Abstract 232: Delayed Administration of Epinephrine is Associated with Worse Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and Initial Pulseless Electrical Activity

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Enzan ◽  
Ken-ichi Hiasa ◽  
Kenzo Ichimura ◽  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
Takeshi Iyonaga ◽  
...  

Background: Delayed administration of epinephrine has been proven to worsen the neurological outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and initial shockable rhythm. We aimed to investigate whether delayed administration of epinephrine might also worsen the neurological outcomes of patients with witnessed OHCA and initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Methods: The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine - out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (JAAM-OHCA) Registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry including 34,754 OHCA patients between 2014 and 2017. The present study assessed the impact of the time to epinephrine administration on neurological outcomes in patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA with initial rhythm of PEA. The primary outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) Scale 1-2 at 30 days after OHCA. The association between the odds ratio for the primary outcome and the time from witnessed OHCA to epinephrine administration was assessed with a restricted cubic spline analysis. Results: Out of 34,754 patients with OHCA, 3,050 patients with OHCA and initial PEA who received epinephrine were included in the present study. Mean age was 73.7 years and 1836 (60.2%) was male. After adjusting for potential confounders, the time from witnessed OHCA to epinephrine administration was associated with lower likelihood of favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96; P<0.001). The restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated that delayed epinephrine administration could decrease the likelihood of a favorable neurological outcome; this was significant within the first 10 minutes. Conclusions: Delayed administration of epinephrine was associated with worse neurological outcomes in patients with witnessed OHCA patients with initial PEA.

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar W Skjeflo ◽  
Eirik Skogvoll ◽  
Jan Pål Loennechen ◽  
Theresa M Olasveengen ◽  
Lars Wik ◽  
...  

Introduction: Presence of electrocardiographic rhythm, documented by the electrocardiogram (ECG), in the absence of palpable pulses defines pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Our aims were to examine the development of ECG characteristics during advanced life support (ALS) from Out-of-Hospital-Cardiac-Arrest (OHCA) with initial PEA, and to explore the effects of epinephrine on these characteristics. Methods: Patients with OHCA and initial PEA in a randomized controlled trial of ALS with or without intravenous access and medications were included. QRS widths and heart-rates were measured in recorded ECG signals during pauses in compressions. Statistical analysis was carried out by multivariate regression (MANOVA). Results: Defibrillator recordings from 170 episodes of cardiac arrest were analyzed, 4840 combined measurements of QRS complex width and heart rate were made. By the multivariate regression model both whether epinephrine was administered and whether return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was obtained were significantly associated with changes in QRS width and heart rate. For both control and epinephrine groups, ROSC was preceded by decreasing QRS width and increasing rate, but in the epinephrine group an increase in rate without a decrease in QRS width was associated with poor outcome (fig). Conclusion: The QRS complex characteristics are affected by epinephrine administration during ALS, but still yields valuable prognostic information.


