were significant reductions in time to bed transfer, rhythm determination, mechanical CPR placement, and duration of each chest compression interruption due to ultrasound. Conclusions: Implementation of our MTV-CPR intervention for cardiac arrest patients resulted in improved trends in survival to discharge and ROSC, as well as improvements in multiple cardiac arrest performance measures.

scholarly journals The Effect of Implementing Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in an Urban City of Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3636
Author(s):  
Yi-Rong Chen ◽  
Chi-Jiang Liao ◽  
Han-Chun Huang ◽  
Cheng-Han Tsai ◽  
Yao-Sing Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Urban City ◽  
Service Response Time ◽  
Mechanical Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key element in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. Mechanical CPR devices have been developed to provide uninterrupted and high-quality CPR. Although human studies have shown controversial results in favor of mechanical CPR devices, their application in pre-hospital settings continues to increase. There remains scant data on the pre-hospital use of mechanical CPR devices in Asia. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 2018 and August 2020 in an urban city of Taiwan to analyze the effects of mechanical CPR devices on the outcomes of OHCA; the primary outcome was attainment of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Of 552 patients with OHCA, 279 received mechanical CPR and 273 received manual CPR, before being transferred to the hospital. After multivariate adjustment for the influencing factors, mechanical CPR was independently associated with achievement of any ROSC (OR = 1.871; 95%CI:1.195–2.930) and sustained (≥24 h) ROSC (OR = 2.353; 95%CI:1.427–3.879). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that mechanical CPR is beneficial in shorter emergency medical service response time (≤4 min), witnessed cardiac arrest, and non-shockable cardiac rhythm. These findings support the importance of early EMS activation and high-quality CPR in OHCA resuscitation.

scholarly journals Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of cardiac arrest: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing machine to human

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e042062
Author(s):  
Manuel Obermaier ◽  
Johannes B Zimmermann ◽  
Erik Popp ◽  
Markus A Weigand ◽  
Sebastian Weiterer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Mechanical Cpr

IntroductionCardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in industrialised countries. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines follow the principles of closed chest compression as described for the first time in 1960. Mechanical CPR devices are designed to improve chest compression quality, thus considering the improvement of resuscitation outcomes. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis methodology to assess trials investigating the therapeutic effect of automated mechanical CPR devices at the rate of return of spontaneous circulation, neurological state and secondary endpoints (including short-term and long-term survival, injuries and surrogate parameters for CPR quality) in comparison with manual chest compressions in adults with cardiac arrest.Methods and analysisA sensitive search strategy will be employed in established bibliographic databases from inception until the date of search, followed by forward and backward reference searching. We will include randomised and quasi-randomised trials in qualitative analysis thus comparing mechanical to manual CPR. Studies reporting survival outcomes will be included in quantitative analysis. Two reviewers will assess independently publications using a predefined data collection form. Standardised tools will be used for data extraction, risks of bias and quality of evidence. If enough studies are identified for meta-analysis, the measures of association will be calculated by dint of bivariate random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated by I2-statistics and explored through sensitivity analysis. By comprehensive subgroup analysis we intend to identify subpopulations who may benefit from mechanical or manual CPR techniques. The reporting follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval will be needed because data from previous studies will be retrieved and analysed. Most resuscitation studies are conducted under an emergency exception for informed consent. This publication contains data deriving from a dissertation project. We will disseminate the results through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and at scientific conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017051633.

The incidence of airway haemorrhage in manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Stephen Edward Asha ◽  
Sarah Doyle ◽  
Glenn Paull ◽  
Victar Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Medical Chart Review ◽  
Group A ◽  
Mechanical Cpr

