Abstract 152: Effect of the 2010 CPR Guidelines for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Non-Shockable Rhythm

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Ashida ◽  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Shigemasa Tani ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
...  

Background: The 2010 guidelines have stressed that systematic post-cardiac arrest care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) can improve the likelihood of patient survival with good neurological outcome. However, the 2010 guidelines showed that induced therapeutic hypothermia may be considered for comatose adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with an initial rhythm of non-shockable (Class IIb). It is unknown whether the post-cardiac arrest care for patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest contributed to favorable neurological outcome. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of the 2010 guidelines in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythm, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of OHCA. Methods: From the data of this registry between 2005 and 2015, we included adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest due to cardiac etiology. Study patients were divided into three groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2000 guidelines (2000G), the era of the 2005 guidelines (2005G), and the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G). The endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 31,204 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 25,045 with ROSC before arrival at the hospital and 6,259 with ROSC after hospital arrival without prehospital ROSC. Figure showed favorable neurological outcome at 30 days in the three groups. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that the 2010 guidelines were an independent predictor of favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA, respectively (Figure). Conclusion: In the patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest, the 2010 guidelines were superior to the 2005 guidelines and the 2000 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoji Watanabe ◽  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Shigemasa Tani ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
...  

Background: The 2010 guidelines have stressed that systematic post-cardiac arrest care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) can improve the likelihood of patient survival with good neurological outcome. Especially, the 2010 guidelines recommended that comatose adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest should be induced therapeutic hypothermia (Class I). However, it is unknown whether the post-cardiac arrest care which was recommended by the 2010 guidelines contributed to favorable neurological outcome. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of the 2010 guidelines in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythm, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: From the data of this registry between 2005 and 2015, we included adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest due to cardiac etiology. Study patients were divided into three groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2000 guidelines (2000G), the era of the 2005 guidelines (2005G), and the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G). The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 30,518 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 24,729 with ROSC before arrival at the hospital and 5,789 with ROSC after hospital arrival without prehospital ROSC. Figure showed favorable neurological outcome at 30 days in the three groups. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that the 2010 guidelines were an independent predictor of favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA, respectively (Figure). Conclusion: In the patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest, the 2010 guidelines were superior to the 2005 guidelines and the 2000 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Hiroshi Nonogi ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
David F Gaieski ◽  
...  

Background: Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation are critical to survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, few studies have investigated the relationship between time interval from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologically intact survival. Methods: From the All-Japan OHCA Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2015, we enrolled adult patients achieving prehospital ROSC after witnessed OHCA, inclusive of arrest after emergency medical service responder arrival. The study patients were divided into two groups according to initial cardiac arrest rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable). The collapse-to-ROSC interval was calculated as the time interval from collapse to first achievement of prehospital ROSC. The primary endpoint was 30-day favorable neurological outcome after OHCA. Results: A total of 69,208 adult patients achieving prehospital ROSC after witnessed OHCA were enrolled; 23,017(33.3%) the shockable arrest group and 46,191 (66.7%) the non-shockable arrest group. The shockable arrest group compared with the non-shockable arrest group had significantly shorter collapse-to-ROSC interval (16±10 min vs. 20±13 min, P<0.001) and significantly higher frequency of the favorable neurological outcome (54.9% vs. 15.3%, P<0.001). Frequencies of the favorable neurological outcome after shockable OHCA decreased to 1.2% to 1.5% with every minute that the collapse-to-ROSC interval was delayed (78% at 1 minute of collapse, 68% at 10 minutes, 44% at 20 minutes, 34% at 30 minutes, 16% at 40 minutes, 4% at 50 minutes and 0% at 60 minutes, respectively, P<0.001), and those after non-shockable OHCA decreased to 0.8% to 1.8% with every minute that the collapse-to-ROSC interval was delayed (40% at 1 minute of collapse, 26% at 10 minutes, 11% at 20 minutes, 5% at 30 minutes, 2% at 40 minutes, 0% at 50 minutes and 0% at 60 minutes, respectively, P<0.001). Conclusions: Termination of the collapse-to-ROSC interval to achieve neurologically intact survival after witnessed OHCA was 50 minutes or longer irrespective of initial cardiac arrest rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable), although the neurologically intact survival rate was difference between the two groups.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
...  