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Romolo Gaspari ◽  

Objective: To measure prevalence of discordance between electrical activity recorded by electrocardiography (ECG) and myocardial activity visualized by echocardiography (echo) in patients presenting after cardiac arrest and to compare survival outcomes in cohorts defined by ECG and echo. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously published prospective study at twenty hospitals. Patients presenting after out-of-hospital arrest were included. The cardiac electrical activity was defined by ECG and contemporaneous myocardial activity was defined by bedside echo. Myocardial activity by echo was classified as myocardial asystole- -the absence of myocardial movement, pulseless myocardial activity (PMA)--visible myocardial movement but no pulse, and myocardial fibrillation- -visualized fibrillation. Primary outcome was the prevalence of discordance between electrical activity and myocardial activity. Secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: 793 patients and 1943 pauses in CPR were included. 28.6% of CPR pauses demonstrated a difference in electrical activity (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo), 5.0% with asystole (ECG) and PMA (echo), and 22.1% with PEA (ECG) and myocardial asystole (echo). Survival to hospital admission for patients with PMA (echo) was 29.1% (95%CI-23.9-34.9) compared to those with PEA (ECG) (21.4%, 95%CI-17.7-25.6). Twenty-five percent of the 32 pauses in CPR with a shockable rhythm by echo demonstrated a non-shockable rhythm by ECG and were not defibrillated. One of these patients survived, a patient with asystole on ECG and vfib by echo survived because vfib was identified on ECG during a subsequent pause and was defibrillated. Conclusion: Patients in cardiac arrest commonly demonstrate different electrical (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo). Further research is needed to better define cardiac activity during cardiac arrest and to explore outcome between groups defined by electrical and myocardial activity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kashiura ◽  
Hideto Yasuda ◽  
Yuki Kishihara ◽  
Keiichiro Tominaga ◽  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To investigate the impact of hyperoxia that developed immediately after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on patients’ 30-day neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from the Japanese OHCA registry from June 2014 to December 2017. We analyzed adult patients (18 years or older) who had undergone ECPR. Eligible patients were divided into the following three groups based on their initial partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) levels after ECMO pump-on: normoxia group, PaO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg; moderate hyperoxia group, 200 mm Hg < PaO2 ≤ 400 mm Hg; and extreme hyperoxia group, PaO2 > 400 mm Hg. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Logistic regression statistical analysis model of 30-day favorable neurological outcomes was performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores calculated using pre-ECPR covariates and for confounding factors post-ECPR.Results: Of the 34 754 patients with OHCA enrolled in the registry, 847 were included. The median PaO2 level was 300 mm Hg (interquartile range: 148–427 mm Hg). Among the eligible patients, 277, 313, and 257 were categorized as normoxic, moderately hyperoxic, and extremely hyperoxic, respectively. Moderate hyperoxia was not significantly associated with neurologically favorable outcomes compared with normoxia as a reference (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.55–1.35; p = 0.51). However, extreme hyperoxia was associated with less neurologically favorable outcomes when compared with normoxia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.29–0.82; p = 0.007).Conclusions: For patients with OHCA who received ECPR, extreme hyperoxia (PaO2 > 400 mm Hg) was associated with poor neurological outcomes. Avoidance of extreme hyperoxia may improve neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA treated with ECPR.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shir Lynn Lim ◽  
Yee How Lau ◽  
Mark Chan ◽  
Terrance Chua ◽  
Huay Cheem Tan ◽  
...  

Background and Aim: The benefit of early coronary angiography (CAG) and revascularization in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. We evaluated the association between early CAG and clinical outcomes in these patients. Methods: Data on all resuscitated adult OHCA cases of cardiac etiology between 2011-2015 were extracted from the prospective Singapore Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study and linked with data from the national database of cardiac procedures. The 30-day survival and neurological outcomes (good outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1 or 2) were compared between patients undergoing early CAG (within 1-calender day) and patients not undergoing early CAG. Inverse probability weighted estimator was used to adjust for propensity to perform early CAG and PCI. Results: Of 976 consecutive patients who survived to admission (mean age 64±13, 73.7% males), 401 (41.1%) patients underwent CAG and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was present in 352 (87.8%), of whom 284 (70.8%) underwent revascularization. Patients who underwent early CAG (n=337[34.5%]) were significantly different compared to those who underwent delayed or no CAG (n=639[65.5%]) (Table 1). Early CAG and PCI patients had improved survival and better neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.806 [95% CI 1.675 - 8.648] and AOR 3.075 [95% CI 1.119 - 8.451]), compared to those without. The odds of survival decreased with epinephrine administration (AOR 0.357 [95% CI 0.199 - 0.640]), but increased with an initial shockable rhythm (AOR 6.587 [95% CI 3.659 - 11.861]). The rates of bleeding (2% vs 0%, p=0.300) and stroke (1.6% vs 1.9%, p=0.880) were not increased with early intervention. Conclusion: Early CAG and PCI after OHCA were associated with improved clinical outcomes after OHCA without increasing complications. Further studies are required to identify the characteristics of patients who would benefit most from this invasive strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. e6.1-e6
Author(s):  
Ali Coppola ◽  
Sarah Black ◽  
Ruth Endacott

BackgroundPulseless electrical activity, a non-shockable cardiac arrest, is treated using advanced life support resuscitation. When resuscitation fails, evidenced-based guidelines are limited on when to stop resuscitation. This led to one UK Ambulance Service developing a local guideline for senior paramedics to cease resuscitation when considered futile. The aim of this study was to examine clinical, patient and system factors of a futile resuscitation for pulseless electrical activity and how senior paramedics apply these factors to the decision-making process.Design and MethodsAn explanatory sequential mixed method design conducted in a single UK Ambulance Service. Cessation of resuscitation data was retrieved for all adult patients suffering an Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest from 1st December 2015 to 31st December 2018. Cases subject to a coronial or police investigation were excluded. Senior paramedics made decisions to cease resuscitation for 50 patients at the scene and these were reviewed in detail. Interviews were conducted with six senior paramedics, who provide telephone clinical support to on-scene paramedics.ResultsThe mean patient age was 78 years, the majority were male (n=30, 60%) had a witnessed collapse (n=37, 74%) and had a PEA rate below 50 (n=46, 92%). There were no significant associations between patient demographics and clinical or system factors. Themes arising from paramedic interviews included concepts that defined futility, the impact of decision-making, conflicting views and supportive clinical decision tools.ConclusionWhilst there were no significant associations between variables, senior paramedics balanced patient survival with resuscitation futility by interpreting key factors, such as patient demographics and clinical factors. This multifactorial approach questions termination of resuscitation based on clinical factors alone. It identifies a group of PEA patients, when resuscitation is not successful, may be considered for termination of resuscitation. Research using a larger sample is warranted to explore the validity of these criteria.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Professor Jonathan Benger for his valuable input and guidance as the educational supervisor for this study. J. Lynde and H. Trebilcock for quantitative data extraction. L. Tremayne and E. Freeman, qualitative data coding. Thank you to all the paramedics who participated.


