Abstract TMP64: Single Stroke Symptoms Cannot Predict Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With a High Reliability

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Schrock ◽  
Ashley Markowski
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Background: Identification of acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the pre-hospital setting is paramount now that endovascular treatment has become the standard of care. Correctly identifying this AIS population will allow transport to appropriate stroke centers with endovascular stroke capabilities. Objectives: We choose to evaluate single symptoms which, if present, might signify an ischemic stroke with a LVO. We tested if the following stroke symptoms including hemiplegia, severe dysarthria, neglect, eye deviation were associated with a LVO. Our hypothesis is that the use of these selected single or multiple NIHSS symptoms will not result in a ROC of > 0.9 rendering it effective in LVO diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort review was conducted of 551 AIS patients who presented to the emergency department over a 77 month period. Subject demographics clinical symptoms, and other pertinent information were collected from the medical record. The following symptoms at ED presentation were evaluated with univariate and multivariate regression and ROC curve analysis; hemiplegia (of arm and leg), dysarthria (severe), neglect, and eye deviation. Results: Out of the 551 patients, 220 (40%) had a moderate stroke (NIHSS >9) while 143 (26%) had a severe stroke (NIHSS>14) and 49% were male. The median NIHSS was 7 (IQR 4-15) and 228 (41%) had LVO on CTA. The odds ratio and area under the ROC curve for hemiplegia, severe dysarthria, neglect, and eye deviation were respectively OR 3.2 (2.2- 4.5), 3.2 (2.2- 4.6), 5.5 (3.4- 8.9), 7.7 (4.6- 13.1) and area under the ROC 0.63, 0.64, 0.63, and 0.64 respectively. The results of multivariate analysis were slightly better with an ROC of 0.72. Conclusions: Singular stroke symptoms do not have the diagnostic power to predict which patient with AIS will have a LVO. While they have positive odds ratios, the ROC analysis suggests that individually or in combination, they are not accurate enough to determine the presence of LVO.

Pre-hospital detection of acute ischemic stroke secondary to emergent large vessel occlusion: lessons learned from electrocardiogram and acute myocardial infarction

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G Chartrain ◽  
Christopher Paul Kellner ◽  
J Mocco
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Currently, there is no device capable of detecting acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) in the pre-hospital setting. The inability to reliably identify patients that would benefit from primary treatment with endovascular thrombectomy remains an important limitation to optimizing emergency medical services (EMS) triage models and time-to-treatment. Several clinical grading scales that rely solely on clinical examination have been proposed and have demonstrated only moderate predictive ability for ELVO. Consequently, a technology capable of detecting ELVO in the pre-hospital setting would be of great benefit. An analogous scenario existed decades ago, in which pre-hospital detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was unreliable until the emergence of the 12-lead ECG and its adoption by EMS providers. This review details the implementation of pre-hospital ECG (PHECG) for the detection of AMI and explores how early experience with PHECG may be applied to ELVO detection devices, once they become available.

Effect of “drip-and-ship” and “drip-and-drive” on endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110068
Author(s):  
Yu Hang ◽  
Zhen Yu Jia ◽  
Lin Bo Zhao ◽  
Yue Zhou Cao ◽  
Huang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.

scholarly journals Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauli E. T. Vuorinen ◽  
Jyrki P. J. Ollikainen ◽  
Pasi A. Ketola ◽  
Riikka-Liisa K. Vuorinen ◽  
Piritta A. Setälä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Emergency Response System ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Cortical Ischemia

Abstract Background In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. Methods We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. Results Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. Conclusion A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation.

Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management and Prognosis between Multiple Large-Vessel Occlusion and Single Large-Vessel Occlusion: Subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Tandem Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Patient Prognosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.

Abstract TP1: The Promising System to Support Rural Area Where No Intervenitionists to Perform Embolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke "Drive and Retrieve Method"

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Osanai
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Rural Area ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Introduction: In Japan, endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion should be performed by neurointerventionists. However, most hospitals in rural area , that offer treatment for cerebral vascular disease do not have access to a neurointerventionist; the rural areas are especially affected. Thus, Our University has offered support to institutions without a neurointerventionist, to perform endovascular treatment. The neurointerventionists stationed in other hospitals drive to retrieve the resultant clot since the acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion. We called this the “drive and retrieve system” method, and launched the prospective trial to evaluate the validity and efficacy of this method. Herein, we report the initial results of this trial. Methods: Nine institutes across our affiliated hospitals within a one-hour drive from Sapporo City took part in this trial. Three of these 9 institutes that have a full-time neurointerventionist were registered as the source. When an episode of acute ischemic stroke requiring intervention occurred in the other 6 hospitals, the available neurointerventionist provided treatment based on the drive and retrieve method. The neurointerventionists’ schedules was updated and distributed to all participating units twice a week, so that the supported hospitals could immediately make contact when required. We analysis the data of 44 cases in this trial from July 2015 to April 2016. Results: For 41 out of 44 cases (93%), Neurointerventionaists were able to respond immediately. The median time from door-to-puncture was 90 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 72-125). The median time from puncture to recanalization was also 76 min (IQR: 57.5-99.5). The recanalization rate (TICI 2b/3) was 77 %. mRS 0-2 was 39%. Conclusion: The drive and retrieve system has the potential to support rural medical institutes that do not have access to a full-time neurointerventionist.

