scholarly journals Studying Collective Human Decision Making and Creativity with Evolutionary Computation

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Sayama ◽  
Shelley D. Dionne
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evolutionary Computation ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Collaborative Design ◽  
Social Dynamics ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Computational Simulation ◽  
Idea Generation ◽  
Evolutionary Perspective ◽  
Human Decision

We report a summary of our interdisciplinary research project “Evolutionary Perspective on Collective Decision Making” that was conducted through close collaboration between computational, organizational, and social scientists at Binghamton University. We redefined collective human decision making and creativity as evolution of ecologies of ideas, where populations of ideas evolve via continual applications of evolutionary operators such as reproduction, recombination, mutation, selection, and migration of ideas, each conducted by participating humans. Based on this evolutionary perspective, we generated hypotheses about collective human decision making, using agent-based computer simulations. The hypotheses were then tested through several experiments with real human subjects. Throughout this project, we utilized evolutionary computation (EC) in non-traditional ways—(1) as a theoretical framework for reinterpreting the dynamics of idea generation and selection, (2) as a computational simulation model of collective human decision-making processes, and (3) as a research tool for collecting high-resolution experimental data on actual collaborative design and decision making from human subjects. We believe our work demonstrates untapped potential of EC for interdisciplinary research involving human and social dynamics.

Recent Advancement in Fuzzy System

2014 ◽  
pp. 158-168
Author(s):  
İ. Burhan Türkşen ◽  
İbrahim Özkan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Fuzzy System ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Decision Under Uncertainty ◽  
Recent Advancement ◽  
Human Decision

Decision under uncertainty is an active interdisciplinary research field. A decision process is generally identified as the action of choosing an alternative that best suites our needs. This process generally includes several areas of research including but not limited to Economics, Psychology, Philosophy, Mathematics, Statistics, etc. In this chapter the authors attempt to create a framework for uncertainties which surrounds the environment where human decision making takes place. For this purpose, the authors discuss how one ought to handle uncertainties within Fuzzy Logic. Furthermore, they present recent advances in Type 2 fuzzy system studies.

scholarly journals Predicting human decision making in psychological tasks with recurrent neural networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baihan Lin ◽  
Djallel Bouneffouf ◽  
Guillermo Cecchi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Prisoner's Dilemma ◽  
Iowa Gambling Task ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Prisoner’S Dilemma ◽  
Gambling Task ◽  
Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
Iterated Prisoner’S Dilemma

Unlike traditional time series, the action sequences of human decision making usually involve many cognitive processes such as beliefs, desires, intentions and theory of mind, i.e. what others are thinking. This makes predicting human decision making challenging to be treated agnostically to the underlying psychological mechanisms. We propose to use a recurrent neural network architecture based on long short-term memory networks (LSTM) to predict the time series of the actions taken by the human subjects at each step of their decision making, the first application of such methods in this research domain. In this study, we collate the human data from 8 published literature of the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma comprising 168,386 individual decisions and postprocess them into 8,257 behavioral trajectories of 9 actions each for both players. Similarly, we collate 617 trajectories of 95 actions from 10 different published studies of Iowa Gambling Task experiments with healthy human subjects. We train our prediction networks on the behavioral data from these published psychological experiments of human decision making, and demonstrate a clear advantage over the state-of-the-art methods in predicting human decision making trajectories in both single-agent scenarios such as the Iowa Gambling Task and multi-agent scenarios such as the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. In the prediction, we observe that the weights of the top performers tends to have a wider distribution, and a bigger bias in the LSTM networks, which suggests possible interpretations for the distribution of strategies adopted by each group.

Recent Advancement in Fuzzy System

2015 ◽  
pp. 437-447
Author(s):  
İ. Burhan Türkşen ◽  
İbrahim Özkan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Fuzzy System ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Decision Under Uncertainty ◽  
Recent Advancement ◽  
Human Decision

Decision under uncertainty is an active interdisciplinary research field. A decision process is generally identified as the action of choosing an alternative that best suites our needs. This process generally includes several areas of research including but not limited to Economics, Psychology, Philosophy, Mathematics, Statistics, etc. In this chapter the authors attempt to create a framework for uncertainties which surrounds the environment where human decision making takes place. For this purpose, the authors discuss how one ought to handle uncertainties within Fuzzy Logic. Furthermore, they present recent advances in Type 2 fuzzy system studies.

