Developing Best Practice Guidance for Discharge Planning Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

Background: Discharge from acute mental health inpatient units is often a vulnerable period for patients. Multiple professionals and agencies are involved and processes and procedures are not standardized, often resulting in communication delays and co-ordination failures. Early and appropriate discharge planning and standardization of procedures could make inpatient care safer.Aim: To inform the development of a multi-component best practice guidance for discharge planning (including the 6 component SAFER patient flow bundle) to support safer patient transition from mental health hospitals to the community.Methods: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method, a panel of 10 professional stakeholders (psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, pharmacists, academics, and policy makers) rated evidence-based statements. Six hundred and sixty-eight statements corresponding to 10 potential components of discharge planning best practice were rated on a 9-point integer scale for clarity, appropriateness and feasibility (median ≥ 7–9) using an online questionnaire then remote online face-to-face meetings.Results: Five of the six “SAFER” patient flow bundle components were appropriate and feasible for inpatient mental health. One component, “Early Flow,” was rated inappropriate as mental health settings require more flexibility. Overall, 285 statements were rated as appropriate and feasible. Forty-four statements were considered appropriate but not feasible to implement.Discussion: This consensus study has identified components of a best practice guidance/intervention for discharge planning for UK mental health settings. Although some components describe processes that already happen in everyday clinical interactions (i.e., review by a senior clinician), standardizing such processes could have important safety benefits alongside a tailored and timely approach to post-discharge care.

Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: Findings from the VESPA Study

Objective To determine whether the participation of consultant gynaecologists in delivering early pregnancy care results in a lower rate of acute hospital admissions. Design Prospective cohort study and emergency hospital care audit; data were collected as part of the national prospective mixed-methods VESPA study on the “Variations in the organization of EPAUs in the UK and their effects on clinical, Service and PAtient-centred outcomes”. Setting 44 Early Pregnancy Assessment Units (EPAUs) across the UK randomly selected in balanced numbers from eight pre-defined mutually exclusive strata. Participants 6606 pregnant women (≥16 years old) with suspected first trimester pregnancy complications attending the participating EPAUs or Emergency Departments (ED) from December 2016 to July 2017. Exposures Planned and actual senior clinician presence, unit size, and weekend opening. Main outcome measures Unplanned admissions to hospital following any visit for investigations or treatment for first trimester complications as a proportion of women attending EPAUs. Results 205/6397 (3.2%; 95% CI 2.8–3.7) women were admitted following their EPAU attendance. The admission rate among 44 units ranged from 0% to 13.7% (median 2.8). Neither planned senior clinician presence (p = 0.874) nor unit volume (p = 0.247) were associated with lower admission rates from EPAU, whilst EPAU opening over the weekend resulted in lower admission rates (p = 0.027). 1445/5464 (26.4%; 95%CI 25.3 to 27.6) women were admitted from ED. There was little evidence of an association with planned senior clinician time (p = 0.280) or unit volume (p = 0.647). Keeping an EPAU open over the weekend for an additional hour was associated with 2.4% (95% CI 0.1% to 4.7%) lower odds of an emergency admission from ED. Conclusions Involvement of senior clinicians in delivering early pregnancy care has no significant impact on emergency hospital admissions for early pregnancy complications. Weekend opening, however, may be an effective way of reducing emergency admissions from ED.

Effectiveness of Allied Health Clinical Supervision Following the Implementation of an Organisational Framework

Background: Clinical supervision makes an important contribution to high quality patient care and professional wellbeing for the allied health workforce. However, there is limited research examining the longitudinal implementation of clinical supervision for allied health. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health at a regional health service and clinicians’ perceptions of the implementation of an organisational clinical supervision framework.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted as a phase of an overarching participatory action research study. The MCSS-26 tool was used to measure clinical supervision effectiveness with additional open-ended questions included to explore the implementation of the clinical supervision framework. MCSS-26 findings were compared with an initial administration of the MCSS-26 5 years earlier. MCSS-26 data (total scores, summed domain and sub-scale scores) were analysed descriptively and reported as mean and standard deviation values. Differences between groups were analysed with independent-samples t-test (t) and one-way between groups ANOVA.Results: There were 125 responses to the survey (response rate 50%). The total MCSS-26 score was 78.5 (S.D. 14.5). The total MCSS-26 score was unchanged compared with the initial administration. There was a statistically significant difference in clinical supervision effectiveness between speech pathology and physiotherapy (F = 2.9, p = 0.03) and higher MCSS-26 scores for participants whose clinical supervisor was a senior clinician and those who chose their clinical supervisor. Seventy percent of participants perceived that the organisation’s clinical supervision framework was useful and provided structure and consistent expectations for clinical supervision.Conclusions: Clinical supervision was effective for allied health in this regional setting and clinical supervision effectiveness was maintained over a 5 year period. The implementation of an organisational clinical supervision framework may have positively impacted on the effectiveness of clinical supervision for some professions.