Background: The 2015 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines have stressed that high-quality CPR improves survival from cardiac arrest (CA). In particular, the guidelines recommended that it is reasonable for rescuers to perform chest compressions at a rate of 100 to 120/min in adult CA patients. However, it is unknown whether the 2015 guidelines contributed to favorable neurological outcome in adult CA patients. The present study aimed to clarify the effects of the 2015 guidelines in adult CA patients, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of out-of-hospital CA (OHCA). Methods: From the data of this registry between 2011 and 2016, we included adult witnessed OHCA patients due to cardiac etiology, who had non-shockable rhythm, PEA and asystole, as an initial rhythm. Study patients were divided into two groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G), and the era of the 2015 guidelines (2015G). The endpoint was the favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 109,175 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 18,764 who received CPR based on 2015G and 90,411 who received CPR based on 2010G. The figure showed favorable neurological outcomes at 30 days in the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for 30-day favorable neurological outcome in 2015G patients as compared to 2010G patients was 1.28 (95%CI 1.11-1.46, p<0.001). Conclusion: In the OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm, the 2015 guidelines were superior to the 2010 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Nishikawa ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Kimio Kikushima ◽  
Kazuhiro Watanabe ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
...  

Background Although there is evidence that epinephrine hydrochloride favors initial ROSC, there is a paucity of evidence that it improves survival in humans. The value and safety of the Î 2 -adrenergic effects of epinephrine is controversial because they may lead to increase postresuscitation syndrome after ROSC. Few studies have investigated whether adrenaline concentration before epinephrine administration was related to incidence of postresuscitation syndrome. METHODS We did a prospective study of adult patients who achieved ROSC with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Blood samples to measure the adrenaline concentration were taken from a vein. The primary endpoint was neurological outcomes at hospital discharge. RESULTS Of the 274 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 108(39%) achieved ROSC. The adrenaline levels ranged from 53 to 15,329pg/ml, with a median of 1,545pg/ml, and 25th and 75th percentile values of 707 and 4,486pg/ml, respectively. Of those, 71% (77/108) had an unfavorable neurological outcome and the adrenaline level was higher among such patients than among those with a favorable neurological outcome (a median, 2,016pg/ml vs. 938pg/ml, p=0.048). Moreover, the adrenaline level was higher among patients who died of postresuscitation syndrome within 24 hours of ROSC than among those with survival at 24 hours (a median, 3,290pg/ml vs. 1,343pg/ml, p=0.038). The adrenaline cutoff value of 944pg/ml for unfavorable neurological outcome had an accuracy of 70%. The adjusted odds ratio for the unfavorable neurological outcome after adrenaline cutoff value of 944pg/ml was 8.9 (95% CI, 2.2–35.9; p=0.002). On the other hand, the adrenaline level after epinephrine administration was 28 times as high as that before epinephrine administration (a median, 42,868pg/ml vs. 1,545pg/ml, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, adrenaline level before epinephrine administration was associated with incidence of postresuscitation syndrome, and the level was extremely increased after epinephrine administration. Epinephrine administration may lead to a severe toxic hyperadrenergic state in postresuscitation period.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji Kawakami ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Teruo Noguchi ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda ◽  
Naohiro W Yonemoto ◽  
...  

Introduction: In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients during shockable rhythm, the epinephrine administration after second defibrillation is recommended by the 2015 ILCOR/CoSTR guidelines. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the proper timing of epinephrine administration particularly in relation to defibrillation. Hypothesis: The timing of epinephrine after first defibrillation (D-E interval) was associated with clinical outcome in OHCA patients. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, we enrolled 753,025 OHCA patients from nationwide prospective population-based registry in Japan. Following exclusion criteria, a total of 1,559 patients with witnessed by bystanders and shockable rhythm on the initial electrocardiogram who administrated epinephrine after defibrillation by emergency medical service personnel and obtained return of spontaneous circulation in prehospital setting were eligible for the study. We evaluated the association between D-E interval and favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category: 1 or 2) at 30 days. To evaluate predictor for better neurological outcome, study patients were categorized as every 2 minutes up to 20 minutes, and more than 20 minutes. Results: Patients with favorable neurological outcome were 22% (N=348). Patients with favorable neurological outcome had a shorter D-E interval than those with non-favorable neurological outcome (7.9±4.1vs 10.2±5.3 min, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that D-E interval at more than 10 minutes, when D-E interval at 2 to 3 minutes as defined reference, was a significant predictor for non-favorable neurological outcome ( Table ). Conclusion: Delayed epinephrine administration after first defibrillation (D-E interval >10 minutes) was significantly associated with non-favorable neurological outcome.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Shigemasa Tani ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
Nobutaka Chiba ◽  
...  

