scholarly journals Comparison of GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B43 Products over Cyprus

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 3212
Author(s):  
Adrianos Retalis ◽  
Dimitris Katsanos ◽  
Filippos Tymvios ◽  
Silas Michaelides
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Annual Basis ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
Gauge Station ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) high-resolution product and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 product are validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for the period from April 2014 to June 2018. The comparison performed is twofold: firstly, the Satellite Precipitation (SP) estimates are compared with the gauge stations’ records on a monthly basis and, secondly, on an annual basis. The validation is based on ground data from a dense and well-maintained network of rain gauges, available in high temporal (hourly) resolution. The results show high correlation coefficient values, on average reaching 0.92 and 0.91 for monthly 3B43 and IMERG estimates, respectively, although both IMERG and TRMM tend to underestimate precipitation (Bias values of −1.6 and −3.0, respectively), especially during the rainy season. On an annual basis, both SP estimates are underestimating precipitation, although IMERG estimates records (R = 0.82) are slightly closer to that of the corresponding gauge station records than those of 3B43 (R = 0.81). Finally, the influence of elevation of both SP estimates was considered by grouping rain gauge stations in three categories, with respect to their elevation. Results indicated that both SP estimates underestimate precipitation with increasing elevation and overestimate it at lower elevations.

scholarly journals The Contribution of Rain Gauges in the Calibration of the IMERG Product: Results from the First Validation over Spain

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Tapiador ◽  
Andrés Navarro ◽  
Eduardo García-Ortega ◽  
Andrés Merino ◽  
José Luis Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Hydrologic Impacts ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractAfter 5 years in orbit, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission has produced enough quality-controlled data to allow the first validation of their precipitation estimates over Spain. High-quality gauge data from the meteorological network of the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET) are used here to validate Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) level 3 estimates of surface precipitation. While aggregated values compare notably well, some differences are found in specific locations. The research investigates the sources of these discrepancies, which are found to be primarily related to the underestimation of orographic precipitation in the IMERG satellite products, as well as to the number of available gauges in the GPCC gauges used for calibrating IMERG. It is shown that IMERG provides suboptimal performance in poorly instrumented areas but that the estimate improves greatly when at least one rain gauge is available for the calibration process. A main, generally applicable conclusion from this research is that the IMERG satellite-derived estimates of precipitation are more useful (r2 > 0.80) for hydrology than interpolated fields of rain gauge measurements when at least one gauge is available for calibrating the satellite product. If no rain gauges were used, the results are still useful but with decreased mean performance (r2 ≈ 0.65). Such figures, however, are greatly improved if no coastal areas are included in the comparison. Removing them is a minor issue in terms of hydrologic impacts, as most rivers in Spain have their sources far from the coast.

scholarly journals Validation of the First Years of GPM Operation over Cyprus

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianos Retalis ◽  
Dimitris Katsanos ◽  
Filippos Tymvios ◽  
Silas Michaelides
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
First Results ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) high-resolution product is validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for a three-year period, starting from April 2014. The precipitation estimates are available in both high temporal (half hourly) and spatial (10 km) resolution and combine data from all passive microwave instruments in the GPM constellation. The comparison performed is twofold: first the GPM data are compared with the precipitation measurements on a monthly basis and then the comparison focuses on extreme events, recorded throughout the first 3 years of GPM’s operation. The validation is based on ground data from a dense and reliable network of rain gauges, also available in high temporal (hourly) resolution. The first results show very good correlation regarding monthly values; however, the correspondence of GPM in extreme precipitation varies from “no correlation” to “high correlation”, depending on case. This study aims to verify the GPM rain estimates, since such a high-resolution dataset has numerous applications, including the assimilation in numerical weather prediction models and the study of flash floods with hydrological models.

scholarly journals An Experimental Study of the Small-Scale Variability of Rainfall

