Governance of Russian Arctic Fisheries in the Barents Sea: Surveying National and Cooperative Currents

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 328-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander I. Glubokov ◽  
Alf Håkon Hoel ◽  
Susan J. Rolston ◽  
Sarah Turgeon ◽  
David L. VanderZwaag
Author(s):  
I. G. Mindel ◽  
B. A. Trifonov ◽  
M. D. Kaurkin ◽  
V. V. Nesynov

In recent years, in connection with the national task of developing the Arctic territories of Russia and the perspective increase in the hydrocarbon mining on the Arctic shelf, more attention is being paid to the study of seismicity in the Barents Sea shelf. The development of the Russian Arctic shelf with the prospect of increasing hydrocarbon mining is a strategically important issue. Research by B.A. Assinovskaya (1990, 1994) and Ya.V. Konechnaya (2015) allowed the authors to estimate the seismic effects for the northern part of the Barents Sea shelf (Novaya Zemlya region). The paper presents the assessment results of the initial seismic impacts that can be used to solve seismic microzoning problems in the areas of oil and gas infrastructure during the economic development of the Arctic territory.


Polar Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-346
Author(s):  
J. Kullberg ◽  
B. Yu. Filippov ◽  
V. M. Spitsyn ◽  
N. A. Zubrij ◽  
M. V. Kozlov

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Malavenda ◽  
Svetlana Malavenda

The minimum number of samples was estimated based on the studies of the distribution of macrophytobenthos. The existing norms of three replicates per sampling station do not always allow to obtain reliable average values. The collection of a large number of samples, especially seasonally, will lead to significant changes in the studied community. It is recommended to put into practice the use of the method of photographing the areas of particular size along transects for further analysis using special software. It is proposed also to amend the existing regulatory documents on sampling of macrophytobenthos in the Barents Sea and other seas of the Russian Arctic. In particular, it is worth making the most of landscape surveys and mapping. The development of a monitoring system for species diversity and macrophytobenthos distribution in the seas of the Russian Arctic is justified in regard to the monitoring of the community state, including that considering the climate change.


1998 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav E Belikov ◽  
Andrei N Boltunov

This paper presents a review of available published and unpublished material on the ringed seal (Phoca hispida) in the western part of the Russian Arctic, including the White, Barents and Kara seas. The purpose of the review is to discuss the status of ringed seal stocks in relation to their primary habitat, the history of sealing, and a recent harvest of the species in the region. The known primary breeding habitats for this species are in the White Sea, the south-western part of the Barents Sea, and in the coastal waters of the Kara Sea, which are seasonally covered by shore-fast ice. The main sealing sites are situated in the same areas. Female ringed seals become mature by the age of 6, and males by the age of 7. In March-April a female gives birth to one pup in a breeding lair constructed in the shore-fast ice. The most important prey species for ringed seals in the western sector of the Russian Arctic are pelagic fish and crustaceans. The maximum annual sealing level for the region was registered in the first 70 years of the 20th century: the White Sea maximum (8,912 animals) was registered in 1912; the Barents Sea maximum (13,517 animals) was registered in 1962; the Kara Sea maximum (13,200 animals) was registered in 1933. Since the 1970s, the number of seals harvested has decreased considerably. There are no data available for the number of seals harvested annually by local residents for their subsistence.


2011 ◽  
pp. 45-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Matveyeva ◽  
O. V. Lavrinenko

For the first time on the north-east of Malozemelskaya tundra at the coast of the Barents Sea the following 5 associations — Puccinellietum phryganodis Hadač 1946 (with subassociations inops Thannheiser, Willers 1988 ex Hofmann 1969 and caricetosum subspatheceае Thannheiser, Willers 1988 nom. nud).; Caricetum subspathaceae Hadač 1946 with subass. Inops Molenaar 1974 and arctanthemetosum hultenii subass. nov. (with variants inops var. nov. and typicum var. nov.); Caricetum glareosae Molenaar 1974 (as a geographical vicariant Calamagrostis deschampsioides vic. nov.) (with subassociations typicum and festucetosum rubrae); Scirpeto—Hippuridetum tetraphyllae Nordh. 1954 (inops subass. nov.), and the Dupontia psilosantha com. type that belong to the three alliance of the Glauco-Puccinellietalia order of the Juncetea maritime class are described with the Braun-Blanquet approach. A provisional ass. Parnassio palustris—Salicetum reptantis ass. nov. prov. represented the transitional vegetation between marshes and tundras belongs to the Scheuchzerio—Caricetea fuscae class. This shows that syntaxa of different levels known previously for various territories outside of the Russian Arctic are rather common at least in its European part. The comparison of the classification units of both Braun-Blanquet and Russian dominant systems (used by A. I. Leskov in the same region in the first half of the last century) has demonstrated a large correspondence in between and the absence of the insuperable barrier between two approaches.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 1533-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Antsulevich