Background: Cardiac arrest is a major public health issue worldwide. In Japan, the regional disparity of the number of physicians per 100000 population is also a major public health problem. However, it is unknown whether there is the relationship between favorable neurological outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to cardiac etiology and this regional disparity. The aim of the present study was to clarify this relationship using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of OHCA. Methods: From the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2011 and 2015, we included adult patients who had OHCA due to cardiac etiology. 47 prefectures of Japan were divided into quartiles on the basis of the number of physicians in each prefecture, reported by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. In addition, study patients were divided into four groups based on these quartiles. We compared favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA in each group, using the multivariable logistic-regression analysis. Results: Four quartile ranges of the number of physicians were set for this study (Figure). Moreover, of the 629,471 OHCA victims between 2011 and 2015, 358,993 met the inclusion criteria. Figure represented favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA in each quartile. In the multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratios for Quartile 2, Quartile 3 and Quartile 4 compared with Quartile 1 for favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA was 0.971 (95%CI 0.918- 1.027; P=0.307), 1.011 (95%CI 0.956- 1.069; P=0.703) and 0.850 (95%CI 0.809- 0.893; P<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The regions in which the number of physicians per 100000 population was larger were inferior to the regions in which the number of these was smaller, in terms of neurological benefits in patients with OHCA due to cardiac etiology.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Unoki ◽  
Daisuke Takagi ◽  
Yudai Tamura ◽  
Hiroto Suzuyama ◽  
Eiji Taguchi ◽  
...  

Background: Prolonged conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) is associated with a poor prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) has been utilized as a rescue strategy for patients with cardiac arrest unresponsive to C-CPR. However, the indication and optimal duration to switch from C-CPR to E-CPR are not well established. In addition, the opportunities to develop teamwork skills and expertise to mitigate risks are few. We thus developed the implementation protocol for the E-CPR simulation program, and investigated whether the faster deployment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) improves the neurological outcome in patients with refractory OHCA. Methods: A total of 42 consecutive patients (age 58±16 years, male ratio 90%, and initial shockable rhythm 64%) received E-CPR (3% of OHCA) during the study period. Among them, 32 (76%) were deployed ECMO during the pre-intervention time period (Pre: from January 2012 to September 2017), whereas 10 (24%) were deployed during the post-intervention time period (Post: October 2017 to May 2019). We compared the door to E-CPR time, collapse to E-CPR time, 30-day mortality, and favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 1, 2) between the two periods. Results: There was no significant difference in age, the rates of male sex and shockable rhythm, and the time form collapse to emergency room admission between the two periods. The door to E-CPR time and the collapse to E-CPR time were significantly shorter in the post-intervention period compared to the pre-intervention period (Pre: 39 min [IQR; 30-50] vs. Post: 29 min [IQR; 22-31]; P=0.007, Pre: 76 min [IQR; 58-87] vs. Post: 59 min [IQR; 44-68]; P=0.02, respectively). The 30-day mortality was similar between the two periods (Pre: 88% vs. Post: 80%; P=0.6). In contrast, the rate of favorable neurological outcome at the time of discharge was significantly higher in post-intervention period (Pre: 0% vs. Post: 20%; P=0.01) compared to the pre-intervention period. Conclusion: A comprehensive simulation-based training for E-CPR seems to improve the neurological outcome in patients with refractory OHCA patients.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars W Andersen ◽  
Katherine Berg ◽  
Brian Z Saindon ◽  
Joseph M Massaro ◽  
Tia T Raymond ◽  
...  

