scholarly journals Mechanical Thrombectomy in Medium Vessel Occlusions

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 3224-3231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pérez-García ◽  
Manuel Moreu ◽  
Santiago Rosati ◽  
Patricia Simal ◽  
Jose Antonio Egido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy techniques for intracranial medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) have evolved in recent years, although the optimal approach is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in MeVOs using mini (0.017 inches microcatheter compatible) stent retrievers combined with low-profile (0.035 inches distal inner diameter) distal aspiration catheters through the blind exchange/mini-pinning (BEMP) technique compared with mini stent retrievers alone. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with the BEMP technique or mini stent retriever alone for intracranial MeVOs from 2017 to 2020 in a comprehensive stroke center. Both groups were compared about baseline characteristics, occlusion site, clinical presentation, clot cause, procedural outcomes (MeVO first-pass and final expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, the mini stent retriever used, number of passes with the front-line approach, and need of rescue therapy), safety outcomes (emboli to unwanted territories and hemorrhagic complications), and clinical outcomes at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with potential predictors of vessel recanalization to find independent variables associated with MeVO first-pass expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2c/3 recanalization. Results: We reviewed 102 patients/106 MeVOs treated with the BEMP technique (n=56) or mini stent retriever (n=50). There was a higher rate of MeVO first-pass expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2c/3 recanalization (57% versus 34%, P =0.017), lower need of rescue therapy (7.1% versus 22%, P =0.028), and lower rate of emboli to new territory (1.8% versus 12%, P =0.035) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (1.9% versus 12.8%, P =0.038) with the BEMP technique. After multivariable analysis, the sole independent factor associated to MeVO first-pass expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2c/3 recanalization was the BEMP technique (odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.19–6.22]; P =0.018). Conclusions: In the setting of MeVOs, the BEMP technique may lead to higher rates of the first-pass recanalization and a lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than mini stent retrievers alone.

scholarly journals Impact of aspiration catheter size on first-pass effect in the combined use of contact aspiration and stent retriever technique

2021 ◽  
pp. svn-2020-000833
Author(s):  
Carlos Pérez-García ◽  
Christian Maegerlein ◽  
Santiago Rosati ◽  
Charlotte Rüther ◽  
Carlos Gómez-Escalonilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Catheter Size

Background and purposeThe first-pass effect (FPE), defined as a first-pass Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia (eTICI) 2c/3 reperfusion, has emerged as a key metric of efficacy in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischaemic stroke. The proximal balloon occlusion together with direct thrombus aspiration during stent retriever thrombectomy (PROTECT)-PLUS technique consists in the use of a balloon guide catheter and a combined MT approach involving contact aspiration and a stent retriever. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of the PROTECT-PLUS technique using distal aspiration catheters (DACs) with different inner diameters by comparing the large-bore DAC Catalyst 7 versus the use of medium-bore DACs.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with PROTECT-PLUS using Catalyst 7, Catalyst 6 or Catalyst 5 with an occlusion of either the terminal carotid artery or the M1 or M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery from 2018 to 2020 in two comprehensive stroke centres. Baseline characteristics and procedural, safety and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in order to find independent predictors of FPE.ResultsWe identified 238 consecutive patients treated with PROTECT-PLUS as front-line approach using Catalyst 7 (n=86), Catalyst 6 (n=78) and Catalyst 5 (n=76). The rate of FPE was higher with Catalyst 7 (54%) than Catalyst 6 (33%, p=0.009) and Catalyst 5 (32%, p=0.005), in addition to higher final eTICI 2c/3 reperfusion rates, shorter procedural times, lower need of rescue therapy and fewer procedure-related complications. After multivariable analysis the sole independent factor associated to FPE was the use of Catalyst 7 (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.58; p=0.014).ConclusionFurther development of combined MT by incorporating larger-bore aspiration catheters is associated with higher reperfusion rates, shorter procedure times, and lower need of rescue therapy while reducing the complication rates.