The hydroid and hydromedusa fauna of Russian Arctic seas, totalling 161 species, has been revised taxonomically and biogeographically. Diversity is highest in the Barents Sea, where 133 species are known to occur. Species composition of Hydrozoa throughout Russian Eurasia is decidedly uniform, with marked similarity among all regional faunistic lists. An assemblage of Arctic ubiquitists, a majority of them boreal-Arctic species, comprise the main element of hydrozoans in all Arctic seas. This faunistic main element is responsible for the faunal uniformity observed from one sea to the next across thousands of kilometres along the northern Eurasian coast. Exceptions occur in marginal regions including western parts of the Barents Sea and south-eastern parts of the Chukchi Sea, where species distribution area contours (named as ‘synperates’) come close together. Based on a biogeographic analysis of faunistic data and species distributions of Hydrozoa, all temperate and cold waters of the Eurasian seas and the Central Polar Basin were referred to a single Arctatlantic biogeographic realm. Biogeographic subdivisions within this realm have rather low hierarchical rank, the result of low endemism, high faunal similarity across the northern seas, and predominance of a North Atlantic fauna in Russian northern seas as far as the easternmost Chukchi Sea.


Author(s):  
Nataliya Marchenko

The 5 Russian Arctic Seas have common features, but differ significantly from each other in the sea ice regime and navigation specifics. Navigation in the Arctic is a big challenge, especially during the winter season. However, it is necessary, due to limited natural resources elsewhere on Earth that may be easier for exploitation. Therefore sea ice is an important issue for future development. We foresee that the Arctic may become ice free in summer as a result of global warming and even light yachts will be able to pass through the Eastern Passage. There have been several such examples in the last years. But sea ice is an inherent feature of Arctic Seas in winter, it is permanently immanent for the Central Arctic Basin. That is why it is important to get appropriate knowledge about sea ice properties and operations in ice conditions. Four seas, the Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, and Chukchi have been examined in the book “Russian Arctic Seas. Navigation Condition and Accidents”, Marchenko, 2012 [1]. The book is devoted to the eastern sector of the Arctic, with a description of the seas and accidents caused by heavy ice conditions. The traditional physical-geographical characteristics, information about the navigation conditions and the main sea routes and reports on accidents that occurred in the 20th century have reviewed. An additional investigation has been performed for more recent accidents and for the Barents Sea. Considerable attention has been paid to problems associated with sea ice caused by the present development of the Arctic. Sea ice can significantly affect shipping, drilling, and the construction and operation of platforms and handling terminals. Sea ice is present in the main part of the east Arctic Sea most of the year. The Barents Sea, which is strongly influenced and warmed by the North Atlantic Current, has a natural environment that is dramatically different from those of the other Arctic seas. The main difficulties with the Barents Sea are produced by icing and storms and in the north icebergs. The ice jet is the most dangerous phenomenon in the main straits along the Northern Sea Route and in Chukchi Seas. The accidents in the Arctic Sea have been classified, described and connected with weather and ice conditions. Behaviour of the crew is taken into consideration. The following types of the ice-induced accidents are distinguished: forced drift, forced overwintering, shipwreck, and serious damage to the hull in which the crew, sometimes with the help of other crews, could still save the ship. The main reasons for shipwrecks and damages are hits of ice floes (often in rather calm ice conditions), ice nipping (compression) and drift. Such investigation is important for safety in the Arctic.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
E.M. Chaban ◽  
I.O. Nekhaev

Retusa pellucida (Brown, 1827) recorded the first time for the recent fauna of the Russian Arctic. New data on morphology of its soft part are given. Shell sculpture of Retusa pellucida is discussed in comparison with R. truncatula (Bruguière, 1792) and related forms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document