Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Apocrine Breast Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1807-1816
Author(s):  
Qin Lu ◽  
Huihui Sun ◽  
Qian Yu ◽  
Dongdong Tang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Quantitative Diagnosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

In the past thirty years, breast cancer in women has continued to rise. The age of onset for women has become lower. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can clearly show the blood perfusion and neovascularization of breast masses. Elastography provides information on the stiffness of tissues. The combination of them shows a good advantage in the various early diagnosis of breast cancer. The combined electrograph can distinguish benign and malignant apocrine breast tumors. The shear wave electrograph (SWE) combined with CEUS has the strongest consistency in the diagnosis and pathology of breast benign tumors. When they were diagnosed separately, it was found that SWE has higher diagnostic value than CEUS; the quantitative diagnosis of SWE is slightly higher than the qualitative diagnosis, and the qualitative diagnosis of CEUS is higher than the quantitative diagnosis. Both SWE and CEUS are valuable in the diagnosis of benign and malignant apocrine breast tumor when combined treatment is made.

scholarly journals Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janu Eva ◽  
Krikavova Lucie ◽  
Little Jirina ◽  
Dvorak Karel ◽  
Brancikova Dagmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Purpose: To determine the benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed in 230 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 to 5. All lesions were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. MVI (MicroVascular Imaging) technique was used to derive qualitative analysis parameters; blood perfusion of the lesions was assessed (perfusion homogeneity, type of vascularization, enhancement degree). Quantitative analysis was conducted to estimate perfusion changes in the lesions within drawn regions of interest (ROI); parameters TTP (time to peak), PI (peak intensity), WIS (wash in slope), AUC (area under curve) were obtained from time intensity (TI) curves. Acquired data were statistically analyzed to assess the ability of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The combination of parameters was also evaluated for the possibility of increasing the overall diagnostic accuracy. Biological nature of the lesions was verified by a pathologist. Benign lesions without histopathological verification (BI-RADS 3) were followed up for at least 24 months. Results: Out of 230 lesions, 146 (64%) were benign, 67 (29%) were malignant, 17 (7%) lesions were eliminated. Malignant tumors showed statistically significantly lower TTP parameters (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 52.7%) and higher WIS values (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 66.4%) than benign tumors. Enhancement degree also proved to be statistically well discriminating as 55.2% of malignant lesions had a rich vascularity (sensitivity 89.6% and specificity 48.6%). The combination of quantitative analysis parameters (TTP, WIS) with enhancement degree did not result in higher accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound has the potential to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions. In particular, this method could help to differentiate lesions BI-RADS category 3 and 4 and thus reduce the number of core-cut biopsies performed in benign lesions. Qualitative analysis, despite its subjective element, appeared to be more beneficial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis did not increase the predictive capability of CEUS.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parametric Imaging in Breast Tumors

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Yuan ◽  
Jiang Quan ◽  
Zhang Yunxiao ◽  
Chen Jian ◽  
He Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Parametric Imaging ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

scholarly journals Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janu Eva ◽  
Krikavova Lucie ◽  
Little Jirina ◽  
Dvorak Karel ◽  
Brancikova Dagmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Purpose: To determine the benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of breast lesions.Materials and Methods: A standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed in 230 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 to 5. All lesions were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. MVI (MicroVascular Imaging) technique was used to derive qualitative analysis parameters; blood perfusion of the lesions was assessed (perfusion homogeneity, type of vascularization, enhancement degree). Quantitative analysis was conducted to estimate perfusion changes in the lesions within drawn regions of interest (ROI); parameters TTP (time to peak), PI (peak intensity), WIS (wash in slope), AUC (area under curve) were obtained from time intensity (TI) curves. Acquired data were statistically analyzed to assess the ability of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The combination of parameters was also evaluated for the possibility of increasing the overall diagnostic accuracy. Biological nature of the lesions was verified by a pathologist. Benign lesions without histopathological verification (BI-RADS 3) were followed up for at least 24 months.Results: Out of 230 lesions, 146 (64%) were benign, 67 (29%) were malignant, 17 (7%) lesions were eliminated. Malignant tumors showed statistically significantly lower TTP parameters (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 52.7%) and higher WIS values (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 66.4%) than benign tumors. Enhancement degree also proved to be statistically well discriminating as 55.2% of malignant lesions had a rich vascularity (sensitivity 89.6% and specificity 48.6%). The combination of quantitative analysis parameters (TTP, WIS) with enhancement degree did not result in higher accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions.Conclusion: We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound has the potential to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions. In particular, this method could help to differentiate lesions BI-RADS category 3 and 4 and thus reduce the number of core-cut biopsies performed in benign lesions. Qualitative analysis, despite its subjective element, appeared to be more beneficial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis did not increase the predictive capability of CEUS.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the Diagnostic Value of B-Mode and Color Doppler for Common Benign Tumors in the Parotid Gland