Author(s):  
Ali Coppola ◽  
Sarah Black ◽  
Ruth Endacott

Abstract Background Evidenced-based guidelines on when to cease resuscitation for pulseless electrical activity are limited and support for paramedics typically defaults to the senior clinician. Senior clinicians include paramedics employed to work beyond the scope of clinical guidelines as there may be a point at which it is reasonable to cease resuscitation. To support these decisions, one ambulance service has applied a locally derived cessation of resuscitation checklist. This study aimed to describe the patient, clinical and system factors and examine senior clinician experiences when ceasing resuscitation for pulseless electrical activity. Design and methods An explanatory sequential mixed method study was conducted in one ambulance service in the South West of England. A consecutive sample of checklist data for adult pulseless electrical activity were retrieved from 1st December 2015 to 31st December 2018. Unexpected results which required exploration were identified and developed into semi-structured interview questions. A purposive sample of senior clinicians who ceased resuscitation and applied the checklist were interviewed. Content framework analysis was applied to the qualitative findings. Results Senior clinicians ceased resuscitation for 50 patients in the presence of factors known to optimise survival: Witnessed cardiac arrest (n = 37, 74%), bystander resuscitation (n = 30, 60%), defibrillation (n = 22, 44%), return of spontaneous circulation (n = 8, 16%). Significant association was found between witnessed cardiac arrest and bystander resuscitation (p = .00). Six senior clinicians were interviewed, and analysis resulted in four themes: defining resuscitation futility, the impact of ceasing resuscitation, conflicting views and clinical decision tools. In the local context, senior clinicians applied their clinical judgement to balance survivability. Multiple factors were considered as the decision to cease resuscitation was not always clear. Senior clinicians deviated from the checklist when the patient was perceived as non-survivable. Conclusion Senior clinicians applied clinical judgement to assess patients as non-survivable or when continued resuscitation was considered harmful with no patient benefit. Senior clinicians perceived pre-existing factors with duration of resuscitation and clinical factors known to optimise patient survival. Future practice could look beyond a set criteria in which to cease resuscitation, however, it would be helpful to investigate the value or threshold of factors associated with patient outcome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Pareek ◽  
Peter Kordis ◽  
Nicholas Beckley-Hoelscher ◽  
Dominic Pimenta ◽  
Spela Tadel Kocjancic ◽  
...  

AimsThe purpose of this study was to develop a practical risk−score to predict poor neurological outcome after out−of−hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) for use on arrival to a Heart Attack Centre.Methods and ResultsBetween May 2012 and December 2017, 1055 patients had OOHCA in our region, of whom 373 patients were included in the King's Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (KOCAR). We performed prediction modelling with multi-variable logistic regression to identify factors independently predictive of the primary outcome in order to derive a risk score. This was externally validated in two independent cohorts comprising 474 patients. The primary outcome was poor neurological function at 6−month follow−up (Cerebral Performance Category 3-−). Seven independent variables for prediction of outcome were identified: Missed (Unwitnessed) arrest, Initial non-shockable rhythm, non-Reactivity of pupils, Age, Changing intra-arrest rhythms, Low pH<;7.20 and Epinephrine administration. From these variables, the MIRA2CLE2 score was developed which had an AUC of 0.90 in the development and 0.85 and 0.89 in the validation cohorts. 3 risk groups of the MIRA2CLE2 were defined − Low risk (≤2−5.6% risk of poor outcome; Intermediate risk (3−4−55.4% of poor outcome) and high risk (≥5−92.3% risk of poor outcome). The risk-score performance was equivalent in a sub-group of patients referred for early angiography and revascularisation where appropriate.ConclusionsThe MIRA2CLE2 score is a practical risk score for early accurate prediction of poor neurological outcome after OOHCA, which has been developed for simplicity of use on admission to a Heart Attack Centre.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document