Abstract TP81: A Closer Look at MRI-Based Core in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Within 6 Hours From Onset

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Luby ◽  
Yojan Shah ◽  
Evan McCreedy ◽  
Kyle Kern ◽  
Lawrence L Latour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Onset Time ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Mri Imaging ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Neurological Improvement ◽  
Stroke Study ◽  
Treatment Onset ◽  
Core Volume

Introduction: Recent clinical trials including EXTEND-IA and SWIFT PRIME utilized CT and MRI imaging to exclude large core patients from endovascular therapy (EVT) presenting within 6 hours from onset. We hypothesize that patients with clinical-core mismatch, retrospectively defined as admit NIHSS ≥ 6 and core volume ≤20 mL, were more likely to have early neurological improvement versus those who did not. Methods: Patients included had confirmed large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, presented within 6 hours from last known normal, were screened pre-EVT with multimodal MRI, treated with EVT between January 2015 through July 2019, and consented to Natural History of Stroke Study. Core volumes were calculated using a fully automated algorithm, “coretool”, based on processed DWI and ADC maps thresholded at ≤620 μm 2 /sec. Perfusion deficit volumes were calculated by thresholding Tmax maps at >6 sec delay. Early neurological improvement (ENI) was defined as a decrease in NIHSS≥8 points or NIHSS of 0-1 at 24 hours. Results: Fifty-four patients met study criteria with median age 54 years, 59% female, admit NIHSS=19 [13-23], onset=117 min [59-155], onset to groin=212 min [171-265], core volume=9mL [4-31], Tmax volume=82mL [50-107], mismatch volume=51mL [30-86], mismatch ratio=7.5 [2.6-11.9], and 90 day mRS=3 [1-5]. Of the 54 patients, 61% (n=33) had clinical-core mismatch while 39% (n=21) did not. Patients with mismatch had smaller core volumes, median 6 versus 39mL (p<0.001) and larger mismatch ratios, median 8.9 versus 2.6, (p=0.003), but no differences in age, sex, IV tPA treatment, onset time, onset to groin time, admit NIHSS, complete recanalization rate, Tmax volume, mismatch volume, or day 90 mRS. Fifty-five percent (18/33) of patients with clinical-core mismatch had ENI at 24 hours versus 24% (5/21) without (p=0.026). Conclusions: Patients with clinical-core mismatch had a significantly higher rate of early neurological improvement at 24 hours post EVT. However, some patients without mismatch but with complete recanalization still did well. Alternative definitions of mismatch, outside of current guidelines, may identify patients that will benefit more from EVT.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Temporal Distribution of Fast and Slow Progressors of Infarct Growth in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2238-2240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Rocha ◽  
Shashvat M. Desai ◽  
Ashutosh P. Jadhav ◽  
Tudor G. Jovin
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Slow Progressors ◽  
Ischemic Core ◽  
Core Volume

Background and Purpose— Fast and slow progressors of infarct growth due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion are commonly observed in clinical practice. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and temporal distribution of fast and slow progressors among anterior circulation large vessel occlusion patients diagnosed within 24 hours of stroke onset. Methods— Single-center retrospective study of all patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent baseline computed tomographic perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging within 24 hours of stroke onset. Prevalence was determined for fast progressors (ischemic core >70 mL, <6 hours of stroke onset) and slow progressors (ischemic core ≤30 mL, >6–24 hours of stroke onset). Results— One hundred eighty-five patients were included. The median time interval from stroke onset to baseline core imaging was 7.6 hours (interquartile range, 3.9–13.2), and median core volume was 17 mL (range, 0–405). Patients had core volume ≤70 mL in 72% of cases in the overall cohort. The prevalence of fast progressors was 25% (95% CI, 17%–37%) and reached 40% (95% CI, 24%–59%) between 3 and 4.5 hours after stroke onset. The prevalence of slow progressors was 55% (95% CI, 46%–64%) and was similar across time intervals beyond 6 hours after stroke onset. Conclusions— Most anterior circulation large vessel occlusion patients had small-to-moderate ischemic core volume, irrespective of early or delayed presentation within 24 hours of stroke onset. Fast progressors were highly prevalent between 3 and 4.5 hours after stroke onset.

scholarly journals Factors associated with prominent vessel sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging in acute ischemic stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-fei Jiang ◽  
Yi-qun Zhang ◽  
Jiang-xia Pang ◽  
Pei-ning Shao ◽  
Han-cheng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Susceptibility Weighted Imaging ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Univariate Analyses