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 351-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tokay ◽  
Kurtuluş
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Sharp Drop ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Variable Nature ◽  
Different Seasons ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Small-scale variability of rainfall has been studied employing six dual rain gauge sites at Wallops Island, Virginia. The rain gauge sites were separated between 0.4 and 5 km, matching the beamwidth of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) precipitation radars. During a 2-yr observational period, over 7100 rainy samples were received at 5-min integration. A single gauge did not report as high as 67% of the time when at least one of the other gauges had rainfall in one of the seasons. Since rainfall from one of the six rain gauges is sufficient for the rainy footprint from a satellite, this demonstrates the common occurrence of the partial beamfilling. For the periods where all gauges were reporting rainfall, a single gauge had at most 13% difference from the areal average rainfall in one of the seasons. This suggests that at the spatial scale of 5 km, the variability caused by the rain gradient is relatively less important than the variability arising from a partially filled footprint. During the passage of frontal systems and tropical cyclones, the beam was filled by rain most of the time and this resulted in relatively higher correlation distances. The correlation distance had a sharp drop off from 45 km in moderately variable rainfall to 3 km in highly variable rainfall and ranged from 5 to 35 km between the different seasons. This demonstrates its highly variable nature. Considering temporal sampling, the monthly rainfall error was 35% and 73% for 3-hourly and twice-daily observations, respectively.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oceanic Multisatellite Precipitation Data from Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission and Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Datasets with Rain Gauge Data from Ocean Buoys

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoyan Wu ◽  
Yilei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Tropical Pacific ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
High Rainfall ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
The Tropical Pacific

AbstractThree satellite-derived precipitation datasets [the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) dataset, the NOAA Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH) dataset, and the newly available Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) dataset] are compared with data obtained from 55 rain gauges mounted on floating buoys in the tropics for the period 1 April 2014–30 April 2017. All three satellite datasets underestimate low rainfall and overestimate high rainfall in the tropical Pacific Ocean, but the TMPA dataset does this the most. In the high-rainfall (higher than 4 mm day−1) Atlantic region, all three satellite datasets overestimate low rainfall and underestimate high rainfall, but the IMERG dataset does this the most. For the Indian Ocean, all three rainfall satellite datasets overestimate rainfall at some gauges and underestimate it at others. Of these three satellite products, IMERG is the most accurate in estimating mean precipitation over the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans, but it is less accurate over the tropical Atlantic Ocean for regions of high rainfall. The differences between the three satellite datasets vary by region and there is a need to consider uncertainties in the data before using them for research.

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of Version 5 (V05) of Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) over the Tianshan Mountains of China

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Yang ◽  
Zhongqin Li ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Anjum ◽  
Yayu Gao
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Heavy Precipitation ◽  
Tianshan Mountains ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Better Than

This study evaluated the performance of the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) version 5 (V05) Early-run and Final-run (IMERG-E and IMERG-F, respectively) products over the Tianshan Mountains. For comparison, the accuracies of two Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) products (3B42RT and 3B42V7) were also analyzed. Performance of the satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs) was analyzed at daily to annual scales from April 2014 to October 2017. Results showed that: (1) IMERG-F and 3B42V7 performed better than IMERG-E and 3B42RT in the characterization of spatiotemporal variability of precipitation; (2) Precipitation estimates from IMERG-F were in the best overall agreement with the gauge-based data, followed by IMERG-E and 3B42V7 on all temporal scales; (3) IMERG-E and 3B42RT products were failed to provide accurate precipitation amounts, whereas IMERG-F and 3B42V7 were able to provide accurate precipitation estimates with the lowest relative biases (4.98% and −1.71%, respectively) and RMSE (0.58 mm/day and 0.76 mm/day, respectively); (4) The enhancement from the IMERG Early-run to the Final-run to capture the moderate to heavy precipitation events was not evident; (5) On seasonal scale, IMEGR-F performed better than all other SPPs, particularly during the spring season with negligible bias (0.28%). It was deduced that IMERG-F was capable of replacing TRMM products.

scholarly journals Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) Prototype in the Korean Peninsula

