scholarly journals Evaluation of TRMM Ground-Validation Radar-Rain Errors Using Rain Gauge Measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxin Wang ◽  
David B. Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Error Variance ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Error Characteristics ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract Ground-validation (GV) radar-rain products are often utilized for validation of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) space-based rain estimates, and, hence, quantitative evaluation of the GV radar-rain product error characteristics is vital. This study uses quality-controlled gauge data to compare with TRMM GV radar rain rates in an effort to provide such error characteristics. The results show that significant differences of concurrent radar–gauge rain rates exist at various time scales ranging from 5 min to 1 day, despite lower overall long-term bias. However, the differences between the radar area-averaged rain rates and gauge point rain rates cannot be explained as due to radar error only. The error variance separation method is adapted to partition the variance of radar–gauge differences into the gauge area–point error variance and radar-rain estimation error variance. The results provide relatively reliable quantitative uncertainty evaluation of TRMM GV radar-rain estimates at various time scales and are helpful to understand better the differences between measured radar and gauge rain rates. It is envisaged that this study will contribute to better utilization of GV radar-rain products to validate versatile space-based rain estimates from TRMM, as well as the proposed Global Precipitation Measurement satellite and other satellites.

scholarly journals Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) Prototype in the Korean Peninsula

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Hye Kim ◽  
Mi-Lim Ou ◽  
Jun-Dong Park ◽  
Kenneth R. Morris ◽  
Mathew R. Schwaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Korean Peninsula ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
International Partnerships ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract Since 2009, the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) has participated in ground validation (GV) projects through international partnerships within the framework of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission. The goal of this work is to assess the reliability of ground-based measurements in the Korean Peninsula as a means for validating precipitation products retrieved from satellite microwave sensors, with an emphasis on East Asian precipitation. KMA has a well-developed operational weather service infrastructure composed of meteorological radars, a dense rain gauge network, and automated weather stations. Measurements from these systems, including data from four ground-based radars (GRs), were combined with satellite data from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and used as a proxy for GPM GV over the Korean Peninsula. A time series of mean reflectivity differences (GR − PR) for stratiform-only and above-brightband-only data showed that the time-averaged difference fell between −2.0 and +1.0 dBZ for the four GRs used in this study. Site-specific adjustments for these relative mean biases were applied to GR reflectivities, and detailed statistical comparisons of reflectivity and rain rate between PR and bias-adjusted GR were carried out. In rain-rate comparisons, surface rain from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and the rain gauges were added and the results varied according to rain type. Bias correction has had a positive effect on GR rain rate comparing with PR and gauge rain rates. This study confirmed advance preparation for GPM GV system was optimized on the Korean Peninsula using the official framework.

scholarly journals Ground Validation for the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Wolff ◽  
D. A. Marks ◽  
E. Amitai ◽  
D. S. Silberstein ◽  
B. L. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Marshall Islands ◽  
Error Statistics ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
Nasa Goddard Space ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract An overview of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Ground Validation (GV) Program is presented. This ground validation (GV) program is based at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and is responsible for processing several TRMM science products for validating space-based rain estimates from the TRMM satellite. These products include gauge rain rates, and radar-estimated rain intensities, type, and accumulations, from four primary validation sites (Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands; Melbourne, Florida; Houston, Texas; and Darwin, Australia). Site descriptions of rain gauge networks and operational weather radar configurations are presented together with the unique processing methodologies employed within the Ground Validation System (GVS) software packages. Rainfall intensity estimates are derived using the Window Probability Matching Method (WPMM) and then integrated over specified time scales. Error statistics from both dependent and independent validation techniques show good agreement between gauge-measured and radar-estimated rainfall. A comparison of the NASA GV products and those developed independently by the University of Washington for a subset of data from the Kwajalein Atoll site also shows good agreement. A comparison of NASA GV rain intensities to satellite retrievals from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI), precipitation radar (PR), and Combined (COM) algorithms is presented, and it is shown that the GV and satellite estimates agree quite well over the open ocean.

scholarly journals An Experimental Study of the Small-Scale Variability of Rainfall

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 351-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tokay ◽  
Kurtuluş
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Sharp Drop ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Variable Nature ◽  
Different Seasons ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Small-scale variability of rainfall has been studied employing six dual rain gauge sites at Wallops Island, Virginia. The rain gauge sites were separated between 0.4 and 5 km, matching the beamwidth of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) precipitation radars. During a 2-yr observational period, over 7100 rainy samples were received at 5-min integration. A single gauge did not report as high as 67% of the time when at least one of the other gauges had rainfall in one of the seasons. Since rainfall from one of the six rain gauges is sufficient for the rainy footprint from a satellite, this demonstrates the common occurrence of the partial beamfilling. For the periods where all gauges were reporting rainfall, a single gauge had at most 13% difference from the areal average rainfall in one of the seasons. This suggests that at the spatial scale of 5 km, the variability caused by the rain gradient is relatively less important than the variability arising from a partially filled footprint. During the passage of frontal systems and tropical cyclones, the beam was filled by rain most of the time and this resulted in relatively higher correlation distances. The correlation distance had a sharp drop off from 45 km in moderately variable rainfall to 3 km in highly variable rainfall and ranged from 5 to 35 km between the different seasons. This demonstrates its highly variable nature. Considering temporal sampling, the monthly rainfall error was 35% and 73% for 3-hourly and twice-daily observations, respectively.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oceanic Multisatellite Precipitation Data from Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission and Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Datasets with Rain Gauge Data from Ocean Buoys