A Computational Role for Dopamine Delivery in Human Decision-Making

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Egelman ◽  
Christophe Person ◽  
P. Read Montague
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Behavioral Strategies ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Decision Strategies ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
Future Events ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
Mesencephalic Dopamine

Recent work suggests that fluctuations in dopamine delivery at target structures represent an evaluation of future events that can be used to direct learning and decision-making. To examine the behavioral consequences of this interpretation, we gave simple decision-making tasks to 66 human subjects and to a network based on a predictive model of mesencephalic dopamine systems. The human subjects displayed behavior similar to the network behavior in terms of choice allocation and the character of deliberation times. The agreement between human and model performances suggests a direct relationship between biases in human decision strategies and fluctuating dopamine delivery. We also show that the model offers a new interpretation of deficits that result when dopamine levels are increased or decreased through disease or pharmacological interventions. The bottom-up approach presented here also suggests that a variety of behavioral strategies may result from the expression of relatively simple neural mechanisms in different behavioral contexts.

scholarly journals Achieving Closed-Loop Control Simulation of Human-Artefact Interaction: A Comparative Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Frederik van der Vegte ◽  
Imre Horváth
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Level Control ◽  
User Interactions ◽  
Loop Control ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Comparative Review ◽  
Human Decision

To include user interactions in simulations of product use, the most common approach is to couple human subjects to simulation models, using hardware interfaces to close the simulation-control loop. Testing with virtual human models could offer a low-cost addition to evaluation with human subjects. This paper explores the possibilities for coupling human and artefact models to achieve fully software-based interaction simulations. We have critically reviewed existing partial solutions to simulate or execute control (both human control and product-embedded control) and compared solutions from literature with a proof-of-concept we have recently developed. Our concept closes all loops, but it does not rely on validated algorithms to predict human decision making and low-level human motor control. For low-level control, validated solutions are available from other approaches. For human decision making, however, validated algorithms exist only to predict the timing but not the reasoning behind it. To identify decision-making schemes beyond what designers can conjecture, testing with human subjects remains indispensable.

scholarly journals Human-agent coordination in a group formation game

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuomas Takko ◽  
Kunal Bhattacharya ◽  
Daniel Monsivais ◽  
Kimmo Kaski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Autonomous Agents ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Group Formation ◽  
Small World ◽  
Human Agent ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
Behaviour Changes ◽  
Formation Game

AbstractCoordination and cooperation between humans and autonomous agents in cooperative games raise interesting questions on human decision making and behaviour changes. Here we report our findings from a group formation game in a small-world network of different mixes of human and agent players, aiming to achieve connected clusters of the same colour by swapping places with neighbouring players using non-overlapping information. In the experiments the human players are incentivized by rewarding to prioritize their own cluster while the model of agents’ decision making is derived from our previous experiment of purely cooperative game between human players. The experiments were performed by grouping the players in three different setups to investigate the overall effect of having cooperative autonomous agents within teams. We observe that the human subjects adjust to autonomous agents by being less risk averse, while keeping the overall performance efficient by splitting the behaviour into selfish and cooperative actions performed during the rounds of the game. Moreover, results from two hybrid human-agent setups suggest that the group composition affects the evolution of clusters. Our findings indicate that in purely or lesser cooperative settings, providing more control to humans could help in maximizing the overall performance of hybrid systems.

Evaluating Human Decision-Making Theories With Monkey Data

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Brown ◽  
Pete Cassey ◽  
Andrew Heathcote ◽  
Roger Ratcliff
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Decision

Scham und Autonomie

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-192
Author(s):  
Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Dynamics ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Intentional Content ◽  
Conceptual Clarification ◽  
The Social ◽  
Conventional Behavior ◽  
And Control

Autonomy is associated with intellectual self-preservation and self-determination. Shame, on the contrary, bears a loss of approval, self-esteem and control. Being afflicted with shame, we suffer from social dependencies that by no means have been freely chosen. Moreover, undergoing various experiences of shame, our power of reflection turns out to be severly limited owing to emotional embarrassment. In both ways, shame seems to be bound to heteronomy. This situation strongly calls for conceptual clarification. For this purpose, we introduce a threestage model of self-determination which comprises i) autonomy as capability of decision-making relating to given sets of choices, ii) self-commitment in terms of setting and harmonizing goals, and iii) self-realization in compliance with some range of persistently approved goals. Accordingly, the presuppositions and distinctive marks of shame-experiences are made explicit. Within this framework, we explore the intricate relation between autonomy and shame by focusing on two questions: on what conditions could conventional behavior be considered as self-determined? How should one characterize the varying roles of actors that are involved in typical cases of shame-experiences? In this connection, we advance the thesis that the social dynamics of shame turns into ambiguous positions relating to motivation, intentional content,and actors’ roles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document