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Hye Kim ◽  
Mi-Lim Ou ◽  
Jun-Dong Park ◽  
Kenneth R. Morris ◽  
Mathew R. Schwaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Korean Peninsula ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
International Partnerships ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract Since 2009, the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) has participated in ground validation (GV) projects through international partnerships within the framework of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission. The goal of this work is to assess the reliability of ground-based measurements in the Korean Peninsula as a means for validating precipitation products retrieved from satellite microwave sensors, with an emphasis on East Asian precipitation. KMA has a well-developed operational weather service infrastructure composed of meteorological radars, a dense rain gauge network, and automated weather stations. Measurements from these systems, including data from four ground-based radars (GRs), were combined with satellite data from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and used as a proxy for GPM GV over the Korean Peninsula. A time series of mean reflectivity differences (GR − PR) for stratiform-only and above-brightband-only data showed that the time-averaged difference fell between −2.0 and +1.0 dBZ for the four GRs used in this study. Site-specific adjustments for these relative mean biases were applied to GR reflectivities, and detailed statistical comparisons of reflectivity and rain rate between PR and bias-adjusted GR were carried out. In rain-rate comparisons, surface rain from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and the rain gauges were added and the results varied according to rain type. Bias correction has had a positive effect on GR rain rate comparing with PR and gauge rain rates. This study confirmed advance preparation for GPM GV system was optimized on the Korean Peninsula using the official framework.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Application of Satellite Precipitation Products in Studying the Summer Precipitation Variations over Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ru Huang ◽  
Pin-Yi Liu ◽  
Ya-Hui Chang ◽  
Chian-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Summer Precipitation ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Reference Base ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
June July ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

In March 2019, Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG)-Final v6 (hereafter IMERG6) was released, with data concerning precipitation dating back to June 2000. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has suggested that researchers use IMERG6 to replace the frequently used Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)-3B42 v7 (hereafter TRMM7), which is expected to cease operation in December 2019. This study aims to evaluate the performance of IMERG6 and TRMM7 in depicting the variations of summer (June, July, and August) precipitation over Taiwan during the period 2000–2017. Data used for the comparison also includes IMERG-Final v5 (hereafter IMERG5) and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation for Global Precipitation Measurement (GSMaP)-Gauge v7 (hereafter GSMaP7) during the summers of 2014–2017. Capabilities to apply the four satellite precipitation products (SPPs) in studying summer connective afternoon rainfall (CAR) events, which are the most frequently observed weather patterns in Taiwan, are also examined. Our analyses show that when using more than 400 local rain-gauge observations as a reference base for comparison, IMERG6 outperforms TRMM7 quantitatively and qualitatively, more accurately depicting the variations of the summer precipitation over Taiwan at multiple timescales (including mean status, daily, interannual, and diurnal). IMERG6 also performs better than TRMM7 in capturing the characteristics of CAR activities in Taiwan. These findings highlight that using IMERG6 to replace TRMM7 adds value in studying the spatial-temporal variations of summer precipitation over Taiwan. Furthermore, the analyses also indicated that IMERG6 outperforms IMERG5 and GSMaP7 in the examination of most of the features of summer precipitation over Taiwan during 2014–2017.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) Product in the São Francisco Basin (Brazil)

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 2714
Author(s):  
Daniele Tôrres Rodrigues ◽  
Cláudio Moisés Santos e Silva ◽  
Jean Souza dos Reis ◽  
Rayana Santos Araujo Palharini ◽  
Jório Bezerra Cabral Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sao Francisco River ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
São Francisco River ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