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the incidence of airway haemorrhage between participants who received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and those who had received mechanical CPR using the LUCAS device.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted by means of a medical chart review. All non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients that presented to the ED, from May 2014 to February 2018, were recruited. The groups were stratified according to those who had the majority of CPR performed using the LUCAS and those who had the majority of CPR performed manually. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with airway haemorrhage, defined as blood observed in the endotracheal tube, pharynx, trachea or mouth, and documented in the doctor or nursing notes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders.Results12 of 54 (22%) participants in the majority LUCAS CPR group had airway haemorrhage, compared with 20 of 215 (9%) participants in the majority manual CPR group, a difference of 13% (95% CI 3% to 26%, p=0.02). The unadjusted odds for developing airway haemorrhage in the majority LUCAS CPR group was 2.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 6.1). After adjusting for confounders, the odds for developing airway haemorrhage in the majority LUCAS CPR group was 2.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.7).ConclusionsThe LUCAS mechanical CPR device is associated with a higher incidence of airway haemorrhage compared with manual CPR. Limitations in the study design mean this conclusion is not robust.

scholarly journals Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate condition: a randomised crossover simulation research study of the interaction between two algorithms

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e030430
Author(s):  
Thomas Ott ◽  
Jascha Stracke ◽  
Susanna Sellin ◽  
Marc Kriege ◽  
Gerrit Toenges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Research Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Stressful Situation ◽  
Simulation Research ◽  
Simulation Centre

ObjectivesDuring a ‘cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate’ situation, asphyxia can lead to cardiac arrest. In this stressful situation, two complex algorithms facilitate decision-making to save a patient’s life: difficult airway management and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, the extent to which competition between the two algorithms causes conflicts in the execution of pivotal treatment remains unknown. Due to the rare incidence of this situation and the very low feasibility of such an evaluation in clinical reality, we decided to perform a randomised crossover simulation research study. We propose that even experienced healthcare providers delay cricothyrotomy, a lifesaving approach, due to concurrent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a ‘cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate’ situation.DesignDue to the rare incidence and dynamics of such a situation, we conducted a randomised crossover simulation research study.SettingWe collected data in our institutional simulation centre between November 2016 and November 2017.ParticipantsWe included 40 experienced staff anaesthesiologists at our tertiary university hospital centre.InterventionThe participants treated two simulated patients, both requiring cricothyrotomy: one patient required cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to asphyxia, and one patient did not require cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was the intervention. Participants were evaluated by video records.Primary outcome measuresThe difference in ‘time to ventilation through cricothyrotomy’ between the two situations was the primary outcome measure.ResultsThe results of 40 participants were analysed. No carry-over effects were detected in the crossover design. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median time to ventilation was 22 s (IQR 3–40.5) longer than that without cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p=0.028), including the decision-making time.ConclusionCricothyrotomy, which is the most crucial treatment for cardiac arrest in a ‘cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate’ situation, was delayed by concurrent cardiopulmonary resuscitation. If cardiopulmonary resuscitation delays cricothyrotomy, it should be interrupted to first focus on cricothyrotomy.

scholarly journals Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Lin Hsieh ◽  
Meng-Che Wu ◽  
Jon Wolfshohl ◽  
James d’Etienne ◽  
Chien-Hua Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction This study is aimed to investigate the association of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from the database inception through April 2020. Our search strings included designed keywords for two concepts, i.e. vascular access and cardiac arrest. There were no limitations implemented in the search strategy. We selected studies comparing IO versus IV access in neurological or survival outcomes after OHCA. Favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was pre-specified as the primary outcome. We pooled the effect estimates in random-effects models and quantified the heterogeneity by the I2 statistics. Time to intervention, defined as time interval from call for emergency medical services to establishing vascular access or administering medications, was hypothesized to be a potential outcome moderator and examined in subgroup analysis with meta-regression. Results Nine retrospective observational studies involving 111,746 adult OHCA patients were included. Most studies were rated as high quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results demonstrated no significant association between types of vascular access and the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.33; I2, 95%). In subgroup analysis, time to intervention was noted to be positively associated with the pooled OR of achieving the primary outcome (OR: 3.95, 95% CI, 1.42–11.02, p: 0.02). That is, when the studies not accounting for the variable of “time to intervention” in the statistical analysis were pooled together, the meta-analytic results between IO access and favourable outcomes would be biased toward inverse association. No obvious publication bias was detected by the funnel plot. Conclusions The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between types of vascular access and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among OHCA patients. Time to intervention was identified to be an important outcome moderator in this meta-analysis of observation studies. These results call for the need for future clinical trials to investigate the unbiased effect of IO use on OHCA CPR.

