Abstract 130: Outcomes of Rescue Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerosis- Insights From the STAR Registry

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Michael A Casey ◽  
Ali Alawieh ◽  
Reda M Chalhoub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerosis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Procedural Time

Introduction: Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) is currently the standard of care for patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) with salvageable tissue. A subgroup of patients with ELVO are found to have refractory occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS), often requiring angioplasty with or without stenting. Whether this treatment is safe or effective in this group of patients remains to be established. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, efficacy and long-term outcome of MT with rescue therapy in patients with ICAS. Methods: STAR registry combined prospectively maintained databases of 11 thrombectomy-capable centers in the US, Europe and Asia. In this analysis, we included patients who underwent rescue balloon angioplasty and/or stenting in the setting of ELVO. A matched sample was produced by matching on the variables of age, admission NIHSS, and location of occlusion. Results: Out of 2827 thrombectomy patients included in STAR registry, 190 patients received MT and required rescue angioplasty and/or stenting. Balloon angioplasty was performed on 116 patients, and 84 patients had intracranial stenting. Compared to the 161 ICAS patients matched to similar number of controls. There was no difference in age, race, sex, rate of IV tPA administration, ASPECTS score, or onset to groin time. Successful first attempt was higher in patients with embolic LVO (22 vs 52, p=0.001), procedural time was longer in patients with ICAS (47 min Vs 31 min, p=<0.001). There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or long term functional outcome. Conclusion: In patients with ELVO with underlying ICAS requiring rescue angioplasty and/or stenting; despite longer procedural time and lower rate of first pass revascularization, rescue therapy appears to be safe with similar complication rates and long-term functional outcomes compared to patients with large vessel occlusion from embolic source. Table 1:

scholarly journals Outcomes of Rescue Endovascular Treatment of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Insights From STAR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Ali Alawieh ◽  
Stacey Wolfe ◽  
Kyle M. Fargen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerosis ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Control

Background Some emergent large vessel occlusions (ELVOs) are refractory to reperfusion because of underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS), often requiring rescue therapy (RT) with balloon angioplasty, stenting, or both. In this study, we investigate the safety, efficacy, and long‐term outcomes of RT in the setting of mechanical thrombectomy for ICAS‐related ELVO. Methods and Results We queried the databases of 10 thrombectomy‐capable centers in North America and Europe included in STAR (Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry). Patients with ELVO who underwent ICAS‐related RT were included. A matched sample was produced for variables of age, admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, onset to groin puncture time, occlusion site, and final recanalization. Out of 3025 patients with MT, 182 (6%) patients required RT because of underlying ICAS. Balloon angioplasty was performed on 122 patients, and 117 patients had intracranial stenting. In the matched analysis, 141 patients who received RT matched to a similar number of controls. The number of thrombectomy passes was higher (3 versus 1, P <0.001), and procedural time was longer in the RT group (52 minutes versus 36 minutes, P =0.004). There was a higher rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation in the RT group (7.8% versus 4.3%, P =0.211), however, the difference was not significant. There was no difference in 90‐day modified Rankin scale of 0 to 2 (44% versus 47.5%, P =0.543) between patients in the RT and control groups. Conclusions In patients with ELVO with underlying ICAS requiring RT, despite longer procedure time and a more thrombectomy passes, the 90 days favorable outcomes were comparable with patients with embolic ELVO.

Abstract TMP4: Impact of Bridging Therapy With Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion- Insights From the STAR Registry

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Ali Alawieh ◽  
Christine A Holmstedt ◽  
Reda M Chalhub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Bridging Therapy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Clinical trials have proven the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with intravenous alteplase (tPA) compared to tPA alone in patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The impact of tPA prior to MT on procedural metrics, successful revascularization, symptomatic hemorrhage and long-term functional outcome has not been established from large scale real-world studies. In this study we evaluate the impact of tPA prior to MT on procedural times, immediate and long-term outcomes. Methods: The STAR registry combined prospectively maintained databases of 11 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers in the US, Europe and Asia. Patients who received mechanical thrombectomy with or without intravenous tPA prior to MT were included in these analyses. Baseline characteristics, procedural time, successful revascularization (TICI ≥ 2B), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (PH2), and long-term functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Total of 1869 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 907 received tPA prior to MT. Baseline features and outcomes are summarized in table 1. There were more white patients in the non-tPA group, and more patients in this group had atrial fibrillation and hyperlipidemia; otherwise there were no differences in baseline features between the two groups. Median NIHSS on admission was 16 in both groups, median ASPECTS was 9 in the tPA group versus 8 in the non-tPA group, p=0.208. Patients in the tPA group had higher rate of successful revascularization, lower number of revascularizations attempts and were more likely to achieve excellent long-term functional outcome. There was no difference in procedural time, rate of symptomatic hemorrhage or length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Bridging therapy with intravenous tPA prior to mechanical thrombectomy may facilitate MT and yield to better long-term functional outcome.