The São Francisco River basin is one of the largest in the Brazilian territory. This basin has enormous economic, social and cultural importance for the country. Its water is used for human and animal supply, irrigation and energy production. This basin is located in an area with different climatic characteristics (humid and semiarid) and studies related to precipitation are very important in this region. In this scenario, the objective of this investigation is to present an assessment of rainfall estimated through the Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) product compared with rain gauges over the São Francisco river basin in Brazil. For that, a period from of 20 years and 18 surface weather stations were used to evaluate the product. Based on different evaluation techniques, the study found that the IMERG is appropriate to represent precipitation over the basin. According to the results, the performance of the IMERG product depends on the location where the rain occurs. The bias ranged from −1.67 to 0.34 mm, the RMSE ranged from 5.36 to 10.36 mm and the values of the correlation coefficients between the daily data from the IMERG and rain gauge ranged from 0.28 to 0.61. The results obtained by Student t-test, density curves and regression analysis, in general, show that the IMERG is able to satisfactorily represent rain gauge data. The exception is the eastern portion of the basin, where the product, on average, underestimates the precipitation (p-value < 0.05) and presents the worst statistical metrics.

scholarly journals Introducing and evaluating the Climate Hazards center IMErg with Stations (CHIMES) - Timely station-enhanced Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Chris C. Funk ◽  
Pete Peterson ◽  
George J. Huffman ◽  
Martin Francis Landsfeld ◽  
Christa Peters-Lidard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Absolute Error ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Station Data ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Variance Explained

AbstractAs human exposure to hydro-climatic extremes and the number of in situ precipitation observations declines, precipitation estimates, such as the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG), provide a critical source of information. Here, we present a new gauge-enhanced data set (CHIMES) designed to support global crop and hydrologic modeling and monitoring. CHIMES enhances the IMERG Late Run product using an updated Climate Hazards Center’s (CHC) high-resolution climatology (CHPclim) and low-latency rain-gauge observations. CHPclim differs from other products because it incorporates long-term averages of satellite precipitation, which increases CHPclim’s fidelity in data-sparse areas with complex terrain. This fidelity translates into performance increases in unbiased IMERGlate data, which we refer to as CHIME. This is augmented with gauge observations to produce CHIMES.The CHC’s curated rain-gauge archive contains valuable contributions from many countries. There are two versions of CHIMES: preliminary and final. The final product has more copious and better-curated station data. Every pentad and month, bias-adjusted IMERG late fields are combined with gauge observations to create pentadal and monthly CHIMESprelim and CHIMESfinal. Comparisons with pentadal, high-quality gridded station data show that IMERG late performs well (r=0.75), but has some systematic biases which can be reduced. Monthly cross-validation results indicate that unbiasing increases the variance explained from 50 to 63 percent and decreases the mean absolute error from 48 to 39 mm month−1. Gauge enhancement then increases the variance explained to 75 percent, reducing the mean absolute error to 27 mm month−1.

scholarly journals Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products from TRMM to GPM

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1745
Author(s):  
Jianxin Wang ◽  
Walter A. Petersen ◽  
David B. Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Regional Differences ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Decomposition Approach ◽  
Precipitation Product ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Error Decomposition ◽  
Improved Accuracy ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Statistical Metrics

The global precipitation measurement mission (GPM) has been in operation for seven years and continues to provide a vast quantity of global precipitation data at finer temporospatial resolutions with improved accuracy and coverage. GPM’s signature algorithm, the integrated multisatellite retrievals for GPM (IMERG) is a next-generation of precipitation product expected for wide variety of research and operational applications. This study evaluates the latest version (V06B) of IMERG and its predecessor, the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) multisatellite precipitation (TMPA) 3B42 (V7) using ground-based and gauge-corrected multiradar multisensor system (MRMS) precipitation products over the conterminous United States (CONUS). The spatial distributions of all products are analyzed. The error characteristics are further examined for 3B42 and IMERG in winter and summer by an error decomposition approach, which partitions total bias into hit bias, biases due to missed precipitation and false precipitation. The volumetric and categorical statistical metrics are used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the two satellite-based products. All products show a similar precipitation climatology with some regional differences. The two satellite-based products perform better in the eastern CONUS than in the mountainous Western CONUS. The evaluation demonstrates the clear improvement in IMERG precipitation product in comparison with its predecessor 3B42, especially in reducing missed precipitation in winter and summer, and hit bias in winter, resulting in better performance in capturing lighter and heavier precipitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document