Chest compression efficacy of child resuscitators

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 448-455
Author(s):  
Tiffany Wai Shan Lau ◽  
Anthony Robert Lim ◽  
Kyra Anne Len ◽  
Loren Gene Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Compression Force ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Video Review ◽  
Brief Training

Background: Chest compression efficacy determines blood flow in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and relies on body mechanics, so resuscitator weight matters. Individuals of insufficient weight are incapable of generating a sufficient downward chest compression force using traditional methods. Aims: This study investigated how a resuscitator's weight affects chest compression efficacy, determined the minimum weight required to perform chest compressions and, for children and adults below this minimum weight, examine alternate means to perform chest compressions. Methods: Volunteers aged 8 years and above were enrolled to perform video-recorded, music-facilitated, compression-only CPR on an audible click-confirming manikin for 2 minutes, following brief training. Subjects who failed this proceeded to alternate modalities: chest compressions by jumping on the lower sternum; and squat-bouncing (bouncing the buttocks on the chest). These methods were assessed via video review. Findings: There were 57 subjects. The 30 subjects above 40kg were all able to complete nearly 200 compressions in 2 minutes. Success rates declined in those who weighed less than 40kg. Below 30 kg, only one subject (29.9 kg weight) out of 14 could achieve 200 effective compressions. Nearly all of the 23 subjects who could not perform conventional chest compressions were able to achieve effective chest compressions using alternate methods. Conclusion: A weight below 40kg resulted in a declining ability to perform standard chest compressions effectively. For small resuscitators, the jumping and squat-bouncing methods resulted in sufficient compressions most of the time; however, chest recoil and injuries are concerns.

Abstract 138: A Before and After Study of Active Compression Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With the Impedance Threshold Device in a Large Urban Pre-Hospital System

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C Moore ◽  
Michael Grahl ◽  
Tracy Marko ◽  
Ariel Blythe-Reske ◽  
Amber Lage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Response Time ◽  
First Responders ◽  
The United States ◽  
Threshold Device ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Mechanical Cpr ◽  
Impedance Threshold Device ◽  
Before And After Study

Introduction: Active Compression Decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an impedance threshold device (ACD+ITD CPR) is available for use in the United States. However, little is known regarding integration of this CPR system into a large urban prehospital system with short response times, routine use of mechanical CPR and ITD, and transport of patients to cardiac arrest centers. This is an ongoing before and after study of the implementation of ACD+ITD CPR in non-traumatic cardiac arrest cases 6 months pre and post protocol change. Hypothesis: Neurologically intact rates of survival, defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2, would be higher post protocol. Methods: Basic life support first responders (n = 420) and paramedics (n = 207) underwent training including didactic and hands-on sessions to learn ACD+ITD CPR. The protocol included ACD+ITD CPR initially, with the option to transition to mechanical CPR at 15 minutes. Demographics, response time, CPR duration, initial rhythm, signs of perfusion during CPR, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were recorded prospectively by first responders. Chart review was performed to determine survival to hospital admission and CPC score at discharge. Results: Training occurred October 2016 to March 2017, with protocol change on May 1, 2017. Cases from November 2016-April 2017 (n = 136) and May 2017-November 2017 (n= 103) were reviewed. Complete data were available for 128 subjects pre-protocol change (94%) and 96 subjects (94%) post. Age, gender, response time, rhythm, total CPR time, and rates of bystander CPR and witnessed arrest were similar between groups. Post protocol change, 87% (89/102) received ACD+ITD CPR with median ACD+ITD CPR time of 15 minutes (range 2-300). Pre-protocol, 6/128 (4.7%) subjects survived with CPC score 1 or 2, versus 8/96 (13.5%) subjects post (difference 8.8%, 95% CI 1%-17%). ROSC rates were similar (pre: 54/127, 42.5% post: 44/93, 47%, difference 4.8%, 95% CI -8% - 18%) Conclusions: The change in protocol was straightforward with a high rate of adherence of the system for the recommended duration of therapy. Results are suggestive of a higher rate of neurological survival with the routine use of ACD+ITD CPR in a small cardiac arrest patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document