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiying Yan ◽  
Dong Xu ◽  
Liyu Chen ◽  
Lingyan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Mean Transit Time ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Quantitative Analyses

PurposeTo preliminarily identify three common benign parotid gland tumors: pleomorphic adenomas (PA), Warthin tumors (WT), and basal cell adenomas (BCA) by qualitative and quantitative analyses using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).MethodsPreoperative images of parotid gland masses were analyzed, including 129 cases of ultrasonography (US) and color Doppler sonography (CDS) and 110 cases of qualitative and quantitative CEUS. The diagnosis was confirmed by postsurgical pathology outcomes.ResultsPA presented low and heterogeneous enhancement and echo-free area, whereas most WT and BCA presented with high and relatively homogeneous enhancement. Compared with WT and BCA groups, a “slow in” pattern was more common in the PA group and a “slow out” pattern was more frequently noted in the WT group than in the PA and BCA groups. The unique features of qualitative CEUS in the PA group enable distinguishing PA from the 2 other groups. The further distinction among the groups was made based on quantitative parameters of time-intensity curves (TICs), which revealed that the mean peak intensity (PI), mean transit time (MTT), the area under the curve (AUC), and time from peak to one half (HT) exhibited significant differences. ROC analysis was next applied to determine the optimal cutoff points to predict the diagnostic tendency among the groups. When the rising slope (RS) was >2.145, the possibility of BCA was greater than WT.ConclusionsCEUS ultrasound is of significant value in the differential diagnosis of the 3 common benign parotid gland masses.

A Study on the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Tissues

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1231-1235
Author(s):  
Huajie Zhao ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Bili Liu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To assess contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)'s value in the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer. Methods : 83 breast cancer patients from April 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled and assigned into observation group (triple, n = 39) and control group (non-triple, n = 44). The diagnostic examinations were performed via CEUS and the features of CEUS were analyzed. Besides, patients in observation group also received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the diagnostic difference was assessed. Results: Observation group showed a significantly smaller size of focus after CEUS than control group compared to before CEUS (p < 0 05) with significant difference of focus enhancement and vascular morphology between two groups (p < 0 05). As for focus blood perfusion parameters, no differences were found regarding rise time (RT) and time to peak (TTP) between the two groups (p > 0 05). However, observation group had significantly higher peak intensity (PI) and wash-in slope (WIS) (p < 0 05). Interestingly, no difference of TNBC diagnosis was observed between CEUS and MRI (p < 0 05). Conclusion: CEUS might be beneficial for screening of triple negative breast cancer before operations and can be used to monitor the focus blood perfusion in a real-time way.

scholarly journals Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janu Eva ◽  
Krikavova Lucie ◽  
Little Jirina ◽  
Dvorak Karel ◽  
Brancikova Dagmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Background To determine the benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of breast lesions. Methods A standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed in 230 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 to 5. All lesions were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. MVI (MicroVascular Imaging) technique was used to derive qualitative analysis parameters; blood perfusion of the lesions was assessed (perfusion homogeneity, type of vascularization, enhancement degree). Quantitative analysis was conducted to estimate perfusion changes in the lesions within drawn regions of interest (ROI); parameters TTP (time to peak), PI (peak intensity), WIS (wash in slope), AUC (area under curve) were obtained from time intensity (TI) curves. Acquired data were statistically analyzed to assess the ability of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The combination of parameters was also evaluated for the possibility of increasing the overall diagnostic accuracy. Biological nature of the lesions was verified by a pathologist. Benign lesions without histopathological verification (BI-RADS 3) were followed up for at least 24 months. Results Out of 230 lesions, 146 (64%) were benign, 67 (29%) were malignant, 17 (7%) lesions were eliminated. Malignant tumors showed statistically significantly lower TTP parameters (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 52.7%) and higher WIS values (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 66.4%) than benign tumors. Enhancement degree also proved to be statistically well discriminating as 55.2% of malignant lesions had a rich vascularity (sensitivity 89.6% and specificity 48.6%). The combination of quantitative analysis parameters (TTP, WIS) with enhancement degree did not result in higher accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions. Conclusions We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound has the potential to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions. In particular, this method could help to differentiate lesions BI-RADS category 3 and 4 and thus reduce the number of core-cut biopsies performed in benign lesions. Qualitative analysis, despite its subjective element, appeared to be more beneficial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis did not increase the predictive capability of CEUS.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings with Sonazoid for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukio MITSUZUKA ◽  
Shinsaku KANAZAWA ◽  
Hideaki OGATA ◽  
Kenichi MARUYAMA ◽  
Tsuneyoshi YAKUWA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ultrasound Findings
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document