scholarly journals Role of Critical Care Medicine Training in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit: Survey Responses From Dual Certified Critical Care Cardiologists

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Brusca ◽  
Christopher Barnett ◽  
Brendan J. Barnhart ◽  
Weifeng Weng ◽  
David A. Morrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Survey Responses ◽  
Cardiovascular Intensive Care

Organization and Structure of the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

2015 ◽  
pp. 86-104
Author(s):  
Michael H. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Low Intensity

The purpose of this chapter is to emphasize and describe the team nature of critical care medicine in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. The chapter will review the importance of various team members and discuss various staffing models (open vs closed, high intensity vs low intensity, etc.) on patient outcomes and cost. The chapter will also examine the roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NP/PAs) in critical care, and will briefly review the growing role of the tele-ICU. Most studies support the concept that a multi-disciplinary ICU team, led by an intensivist, improves patient outcomes and decreases overall cost of care. The role of the tele-ICU and 24 hour in-house intensivist staffing in improving outcomes is controversial, and more research is needed in this area. Finally, a brief discussion of billing for critical care will be discussed.

Organization and Structure of the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 709-727
Author(s):  
Michael H. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Low Intensity

The purpose of this chapter is to emphasize and describe the team nature of critical care medicine in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. The chapter will review the importance of various team members and discuss various staffing models (open vs closed, high intensity vs low intensity, etc.) on patient outcomes and cost. The chapter will also examine the roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NP/PAs) in critical care, and will briefly review the growing role of the tele-ICU. Most studies support the concept that a multi-disciplinary ICU team, led by an intensivist, improves patient outcomes and decreases overall cost of care. The role of the tele-ICU and 24 hour in-house intensivist staffing in improving outcomes is controversial, and more research is needed in this area. Finally, a brief discussion of billing for critical care will be discussed.

scholarly journals The role of speech and language therapists in the intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie McRae ◽  
Elizabeth Montgomery ◽  
Zoë Garstang ◽  
Eibhlin Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Skills Development ◽  
Technological Innovations ◽  
Speech And Language ◽  
National Guidance

National guidance recommends the involvement of speech and language therapists in intensive care particularly for those requiring tracheostomy and ventilation. However, the role of speech and language therapists is poorly understood especially in the context of critical care. This article aims to increase awareness of the background training and skills development of speech and language therapists working in this context to demonstrate their range of specialist abilities. Speech and language therapists support and enhance the process of laryngeal weaning alongside the rehabilitation of speech and swallowing as part of the multidisciplinary team. Examples are provided of the types of interventions that are used and technological innovations that may enhance rehabilitation of oropharyngeal impairments.

scholarly journals Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship

ATS Scholar ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-405
Author(s):  
Anna K. Brady ◽  
Wade Brown ◽  
Joshua L. Denson ◽  
Gretchen Winter ◽  
Abesh Niroula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine

scholarly journals Monitoring intensive care unit performance—impact of a novel individualised performance scorecard in critical care medicine: a mixed-methods study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e019165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M Fernando ◽  
David Neilipovitz ◽  
Aimee J Sarti ◽  
Erin Rosenberg ◽  
Rabia Ishaq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Resource Utilisation ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionPatients admitted to a critical care medicine (CCM) environment, including an intensive care unit (ICU), are susceptible to harm and significant resource utilisation. Therefore, a strategy to optimise provider performance is required. Performance scorecards are used by institutions for the purposes of driving quality improvement. There is no widely accepted or standardised scorecard that has been used for overall CCM performance. We aim to improve quality of care, patient safety and patient/family experience in CCM practice through the utilisation of a standardised, repeatable and multidimensional performance scorecard, designed to provide a continuous review of ICU physician and nurse practice, as well as departmental metrics.Methods and analysisThis will be a mixed-methods, controlled before and after study to assess the impact of a CCM-specific quality scorecard. Scorecard metrics were developed through expert consensus and existing literature. The study will include 19 attending CCM physicians and approximately 300 CCM nurses. Patient data for scorecard compilation are collected daily from bedside flow sheets. Preintervention baseline data will be collected for 6 months for each participant. After this, each participant will receive their scorecard measures. Following a 3-month washout period, postintervention data will be collected for 6 months. The primary outcome will be change in performance metrics following the provision of scorecard feedback to subjects. A cost analysis will also be performed, with the purpose of comparing total ICU costs prior to implementation of the scorecard with total ICU costs following implementation of the scorecard. The qualitative portion will include interviews with participants following the intervention phase. Interviews will be analysed in order to identify recurrent themes and subthemes, for the purposes of driving scorecard improvement.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the local research ethics board. Publication of results is anticipated in 2019. If this intervention is found to improve patient- and unit-directed outcomes, with evidence of cost-effectiveness, it would support the utilisation of such a scorecard as a quality standard in CCM.

Guidelines and Levels of Care for Pediatric Intensive Care Units

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

Pediatric critical care medicine has matured dramatically during the past two decades. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of life-threatening processes and the technologic capacity to monitor and treat pediatric patients suffering from them have advanced rapidly during this period. Along with the scientific and technical advances has been the evolution of the pediatric intensive care unt (PICU), where the special needs of critically ill or injured children can be met by pediatric specialists. In 1985, the American Board of Pediatrics recognized the new subspecialty of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine and established criteria for subspecialty certification. The American Boards of Medicine, Surgery, and Anesthesiology gave similar recognition to the subspecialty. In 1990, the Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education completed its first accreditation of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Training Programs. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit. This policy represents the consensus of the three above-mentioned groups who believe the recommendations that follow are current, necessary, and attainable in 1993. The guidelines are not intended as a statement of the ideal or ultimate requirements for PICUs. We expect standards for PICUs to rise as critical care medicine continues to develop and appropriately trained providers become more readily available. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit.

Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines: Nurses’ Involvement in Development and Implementation

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy E. Davidson ◽  
Chris Winkelman ◽  
Céline Gélinas ◽  
Anna Dermenchyan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Staff Nurse ◽  
Nurse Leader ◽  
Professional Guidelines

The 2013 American College of Critical Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit serves as a living example of nurses’ involvement in the development and implementation of professional guidelines. Nurses who served on this guideline-writing panel describe their experiences. Specific examples from the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines for care are used to explore the roles of the nurse leader, nurse informaticist, staff nurse, and nurse researcher in relationship to guideline implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document