Allometric Dose Retranslation Unveiled Substantial Immunological Side Effects of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor After Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 623-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel-Christoph Wagner ◽  
Claudia Pösel ◽  
Isabell Schulz ◽  
Gerda Schicht ◽  
Johannes Boltze ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4111-4111
Author(s):  
Guangsheng He ◽  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Wu Depei ◽  
Aining Sun ◽  
Zhengming Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4111 Objective Biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL) involves both myeloid and lymphoid cells, and there is lack of uniformity in treatment at present. Optimal approach for therapy of BAL is unknown, and BAL usually becomes refractory to conventional chemotherapy. It was found that CAG regimen [low-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) plus aclarubicin with concurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)] is effective for both myeloid leukemia and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To explore the efficiency of CAG regimen for refractory BAL, 12 BAL patients who were failed to daunorubicin/mitoxantrone, cytosine arabinoside, vincristine, prednisone (D/MAOP) regimen, were treated by CAG. 8 were males and 4 was female, with ages ranging from 20 to 43 years (median=34 years). Immunophenotype of B lymphoid lineage/myeloid lineage showed in 8 patients, and T lymphoid lineage/myeloid lineage showed in 4 patients. The patients whose blast cells did not decrease 50% after induction regimen with lymphoid and/or myeloid drugs were defined as refractory cases. Methods 12 refractory BAL patients were treated by CAG regimen (cytosine arabinoside 10 mg/m2 subcutaneously every 12 hours, day 1-14; aclarubicin 5-7 mg/m2 intravenously daily, day 1-8; and concurrent use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 200μg·m-2·d-1 subcutaneously) from November 2002 to April 2009. The efficacy of the regimen was evaluated by response rate, and the side-effects was also measured. Results The major chemotherapy toxicity was bone marrow depression, mainly showing as pancytopenia. Median duration of absolute neutrophil count (ANC)<0.50×109/L and of platelet (PLT) count<20×109/L was 13 (range, 1-17) days and 1 day (range, 0-5 days), respectively. Median transfusion of red cells and PLT was 4 (range, 1.5-12) U and 20 (range, 0-40) U, respectively. Besides bone marrow depression, other side-effects such as infection, bleeding, nausea and vomiting also occurred during therapy. According to chemotherapy toxicity assessment of WHO, there were 7 patients confronting infection, among whom only 2 patient occurred III-‡W infection. No serious nausea vomiting or hepatic function damage happened. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Herrscher ◽  
Julie Leblanc ◽  
Thierry Petit

Background: The main side effects of tamoxifen are menopausal symptoms. We report a case of agranulocytosis induced by tamoxifen in a 33-year-old woman treated in the adjuvant setting. Case Presentation: Ten days after the beginning of tamoxifen treatment, the patient complained of asthenia and mucositis. Blood testing showed a grade 4 neutropenia (0.06 G/L) without any other major hematologic disorder. Tamoxifen was discontinued, and the patient received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Within 2 days, she recovered to a normal granulocyte count. Tamoxifen was then switched to the combination of ovarian suppression (triptorelin) and aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole). Conclusion: Agranulocytosis is a very rare adverse event of tamoxifen.


Author(s):  
Yumiko Goto ◽  
Kent Kanao ◽  
Kazuhiro Matsumoto ◽  
Ikuo Kobayashi ◽  
Keishi Kajikawa ◽  
...  

AbstractAn 80 year old Japanese man with bilateral ureteral cancer underwent laparoscopic bilateral nephroureterectomy and lymph-node dissection. The pathological stage of the left and right ureteral tumors was pT3pN0M0. He received two courses of adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy while undergoing hemodialysis. The standard dose of gemcitabine and 50% of the standard dose of cisplatin were administered on the same day. Hemodialysis was started 6 h after gemcitabine administration and 1 h after cisplatin administration. The side effects were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. In the first course, Grade 4 side effects including leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed. He was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and platelet transfusion. Because the second course was administered without reducing the doses, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered prophylactically, and Grade 4 side effects were reduced to Grade 3. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy can be administered safely in a patient with advanced ureteral cancer undergoing hemodialysis by adequately managing adverse events.


