Surgical Treatment and Rediscussion of Day’s Classification of Crescent Pelvic Fracture Combined with the Sacral Fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1471-1476
Author(s):  
Qing-Song Fu ◽  
Xiao Yu ◽  
Xin-Hua Yuan ◽  
Wei-Bin Wang ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Bone Mass ◽  
Pelvic Fracture ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Good Condition ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Sacral Fracture ◽  
The Mean

Objective: The aim of this study was to summarize the surgical treatment of crescent pelvic fracture combined with the sacral fracture and rediscuss the Day’s classification in the pelvic crescent fractures. Methods: From May 2012 to May 2019, 24 patients of crescent pelvic fracture combined with the sacral fracture were included in this study (15 males, 9 females, mean age: 46.8 years). In this study, there were 8 cases, whose posterior bone mass was large, involving less than 1/2 of the sacroiliac joint. The lateral position was used and the arc incision along the posterior iliac ridge could be taken, the fracture should be first reduced and fixated with lag screw, and then with reconstruction plate. There were another 16 cases, whose posterior bone mass was small, involving more than 1/2 of the sacroiliac joint. For the patients with less injury of sacroiliac joint posterior ligament, the anterior ring of pelvis was fixated first, then the arc-shaped incision along the posterior iliac ridge on both sides was taken in prone position, the fracture could be reduced and fixated with lag screws and then fixated with tension plate. For the patients with server sacroiliac joint complex injury, the open reduction of anterior and posterior rings of the pelvis was taken in the floating position and fixation or arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint could be taken. For the patients without obvious displacement of the sacroiliac joint, the anterior and posterior approaches could be used at the same time in the supine position to fixate the sacroiliac joint fixation. In addition, the average operation time, the mean blood loss, displacement differences between preoperation and postoperation, fracture union time and Hannover Scoring System were recorded. Results: The average operation time was 75 mins (range from 40 mins to 160 mins), the mean blood loss was 561.7 ml (range from 300 ml to 1100 ml). Meanwhile, no lumbosacral radiculomyelitis was injured in these cases. The mean follow-up period was 16.1 months (range from 12 months to 36 months) and the mean radiographic healing time was 3.6 months (range from 3 months to 6 months) respectively. Due to Hannover Scoring System, 18 patients were in excellent condition and 6 patients were in good condition. Conclusion: The crescent pelvic fracture combined with the sacral fracture was not included in current Day’s classification. We treated 24 cases of crescent pelvic fracture combined with the sacral fracture and obtained good clinical outcome. Therefore, we posed a new type to complement it to the Day’s classification, which was defined as crescent pelvic fracture combined with sacral fracture. It was helpful for the surgeons to choose suitable approach and implants.

scholarly journals Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The area which located at the medial pedicle, posterior vertebral body and ventral hemilamina is defined as the hidden zone. Surgical management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation (HZLDH) is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) technique for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with HZLDH were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and fragment were visually exposed using MELS. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 (18–24) months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is safe and effective in the management of HZLDH. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Coblation Adenoidectomy and Regular Curettage Adenoidectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kerala

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. 3559-3566
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam R. T. ◽  
Shahul Hameed A. ◽  
Meera Rajan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tube Function ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND An ideal surgery to remove hypertrophied adenoid mass should be safe, with less bleeding and operation time along with post-operative improvement in the eustachian tubal ventilation and normal respiration. It should also have low morbidity and mortality. Among the various methods described for its removal, the two commonly used methods are conventional cold curettage method and coblation technique. The purpose of this study was to collate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy with the conventional curettage adenoidectomy. METHODS A prospective comparative study with fifty patients was studied who underwent adenoidectomy. Twenty five patients underwent endoscopy assisted coblation adenoidectomy and twenty five patients underwent regular adenoidectomy by curettage. RESULTS Patients who underwent coblation adenoidectomy showed better results during follow up in terms of completeness of removal. 80 % of children undergoing regular adenoidectomy by curettage method showed remnant adenoid tissue in the nasopharynx at the end of the procedure. But it was 6 % among the children undergoing endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. The mean duration of operation was higher for endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy which was significant statistically. The mean blood loss was 30.36 ml in regular curettage adenoidectomy; 10.6 ml with endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy. The grading of pain was significantly lower in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of eustachian tube function after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Coblation adenoidectomy has significant advantages over conventional adenoidectomy in terms of completeness of removal, reduced blood loss, and lower post-operative pain grade. KEYWORDS Coblation, Adenoidectomy, Curettage, Haemorrhage and Complications