How senior paramedics decide to cease resuscitation in pulseless electrical activity out of hospital cardiac arrest: a mixed methods study

Background Evidenced-based guidelines on when to cease resuscitation for pulseless electrical activity are limited and support for paramedics typically defaults to the senior clinician. Senior clinicians include paramedics employed to work beyond the scope of clinical guidelines as there may be a point at which it is reasonable to cease resuscitation. To support these decisions, one ambulance service has applied a locally derived cessation of resuscitation checklist. This study aimed to describe the patient, clinical and system factors and examine senior clinician experiences when ceasing resuscitation for pulseless electrical activity. Design and methods An explanatory sequential mixed method study was conducted in one ambulance service in the South West of England. A consecutive sample of checklist data for adult pulseless electrical activity were retrieved from 1st December 2015 to 31st December 2018. Unexpected results which required exploration were identified and developed into semi-structured interview questions. A purposive sample of senior clinicians who ceased resuscitation and applied the checklist were interviewed. Content framework analysis was applied to the qualitative findings. Results Senior clinicians ceased resuscitation for 50 patients in the presence of factors known to optimise survival: Witnessed cardiac arrest (n = 37, 74%), bystander resuscitation (n = 30, 60%), defibrillation (n = 22, 44%), return of spontaneous circulation (n = 8, 16%). Significant association was found between witnessed cardiac arrest and bystander resuscitation (p = .00). Six senior clinicians were interviewed, and analysis resulted in four themes: defining resuscitation futility, the impact of ceasing resuscitation, conflicting views and clinical decision tools. In the local context, senior clinicians applied their clinical judgement to balance survivability. Multiple factors were considered as the decision to cease resuscitation was not always clear. Senior clinicians deviated from the checklist when the patient was perceived as non-survivable. Conclusion Senior clinicians applied clinical judgement to assess patients as non-survivable or when continued resuscitation was considered harmful with no patient benefit. Senior clinicians perceived pre-existing factors with duration of resuscitation and clinical factors known to optimise patient survival. Future practice could look beyond a set criteria in which to cease resuscitation, however, it would be helpful to investigate the value or threshold of factors associated with patient outcome.

799 Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decisions in Neck of Femur Fractures – Is Documentation Adequate?

Introduction ‘Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ (DNACPR) documentation is essential to communicate decisions regarding ceilings of care for patients to the clinical team. Patients admitted to hospital with a fractured neck of femur (#NOF) are often elderly with multiple comorbidities, and so robust and clear anticipatory care plans are especially indicated. Method All patients admitted to a large district general hospital in Scotland with a #NOF over a three-week period between 23/10/2020 and 12/11/2020 were identified prospectively and included in this audit. Patients’ demographic information, DNACPR status and the quality of their DNACPR documentation was recorded. Results 20 patients (85% Female, 15% Male) were identified and included. Median ASA grade was 3, with 77.8% of patients ASA grade 3 or 4. 63.2% of patients had DNACPR documentation in place, all of which were ASA grade 3 or above. Most DNACPR documentation had patient information clearly identifiable (91.7%), was completed preoperatively (90.9%), and involved either the patient or appropriate relative or power of attorney (91.6%). However, only 75% of patients’ documentation had the rationale for the DNACPR decision documented and only 25% of DNACPR decisions were reviewed by a senior clinician within 72 hours. No DNACPR decisions were documented as having been communicated to the wider healthcare team. Conclusions DNACPR documentation is a crucial for anticipatory care planning in #NOF patients. This audit shows improvement is needed in documenting whether decisions have been reviewed by senior clinicians, and if they have been communicated to the wider healthcare team.

116 An Assessment of Current Practice for Suspected Paediatric Testicular Torsion

Aim British Paediatric surgery guidelines (2019) state ‘immediate surgery should be performed if testicular torsion is suspected’. However, imaging ‘may be considered for a small number of children under the guidance of a senior clinician in late presenters or in those with atypical features. This study reviewed current practice in our hospital. Method Boys aged 16 and under in 2017-2019 who underwent scrotal exploration for suspected testicular torsion were reviewed. Outcomes assessed were number having ultrasound prior to theatre, pathological findings, number who had an orchidectomy, and post-op complications. Additionally, all testicular ultrasounds in those aged under 16 were screened to establish how many were requested for possible or missed torsion. Results 46 patients underwent surgical exploration of which 18 had a confirmed torsion. Six patients had imaging prior to surgery, of which five suggested torsions and four of these were confirmed in theatre. 202 boys under 16 had a testicular ultrasound; 26 of these were for late presentation or those with atypical features of torsion. Three underwent scrotal exploration two of whom had reports suggestive of torsion which was confirmed on exploration. Conclusions Most testicular torsions occur around the age of puberty with no torsion identified in patients under 10. Ultrasound is a useful tool for identification of vascularity or alternative pathology in late or atypical presentations of torsion; but does not replace clinical judgement. Imaging may have prevented unnecessary exploration in 23 cases, although negative imaging did not always preclude exploration.

