Abstract TP190: Incongruence Between Survivors and Family Caregivers About Survivor Function is Associated With Poor Outcomes for Both Members of the Dyad

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J McCarthy ◽  
Tamilyn Bakas ◽  
Erik Nelson ◽  
Jeffrey Schellinger ◽  
Kalyn Black ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 569-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. McCarthy ◽  
Tamilyn Bakas ◽  
Jeffrey Schellinger ◽  
Katie Stapleton ◽  
Brett M. Kissela

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Michael McCarthy ◽  
Morgan Lee-Regalado Hustead ◽  
Rachel Bacon ◽  
Yolanda Evie Garcia ◽  
Dorothy Dunn ◽  
...  

Abstract The aging of the United States population has led to an increase in the prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Many individuals with ADRD receive care from family members and friends who, themselves, experience poor health outcomes. ADRD family caregivers from diverse backgrounds are frequently underserved by health and social service systems. However, research suggests that diverse caregivers possess culturally-based strengths that serve as protective factors against poor outcomes. This presentation reports findings from a study to develop and validate a community assessment of the needs, assets, and resources of rural Latinx and Native American ADRD family caregivers. Initial assessment items were based upon validated measures developed for diverse ADRD and comparable caregiver populations. A Delphi process was used to obtain ratings from a 9-member expert panel (ADRD policy makers, providers, and family caregivers) about the degree to which the assessment was: (1) inclusive of different cultural groups; (2) respectful of cultural values and norms; (3) comprehensive with respect to needs, assets, and resources, and; (4) relevant to the lived experiences of diverse rural caregivers. Experts also provided qualitative feedback about modifying phrases to make the assessment more relevant to diverse respondents, removing sections, and adding items and response options to better reflect rural life. After two formal rounds of review and multiple iterations, between 77% and 100% of experts agreed that all sections of the assessment met criteria. Findings highlight the benefits of a systematic process for developing and validating community assessments for diverse, rural populations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1036-1036
Author(s):  
Priyanka Shrestha ◽  
Donna Fick ◽  
Marie Boltz ◽  
Susan Loeb ◽  
Andrew High

Abstract Persons living with dementia (PLWD) are at increased risk for COVID-19 and associated poor outcomes, including: incident delirium, hospitalization, severe symptoms, intensive care admission, and even death. PLWD are likely to rely on family caregivers to maintain their health and well-being in the community. Under normal circumstances, caregiving can be stressful and complex, and the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to change and exacerbate the stresses of family caregiving. As a part of a larger study using descriptive qualitative methodology to explore the family caregiver understanding and experiences related to delirium in caring for a person with dementia, 14 participants (age x̄ =67, SD= 13.8) were asked about the impact of COVID-19 on their caregiving for PLWD. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews using Dedoose generated four overarching themes associated with the family caregiver’s perspective of changes in caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: 1) Cautious of COVID-19 exposure, 2) We can’t go in, 3) Feeling of isolation for both the PLWD and caregiver, and 4) Six-feet distance. The current study highlights the importance of understanding the needs of PLWD during a pandemic based upon the perspective of their family caregivers and will inform the development of ways to safely incorporate family caregivers in the interdisciplinary care team. Caregivers are integral to the care of PLWD across settings of care and should be partners even during a pandemic. Solutions for care include integrating technology for individualized approaches. Finally, future areas for research will be discussed.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Rosemary Lubinski

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  

GeroPsych ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Wilz ◽  
Denise Schinköthe ◽  
Renate Soellner

Introduction: The evaluation of effective interventions is still needed to prevent family caregivers of persons with dementia from becoming physically or mentally ill. However, in most existing intervention studies, primary outcomes are not well matched to the treatment goals. Method: A randomized controlled trial (N = 229) was conducted to compare a treatment group (CBT), a treated control group, and an untreated control group. In theses analyses we focused on the primary outcome measurement (GAS) as a perceived treatment success as well as treatment compliance and participants’ evaluation. Results: Results showed that 30.1% achieved complete goal attainment, 39.8% partial goal attainment, and 24.1% declared no change (overachievement 2.4%; deterioration 3.6%). Discussion: The intervention can be considered to have been successful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document