scholarly journals Surgery for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Purpose A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 257) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. A total of 45 patients were operated on by an anterior approach (Group A), 52 by a combined anterior and posterior approach (Group B) and 160 by a posterior approach (Group C). Anti-tuberculosis therapy was performed both before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion, pain relief and neurological recovery. The mean loss of correction in group A at last follow-up was higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than in groups A and C. Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only approach is superior to the anterior-only approach in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only approach is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined approach but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction; Three approaches.

Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Surgical management of lumbar disc herniation in the hidden zone is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce a safe and effective technique named microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes within a two year follow-up period. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with hidden zone lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and herniated fragment were visually exposed using this extra-laminar approach. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 months, ranging from 18 to 24 months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is a safe and effective method in the management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

scholarly journals A new scoring system for placement of abdominal aortic balloon in Placenta accreta spectrum patients with placenta previa: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusen Huang ◽  
Jingjie Wang ◽  
Qiuju Xiong ◽  
Wenjian Wang ◽  
Yi Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
New Scoring

Abstract Background In recent years, abdominal aortic balloon occlusion is considered an effective method for placenta accreta spectrum patients with placenta previa. However, not all patients in this category require abdominal aortic balloon placement. This study aims to investigate whether the new scoring system is effective for the placement of the abdominal aortic balloon in Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)patients with placenta previa. Methods PAS patients with placenta previa diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound were included, and divided into three groups according to their scores graded by a new scoring system (grade Ⅰ group ≤ 5 points, 6 points ≤ grade Ⅱ group ≤ 9 points, grade Ⅲ group ≥ 10 points). Patients with grade Ⅲ were placed with an abdominal aortic balloon unless their families and patients strongly refused. Those with grade I were not placed with an abdominal aortic balloon. Those with grade II generally were not placed with an abdominal aortic balloon unless their families and patients strongly request. Indicators were analyzed, including postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion requirements, operation time, and the ability to preserve the uterus and fertility. Results Estimated blood loss, the number of intraoperative transfused patients, postoperative days were different among the three groups. In group 2 (grade II), there was no significant difference in other observation indexes༈intraoperative blood loss 629 ± 214 vs 758 ± 749, P = 0.488, packed red blood cells47 ± 194 vs 154 ± 445, P = 0.488, admission to ICU 0/7 vs 3/71, P = 1.000, total hysterectomies 0/7 vs 2/71, P = 1.000༉(except for the operation time81.4 ± 19.5 vs 61.7 ± 30.6, P = 0.013) between the abdominal aortic balloon and non-abdominal aortic balloon groups. In group 3 (grade III), significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss (950 ± 390 vs 2238 ± 1052, P༜0.001), packed red blood cells(213 ± 311 vs 662 ± 528, P༜0.001), postoperative blood transfusion volume(105 ± 181 vs 300 ± 321, P = 0.008), operation time(90.0 ± 25.9 vs 115.9 ± 45.3, P = 0.013), the proportion of people who need blood transfusion(14 in the IABO vs 11 in the NIABO, P = 0.002) and the total Hysterectomies (0 in the IABO vs 2 in the NIABO, P = 0.011) between the abdominal aortic balloon and non-abdominal aortic balloon groups. Conclusion With the new scoring system, not all patients with PAS and placenta previa need a preventive temporary balloon occlusion of the subrenal abdominal aorta. We recommend placing an abdominal aortic balloon in patients with grade III, for it can control intraoperative bleeding and reduce intraoperative blood transfusion, and reduce the risk of hysterectomy. For patients with grade I and II, abdominal aortic balloon placement is not recommended.

