Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition?

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Gauthier ◽  
Marlene Behrmann ◽  
Michael J. Tarr

We argue that the current literature on prosopagnosia fails to demonstrate unequivocal evidence for a disproportionate impairment for faces as compared to nonface objects. Two prosopagnosic subjects were tested for the discrimination of objects from several categories (face as well as nonface) at different levels of categorization (basic, subordinate, and exemplar levels). Several dependent measures were obtained including accuracy, signal detection measures, and response times. The results from Experiments 1 to 4 demonstrate that, in simultaneous-matching tasks, response times may reveal impairments with nonface objects in subjects whose error rates only indicate a face deficit. The results from Experiments 5 and 6 show that, given limited stimulus presentation times for face and nonface objects, the same subjects may demonstrate a deªcit for both stimulus categories in sensitivity. In Experiments 7, 8 and 9, a match-to-sample task that places greater demands on memory led to comparable recognition sensitivity with both face and nonface objects. Regardless of object category, the prosopagnosic subjects were more affected by manipulations of the level of categorization than normal controls. This result raises questions regarding neuropsychological evidence for the modularity of face recognition, as well as its theoretical and methodological foundations.

1986 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Herskovic ◽  
Mitchell L. Kietzman ◽  
Samuel Sutton

SynopsisDifferences in response criterion and sensory sensitivity to visual flicker among major depressive patients, dysthymic patients, and normal controls were investigated. Also, signal detection confidence ratings and response times were compared. The results indicated that major depressive patients responded more conservatively (i.e. were less willing to respond ‘flicker’) than either of the other groups. The groups did not differ significantly on a criterion free measure of flicker sensitivity. The major conclusions are: (1) previously reported visual flicker differences between depressed patients and normal controls were probably due to the more conservative response criterion of the patients and not to flicker sensitivity differences between groups; and (2) confidence ratings and response times yield similar conclusions with respect to visual flicker sensitivity and response criterion. Therefore, interpretations concerning a sensory or perceptual deficit in depression must take into account the differences in response criterion between depressed patients and normal controls.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Li ◽  
Maruti Mishra ◽  
Bar Yosef ◽  
Joseph DeGutis

Response times (RT) are commonly used to assess cognitive abilities and have recently been employed to assess face and object recognition abilities, such as quantifying the prevalence of object recognition deficits in developmental prosopagnosia (DP). However, it is unclear whether RTs from face and object processing tasks predict recognition ability beyond accuracy. To test the validity of RTs, we examined accuracy and RT on a widely-used face matching assessment modified to collect meaningful RT data, the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test (BFRT-c), and measured whether accuracy and RT predicted face recognition ability and DP/control group membership. 62 controls and 36 developmental prosopagnosics (DPs) performed the BFRT-c as well as validated measures of face recognition ability, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and Famous Faces Test (FFT). In both controls and DPs, there was little-to-no association between BFRT-c accuracy and RT (controls: r=.07, DPs: r=.03). In controls, BFRT-c accuracy robustly predicted CFMT (r=.49), FFMT (r=.43), and a composite of these measures (r=.54), whereas BFRT-c RT was not significantly associated with these measures (all r's < .16). We also found that BFRT-c accuracy significantly differed between DPs and controls, but RT failed to differentiate the groups. These results were replicated when performing outlier removal and we also found that combined scores of accuracy and RT (inverse efficiency score and balanced integration score) did not predict face recognition ability or group membership as well as accuracy alone. Together, these results suggest that researchers should use caution when using RTs to characterize individual differences in face processing or diagnose deficits in prosopagnosia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S55
Author(s):  
Seunghee Won ◽  
Minjae Bae ◽  
Bohyun Jin ◽  
Hyo-Deog Rim

Abstract Background Schizophrenia and Bipolar I disorder patients lack the ability to identify emotional expressions, which is characterized by poor social and professional functions. Facial affect recognition is a complex function that includes cortical and limbic connections, providing an essential source of information during face-to-face communication. In this study, the Facial Labeling Task, which can evaluate Koreans’ ability to recognize emotions using facial expressions, is used to compare defects in face emotional recognition in patients with remitted schizophrenia patients, euthymic bipolar I disorder patients, and normal controls. Methods Three groups were included in this study: remitted patients with schizophrenia (n=75), patients in euthymic states of bipolar I disorder (n=70), and healthy controls (n=59) who were matched on age, sex, years of education. Facial Labeling Task was used to examine face emotional recognition defects the standardized happy, fearful, disgust, anger, sad, contempt, surprise and neutral faces from actors (4 males, 4 females) were used (emotional intensity 100%). Accuracy (commission error rates), correct response times of each trial were calculated. All subjects had to satisfy the inclusion criteria(absence of substance abuse, head trauma, mental retardation) and subjects with above mild level of psychiatric symptoms [BPRS(Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) >31, K-MADRS(Korean version Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale) Score >9, YMRS(Young Mania Rating Scale Korean version) Score >7] were excluded. All of patients group had to be in remitted state at least 3 months. All of subjects in normal control group were interviewed before the test using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-1 Disorder to rule out psychiatric history. We used Korean version-Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Psychomotor performance was examined using Finger Tapping Test. Results There were no differences on demographic data between three groups. Although psychopathologies in all groups were within the criteria, there were group differences. The scoring of BPRS, YMRS, MADRS were higher in schizophrenia patients. Intelligence was low in schizophrenia and Bipolar I disorder patients. There was no difference among the group in the psychomotor speed. Two patients groups were significantly higher error rates for sadness (p < 0.01), anger (p < 0.001),, and neutral (p < 0.01). Schizophrenia group showed significantly higher error rates for contempt to normal controls (p < 0.05). Happy and neutral face had significantly more delayed correct response times in two patient groups than in the healthy controls (p < 0.05). Discussion These finds suggest that the patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder have a defects in the perception and response of specific emotions in the remitted states, and schizophrenia is more emotionally impaired than bipolar disease. Therefore, it is thought that a defects in facial recognition should be considered in the process of assessing and treating patients with bipolar I disorder as well as those with schizophrenia.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catrina Hacker ◽  
Irving Biederman

