scholarly journals Time Course for Benefit and Risk of Clopidogrel and Aspirin After Acute Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (8) ◽  
pp. 658-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Claiborne Johnston ◽  
Jordan J. Elm ◽  
J. Donald Easton ◽  
Mary Farrant ◽  
William G. Barsan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Ischemic Events ◽  
Benefit And Risk

Background: In patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack enrolled in the POINT trial (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke [POINT] Trial), the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days reduced major ischemic events but increased major hemorrhage in comparison to aspirin alone. Methods: In a secondary analysis of POINT (N=4881), we assessed the time course for benefit and risk from the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischemic vascular death. The primary safety outcome was major hemorrhage. Risks and benefits were estimated for delayed times of treatment initiation using left-truncated models. Results: Through 90 days, the rate of major ischemic events was initially high then decreased markedly, whereas the rate of major hemorrhage remained low but relatively constant throughout. With the use of a model-based approach, the optimal change point for major ischemic events was 21 days (0–21 days hazard ratio 0.65 for clopidogrel-aspirin versus aspirin; 95% CI, 0.50–0.85; P =0.0015, in comparison to 22–90 days hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.81–2.35; P =0.24). Models showed benefits of clopidogrel-aspirin for treatment delayed as long as 3 days after symptom onset. Conclusions: The benefit of clopidogrel-aspirin occurs predominantly within the first 21 days, and outweighs the low, but ongoing risk of major hemorrhage. When considered with the results of the CHANCE trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events), a similar trial treating with clopidogrel-aspirin for 21 days and showing no increase in major hemorrhage, these results suggest that limiting clopidogrel-aspirin use to 21 days may maximize benefit and reduce risk after high-risk transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00991029.

scholarly journals Carotid Stenosis and Recurrent Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Sara Rostanski ◽  
Alexandra Kvernland ◽  
Brian Mac Grory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ischemic Stroke Risk ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background and Purpose: Randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. We sought to determine whether the presence of carotid stenosis was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke and whether the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin was associated with more benefit in patients with versus without carotid stenosis. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the POINT trial (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke) that randomized patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack within 12 hours from last known normal to receive either clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin alone. The primary predictor was the presence of ≥50% stenosis in either cervical internal carotid artery. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. We built Cox regression models to determine the association between carotid stenosis and ischemic stroke and whether the effect of clopidogrel was modified by ≥50% carotid stenosis. Results: Among 4881 patients enrolled POINT, 3941 patients met the inclusion criteria. In adjusted models, ≥50% carotid stenosis was associated with ischemic stroke risk (hazard ratio, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.68–3.57], P <0.001). The effect of clopidogrel (versus placebo) on ischemic stroke risk was not significantly different in patients with <50% carotid stenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50–0.93], P =0.014) versus those with ≥50% carotid stenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.45–1.72], P =0.703), P value for interaction=0.573. Conclusions: The presence of carotid stenosis was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke during follow-up. The effect of added clopidogrel was not significantly different in patients with versus without carotid stenosis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03354429.

scholarly journals Validation of the ABCD 2 Score to Identify the Patients With High Risk of Late Stroke After a Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1298-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Jian-Hui Fu ◽  
Xiang-Yan Chen ◽  
Yang-Kun Chen ◽  
Thomas W. Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

scholarly journals Early Dabigatran Treatment After Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke Does Not Result in Hemorrhagic Transformation

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-611
Author(s):  
Anas Alrohimi ◽  
Kelvin Ng ◽  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Brian Buck ◽  
Grant Stotts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Ischemic Events