SOFIA catheter for direct aspiration of large vessel occlusion stroke: A single-center cohort and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110053
Author(s):  
Federico Bolognini ◽  
Pablo A Lebedinsky ◽  
Mariano Musacchio ◽  
Mariette Delaitre ◽  
Abdoulaye M Traoré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Line ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Global Rate ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose Direct aspiration (DA) using large-bore distal aspiration catheters is an established strategy for the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) of large-vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). However, the performance of individual catheters like SOFIA has yet to be examined. Methods We present a cohort of 144 consecutive patients treated with first-line DA and SOFIA 6 F Plus catheter for LVOS. We also conducted a systematic review of the literature searching multiple databases for reports on thrombectomy with DA and SOFIA catheters and performed a meta-analysis of recanalization, safety, and clinical outcomes. Results In the study cohort a successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) rate of 75.7% was achieved with DA alone, the global rate for functional independence (90-day mRS 0-2) was 40.3%. For the metanalysis we selected nine articles that included a total of 758 patients treated with first-line thrombectomy with the SOFIA catheters. The mTICI 2b-3 rate was 71.6% (95%CI, 66.3-76.5%) while a rescue stent-retriever was used in 24.1% (95%CI, 17.7-31.9%) of cases. The overall mTICI2b-3 rate after DA and rescue therapy was 88.9% (95%CI, 82.6-93.1%). We found a pooled estimate of 45.6% (95%CI, 38.6-52.8%) for functional independence, a mortality within 90 days of 19% (95%CI, 14.1-25.0%) and a rate of 5.8% (95%CI, 4.2-8.0%) of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusion The DA approach for LVOS with the SOFIA catheters is highly effective with an efficacy and safety profile comparable to those found in contemporary thrombectomy trials and observational studies that use other devices or approaches.

Feasibility and safety of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval using Solitaire FR as a treatment for emergent large-vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jong-Hoon Kim ◽  
Young-Jin Jung ◽  
Chul-Hoon Chang
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerosis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retrieval ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Solitaire Fr

OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO) remains unclear. Reocclusion during endovascular treatment (EVT) occurs frequently (57.1%–77.3%) after initial recanalization with stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in ICAS-related ELVO. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval (FRESH) using the Solitaire FR versus SR thrombectomy in patients with ICAS-related ELVO.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial ELVO of the anterior circulation who underwent EVT between January 2017 and December 2019 at Yeungnam University Medical Center. Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation was classified by etiology as follows: 1) no significant stenosis after recanalization (embolic group) and 2) remnant stenosis > 70% or lesser degree of stenosis with a tendency toward reocclusion and/or flow impairment during EVT (ICAS group). The ICAS group was divided into the SR thrombectomy group (SR thrombectomy) and the FRESH group.RESULTSA total of 105 patients (62 men and 43 women; median age 71 years, IQR 62.5–79 years) were included. The embolic, SR thrombectomy, and FRESH groups comprised 66 (62.9%), 26 (24.7%), and 13 (12.4%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the SR thrombectomy and FRESH groups in symptom onset–to-door time, but puncture-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter in the latter group (39 vs 54 minutes, p = 0.032). There were fewer stent retrieval passes but more first-pass recanalizations in the FRESH group (p < 0.001). Favorable functional outcomes were significantly more frequent in the FRESH group (84.6% vs 42.3%, p = 0.017).CONCLUSIONSThis study’s findings suggest that FRESH, rather than rescue stenting, could be a treatment option for ICAS-related ELVO.

scholarly journals Workflow Intervals of Endovascular Acute Stroke Therapy During On- Versus Off-Hours

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2842-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter H. Hinsenveld ◽  
Inger R. de Ridder ◽  
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽  
Jan A. Vos ◽  
Adrien E. Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with acute ischemic stroke because of large vessel occlusion involves complicated logistics, which may cause a delay in treatment initiation during off-hours. This might lead to a worse functional outcome. We compared workflow intervals between endovascular treatment–treated patients presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods— We retrospectively analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study in the Netherlands and included patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who presented between March 2014 and June 2016. Off-hours were defined as presentation on Monday to Friday between 17:00 and 08:00 hours, weekends (Friday 17:00 to Monday 8:00) and national holidays. Primary end point was first door to groin time. Secondary end points were functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) and workflow time intervals. We stratified for transfer status, adjusted for prognostic factors, and used linear and ordinal regression models. Results— We included 1488 patients of which 936 (62.9%) presented during off-hours. Median first door to groin time was 140 minutes (95% CI, 110–182) during off-hours and 121 minutes (95% CI, 85–157) during on-hours. Adjusted first door to groin time was 14.6 minutes (95% CI, 9.3–20.0) longer during off-hours. Door to needle times for intravenous therapy were slightly longer (3.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.7–6.3) during off-hours. Groin puncture to reperfusion times did not differ between groups. For transferred patients, the delay within the intervention center was 5.0 minutes (95% CI, 0.5–9.6) longer. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients presenting during off- and on-hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14). Reperfusion rates and complication rates were similar. Conclusions— Presentation during off-hours is associated with a slight delay in start of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This treatment delay did not translate into worse functional outcome or increased complication rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document