1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 508-513
Author(s):  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
Ronald E. Domen ◽  
Martin L. Smith

Abstract Objective.—To explore some of the ethical issues surrounding the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to healthy individuals for the purpose of retrieval of granulocytes. Design.—Review of the historical precedent of drug administration to normal blood donors and review of the literature concerning the side effects of G-CSF administration to healthy individuals, particularly as related to granulocyte collection. We identify and discuss some of the ethical questions regarding this issue. Results.—Although the short-term side effects of G-CSF use in normal donors are generally felt to be benign, little is known about the long-term side effects. Ethical questions regarding the administration of this drug to normal donors for the purpose of collecting large numbers of granulocytes include the following: Does the potential benefit to a patient/recipient justify the unknown risks to the medicated granulocyte donor? Who should act as an advocate for donors so that their best interests are protected? What is the role and quality of informed consent for donors undergoing G-CSF administration? Is monetary compensation appropriate for donors administered G-CSF as part of a research protocol? Conclusions.—We recommend the establishment of a donor registry to collect the needed data on the side effects of G-CSF on normal donors. Until adequate data are collected, the use of G-CSF and similar agents in normal donors should be regarded as experimental and subject to review by institutional review boards.


Author(s):  
O. O. Shevchuk ◽  
I. M. Todor ◽  
N. Yu. Lukianova ◽  
N. K. Rodionova ◽  
V. G. Nikolaev ◽  
...  

Background. Side effects of antineoplastic agents (especially leukopenia and neutropenia) could be the main limiting factors for efficient treatment. Objective. The research is aimed at the study of myeloprotective capability of biosimilars of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granular carbon oral adsorbent C2 in melphalan-induced bone marrow suppression in Guerin carcinoma-grafted rats. Methods. Melphalan at the dose of 5.5 mg/kg was used to promote bone marrow suppression in the Guerin carcinoma grafted rats. To fight myelosuppression, we used filgrastim and its analogue, designed and produced by IEPOR, a recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-GCSF). Carbon granulated enterosorbent C2 was used for enteral sorption therapy (bulk density γ=0.18 g/cm3, diameter of granules 0.15-0.25 mm, BET pore surface – 2162 m2/g). All rats were sacrificed on the 17th day after carcinoma cells inoculation or on the 8th day after Melphalan injection. Results. Alkylating cytostatic agent caused severe leukopenia (by 95.7%), neutropenia (by 73.9%), and thrombocytopenia (by 84.9%) in the experimental rats. Mortality rate was 57%. Filgrastim and enterosorption with carbon oral adsorbent C2 increased the studied indices, but the most prominent results were observed when combination of both factors was used. Studied means did not affect the anti-tumor efficacy of Melphalan alone and in combination. Conclusions. Our results are perspective for further investigation of the efficacy of the combination of carbon oral adsorbents and hematopoietic cytokines in cases of ameliorate anti-cancer chemotherapy side effects, and its implementation into clinics.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S613-S613
Author(s):  
A. Gomez Peinado ◽  
P. Cano Ruiz ◽  
S. Cañas Fraile ◽  
M. Gonzalez Cano ◽  
G.E. Barba Fajardo

IntroductionClozapine is a neuroleptic commonly used in treatments resistant to schizophrenia. However, despite the benefits, clozapine might cause some serious side effects. Hence, it is of the utmost necessity to keep an exacting control of the patients.ObjectivesTo study some of the therapeutical approaches to the treatment of clozapine induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis.MethodsReview of some articles in Mental Health Journals.ResultsThe treatment with clozapine, substratum of aminergic and muscarinic receptors, entails a 0.9% risk of causing agranulocytosis, and approximately a 2.7% risk of causing neutropenia. Both occur, over 80% of them, during the first 18 weeks of treatment. Thus, before starting it, it is necessary to draw some blood and analyze the complete blood count (CBC). Also, we must analyze CBCs weekly during the first 18 weeks. Other dyscrasias like leukopenia, leukocytosis, anaemia, eoshinophilia, thrombocythaemia or thrombocytopenia can also be observed. When agranulocytosis appears, it can be treated by discontinuing the clozapine treatment, but also using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or lithium, both separated or combined with clozapine. Lithium produces reversible leukocytosis onceplasma levels of > 0.4 mmol/L are reached. Despite the simultaneous treatment with lithium, clozapine can trigger some neurological side effects, it seems that seizure risk remains invariable.ConclusionsSome of the clozapine's side effects, like neutropenia or agranulocytosis, are potentially lethal. Their treatment consists of discontinuing clozapine or initiating granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or lithium. These are good options that can give rise to a later continued treatment with clozapine.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3984-3984
Author(s):  
Hua Wang ◽  
Yue Lu