ABSTRACT:Objectives:The optimal timing of anticoagulation after ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is unknown. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of initiating dabigatran therapy within 14 days of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke in AF patients.Patients and Methods:A prospective, multi-center registry (NCT02415855) in patients with AF treated with dabigatran within 14 days of acute ischemic stroke/TIA (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 3) onset. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were assessed for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and graded by using European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria.Results:One hundred and one patients, with a mean age of 72.4 ± 11.5 years, were enrolled. Median infarct volume was 0 ml. Median time from index event onset to dabigatran initiation was 2 days, and median baseline NIHSS was 1. Pre-treatment HT was present in seven patients. No patients developed symptomatic HT. On the day 7 CT scan, HT was present in six patients (one progressing from baseline hemorrhagic infarction type 1). Infarct volume was a predictor of incident HT (odds ratio = 1.063 [1.020–1.107], p < 0.003). All six (100%) patients with new/progressive HT were functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 0–2) at 30 days, which was similar to those without HT (90%, p = 0.422). Recurrent ischemic events occurred within 30 days in four patients, two of which were associated with severe disability and death (mRS 5 and 6, respectively).Conclusion:Early dabigatran treatment did not precipitate symptomatic HT after minor stroke. Asymptomatic HT was associated with larger baseline infarct volumes. Early recurrent ischemic events may be clinically more important.

scholarly journals Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in addition to Aspirin in minor ischemic stroke/ transient ischemic attack—Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250553
Author(s):  
Gabriele Zitikyte ◽  
Danielle Carole Roy ◽  
Shan Dhaliwal ◽  
Ronda Lun ◽  
Brian Hutton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Introduction Patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack represent a high-risk population for recurrent stroke. No direct comparison exists comparing dual antiplatelet therapy regimens—namely, Ticagrelor and Aspirin versus Clopidogrel and Aspirin. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will examine the efficacy of these two different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke and mortality up to 30 days. Methods and analysis MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched with the assistance of a medical information specialist. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for inclusion; eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials that enrolled adults presenting with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and compared one or more of the interventions against each other and/or a control. The primary outcomes will be recurrent ischemic stroke up to 30 days from symptom onset. Secondary outcomes will include safety outcomes (I.e. major bleeding and mortality), functional disability, and outcomes up to 90 days from symptom onset. A Bayesian approach to NMA will be implemented using the BUGSnet function in R Software. Between group comparisons for time-to-event (TTE) and dichotomous outcomes will be presented in terms of hazard ratios and odds ratios with 95% credible intervals, respectively. Secondary effect measures of treatment ranking will also be estimated. Ethics and dissemination No formal research ethics approval are necessary. We will disseminate our findings through scientific conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and social media/the press. The findings from this review will aid clinicians in decision-making on the choice of antithrombotic therapy in a high-risk stroke population and could be important in the development of future treatment trials and guidelines. Registration ID with Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XDJYZ.

Hemostatic Activity in Patients with a Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke with or without Chronic Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 350-356
Author(s):  
Gheorghe A. Pop ◽  
Han J. Meeder ◽  
Wynsen van Oudenaarden ◽  
Jeannette C. van Latum ◽  
Wim Verweij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hemostatic Activity ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Clinical Effects of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy after Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, a Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Condello ◽  
Gaetano Liccardo ◽  
Giuseppe Ferrante
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Evidence about the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is emerging. The aim of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis about the risks and benefits of DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in this setting. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov databases, main international conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA not eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy presenting in the first 24 hours after the acute event. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemic stroke recurrence, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause death. Results: A total of 4 studies enrolling 21,459 patients were included. DAPT with clopidogrel was used in 3 studies, DAPT with ticagrelor in one study. DAPT duration was 21 days in one study, 1 month in one study, and 3 months in the remaining studies. DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (relative risk [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82, P<0.001, number needed to treat 50 [95% CI 40-72], while it was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.49-4.53, P=0.001, number needed to harm 330 [95% CI 149-1111]), of intracranial hemorrhage (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.41-6.66, P=0.005), with a trend towards higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.83-4.05, P=0.14), and a slight tendency towards higher risk of all-cause death (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89-1.89, P=0.16). Conclusions: Among patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or TIA, DAPT, as compared with aspirin monotherapy, might offer better effectiveness in terms of ischemic stroke recurrence at the expense of a higher risk of major bleeding. The trade-off between ischemic benefits and bleeding risks should be assessed in tailoring the therapeutic strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document