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoyan Wu ◽  
Yilei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Tropical Pacific ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
High Rainfall ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
The Tropical Pacific

AbstractThree satellite-derived precipitation datasets [the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) dataset, the NOAA Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH) dataset, and the newly available Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) dataset] are compared with data obtained from 55 rain gauges mounted on floating buoys in the tropics for the period 1 April 2014–30 April 2017. All three satellite datasets underestimate low rainfall and overestimate high rainfall in the tropical Pacific Ocean, but the TMPA dataset does this the most. In the high-rainfall (higher than 4 mm day−1) Atlantic region, all three satellite datasets overestimate low rainfall and underestimate high rainfall, but the IMERG dataset does this the most. For the Indian Ocean, all three rainfall satellite datasets overestimate rainfall at some gauges and underestimate it at others. Of these three satellite products, IMERG is the most accurate in estimating mean precipitation over the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans, but it is less accurate over the tropical Atlantic Ocean for regions of high rainfall. The differences between the three satellite datasets vary by region and there is a need to consider uncertainties in the data before using them for research.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Radar Rainfall Products: Lessons Learned from the NASA TRMM Validation Program in Florida

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1492-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Amitai ◽  
David A. Marks ◽  
David B. Wolff ◽  
David S. Silberstein ◽  
Brad L. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Product Evaluation ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract Evaluation of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite observations is conducted through a comprehensive ground validation (GV) program. Since the launch of TRMM in late 1997, standardized instantaneous and monthly rainfall products are routinely generated using quality-controlled ground-based radar data adjusted to the gauge accumulations from four primary sites. As part of the NASA TRMM GV program, effort is being made to evaluate these GV products. This paper describes the product evaluation effort for the Melbourne, Florida, site. This effort allows us to evaluate the radar rainfall estimates, to improve the algorithms in order to develop better GV products for comparison with the satellite products, and to recognize the major limiting factors in evaluating the estimates that reflect current limitations in radar rainfall estimation. Lessons learned and suggested improvements from this 8-yr mission are summarized in the context of improving planning for future precipitation missions, for example, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM).

scholarly journals Evaluation of TRMM Rain Estimates Using Ground Measurements over Central Florida

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 926-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxin Wang ◽  
David B. Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Multiple Time Scales ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Central Florida ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractThis study evaluates space-based rain estimates from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite using ground-based measurements from the radar (GR) and tipping-bucket rain gauges (TG) over the TRMM Ground Validation (GV) site at Melbourne, Florida. The satellite rain products are derived from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI), precipitation radar (PR), and combined (COM) rain algorithms using observations from both instruments. The TRMM satellite and GV rain products are spatiotemporally matched and are intercompared at multiple time scales over the 12-yr period from 1998 to 2009. On monthly and yearly scales, the TG agree excellently with the GR because the GR rain rates are generated using the TG data as a constraint on a monthly basis. However, large disagreements exist between the GR and TG at shorter time scales because of their significantly different spatial and temporal sampling modes. The yearly biases relative to the GR for the PR and TMI are generally negative, with a few exceptions. The COM bias fluctuates from year to year over the 12-yr period. The PR, TMI, and COM are in good overall agreement with the GR in the lower range of rain rates, but the agreement is notably worse at higher rain rates. The diurnal cycle of rainfall is captured well by all products, but the peak satellite-derived rainfall (PR, TMI, and COM) lags the peak from the ground measurements (GR and TG) by ~1 h.

scholarly journals Comparison of GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B43 Products over Cyprus

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 3212
Author(s):  
Adrianos Retalis ◽  
Dimitris Katsanos ◽  
Filippos Tymvios ◽  
Silas Michaelides
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Annual Basis ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
Gauge Station ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) high-resolution product and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 product are validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for the period from April 2014 to June 2018. The comparison performed is twofold: firstly, the Satellite Precipitation (SP) estimates are compared with the gauge stations’ records on a monthly basis and, secondly, on an annual basis. The validation is based on ground data from a dense and well-maintained network of rain gauges, available in high temporal (hourly) resolution. The results show high correlation coefficient values, on average reaching 0.92 and 0.91 for monthly 3B43 and IMERG estimates, respectively, although both IMERG and TRMM tend to underestimate precipitation (Bias values of −1.6 and −3.0, respectively), especially during the rainy season. On an annual basis, both SP estimates are underestimating precipitation, although IMERG estimates records (R = 0.82) are slightly closer to that of the corresponding gauge station records than those of 3B43 (R = 0.81). Finally, the influence of elevation of both SP estimates was considered by grouping rain gauge stations in three categories, with respect to their elevation. Results indicated that both SP estimates underestimate precipitation with increasing elevation and overestimate it at lower elevations.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Application of Satellite Precipitation Products in Studying the Summer Precipitation Variations over Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ru Huang ◽  
Pin-Yi Liu ◽  
Ya-Hui Chang ◽  
Chian-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Summer Precipitation ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Reference Base ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
June July ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