Abstract Introduction: Although the considerable advances have been made in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in recent decades, only one third of patients (except for acute promyelocytic leukemia) can be cured , and most suffer relapse or primary refractory (R/R). However, there is no standard regimen for R/R AML patients after conventional chemotherapy.A regimen consisting of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming the combination of low-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) and aclarubicin, termed the CAG regimen,was first reported by a Japanese group in 1995. It has been proved that cladribine is a attractive drug in AML because of their significant synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents and favorable toxicity profile. Efforts were made to improve the efficacy of the CAG regimen among institutions, including combining it with other chemotherapy drugs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of C-CAG regimen (cladribine in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin) in patients with R/R AML(This study was registered at www.chictr.org, the Clinical Trial Registration Number was ChiCTR-OPC-16010166). Methods: Enrolment began in August 2016 for a Phase II single-center clinical trial . The patients in this arm will receive C-CAG regimen for salvage treatment,detailed as following:Cladribine 5mg/㎡,d1-5; G-CSF 300ug,d0-9; aclarubicin 10mg,d3-6;cytarabine 10mg/㎡ q12h, SC, d3-9;4 weeks a cycle.The patients are permitted to quit the study if complete remission(CR) is not achieved after 2 course of chemotherapy. If conditions were right,the patients achieving CR were recommended to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT). Otherwise, the patients were given for a total of six cycles unless there was disease progression or unacceptable side effects, or withdrawal of patient consent. Results: Until June 1, 2018, we have completed the enrolment of 15 patients with R/R AML. The main clinical characteristics of the 15 patients are presented in Table 1. The median age was 38 years and ranged from 21 to 72 years. The majority of patients presented with FAB subtype of M2 or M5. All patients(n=15) have begun treatment and are evaluable for response. Of the 15 patients, complete remission rates is 73.3% to C-CAG regimen. No patients received allogeneic transplantation due to scarcity of bone marrow donors or inability of the patients to afford the expensive medical treatment.At a median follow-up of 6 months (2-24), the median DFS and OS for all 15 patients were 8 and 12 months, respectively.The most common adverse effect was myelosuppression. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was 80.0%.The respective median duration of neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5×109/L) was 12 days. The median time of platelet recovery over 50 × 109/L was 23 days.All patients presented an incidence of 13.3% for Grade 3 or 4 infectious toxicity. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Non-hematological side effects were mild. Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal side effects were rarely observed, owing to the prophylactic antiemetic drug administration. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that the C-CAG regimen chemotherapy is significantly effective against R/R AML with a high remission rate and a low hematological toxicity, thus serves as an alternative treatment for R/R AML. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
G V Zuccotti ◽  
A Plebani ◽  
G Biasucci ◽  
M Clerici-Schoeller ◽  
G Banderali ◽  
...  

To determine whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and erythropoietin are effective in the therapy of neutropenia and anaemia related to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to anti-retroviral agents, we recruited 11 HIV-infected children (mean age 4 years 10 months). All the children were given granulocyte-colony stimulating factor at a dosage of 5 μ-g/kg twice or three times a week while erythropoietin was administered additionally to three patients at a dosage of 50 U/kg twice a week. Both agents were administered subcutaneously for at least 4 months. Leukocyte and neutrophil counts significantly increased during the treatment (after 1 month, P = 0.003 and P = 0.009, respectively). Erythropoietin prevented blood transfusions and increased haemoglobin levels in the three children treated. No side-effects were recorded during the administration of either agent. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and erythropoietin appear to be safe and useful agents in the management of HIV-infected children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document