Response by Denfeld et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Characterizing Gender Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure”

Author(s):  
Quin E. Denfeld ◽  
Kerri Winters-Stone ◽  
S. Albert Camacho ◽  
Christopher S. Lee
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C Davis ◽  
Christopher S Lee ◽  
Amy Corcoran ◽  
Nandita Gupta ◽  
Izabella Uchmanowicz ◽  
...  

Introduction: The intersection of frailty and heart failure (HF) continues to garner interest. Almost half of patients with HF are frail; however, gender differences in the prevalence of frailty in HF are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to quantify gender differences in the prevalence of frailty in HF. Methods: Data from a subset of studies from a previous meta-analysis were analyzed if they included prevalence of frailty by gender. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to quantify the relative and absolute risk of frailty in women compared to men with HF overall, and divided into Physical and Multidimensional Frailty measures. Risk ratios (RR) along with their confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: Thirteen studies involving 3,662 women and men with HF were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated prevalence of frailty in HF was 51.4% for women and 33.9% for men. The overall absolute risk increase for women compared to men with HF being frail was 14% (z = 3.92, p < 0.001). Overall, women with HF had a 42.1% higher risk of being frail (RR = 1.42 (CI = 1.19-1.69), p < 0.001) compared to men with HF, and there was significant heterogeneity in RRs across studies ( I 2 = 81.7%). Among studies that used Physical Frailty measures, women with HF had a 43.7% higher risk of being frail (RR = 1.44 (CI = 1.20-1.73), p < 0.001) compared with men. Among studies that used Multidimensional Frailty measures, there was no significant difference in risk of frailty between women and men (RR = 1.36 (CI = 0.94,1.96), p = 0.105). Conclusions: In HF, frailty affects women significantly more than men, although this was only noted among studies that measured physical frailty, and there was significant heterogeneity across studies. Future work should focus on elucidating potential causes of gender differences in frailty in HF.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quin E Denfeld ◽  
Beth A HABECKER ◽  
S. A Camacho ◽  
Mary Davis ◽  
Nandita Gupta ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although women with heart failure (HF) are potentially more likely to be physically frail compared with men with HF, the underlying contributors to this gender difference are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender differences in physical frailty phenotypes in HF with a focus on physiological, clinical, and symptom characteristics. Methods: We prospectively enrolled adults with Class I-IV HF. Physical frailty was measured with the Frailty Phenotype Criteria: unintentional weight loss, weakness, slowness, physical exhaustion, and low physical activity; those who met 0-2 criteria were not physically frail, and those who met 3-5 criteria were physically frail. Body composition was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Clinical data were extracted from the medical record. Symptoms of dyspnea, sleep-related impairment, pain interference, depression, and anxiety were assessed. Simple comparative statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify gender differences in physical frailty. Results: The average age of the sample (n = 115) was 63.6±15.7 years, 49% were women, and 73% had non-ischemic etiology. About 43% of the sample was physically frail. Women were 4.5 times as likely to be physically frail compared with men, adjusting for covariates (OR = 4.52, 95%CI [1.69, 12.08], p = 0.003). Both physically frail men and women had significantly more type 2 diabetes and worse dyspnea symptoms compared with non-physically frail men and women, respectively. Physically frail men had significantly lower appendicular muscle mass, higher percent body fat, trunk fat, and appendicular fat, and lower hemoglobin compared with non-physically frail men (all p < 0.05). Physically frail women had significantly higher comorbidity burden and worse sleep-related impairment, pain interference, and depressive symptoms compared with non-physically frail women (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Women are significantly more likely to be physically frail in HF. Physical frailty in men with HF may be primarily characterized by comorbidities and sarcopenic obesity; whereas physical frailty in women with HF may be predominantly characterized by comorbidities and worse symptoms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. S184
Author(s):  
Akifumi Uehara ◽  
Akihiro Yokoyama ◽  
Kanako Oishi ◽  
Yuki Izumi ◽  
Satoru Abe ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Setri Fugar ◽  
Juliet A Yirerong ◽  
Alfred Solomon ◽  
Ahmed A Kolkailah ◽  
Tauseef Akthar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) is reported to occur predominantly in young women. Gender differences in the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with SCAD have not been studied on a population level. We sought to compare the in-hospital outcomes of men and women presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and SCAD. Methods: We identified patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2015 who presented with primary diagnoses of AMI and SCAD. We identified SCAD with ICD-9 code 414.12. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort was created to examine the outcomes between men and women. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital cardiac and non-cardiac complications. Results: Of the 6617 (32017 weighted national estimates) patients with SCAD over the study period, majority were males 3667 (55.4%). Males were younger than females (60.32 yr vs. 61.59 yr) and presented more often with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (53.0% vs. 45.9% P=<0.001). Propensity matching yielded 2366 males and 2366 females. In the matched group, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between males and females (OR 1.20 95% CI -0.93-1.54). With regards to in-hospital complications, ventricular tachycardia (V-Tach) was significantly less frequent in females as compared to males (8.0% vs. 10.1% OR 0.76 p-value 0.003). There was no significant difference between females and males in the frequency of other complications, including intracranial hemorrhage (0.2% vs 0.2% OR 1.45 p-value 0.50), GI bleed (1.8% vs 1.3% OR 1.35 p-value 0.13), cardiogenic shock (9.8% vs 9.7% OR 1.01 p-value 0.86), acute heart failure (3% vs 2.6% OR 1.18 p-value 0.26), ventricular fibrillation(vfib) (5.6% vs 6.0% OR 0.928 p-value 0.48) or stroke ( 1.5% vs 1.0% OR 1.535 p-value 0.06) Conclusion: In our large population-based analysis, compared to females, males were more likely to present with STEMI as compared to females. With the except of V-Tach, which was higher in males, there were no significant gender differences in hospital outcomes namely inpatient mortality, cardiogenic, Vfib or acute heart failure.


Author(s):  
Juana Oyanguren ◽  
Beatriz Díaz-Molina ◽  
Iñaki Lekuona ◽  
José González-Costello ◽  
Silvia López-Fernández ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document