Tests of face recognition implicitly assume it to be an undifferentiated ability. However, several possible independent components could comprise face recognition proficiency, such as those for the perceptual discrimination of faces, face memory, and the ability to generalize across viewpoints. We assessed two possible components of face recognition ability: the proficiency for the perceptual discrimination of faces using a quantitative measure of face similarity and the proficiency for remembering those faces using a minimal delayed match-to-sample task. We document a strong cost of delay on error rates and mean correct reaction times in face matching. We further demonstrate that the slope of performance over increased perceptual difficulty is parallel for each of three levels of delay. These results provide evidence, by additive factors logic, that face memory and face perception are independent processes within subjects. Finally, we document an independence of the proficiencies for face memory and face perception across subjects.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2916-2938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Émilie Coallier ◽  
John F. Kalaska

Human subjects chose between two color-coded reach targets using multicolored checkerboard-like decision cues (DCs) that presented variable amounts of conflicting sensory evidence supporting both target choices. Different DCs contained different numbers of small squares of the two target colors. The most ambiguous DCs contained nearly equal numbers of squares of both target colors. The subjects reached as soon as they selected a target after the appearance of the DC (“choose-and-go” task). The choice behavior of the subjects showed many similarities to prior studies using other stimulus properties (e.g., visual motion coherence, brightness), including progressively longer response times and higher target-choice error rates for more ambiguous DCs. However, certain trends in their choice behavior could not be fully captured by simple drift-diffusion models. Allowing the subjects to view the DCs for a period of time before presenting the targets (“match-to-sample” task) resulted in much shorter response times overall, but also revealed a reluctance of subjects to commit to a decision about the predominant color of the more ambiguous DCs during the initial extended observation period. Model processing and simulation analyses suggest that the subjects might adjust the dynamics of their decision-making process on a trial-to-trial basis in response to the variable level of ambiguous and conflicting evidence in different DCs between trials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Hearne ◽  
Damian P. Birney ◽  
Luca Cocchi ◽  
Jason B. Mattingley

Abstract. The Latin Square Task (LST) is a relational reasoning paradigm developed by Birney, Halford, and Andrews (2006) . Previous work has shown that the LST elicits typical reasoning complexity effects, such that increases in complexity are associated with decrements in task accuracy and increases in response times. Here we modified the LST for use in functional brain imaging experiments, in which presentation durations must be strictly controlled, and assessed its validity and reliability. Modifications included presenting the components within each trial serially, such that the reasoning and response periods were separated. In addition, the inspection time for each LST problem was constrained to five seconds. We replicated previous findings of higher error rates and slower response times with increasing relational complexity and observed relatively large effect sizes (η2p > 0.70, r > .50). Moreover, measures of internal consistency and test-retest reliability confirmed the stability of the LST within and across separate testing sessions. Interestingly, we found that limiting the inspection time for individual problems in the LST had little effect on accuracy relative to the unconstrained times used in previous work, a finding that is important for future brain imaging experiments aimed at investigating the neural correlates of relational reasoning.


Author(s):  
Edita Poljac ◽  
Ab de Haan ◽  
Gerard P. van Galen

Two experiments investigated the way that beforehand preparation influences general task execution in reaction-time matching tasks. Response times (RTs) and error rates were measured for switching and nonswitching conditions in a color- and shape-matching task. The task blocks could repeat (task repetition) or alternate (task switch), and the preparation interval (PI) was manipulated within-subjects (Experiment 1) and between-subjects (Experiment 2). The study illustrated a comparable general task performance after a long PI for both experiments, within and between PI manipulations. After a short PI, however, the general task performance increased significantly for the between-subjects manipulation of the PI. Furthermore, both experiments demonstrated an analogous preparation effect for both task switching and task repetitions. Next, a consistent switch cost throughout the whole run of trials and a within-run slowing effect were observed in both experiments. Altogether, the present study implies that the effects of the advance preparation go beyond the first trials and confirms different points of the activation approach ( Altmann, 2002) to task switching.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (05) ◽  
pp. 525-533
Author(s):  
Evrim Gülbetekin ◽  
Seda Bayraktar ◽  
Özlenen Özkan ◽  
Hilmi Uysal ◽  
Ömer Özkan

AbstractThe authors tested face discrimination, face recognition, object discrimination, and object recognition in two face transplantation patients (FTPs) who had facial injury since infancy, a patient who had a facial surgery due to a recent wound, and two control subjects. In Experiment 1, the authors showed them original faces and morphed forms of those faces and asked them to rate the similarity between the two. In Experiment 2, they showed old, new, and implicit faces and asked whether they recognized them or not. In Experiment 3, they showed them original objects and morphed forms of those objects and asked them to rate the similarity between the two. In Experiment 4, they showed old, new, and implicit objects and asked whether they recognized them or not. Object discrimination and object recognition performance did not differ between the FTPs and the controls. However, the face discrimination performance of FTP2 and face recognition performance of the FTP1 were poorer than that of the controls were. Therefore, the authors concluded that the structure of the face might affect face processing.


2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jouni Ihalainen ◽  
Timo Sarajärvi ◽  
Susanna Kemppainen ◽  
Pekka Keski-Rahkonen ◽  
Marko Lehtonen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document