scholarly journals Sudden Cardiac Death in Women With Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease, Preserved Ejection Fraction, and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Report From the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study

Author(s):  
Puja K. Mehta ◽  
B. Delia Johnson ◽  
Tanya S. Kenkre ◽  
Wafia Eteiba ◽  
Barry Sharaf ◽  
...  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1450-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Juhani Junttila ◽  
Antti M. Kiviniemi ◽  
E. Samuli Lepojärvi ◽  
Mikko Tulppo ◽  
Olli-Pekka Piira ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2305-2308
Author(s):  
Efstathios K. Iliodromitis ◽  
Dimitrios Farmakis

There are three main groups in the general population as far as sudden cardiac death (SCD) is concerned: individuals without a known history or predisposing factors for heart disease; individuals with known risk factors for heart disease or SCD; and patients with diagnosed ischaemic, structural, or electrical cardiac conditions, acquired or genetic, that are associated with an increased risk for SCD. Although SCD literature focuses mainly on patients with known heart disease, approximately 50% of SCD cases occur in individuals belonging to the first two groups. The annual incidence of SCD in the general population ranges between 0.6 and greater than 1.4 per 1000 individuals. SCD occurs more commonly in men than in women and with an incidence that increases with age due to the increase in coronary artery disease. The commonest aetiologies for SCD in the general population are coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathy, accounting for 80% and 10–15% of cases, respectively. A number of factors have been related to an increased risk for SCD in the general population including genetic predisposition, risk factors for atherosclerosis, strenuous physical activity and sports, electrocardiographic abnormalities, elevated levels of biomarkers, and abnormalities in imaging and other diagnostic techniques. However, large-scale prospective studies that confirm the feasibility, clinical efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of using these factors for broad mass screening for SCD are generally lacking and therefore risk stratification for SCD in the general population remains challenging.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
A V Staferov ◽  
A V Sorokin

Sudden cardiac death - a non-violent death, which developed instantly or within one hour from the time of acute changes in the clinical status of patient, which is based on cardiac causes. The main cause of SCD is coronary heart disease, which accounts for 80% of all cases. More than half of that cases are associated with acute disorders of the coronary circulation. Sudden cardiac death is a leading cause of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. All activities that improve the prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease, reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death. Methods of direct myocardial revascularization allowed to improve radically the quality of life and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Interventional treatment is highly effective and widely used method of direct myocardial revascularization, plays a crucial role in improving life expectancy of patients with ischemic heart disease, including through the prevention of sudden cardiac death.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bergami ◽  
Marialuisa Scarpone ◽  
Edina Cenko ◽  
Elisa Varotti ◽  
Peter Louis Amaduzzi ◽  
...  

: Subjects affected by ischemic heart disease with non-obstructive coronary arteries constitute a population that has received increasing attention over the past two decades. Since the first studies with coronary angiography, female patients have been reported to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease more frequently than their male counterparts, both in stable and acute clinical settings. Although traditionally considered a relatively infrequent and low-risk form of myocardial ischemia, its impact on clinical practice is undeniable, especially when it comes to infarction, where the prognosis is not as benign as previously assumed. Unfortunately, despite increasing awareness, there are still several questions left unanswered regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. The purpose of this review is to provide a state of the art and an update on current evidence available on gender differences in clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of ischemic heart disease with non-obstructive coronary arteries, both in the acute and stable clinical setting.


Author(s):  
Harindra C Wijeysundera ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Maria C Bennell ◽  
Madhu K Natarajan ◽  
Warren J Cantor ◽  
...  

Background: Wide variation exists in the diagnostic yield of coronary angiography in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD). Previous work has primarily focused on patient factors for this variation. We sought to understand if system and physician factors, specifically hospital and physician type, as well as physician self-referral, have incremental impacts on the yield of coronary angiography, above and beyond that of patient factors alone. Methods: All patients who underwent a diagnostic coronary angiogram for possible stable IHD, at the 18 cardiac centers in Ontario, Canada were identified from October 1st, 2008 to September 30th, 2011. Obstructive coronary artery disease was defined as stenosis greater than 70% in the main coronary arteries or greater than 50% in the left main artery. Physicians were classified as either invasive or interventional. Hospitals were categorized into cath only, stand-alone PCI and full service centers. Multi-variable hierarchical logistic models were developed to identify system and physician level predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease, having adjusted for patient factors. Results: Our cohort consisted of 60,986 patients who underwent a diagnostic angiogram for possible stable IHD, of which 33,483 had obstructive coronary artery disease (54.9%), ranging from 41.0% to 70.2% across centers. Self-referral rates varied from 4.8% to 74.6%. Fewer self-referral patients (52.5%) had obstructive coronary artery disease compared to non-self-referral patients (56.5%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.93;p <0.001), after accounting for patient factors. Angiograms performed by interventional physicians had a higher likelihood of showing obstructive coronary artery disease (60.1% vs. 50.8%; OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.17-1.28; p<0.001). Fewer angiograms at cath only centers showed obstructive disease (45.0%) compared to full service centers (58.1%); this was of borderline significance (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.34-1.00; p=0.05). Conclusion: Physician and system factors are important predictors of the diagnostic yield of coronary angiography in stable IHD, even after accounting for patient characteristics. Further study into the drivers of how these physician and system factors impact diagnostic yield is an important focus for quality improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document