scholarly journals Percutaneous endoscopic treatment of benign and malignant renal pelvis carcinoma: A single-center experience

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Wu Xiu Han ◽  
Sheng Yan Li ◽  
Hao Yuan Chen ◽  
Zhe Yu Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Renal Pelvis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laser Evaporation ◽  
Pathological Grade ◽  
Group I ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a safe and efficient treatment for intro-renal diseases, most of which are calculus disease. In this study, we carried out percutaneous endoscopic nephron-sparing ablation for renal carcinoma in carefully selected patients. Our aim was to evaluate whether percutaneous endoscopic nephron-sparing operation was feasible for patients with renal cell carcinoma.Methods A total of 15 patients with renal pelvis carcinoma were treated with laser evaporation under percutaneous endoscopy between January 2015 and September 2019 ( group I ). Another 13 patients who received standard radical nephroureterectomy were recruited as the control group (group II). We recorded demographic data of the patients, the indication for surgery, tumor pathological grade, size and side of tumor, and the intraoperative and postoperative outcome, including the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complication rate, as well as progression-free survival (PFS).Results In both groups, all of the patients received flexible ureteroscopy. In group I, 14 patients had transitional renal cell carcinoma (UCC), four had pathological grade I, nine had grade II, and one had hemangiopericytoma. In group II, all patients had UCC, five had pathological grade I, and eight had grade II. In group I, the mean operation time was 118 min (65–236 min), the mean blood loss was 110 ml (55–220 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 9 days (7–12 days). During follow-up, two patients died and two had recurrence; among them, one had systematic bone metastasis. The PFS rate was 66.7% (10/15). In group II, the mean operation time was 265 min (185–436 min), the mean blood loss was 133 ml (85–240 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 13 days (9–16 days). During the follow-up, two patients died and there was no local or systematic metastasis. The PFS rate was 84.6% (11/13). There was no significant difference in blood loss between the groups. However, the operation time and mean hospital stay were significantly shorter in group I compared with that in group II ( P < 0.05). But the PFS rate was significantly higher in group II than in group I (P < 0.05).Conclusions This study shows that laser evaporation under percutaneous endoscopy for renal pelvis carcinoma is a safe, effective, and technically feasible procedure for treating benign and malignant renal pelvis carcinoma.

scholarly journals Laennec’s approach for laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Hu ◽  
Gongming Zhang ◽  
Meng Chen ◽  
Chengcheng Zhong ◽  
Mingxu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Hepatic Veins ◽  
Hepatic Hemangioma ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Laennec’s capsule has been found for about 200 years. However, laparoscopic anatomical right and left hemihepatectomy (LARH and LALH) using Laennec’s approach are rarely reported. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the technical details and the surgical outcomes of 15 patients who underwent LAH via Laennec’s approach between May 2017 and July 2020. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were recorded and analyzed. Results Four of 15 patients were diagnosed with hepatic hemangioma, 2 had hepatolithiasis, and 9 patients had primary liver cancer. During the surgery, Laennec’s approach was used for LAH without conversion to open surgery. Four patients were treated with LARH, and 11 patients were cured with LALH. The mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 6.5 years, and four were male. The mean operative time, blood loss, and length of the postoperative hospital stay were 193 ± 49 min, 247 ± 120 mL, and 8.7 ± 2.0 days, respectively. There was no incidence of postoperative bile leakage and bleeding. No mortality occurred. We also demonstrated that Laennec’s capsule does exist around the peripheral hepatic veins with histological confirmation. Conclusions Laennec’s approach is safe and feasible for LAH. Precise isolation of Laennec’s approach based on Laennec’s capsule helps to standardize the surgical techniques for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy.

scholarly journals Laparoendoscopic Two-Site Myomectomy (LETS-M) Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and The Glove-Port Technique

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Chi Wu ◽  
Bor-Ching Sheu ◽  
Kuan-Ju Huang ◽  
Su-Cheng Huang ◽  
Wen-Chun Chang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Experienced Surgeon ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Postoperative Hematoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Glove Port