Comparison of aspiration-first versus stentriever-first techniques in performing mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016547
Author(s):  
Vance L Fredrickson ◽  
Phillip A Bonney ◽  
Shivani D Rangwala ◽  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Operator Series ◽  
First Pass

BackgroundBoth stentriever and direct-aspiration thrombectomy effectively treat large-vessel occlusions. However, data are limited comparing clinical outcomes after aspiration-first versus stentriever-assisted aspiration for thrombectomy.MethodsA retrospective cohort study compared procedure times and radiographic outcomes after two mechanical thrombectomy techniques (aspiration first or stentriever). To minimize bias and variability inherent to multi-operator series, we assessed consecutive patients with cerebrovascular occlusions treated by a single surgeon during a 1 year period at two stroke centers. Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) grades were assessed by an investigator blinded to treatment.ResultsData from 93 patients (median age 70 years) were analyzed: 73 patients (78.5%) were treated with a strentriever-first strategy and 20 (21.5%) were treated with aspiration first, with stentriever rescue therapy required in only three of these cases following unsuccessful aspiration. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, sites of occlusion, or rates of tandem occlusions between aspiration-first and stentriever-assisted groups (p≥0.36). The rate of first-pass eTICI ≥2b was 75.0% (15/20) for aspiration-first and 52.1% (38/73) for strentriever-first groups (p=0.07), while the rate of final eTICI ≥2b was 100% (20/20) and 82.2% (60/72), respectively (p=0.04). The aspiration-first technique was associated with procedural times ≤25 min in a multivariable analysis (adjusted OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.15 to 18.39; p=0.03).ConclusionsIn this single-surgeon series, an aspiration-first technique was associated with a statistically significant improvement in eTICI outcomes and faster procedure times compared with stentriever-assisted aspiration. Further prospective studies are necessary to minimize selection bias inherent in this study design.

scholarly journals Intracranial Stenting as Rescue Therapy After Failure of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion: Data From the ANGEL-ACT Registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Luo ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Xuelei Zhang ◽  
Baixue Jia ◽  
Xiaochuan Huo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: Studies on rescue therapy for acute posterior circulation stroke due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) are limited in the modern era of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rescue stenting (RS) following MT failure in patients with BAO.Methods: Data were collected from the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) prospective registry in China. Patients who underwent MT for BAO with failure of recanalization were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the RS and non-RS groups. Clinical and laboratory findings, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results: Overall, 93 patients with acute BAO were analyzed. The RS group included 81 (87.1%) patients, and the non-RS group included 12 patients. A modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b/3 was achieved in 75 (92.6%) patients in the RS group. Compared with the non-RS group, the RS group had a significantly higher rate of successful recanalization and favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days post-procedure, 0–3: 16.7 vs. 51.9%, respectively; P = 0.023) without an increase in the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and a significantly lower mortality rate (58.3 vs. 18.5%, respectively; P = 0.006). Furthermore, the use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor improved the rate of recanalization of the target artery without increasing the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.Conclusions: Permanent stenting appears to be a feasible rescue modality when MT fails and might provide functional benefits in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to BAO.

scholarly journals In vitro testing of a funnel-tip catheter model to decrease clot migration and to evaluate clot effects in mechanical thrombectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Payne ◽  
Samantha Krost-Reuhl ◽  
Axel Heimann ◽  
Oliver Kempski ◽  
Naureen Keric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
In Vivo Experiments ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Static Conditions

Abstract Clot-retrieval failure and embolism in new territories (ENT) are complications reducing the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Reasons for these problems are clot abruption during stent retriever retraction into the cylindrical tip of a standard distal access catheter (DAC), and antegrade blood flow during retrieval. To overcome these complications, a funnel-shaped tip catheter model was developed and tested. Using an experimental in vitro setup, this study compared the efficacy of a funnel-shaped tip with a standard cylindrical tip in combination with different clot compositions. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed 80 times for each tip, using two stent retrievers (Trevo XP ProVue 3/20 mm and 4/20 mm) and four different clot types (mechanical vs. static preparation, 0-24h vs. 72h clot aging times). Significantly higher first-pass recanalization rates were observed for the funnel-shaped tip, which reached 70.0% vs. 30.0% for the standard tip (absolute difference, 32; relative difference 20.0%, P < 0.05), regardless of the clot type and stent retriever. Recanalization could be increased using fibrin-rich mechanical clots vs. clots prepared under static conditions, as well as 0-24h vs. 72h aged clots, respectively. The extended in vitro-experiments verified the usability of the recently patented funnel-shaped DAC, hereby implementing next-level in vivo-experiments.

scholarly journals First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Célina Ducroux ◽  
Michel Piotin ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Raphael Blanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Stent Retrievers

BackgroundThe ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality.ObjectiveWe report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial.Materials and methodsASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy techniques, assessed by an external core laboratory using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Rates of FPE (defined by mTICI 2c/3 after a single pass with no rescue therapy) were compared between patients treated with SR and CA techniques. Outcomes were compared between FPE-SR and FPE-CA patients, and between FPE and non-FPE patients.ResultsFPE was achieved in 97/336 patients (28.9%), with no significant difference between SR and CA (respectively 53/169 patients (31.3%) vs 44/167 patients (26.3%), adjusted RR for CA versus SR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; p=0.44). After prespecified adjustment for allocated arm and randomization stratification factors, FPE in patients was associated with a significantly improved clinical outcome and a decreased mortality, and a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications than in non-FPE patients.ConclusionIn the ASTER trial, similar rates of FPE were achieved with SR and CA, and FPE was associated with a significantly improved outcome. New techniques and devices to improve the rate of FPE are warranted.Trial registration numberUnique identifier: NCT02523261.

