Subsequent Shockable Rhythm During Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children With Initial Non‐Shockable Rhythms: A Nationwide Population‐Based Observational Study

Backgrounds: The population of elderly people aged 65 years or older in 2014 is 33 million, and the aging rate (proportion of the total population) is 26.0% in Japan. Victims facing to out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are getting older and older. Emergency medical system (EMS) in Japan must do the same resuscitation protocols once called to the patient with OHCA, even when he or she is very old and activity of daily life is very low. We need to clarify whether same resuscitation protocols are required to very highly aged patients with OHCA or not. Methods and Results: From January 2005 through December 2014, we conducted a prospective, population-based, observational study involving the consecutive patients across Japan who had OHCA (n= 1,299,784). The percentage of patients with OHCA aged more than 80 years old was increasing from 37.1% in 2005 to 47.8% in 2014 by 1% each year. Survival at one month after OHCA with cerebral performance category (CPC) scale 1 or 2 were 4,368 out of total 318,590 OHCA (1.4%) in 80’s, 1043 out of 126,546 (0.8%) in 90’s, and 35 out of 5,544 (0.6%) in aged more than 100 (from 100 to 114). Survival at one month after OHCA with CPC scale 1 or 2 was 11.084 out of 234,366 (4.7%) in 50- 60’s. Patients with witnessed OHCA with shockable rhythm and by-stander CPR survived to CPC 1 or 2 at one month after OHCA were 8.0% in 80’s, 4.1% in 90’s, 0 in aged more than 100, and 22.2% in 50-60’s respectably. Conclusion: Number of survivors with CPC 1 or 2 were very few in patients with OHCA aged more than 80 years old, but still existed. Although the same resuscitation protocols are needed for highly aged victims with OHCA, another system which arrow EMS to stop resuscitation should be established in the highly aging society.

Download Full-text

Citizen bystander–patient relationship and 1-month outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin from the All-Japan Utstein Registry: a prospective, nationwide, population-based, observational study

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024715 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. e024715 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yasunori Suematsu ◽

Bo Zhang ◽

Takashi Kuwano ◽

Hideto Sako ◽

Masahiro Ogawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Observational Study ◽

Family Member ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Neurological Impairment ◽

Population Based ◽

Public Access ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectivesThe presence of a bystander witness is a crucial predictor of patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the differences in survival and neurological outcomes among different types of citizen bystanders are not well understood.DesignWe analysed data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based, observational study that was started in January 2005.SettingThe registry includes all patients with OHCA who were transported to the hospital by emergency medical service (EMS) in Japan. The type of citizen bystander was classified as family member, friend, colleague, passerby or other.ParticipantsWe analysed 210 642 patients in the registry who were 18 years or older and experienced OHCA of cardiac origin witnessed by a citizen bystander between 2005 and 2014.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe main outcomes were 1 month survival and 1 month survival with minimal neurological impairment.ResultsOf the citizen bystander-witnessed cases, 65.1% (137 147/210 642) were witnessed by a family member. However, among patients who survived to 1 month and who had a favourable 1 month neurological outcome, much lower proportions (53.9% (10 907/20 239) and 48.9% (5722/11 696)) were witnessed by a family member. Witness by a friend, colleague or passerby was associated with good 1 month neurological function, after controlling for the patient’s age, first recorded rhythm, gender, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), use of a public-access automated external defibrillator, dispatcher instructions, collapse-call time and response time compared with witness by a family member (friend: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.46, colleague: OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.98, passerby: OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.84).ConclusionsOne-month survival and favourable1 month neurological outcome of patients with OHCA of cardiac origin witnessed by a family member were worse than those in cases witnessed by a friend, colleague or passerby, independent of the patient characteristics and the response of EMS.

Download Full-text

Abstract 152: Effect of the 2010 CPR Guidelines for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Non-Shockable Rhythm

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.152 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Tadashi Ashida ◽

Tsukasa Yagi ◽

Ken Nagao ◽

Shigemasa Tani ◽

Eizo Tachibana ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Population Based ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Class Iib ◽

Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The 2010 guidelines have stressed that systematic post-cardiac arrest care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) can improve the likelihood of patient survival with good neurological outcome. However, the 2010 guidelines showed that induced therapeutic hypothermia may be considered for comatose adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with an initial rhythm of non-shockable (Class IIb). It is unknown whether the post-cardiac arrest care for patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest contributed to favorable neurological outcome. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of the 2010 guidelines in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythm, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of OHCA. Methods: From the data of this registry between 2005 and 2015, we included adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest due to cardiac etiology. Study patients were divided into three groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2000 guidelines (2000G), the era of the 2005 guidelines (2005G), and the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G). The endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 31,204 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 25,045 with ROSC before arrival at the hospital and 6,259 with ROSC after hospital arrival without prehospital ROSC. Figure showed favorable neurological outcome at 30 days in the three groups. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that the 2010 guidelines were an independent predictor of favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA, respectively (Figure). Conclusion: In the patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest, the 2010 guidelines were superior to the 2005 guidelines and the 2000 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.

Download Full-text