Chapter 21 Marine Protected Areas in the North Sea

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Gubbay ◽  
Gerard Peet
2021 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 105230
Author(s):  
Michael Weinert ◽  
Moritz Mathis ◽  
Ingrid Kröncke ◽  
Thomas Pohlmann ◽  
Henning Reiss

Marine Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Brouwer ◽  
S. Brouwer ◽  
M.A. Eleveld ◽  
M. Verbraak ◽  
A.J. Wagtendonk ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1203-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Kjærsgaard ◽  
Hans Frost

Abstract Kjærsgaard, J., and Frost, H. 2008. Effort allocation and marine protected areas: is the North Sea Plaice Box a management compromise? – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1203–1215. A complex bioeconomic model is used to study the economic and biological consequences of establishing a marine protected area (MPA). The model is a multispecies age-structured bioeconomic model that treats days at sea and number of vessels, for different fleets fishing inside and outside the protected area, as endogenous variables. A simulation applies an adaptive investment rule that determines fleet size from year to year, and an optimization procedure provides a benchmark for a profit-maximizing solution over time. In contrast to most conventional studies on MPAs, fishing within the protected area is possible. Moreover, the stock is not divided between inside and outside the protected area, although the abundance of different age classes in each area differs. Therefore, the economic and biological impacts of fishing inside or outside are different. The North Sea flatfish fishery is used as a case study, so the analysis is particularly relevant because North Sea flatfish regulation is currently under revision.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gusatu ◽  
Yamu ◽  
Zuidema ◽  
Faaij

Over the last decade, the accelerated transition towards cleaner means of producing energy has been clearly prioritised by the European Union through large-scale planned deployment of wind farms in the North Sea. From a spatial planning perspective, this has not been a straight-forward process, due to substantial spatial conflicts with the traditional users of the sea, especially with fisheries and protected areas. In this article, we examine the availability of offshore space for wind farm deployment, from a transnational perspective, while taking into account different options for the management of the maritime area through four scenarios. We applied a mixed-method approach, combining expert knowledge and document analysis with the spatial visualisation of existing and future maritime spatial claims. Our calculations clearly indicate a low availability of suitable locations for offshore wind in the proximity of the shore and in shallow waters, even when considering its multi-use with fisheries and protected areas. However, the areas within 100 km from shore and with a water depth above –120 m attract greater opportunities for both single use (only offshore wind farms) and multi-use (mainly with fisheries), from an integrated planning perspective. On the other hand, the decrease of energy targets combined with sectoral planning result in clear limitations to suitable areas for offshore wind farms, indicating the necessity to consider areas with a water depth below –120 m and further than 100 km from shore. Therefore, despite the increased costs of maintenance and design adaptation, the multi-use of space can be a solution for more sustainable, stakeholder-engaged and cost-effective options in the energy deployment process. This paper identifies potential pathways, as well as challenges and opportunities for future offshore space management with the aim of achieving the 2050 renewable energy targets.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oceana ◽  
Silvia Garcia ◽  
Allison L. Perry ◽  
Jorge Blanco ◽  
Cecilie Petersen ◽  
...  

The northern waters of the Danish North Sea encompass a wide range of depths, reaching down to 480 m in the region of the Skagerrak. The area is home to a rich diversity of seabed habitats and associated species, including those that are priorities for marine conservation at EU and international levels. As a result, eight marine protected areas (MPAs) have been designated with the aim of protecting habitats such as reefs, bubbling reefs, and sandbanks, as well as harbour porpoise. However, the poor condition of protected habitats within these areas indicates that current protection is insufficient, and recent assessments of the Danish MPA network have revealed key gaps in coverage in the North Sea that must be addressed, particularly in offshore areas. On the basis of its findings, Oceana recommends the designation or enlargement of MPAs to safeguard these valuable features in specific areas, and the formal protection of priority features that occur within existing MPAs but which are not currently protected by those sites. Critically, given the intensity of human pressure in the Danish North Sea, designated MPAs must be effectively managed if they are to achieve their intended conservation aims.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document