Abstract P504: Outcomes and Predictors of Successful First Pass in MCA Occlusions Using ADAPT Thrombectomy Technique - Insights From STAR

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Ali Alawieh ◽  
Mais Al-Kawaz ◽  
Robert Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
First Pass ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction: Successful first pass (SFP) has been identified as a key benchmark of the success of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, studies that evaluate the predictors and outcomes of SFP using ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration first Pass Technique) are limied by the small number of patients or single center design. Methods: We used data from the prospectively collected data from 28 stroke centers that are included in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions at the level of M1 or M2 segments were included. SFP was defined by achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score≥2b with a single aspiration attempt. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of SFP and evaluate the relationship between SFP and favorable 90-day outcome (90-day modified Rankin scale ≤2). Results: Out of 6123 patients included in STAR, 1002 (16.4%) underwent MT of M1 or M2 occlusion using ADAPT technique. SFP was achieved in 390 (38.9%) patients. SFP patients were older (72 vs. 69, P=0.007), had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on presentation (9 vs. 8, P=0.018) (Table 1). On multivariable analysis, neither age (aOR 1.006, 95% CI 0.996-1.016, P=0.252) nor ASPECTS (aOR 1.055, 95% CI 0.976-1.141, P=0.179) were independent predictor of SFP. Importantly, SFP was independently associated with favorable 90-day outcome (aOR 2.769, 95% CI 1.988-3.858, P<0.001) after controlling for age, sex, ASPECTS, history of atrial fibrillation, NIHSS on presentation, onset to groin time and IV-tPA. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with M1 or M2 occlsuion undergoing MT using ADAPT technique, patients who had SFP were older and had better ASPECTS. However, both age and ASPECTS were not independently associated with SFP. Also, patients who had SFP were almost 3 times more likely to achieve favorable 90-day outcome.

scholarly journals First-Pass Reperfusion by Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute M1 Occlusion: The Size of Retriever Matters

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Serna Candel ◽  
Marta Aguilar Pérez ◽  
Hansjörg Bäzner ◽  
Hans Henkes ◽  
Victoria Hellstern
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Optimal Size ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Tandem Stenosis ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Adjusted Incidence Rate ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Adjusted Incidence

Introduction: Single-pass complete reperfusion using stent retrievers has been shown to improve functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion strokes. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal size of stent retrievers to achieve one-pass complete reperfusion by mechanical thrombectomy.Methods: The study evaluated the results of aspiration-assisted mechanical thrombectomy of acute isolated occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in the M1 segment with a novel 5 × 40-mm stent retriever compared to the usual 4 × 20-mm device. Reperfusion status was quantified using the Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale. We hypothesized that thrombectomy of M1 occlusions with 5 × 40-mm stent retriever yields higher rates of complete first-pass reperfusion (FP) (TICI ≥2c after one pass) and successful or modified FP (mFP) (TICI ≥2b after one pass) than thrombectomy with 4 × 20. We included isolated M1 occlusions treated with pRESET 5 × 40 (phenox) as first-choice device for thrombectomy and compared with M1 occlusions treated with pRESET 4 × 20. We excluded patients with additional occlusions or tandem stenosis or who received an intracranial stent or angioplasty as a part of the endovascular treatment.Results: One hundred thirteen patients were included in the 4 × 20 group and 57 patients in the 5 × 40 group. The 5 × 40 group achieved higher FP compared to 4 × 20 group [61.4% (35 of 57 patients) vs. 40.7% (46 of 113), respectively; adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 2.20 (1.08–4.48), p = 0.030] and a higher mFP [68.4%, 39 of 57 patients vs. 48.7%, 55 of 113; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 2.11 (1.04–4.28), p = 0.037]. Frequency of successful reperfusion (TICI ≥2b) was similar in both groups (100 vs. 97.3%), but frequency of complete reperfusion (TICI ≥2c) was higher in the 5 × 40 group [82.5 vs. 61.9%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 2.47 (1.01–6.04), p = 0.047]. Number of passes to achieve reperfusion was lower in the 5 × 40 group than in the 4 × 20 group [1.6 ± 1.1 vs. 2 ± 1.4, p = 0.033; adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI) = 0.84 (0.69–1.03), p = 0.096]. Modified Rankin scale at 90 days was similar in 5 × 40 and 4 × 20 groups.Conclusions: The size of stent retriever matters in acute M1 occlusions treated with aspiration-assisted mechanical thrombectomy. A longer stent retriever with a larger nominal diameter achieves a higher complete and successful FP and higher successful reperfusion compared to a shorter stent retriever.