AbstractThe prominent vessel sign (PVS) on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is not displayed in all cases of acute ischemia. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the presence of PVS in stroke patients. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted within 24 h from symptom onset underwent emergency multimodal MRI at admission. Associated factors for the presence of PVS were analyzed using univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A total of 218 patients were enrolled. The occurrence rate of PVS was 55.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences between PVS-positive group and PVS-negative group in age, history of coronary heart disease, baseline NIHSS scores, total cholesterol, hemoglobin, anterior circulation infarct, large vessel occlusion, and cardioembolism. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the independent factors associated with PVS were anterior circulation infarct (odds ratio [OR] 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–53.3), large vessel occlusion (OR 123.3; 95% CI 33.7–451.5), and cardioembolism (OR 5.6; 95% CI 2.1–15.3). Anterior circulation infarct, large vessel occlusion, and cardioembolism are independently associated with the presence of PVS on SWI.

Feasibility and safety of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval using Solitaire FR as a treatment for emergent large-vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jong-Hoon Kim ◽  
Young-Jin Jung ◽  
Chul-Hoon Chang
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerosis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retrieval ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Solitaire Fr

OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO) remains unclear. Reocclusion during endovascular treatment (EVT) occurs frequently (57.1%–77.3%) after initial recanalization with stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in ICAS-related ELVO. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of the strategy of first stenting without retrieval (FRESH) using the Solitaire FR versus SR thrombectomy in patients with ICAS-related ELVO.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial ELVO of the anterior circulation who underwent EVT between January 2017 and December 2019 at Yeungnam University Medical Center. Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation was classified by etiology as follows: 1) no significant stenosis after recanalization (embolic group) and 2) remnant stenosis > 70% or lesser degree of stenosis with a tendency toward reocclusion and/or flow impairment during EVT (ICAS group). The ICAS group was divided into the SR thrombectomy group (SR thrombectomy) and the FRESH group.RESULTSA total of 105 patients (62 men and 43 women; median age 71 years, IQR 62.5–79 years) were included. The embolic, SR thrombectomy, and FRESH groups comprised 66 (62.9%), 26 (24.7%), and 13 (12.4%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the SR thrombectomy and FRESH groups in symptom onset–to-door time, but puncture-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter in the latter group (39 vs 54 minutes, p = 0.032). There were fewer stent retrieval passes but more first-pass recanalizations in the FRESH group (p < 0.001). Favorable functional outcomes were significantly more frequent in the FRESH group (84.6% vs 42.3%, p = 0.017).CONCLUSIONSThis study’s findings suggest that FRESH, rather than rescue stenting, could be a treatment option for ICAS-related ELVO.

Abstract 31: Penumbra Consumption Rates Based on T Max Delay and Reperfusion Status: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Defuse-3 Trial

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
Eytan Raz ◽  
Seena Dehkharghani ◽  
Howard Riina ◽  
Ryan McTaggart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Consumption Rates ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
New Generation

Introduction: In patients with acute large vessel occlusion, the definition of penumbral tissue based on T max delay perfusion imaging is not well established in relation to late-window endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In this study, we sought to evaluate penumbra consumption rates for T max delays in patients treated between 6 and 16 hours from last known normal. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the DEFUSE-3 trial, which included patients with an acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation occlusion within 6-16 hours of last known normal. The primary outcome is percentage penumbra consumption defined as (24 hour infarct volume-core infarct volume)/(Tmax volume-baseline core volume). We stratified the cohort into 4 categories (untreated, TICI 0-2a, TICI 2b, and TICI3) and calculated penumbral consumption rates. Results: We included 143 patients, of which 66 were untreated, 16 had TICI 0-2a, 46 had TICI 2b, and 15 had TICI 3. In untreated patients, a median (IQR) of 48% (21% - 85%) of penumbral tissue was consumed based on Tmax6 as opposed to 160.6% (51% - 455.2%) of penumbral tissue based on Tmax10. On the contrary, in patients achieving TICI 3 reperfusion, a median (IQR) of 5.3% (1.1% - 14.6%) of penumbral tissue was consumed based on Tmax6 and 25.7% (3.2% - 72.1%) of penumbral tissue based on Tmax10. Conclusion: Contrary to prior studies, we show that at least 75% of penumbral tissue with Tmax > 10 sec delay can be salvaged with successful reperfusion and new generation devices. In untreated patients, since infarct expansion can occur beyond 24 hours, future studies with delayed brain imaging are needed to determine the optimal T max delay threshold that defines penumbral tissue in patients with proximal anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.