Background: Delay in administration of the first epinephrine dose has been shown to be associated with a lower chance of good outcome in adult, in-hospital, non-shockable cardiac arrest. Whether this association is true in pediatric in-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest remains unknown. Methods: We utilized the Get With the Guidelines - Resuscitation national registry to identify pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with an in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2000 and 2010. We included patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm who received at least one dose of epinephrine. To assess the association between time to epinephrine administration and survival to discharge we used multivariate logistic regression models with adjustment for multiple predetermined variables including age, gender, illness category, pre-existing mechanical ventilation, monitored, witnessed, location, time of the day/week, year of arrest, insertion of an airway, initial rhythm, time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hospital type and hospital teaching status. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurological outcome. Results: 1,131 patients were included. Median age was 9 months (quartiles: 21 days - 6 years) and 46% were female. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 29%. Longer time to epinephrine was negatively associated with survival to discharge in multivariate analysis (OR: 0.94 [95%CI: 0.90 - 0.98], per minute delay). Longer time to epinephrine was negatively associated with ROSC (OR: 0.93 [95%CI: 0.90 - 0.97], per minute delay) but was not statistically significantly associated with survival with good neurological outcome (OR: 0.95 [95%CI: 0.89 - 1.03], per minute delay). Conclusions: Delay in administration of epinephrine during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm is associated with a lower chance of ROSC and lower survival to hospital discharge.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seulki Choi ◽  
Tae Han Kim ◽  
Ki Jeong Hong ◽  
Sung Wook Song ◽  
Joo Jeong ◽  
...  

Background: The early and timely defibrillation in shockable rhythm of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by prehospital EMS providers is crucial for successful resuscitation. In emergency medical service (EMS) system, where advanced cardiac life support could not be fully provided before hospital transport, optimal range of prehospital defibrillation attempts is debatable. We evaluated association between number of prehospital defibrillation attempts and survival outcomes in OHCA patients who were unresponsive to field resuscitation and defibrillations. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using nationwide OHCA registry of Korea from 2013 to 2016. Adult EMS treated OHCA with presumed cardiac origin with shockable initial ECG rhythm were enrolled. Final analysis was performed in patients who did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on scene before hospital transport. We categorized number of prehospital defibrillation attempt into 3 groups: ≤3 attempts, 4-5 attempts and ≥6 attempts. Primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate association between neurological outcome and defibrillation attempts. Result: Total 6,679 patients were enrolled for final analyzed. Among total ≤3 defibrillations were attempted in 5015 patients (75.1%), 1050 patients (15.7%) for 4-5 attempts, 614 patient. (9.2%) for ≥6 attempts. Although survival to discharge rate was highest in group with ≤3 defibrillation attempts (8.1% vs. 7.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.01), survival rate with favorable neurological outcome was highest in group with 4-5 defibrillation attempts (3.0% vs. 4.5% vs. 2.1%, p=0.02). As 4-5 attempts group reference, adjusted odds ratio for favorable neurological outcome of ≤3 attempts was 0.66 (95% CI 0.46 - 0.94) and of ≥6 attempts was 0.47 (95% CI 0.25 - 0.89). Conclusion: For patients with shockable initial cardiac rhythm who were unresponsive to filed defibrillation and resuscitation, moderate amount of defibrillation attempt was associated with favorable neurological outcome compared to fewer defibrillation attempts and prolonged number of defibrillation attempts on scene.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Kragholm ◽  
Monique Anderson ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Phillip J. Schulte ◽  
Michael C. Kurz ◽  
...  

Introduction: How long resuscitation attempts should be continued before termination of efforts is not clear in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We studied outcomes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) across quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Hypothesis: Survival with favorable neurological outcome is seen in all time intervals from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Methods: Using data from Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation clinical trials: IMpedance valve and an Early vs. Delayed analysis (PRIMED) available via National Institute of Health, patients with ROSC not witnessed by the emergency medical service (EMS) were identified and grouped by quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. We defined favorable neurological outcome as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of ≤3. Results: Included were 3,431 OHCA patients with ROSC. Median time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC was 22.8 min (25%-75% 17 min–29.2 min); 953 (27.8%) survived to discharge (20.4% mRS ≤3). Significant survival and favorable neurological outcome were seen in each quartile (Figure). In patients who received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rates were 60.9%, 33.2%, 18.3% and 11.1% across quartiles of time to ROSC versus (vs.) 51.5%, 25.6%, 13.3% and 8.9% in patients without bystander CPR; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 50.7%, 23.8%, 12.2% and 9.1% vs. 40.1%, 16.6%, 8% and 4.8%. Correspondingly, survival rates in defibrillated patients were 70.1%, 45.9%, 25.5% and 16.4% vs. 36.3%, 9.5%, 6% and 3.4% in non-defibrillated patients; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 59.8%, 33.4%, 18.3% and 11.4% vs. 24.4%, 4.1%, 1.9% and 1.8%. Conclusions: Survival with favorable neurological outcome was seen in all quartiles of time to ROSC, even in cases without bystander CPR or shocks delivered. This suggests that EMS personnel should not terminate resuscitation efforts too early.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document