scholarly journals Transcatheter Treatment of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation With Direct Annuloplasty

Author(s):  
Maria I. Körber ◽  
Melanie Landendinger ◽  
Muhammed Gerçek ◽  
Bo E. Beuthner ◽  
Kai P. Friedrichs ◽  
...  

Background: Treatment options for secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remain limited. Early real-world data of a new percutaneous direct annuloplasty system for tricuspid repair were examined. Methods: The first 60 patients treated with the Cardioband tricuspid valve repair system at 4 centers were included in this retrospective study. The primary efficacy end point was technical success with reduction of TR ≥2 grades at discharge. Combined primary safety end point was major adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, cardiothoracic surgery, and stroke) at 30 days. Results: Median patient age was 76 years (73–82), median EuroScore II was 3.9% (2.2–8.1), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was present in 78%, and 81.7% were in the New York Heart Association class III/IV. Massive or torrential TR was found in 51.7%, and severe TR in 48.3%. The primary efficacy end point was achieved in 45%, while 60.3% of patients had less-than-severe TR at discharge. Vena contracta was reduced by 47% from 12.9±4.8 to 7.0±3.4 mm ( P <0.001). Overall, the majority of patients (81.7%) improved at least by 1 New York Heart Association class. At follow-up 81.3% of patients presented in the New York Heart Association class I or II. The primary safety end point occurred in 4 patients with 2 in-hospital deaths, both not device related. Right coronary artery complications (vessel perforation or stent implantation) occurred in 9 patients (15%). Procedural time decreased from 298 to 185 minutes ( P <0.001) with efficacy remaining stable ( P =0.817) when comparing procedure numbers 11 or more to the earliest 5 procedures per center. Conclusions: This first real-world experience suggests that transcatheter treatment of advanced secondary TR using direct annuloplasty is feasible and reasonably safe early in the learning curve, with significant symptomatic benefit. Further studies are warranted to provide data on long-term outcome and patient prognosis.

Author(s):  
F. Meijerink ◽  
K. T. Koch ◽  
R. J. de Winter ◽  
M. Holierook ◽  
B. J. W. M. Rensing ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is increasingly prevalent and impairs quality of life and survival, despite medical treatment. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) has recently become available as a treatment option for patients not eligible for tricuspid valve surgery. In this study we describe the early experience with TTVR in the Netherlands. Methods All consecutive patients scheduled for TTVR in two tertiary hospitals were included in the current study. Patients were symptomatic and had severe functional TR. TTVR was performed either with the MitraClip (off-label use) or dedicated TriClip delivery system and device. Procedural success was defined as achievement of clip implantation, TR reduction ≥ 1 grade and no need for re-do surgical or transcatheter intervention. Clinical improvement was evaluated after 4 weeks. Results Twenty-one patients (median age 78 years, 33% male, 95% New York Heart Association class ≥ 3, 100% history of atrial fibrillation) underwent TTVR. Procedural success was achieved in 16 patients, of whom 15 reported symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association class 1 or 2). There was no in-hospital mortality and no major complications occurred. Baseline glomerular filtration rate and TR coaptation gap size were associated with procedural success. Conclusion The current study showed that TTVR seems a promising treatment option for patients with severe functional TR deemed high risk for surgery. Successful TR reduction is most likely in patients with limited coaptation gap size and strongly determines clinical benefit. Adequate patient selection and timing of treatment seem essential for an optimal patient outcome.


Author(s):  
Luca Testa ◽  
Mauro Agnifili ◽  
Nicolas M. Van Mieghem ◽  
Didier Tchétché ◽  
Anita W. Asgar ◽  
...  

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has determined a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, the durability of bioprostheses is still a matter of concern, and little is known about the management of degenerated TAV. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with a degenerated TAV treated by means of a second TAVR. Methods: The TRANSIT is an international registry that included cases of degenerated TAVR from 28 centers. Among around 40 000 patients treated with TAVR in the participating centers, 172 underwent a second TAVR: 57 (33%) for a mainly stenotic degenerated TAV, 97 (56%) for a mainly regurgitant TAV, and 18 (11%) for a combined degeneration. Overall, the rate of New York Heart Association class III/IV at presentation was 73.5%. Results: Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 device success rate was 79%, as a consequence of residual gradient (14%) or regurgitation (7%). At 1 month, the overall mortality rate was 2.9%, while rates of new hospitalization and New York Heart Association class III/IV were 3.6% and 7%, respectively, without significant difference across the groups. At 1 year, the overall mortality rate was 10%, while rates of new hospitalization and New York Heart Association class III/IV were 7.6% and 5.8%, respectively, without significant difference across the groups. No cases of valve thrombosis were recorded. Conclusions: Selected patients with a degenerated TAV may be safely and successfully treated by means of a second TAVR. This finding is of crucial importance for the adoption of the TAVR technology in a lower risk and younger population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04500964.


Author(s):  
Christian Sohns ◽  
Konstantin Zintl ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Lilas Dagher ◽  
Dietrich Andresen ◽  
...  

Background: Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined. Methods: The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit. Results: In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P <0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P =0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P =0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P =0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P <0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P =0.001). Conclusions: Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient’s heart failure symptoms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document