In March 2019, Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG)-Final v6 (hereafter IMERG6) was released, with data concerning precipitation dating back to June 2000. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has suggested that researchers use IMERG6 to replace the frequently used Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)-3B42 v7 (hereafter TRMM7), which is expected to cease operation in December 2019. This study aims to evaluate the performance of IMERG6 and TRMM7 in depicting the variations of summer (June, July, and August) precipitation over Taiwan during the period 2000–2017. Data used for the comparison also includes IMERG-Final v5 (hereafter IMERG5) and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation for Global Precipitation Measurement (GSMaP)-Gauge v7 (hereafter GSMaP7) during the summers of 2014–2017. Capabilities to apply the four satellite precipitation products (SPPs) in studying summer connective afternoon rainfall (CAR) events, which are the most frequently observed weather patterns in Taiwan, are also examined. Our analyses show that when using more than 400 local rain-gauge observations as a reference base for comparison, IMERG6 outperforms TRMM7 quantitatively and qualitatively, more accurately depicting the variations of the summer precipitation over Taiwan at multiple timescales (including mean status, daily, interannual, and diurnal). IMERG6 also performs better than TRMM7 in capturing the characteristics of CAR activities in Taiwan. These findings highlight that using IMERG6 to replace TRMM7 adds value in studying the spatial-temporal variations of summer precipitation over Taiwan. Furthermore, the analyses also indicated that IMERG6 outperforms IMERG5 and GSMaP7 in the examination of most of the features of summer precipitation over Taiwan during 2014–2017.

scholarly journals Evaluation of GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) Rainfall Products Using the Rain Gauge Network over China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
Tongwen Wu ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Shihao Tang
Keyword(s):  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Observation Network ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractThe Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on board the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission core satellite provides the new-generation global observation of rain since 2014. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the suitability and limitation of GPM-DPR level-2 products over China. The DPR rain rate products are compared with rain gauge data during the summers of five years (2014-2018). The ground observation network is composed of more than 50000 rain gauges. The DPR precipitation products for all scans (DPR_NS, DPR_MS and DPR_HS) generally underestimate rain rates. However, DPR_MS agrees better with gauge estimates than DPR_NS and DPR_HS, yielding the lowest mean error, systematic deviation, and the highest Pearson correlation coefficient. In addition, all three swath types show obvious overestimation over gauge estimates between 0.5 to 1 mm/h and underestimation when gauge estimates are larger than 1 mm/h. The DPR_HS and DPR_MS agree better with gauge estimates below and above 2.5 mm/h, respectively. A deeper investigation was carried out to analyze the variation of DPR_MS’s performance with respect to terrains over China. An obvious underestimation, relative to gauge estimates, occurs in Tibetan Plateau while a slight overestimation occurs in North China Plain. Furthermore, our comprehensive analysis suggests that in Sichuan Basin, the DPR_MS exhibit the best agreement with gauge estimates.

scholarly journals Ground Validation of GPM IMERG Precipitation Products over Iran

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Fadia Maghsood ◽  
Hossein Hashemi ◽  
Seyyed Hasan Hosseini ◽  
Ronny Berndtsson
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Data ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Rainfall Index ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Global Precipitation

Accurate estimation of precipitation is crucial for fundamental input to various hydrometeorological applications. Ground-based precipitation data suffer limitations associated with spatial resolution and coverage; hence, satellite precipitation products can be used to complement traditional rain gauge systems. However, the satellite precipitation data need to be validated before extensive use in the applications. Hence, we conducted a thorough validation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals (IMERG) product for all of Iran. The study focused on investigating the performance of daily and monthly GPM IMERG (early, late, final, and monthly) products by comparing them with ground-based precipitation data at synoptic stations throughout the country (2014–2017). The spatial and temporal performance of the GPM IMERG was evaluated using eight statistical criteria considering the rainfall index at the country level. The rainfall detection ability index (POD) showed that the best IMERG product’s performance is for the spring season while the false alarm ratio (FAR) index indicated the inferior performance of the IMERG products for the summer season. The performance of the products generally increased from IMERG-Early to –Final according to the relative bias (rBIAS) results while, based on the quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots, the IMERG-Final could not be suggested for the applications relying on extreme rainfall estimates compared to IMERG-Early and -Late. The results in this paper improve the understanding of IMERG product’s performance and open a door to future studies regarding hydrometeorological applications of these products in Iran.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document