Abstract 202: Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Distal Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Navdeep Sangha ◽  
Muhammad Shazam Hussain ◽  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Nirav Vora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction: Five RCTs demonstrated the superiority of endovascular therapy (EVT) over best medical management (MM) for acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. Patients with M2 occlusions, however, were underrepresented (95 randomized; 51 EVT treated). Evidence from RCTs of the benefit of EVT for M2 occlusions is lacking, as reflected in the recent AHA guidelines. Methods: A retrospective cohort was pooled from 10 academic centers from 1/12 to 4/15 of AIS patients with LVO isolated to M2 presenting within 8 hours from last known normal (LKN). Patients were divided into EVT and MM groups. Primary outcome was 90 day mRS (good outcome 0-2); secondary outcome was sICH. Logistic regression compared the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors of good outcome in the EVT group. Results: Figure 1 shows participating centers, 522 patients (288 EVT and 234 MM) were identified. Table (1) shows baseline characteristics. MM treated patients were older and had higher IV tPA treatment rates, otherwise the 2 groups were balanced. 62.7 % EVT patients had mRS 0-2 at 90 days compared to 35.4 % MM (figure 2). EVT patients had 3 times the odds of good outcome as compared to MM patients (OR: 3.1, 95% CI:2.1-4.4, P <0.001) even after adjustment for age, NIHSS, ASPECTS, IV tPA and LKN to door time (OR: 3.2, 95%CI: 2-5.2, P<0.001). sICH rate was 5.6 %, which was not statistically different than the MM group (table 1, P=0.1). Age, NIHSS, good ASPECTS, LKN to reperfusion time and successful reperfusion mTICI ≥ 2b were independent predictors of good outcome in EVT patients. There was a linear relationship between good outcome and time LKN to reperfusion (Figure 3). Conclusion: Despite inherent limitations of its retrospective design, our study suggests that EVT may be effective and safe for distal LVO (M2) relative to best MM. A trial randomizing M2 occlusions to EVT vs. MM is warranted to confirm these findings.

Efficient Multimodal MRI Evaluation for Endovascular Thrombectomy of Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 105271
Author(s):  
Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul ◽  
David S. Liebeskind ◽  
Reza Jahan ◽  
Sidney Starkman ◽  
Latisha Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Multimodal Mri ◽  
Mri Evaluation

Abstract 1122‐000022: Delays in Care for Patients with Acute Stroke During Hospitalization for Other Reasons

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Vigilante ◽  
Parth Patel ◽  
Prasanth Romiyo ◽  
Lauren Thau ◽  
Mark Heslin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Symptom Recognition ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Recognition Imaging

Introduction : In‐hospital stroke (IHS) is defined as stroke that occurs during hospitalization for non‐stroke conditions. We aimed to understand the timing of symptom recognition for patients who experienced IHS and its impact on the care they receive. Methods : A prospective, single center registry of adult patients (9/20/19‐2/28/21) was queried for acute anterior circulation IHS. Indications for hospitalization, delays from last known well (LKW) to symptom recognition, imaging, and treatment were explored. Results : Of 928 consecutively evaluated adults with acute stroke, 85 (9%) developed an anterior circulation IHS, 39 (46%) of whom were female, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 60–76) and median NIHSS of 15 (IQR 4–22). Sixty‐eight (80%) had a >1 hour delay from last known well to symptom recognition. Two patients (2%) received IV thrombolysis, although another 38 (45%) would have been eligible if not for a delay in symptom recognition. An ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion was observed in 18 patients (21%), 7 of whom were treated at a median of 174 minutes after LKW (IQR 65–219). Compared to the 11 patients who did not undergo thrombectomy with large vessel occlusion, those who underwent thrombectomy had non‐significantly shorter delays from LKW until neuroimaging (median 85 [IQR 65‐162] vs. 216 [IQR 133‐507], p = 0.12). Conclusions : While uncommon, patients with IHS experience delays in symptom recognition and treatment, which lead to exclusion from acute care treatment such as thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Earlier detection with more frequent nursing assessments or advanced neuromonitoring devices in at‐risk patients may reduce delays in care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document