Abstract We aim to evaluate the surgical outcome of laparoendoscopic two-site myomectomy (LETS-M). The medical records of 204 women receiving LETS-M in a tertiary referral center, including 183 surgeries performed by the experienced surgeon and 21 surgeries performed by 3 well-supervised trainees were retrospectively reviewed. The age of the participants was 39.3±6.4 years. The mean diameter of the largest myoma was 8.5±2.2 cm. The mean weight of the myomas was 281.1±183.1 g. The operation time was 97.6±40.2 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 99.3±115.2 mL. There were 3 (1%) cases of excessive blood loss (more than 500 mL) and 2 (1%) of postoperative hematoma. The only significant difference between the experienced surgeon and trainees was the operation time (92.3±32.2 min vs. 141.2±54 min, p<.001), while the myoma number, myoma diameter, myoma weight, and intraoperative blood loss were not significantly different. The operation time did not differ among different myoma locations. In multivariate analysis, virginity, myoma number, more than 2 large myomas, and myoma size were independent variables for longer operation times. No patient experienced any major complications. The result revealed that LETS-M is a minimally invasive surgical method that is safe, effective, and easy to learn for managing uterine myoma.

scholarly journals The effect and long-term outcome of Partial Anterior Myometrial Resection and Reconstruction under tourniquet and/or prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion on the patients with placenta percreta 

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huidan Zhao ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Ya Tao ◽  
Zhuan Liu ◽  
Cai Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Aorta ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Placenta Percreta ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders often experience overwhelming hemorrhage during cesarean. Placenta percreta is the most serious subtype. In this paper, we propose a new procedure in order to control intraoperative bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the effect and long-term outcome of Partial Anterior Myometrial Resection and Reconstruction under tourniquet and/or prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion on patients with placenta percreta. Methods In a retrospective study, data from patients with placenta percreta who delivered by cesarean section between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 were analyzed. Short-term and long-term outcomes were followed up by outpatient clinic and by phone. The quantity of estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, urine tube time, hospital stay and short-term and long-term complications including fever, thrombosis, hematoma, breast feeding and menstruation problems, lower limb complaints, intrauterine adhesion and so on, were analyzed. Results For all cases, the mean EBL in the surgery was 1399 ± 948 mL, the mean operation time was 107 ± 35minutes, and the mean perioperative hospital stay was 9.6 ± 5.0 days. All the patients had a preserved uterus. Menstrual quantity decreased in 12 patients. Menstrual period prolonged in 11 cases. Uncomfortable abdomen symptoms happened in 9 cases after the surgery. Four cases got thrombosis and 3 got hematoma. Lower extremity discomfort was found in 6 patients. Conclusion Combined with prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion and/or tourniquet, Partial Anterior Myometrial Resection and Reconstruction is highly effective in reducing the intraoperative blood loss and hysterectomy in placenta percreta. But we should pay great attention to short-term and long-term complications, especially to the complications associated with aorta balloon occlusion.

scholarly journals Treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation using one-stage retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901987046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianfeng Ren ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Siyuan Li ◽  
Jiankun Yang ◽  
Yongming Xi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) has been challenging for spine surgeons. Various methods have been used to treat IAAD, but no consensus has been reached. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction and fixation for IAAD. Methods: From March 2007 to May 2015, 13 patients diagnosed with IAAD underwent anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and sequential posterior reduction and fixation. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were retrospectively recorded. Results: The surgeries were accomplished successfully. The mean operative time was about 3.8 h. The mean estimated blood loss was about 130 mL. The patients experienced postoperative pharyngeal pain. Only one patient had a vague voice and increased oral discharge postoperatively. At the final follow-up, JOA scores had significantly increased ( p < 0.05), and all the patients had solid bony fusion. Conclusion: The present study reinforces the efficacy and safety of anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction and fixation for IAAD. It can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and is safe for experienced spine surgeons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document