507 Quantifying the Limitations of Clinical and Technology-Based Flap Monitoring Strategies Using A Systematic Recurrent Themes Analysis

Aim Multiple techniques exist to monitor free flap viability postoperatively, varying with practical and personal preference, yet the limitations of each technique remain unquantified. This systematic review aims to identify the most commonly reported limitations of these techniques in clinical practice. Method A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science with search criteria for postoperative free flap monitoring techniques. Search results were independently screened using defined criteria by two authors and a senior clinician. Limitations of the techniques found in the discussion section of eligible papers were recorded and categorised using recurrent theme analysis. Results A total of 4826 records were identified. 4643 articles met the eligibility criteria and were subsequently reviewed, with 195 papers included in the final analysis. The most frequently reported limitations of clinical monitoring were interpretation requiring expertise (25% of related papers), unsuitability for buried flaps (21%), and lack of quantitative/objective values (19%). For non-invasive technologies: lack of quantitative/objective values (21%), cost (16%) and interpretation requiring expertise (13%). For invasive technologies: application requiring expertise (25%), equipment design and malfunction (13%) and cost (13%). Conclusions This is the first systematic review to quantify the limitations of different flap monitoring techniques as reported in the literature. The limitations identified better inform clinicians to decide the best single or combined monitoring approach for their practice and aid development in new flap monitoring technologies.

1145 Achilles Tendon Rupture Management: Improving Our Pathway

Background Achilles tendon ruptures are the most common tendon injury which affect predominantly middle age males. The yearly incidence is 31/100,000, with a rising incidence due to an increasingly active older generation1. Conservative versus operative management options shows no significant difference in rates of re-rupture or length of rehabilitation2. Delays in imaging have been found to delay definitive treatment and led to multiple attendances in the outpatient clinic. Method A retrospective analysis was performed patients diagnosed with an Achilles tendon rupture from September 2016 to February 2017 throughout the East Kent Trust. Patients were identified via clinical coding of ED attendance. Following implementation of the pathway in October 2018, a second retrospective analysis of patients identified between October 2018 and March 2019 was performed. Patients with re-ruptures or < 16 years old were excluded from the study. Results Following introduction of the pathway, there has been a 100% increase in the number of ultrasound scans performed, with the rupture gap size documented in 50% of these. The time to decision for conservatively managed patients dropped from 8 to 2 days. The number of clinic appointments also dropped from 3 to 2 with the management of patients predominantly in the plaster room. Conclusions The pathway has streamlined the process for patients following their injury. The majority of patients are seen by a senior clinician within 72 hours and a treatment plan clarified. The use of surgical care practitioner led clinics have allowed continuity of care for these patients and swift escalation when required.

Sins of Omission: Are junior doctors failing to report clinical incidents, and if so, how can we better support them to do so?

Objectives University Hospitals Birmingham's (UHB) Foundation Doctors should log clinical incidents via the Trust's incident reporting system. Anecdotal reports suggest under-reporting is commonplace. It is therefore important to identify the proportion of Foundation Year 1 (FY1s) who witnessed but did not report incidents and identify and weigh perceived barriers to reporting. We can then suggest strategies to address these barriers and repeat our data collection. Methodology We performed an analysis of anonymised data from the Trust's Datix Incident Reporting system alongside an anonymised survey to determine the proportion of FY1s witnessing reportable clinical incidents, and the proportion successfully reporting an incident in the 2017/18 academic year. The survey also gathered data on FY1 perceptions of barriers to reporting. We went on to discuss our results with UHB management and suggested several strategies to improve reporting, prior to repeating data collection for the 2019–20 academic year. Results 36.4% FY1 doctors surveyed in 2017–18 reported witnessing at least one clinical incident that they did not report. 37.0% FY1 doctors surveyed in 2019–20 reported the same. Respondents felt time taken to complete forms and system complexity were the key barriers to reporting. Conclusion Results show that over a third of FY1s at UHB had witnessed but not reported at least one clinical incident each year. The evidence-based strategies suggested to the trust in 2018 and 2020 included FY1 education on incident reporting, early senior clinician involvement in the reporting pathway, and a streamlined reporting system integrated with existing infrastructure. These have not been implemented.

Fifteen-minute consultation: The approach to the febrile child

Febrile children presenting to the emergency department pose unique challenges. This article highlights the importance of identifying children at particular risk of serious bacterial infection (SBI) using risk factors, red flags and appropriate investigations. Emergency clinicians must be aware of the risk factors for SBI in febrile children, including young age, ill-appearing children and those with complex comorbidities or immunodeficiency. The presence of red flags in febrile children should immediately alert concern and prompt senior clinician review. This article also discusses the appropriate use of investigations and their role in complementing clinical assessment. When discharging children home after emergency department assessment, safety netting should be undertaken to ensure parents are aware when to seek further medical opinion. The presence of a prolonged fever of 5 days or longer should alert suspicion and usually requires further investigation.