Abstract P104: Incidence, Characteristics and Outcomes of Large Vessel Stroke in Covid-19: An International Multicenter Study

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyank Khandelwal ◽  
Fawaz Al-Mufti ◽  
Ambooj Tiwari ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
International Multicenter Study ◽  
International Multicenter

Background: While there are reports of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in COVID-19 patients, the overall incidence of acute ischemic stroke and clinical characteristics of large vessel occlusion in such patient remains to be established. Methods: A retrospective, international multicenter study of large vessel occlusion (LVO) was undertaken from March 1 to May 1, 2020 at 12 stroke centers from 4 countries. Detailed data were collected on consecutive LVOs in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the incidence of AIS/LVO was measured. Among patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, stroke outcomes along with COVID-19 symptoms were reported. Results: Out of a total of 6698 COVID-19 patients admitted to 10 stroke centers, the incidence of stroke was found to be 1.3% (range 0.6-2.6%). The median age of patients who presented with LVO was 51 years (range 27-87) and in the US centers, African Americans comprised 28% of all patients. Ten patients (16 %) were less than 50 years of age with no significant risk factors for LVOs the vast majority. Among the LVOs eligible for MT, the average time to presentation from symptom onset to presentation was 9.3 hours. Successful revascularization was achieved in 81% of patients and the intracranial hemorrhage rate was 14% with no symptomatic hemorrhages. Twenty-one (50%) patients were either discharged to home or to acute rehabilitation facilities. Conclusion: LVOs was predominant in patients with AIS and COVID-19, occurring at a significantly younger age and affecting African Americans disproportionately.

Prevalence of large vessel occlusion in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke: a 10-year systematic review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Lakomkin ◽  
Mandip Dhamoon ◽  
Kirsten Carroll ◽  
Inder Paul Singh ◽  
Stanley Tuhrim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Meta Analyses

BackgroundAccurate assessment of the prevalence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is critical for optimal resource allocation in neurovascular intervention.ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of the literature in order to identify the proportion of patients with AIS presenting with LVO on image analysis.MethodsA systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in order to identify studies reporting LVO rates for patients presenting with AIS. Studies that included patients younger than 18 years, were non-clinical, or did not report LVO rates in the context of a consecutive AIS series were excluded. Characteristics regarding presentation, diagnosis, and LVO classification were recorded for each paper.ResultsSixteen studies, spanning a total of 11 763 patients assessed for stroke, were included in the qualitative synthesis. The majority (10/16) of articles reported LVO rates exceeding 30% in patients presenting with AIS. There was substantial variability in the LVO definitions used, with nine unique classification schemes among the 16 studies. The mean prevalence of LVO was 31.1% across all studies, and 29.3% when weighted by the number of patients included in each study.ConclusionsDespite the wide variability in LVO classification, the majority of studies in the last 10 years report a high prevalence of LVO in patients presenting with AIS. These rates of LVO may have implications for the volume of patients with AIS who may benefit from endovascular therapy.

scholarly journals Integrated Stroke System Model Expands Availability of Endovascular Therapy While Maintaining Quality Outcomes

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lopez-Rivera ◽  
Sergio Salazar-Marioni ◽  
Rania Abdelkhaleq ◽  
Sean I. Savitz ◽  
Alexandra L. Czap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Advisory Council ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Interhospital Transfer ◽  
Lower Volume

Background and Purpose: The optimal endovascular stroke therapy (EVT) care delivery structure is unknown. Here, we present our experience in creating an integrated stroke system (ISS) to expand EVT availability throughout our region while maintaining hospital and physician quality standards. Methods: We identified all consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke treated with EVT from January 2014 to February 2019 in our health care system. In October 2017, we implemented the ISS, in which 3 additional hospitals (4 total) became EVT-performing hospitals (EPHs) and physicians were rotated between all centers. The cohort was divided by time into pre-ISS and post-ISS, and the primary outcome was time from stroke onset to EPH arrival. Secondary outcomes included hospital and procedural quality metrics. We performed an external validation using data from the Southeast Texas Regional Advisory Council. Results: Among 513 patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke treated with EVT, 58% were treated pre-ISS and 43% post-ISS. Over the study period, EVT procedural volume increased overall but remained relatively low at the 3 new EPHs (<70 EVT/y). After ISS, the proportion of patients who underwent interhospital transfer decreased (46% versus 37%; P <0.05). In adjusted quantile regression, ISS implementation resulted in a reduction of time from stroke onset to EPH arrival by 40 minutes ( P <0.01) and onset to groin puncture by 29 minutes ( P <0.05). Rates of postprocedural hemorrhage, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b/3, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale were comparable at the higher and lower volume EPHs. The improvement in onset-to-arrival time was not reflective of overall improvement in secular trends in regional prehospital care. Conclusions: In our system, increasing EVT availability decreased time from stroke onset to EPH arrival. The ISS provides a framework to maintain quality in lower volume hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document