scholarly journals Inadvertent Detachment of Stent Retrievers during Mechanical Thrombectomy—A Clinical and Biomechanical Perspective

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 658
Author(s):  
Piotr Piasecki ◽  
Marek Wierzbicki ◽  
Piotr Tulik ◽  
Katarzyna Potocka ◽  
Adam Stępień ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Phantom Study ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Intracranial Vessel ◽  
Mechanical Study ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Phantom Studies ◽  
Stroke Centre

Background: The inadvertent detachment of stent retrievers during mechanical thrombectomy is an extremely rare but feared complication associated with poor clinical outcomes. We discuss management considerations after an unexpected disconnection of the pRESET stent retriever during mechanical thrombectomy, based on clinical experience and mechanical and phantom studies. Methods: We present a clinical course of rare accidents of stent-retriever separation inside an intracranial vessel that occurred in patients in a comprehensive stroke centre between 2018 and 2020. We designed a phantom study to assess the Tigertriever’s ability to remove a detached stent retriever from intercranial vessels. In the mechanical study, several types of stent retrievers were evaluated in order to find the weakest point at which detachment occurred. Results: Two patients (~0.7%) with inadvertent stent-retriever detachment were found in our database. Failed attempts of endovascular removal with no recanalization at the end of procedure were reported in both cases. mRS after 3 months was three and four respectively. In the mechanical study, the Tigertriever was the most resistant to detachment and was followed by Embotrap > pRESET > 3D Separator. In the phantom study, the pRESET device detached in a configuration resembling the M1 segment was successfully removed with the Tigertriever. Conclusions: Conservative management of the inadvertent detachment of stent retrievers during mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion may be acceptable in order to avoid further periprocedural complications after unsuccessful device removal attempts. Based on the phantom and mechanical studies, the Tigertriever may be a useful tool for the removal of detached pRESET devices.

scholarly journals Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke. Experience from Switching from Stent Retriever Only to Stent Retriever Combined with Aspiration Catheter

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1802
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Meder ◽  
Paweł Żuchowski ◽  
Wojciech Skura ◽  
Violetta Palacz-Duda ◽  
Milena Świtońska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Need To Evaluate ◽  
The Difference

Endovascular treatment is a rapidly evolving technique; therefore, there is a constant need to evaluate this method and its modifications. This paper discusses a single-center experience and the results of switching from the stent retriever only (SO) mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to the combined approach (CA), with a stent retriever and aspiration catheters. Methods: The study involved a retrospective analysis of 70 patients undergoing MT with the use of either SO or CA. The primary endpoint was the frequency of perfect reperfusion defined as grade 3 of the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) after the first pass. The secondary endpoints were the procedure success, defined as mTICI grades 2b-3; time of the procedure; clinical outcome, measured by 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score; Δ NIHSS, defined as the difference between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at patients’ admission and discharge; and the total number of device passes. Results: Out of the 70 patients included, 33 were treated with SO and 37 with CA. In both groups, a total number of 42 patients received intravenous recombined tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rTPA: 20 patients (60.6%) in the SO group and 22 patients (59.5%) in the CA group (p = 1.000). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding first-pass success rate, with 46% in the CA group and 18% in the SO group, (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.28 to 11.44, p = 0.016). Complete procedure success tended to be more frequent in the CA group than in the SO group—94.6% vs. 84.8% (OR 3.13, 95% CI 0.56 to 17.34, p = 0.193)—and CA tended to require a lower number of passes than SO (mean 1.76 vs. 2.09 passes per procedure, p = 0.114), yet these differences did not reach statistical significance. Mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in the CA group than in the SO group (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.017). There was a significant difference in clinical outcomes, with higher Δ NIHSS (9.3 in the CA group vs. 6.7 in the SO group, p = 0.025) after the procedure and 90-day mRS (median 2 in the CA group vs. 4 in the SO group, p = 0.031). Conclusions: Combining stent retrievers with aspiration catheters may offer a beneficial effect on angiographic results and clinical outcomes in stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document