scholarly journals The Effect of Tropospheric Jet Latitude on Coupling between the Stratospheric Polar Vortex and the Troposphere

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2077-2095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaim I. Garfinkel ◽  
Darryn W. Waugh ◽  
Edwin P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Phase Speed ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
The North ◽  
Eddy Heat Flux ◽  
Tropospheric Circulation ◽  
The North Pacific

Abstract A dry general circulation model is used to investigate how coupling between the stratospheric polar vortex and the extratropical tropospheric circulation depends on the latitude of the tropospheric jet. The tropospheric response to an identical stratospheric vortex configuration is shown to be strongest for a jet centered near 40° and weaker for jets near either 30° or 50° by more than a factor of 3. Stratosphere-focused mechanisms based on stratospheric potential vorticity inversion, eddy phase speed, and planetary wave reflection, as well as arguments based on tropospheric eddy heat flux and zonal length scale, appear to be incapable of explaining the differences in the magnitude of the jet shift. In contrast, arguments based purely on tropospheric variability involving the strength of eddy–zonal mean flow feedbacks and jet persistence, and related changes in the synoptic eddy momentum flux, appear to explain this effect. The dependence of coupling between the stratospheric polar vortex and the troposphere on tropospheric jet latitude found here is consistent with 1) the observed variability in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific and 2) the trend in the Southern Hemisphere as projected by comprehensive models.

Tropospheric Precursors of Anomalous Northern Hemisphere Stratospheric Polar Vortices

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 3282-3299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaim I. Garfinkel ◽  
Dennis L. Hartmann ◽  
Fabrizio Sassi
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
North Pacific ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Pacific

Abstract Regional extratropical tropospheric variability in the North Pacific and eastern Europe is well correlated with variability in the Northern Hemisphere wintertime stratospheric polar vortex in both the ECMWF reanalysis record and in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model. To explain this correlation, the link between stratospheric vertical Eliassen–Palm flux variability and tropospheric variability is analyzed. Simple reasoning shows that variability in the North Pacific and eastern Europe can deepen or flatten the wintertime tropospheric stationary waves, and in particular its wavenumber-1 and -2 components, thus providing a physical explanation for the correlation between these regions and vortex weakening. These two pathways begin to weaken the upper stratospheric vortex nearly immediately, with a peak influence apparent after a lag of some 20 days. The influence then appears to propagate downward in time, as expected from wave–mean flow interaction theory. These patterns are influenced by ENSO and October Eurasian snow cover. Perturbations in the vortex induced by the two regions add linearly. These two patterns and the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) are linearly related to 40% of polar vortex variability during winter in the reanalysis record.

An ecosystem model for the North Pacific embedded in a general circulation model

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Kawamiya ◽  
Michio J. Kishi ◽  
Nobuo Suginohara
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation Model ◽  
North Pacific ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Ecosystem Model ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Pacific

scholarly journals Influence of Wintertime Polar Vortex Variation on the Climate over the North Pacific during Late Winter and Spring

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kequan Zhang ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Mian Xu ◽  
Jiankai Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Ocean ◽  
North Pacific ◽  
Geopotential Height ◽  
North Pacific Ocean ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Pacific ◽  
The Bering Sea

The effects of wintertime stratospheric polar vortex variation on the climate over the North Pacific Ocean during late winter and spring are analyzed using the National Centers for Environmental Predictions, version 2 (NCEP2) reanalysis dataset. The analysis revealed that, during weak polar vortex (WPV) events, there are noticeably lower geopotential height anomalies over the Bering Sea and greater height anomalies over the central part of the North Pacific Ocean than during strong polar vortex (SPV) events. The formation of the dipolar structure of the geopotential height anomalies is due to a weakened polar jet and a strengthened mid-latitude jet in the troposphere via geostrophic equilibrium. The mechanisms responsible for the changes in the tropospheric jet over the North Pacific Ocean are summarized as follows: when the stratospheric polar westerly is decelerated, the high-latitude eastward waves slow down, and the enhanced equatorward propagation of the eddy momentum flux throughout the troposphere at 60° N. Consequently, the eddy-driven jet over the North Pacific Ocean also shows a southward displacement, leading to a weaker polar jet but a stronger mid-latitude westerly compared with those during the SPV events. Furthermore, anomalous anti-cyclonic flows associated with the higher pressure over the North Pacific Ocean during WPV events induce a warming sea surface temperature (SST) over the western and central parts of the North Pacific Ocean and a cooling SST over the Bering Sea and along the west coast of North America. This SST pattern can last until May, which favors the persistence of the anti-cyclonic flows over the North Pacific Ocean during WPV events. A well-resolved stratosphere and coupled atmosphere-ocean model (CMCC-CMS) can basically reproduce the impacts of stratospheric polar vortex variations on the North Pacific climate as seen in NCEP2 data, although the simulated dipole of geopotential height anomalies is shifted more southward.

Influence of gravity wave drag parametrisations on the stratospheric circulation of seasonal ICON-NWP experiments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Köhler ◽  
Dörthe Handorf ◽  
Ralf Jaiser ◽  
Klaus Dethloff ◽  
Günther Zängl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Wave ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Sensitivity Experiments ◽  
Hemisphere Winter

<p>The stratospheric polar vortex is highly variable in winter and thus, models often struggle to capture its variability and strength. Yet, the influence of the stratosphere on the tropospheric circulation becomes highly important in Northern Hemisphere winter and is one of the main potential sources for subseasonal to seasonal prediction skill in mid latitudes. Mid-latitude extreme weather patterns in winter are often preceded by sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), which are the strongest manifestation of the coupling between stratosphere and troposphere. Misrepresentation of the SSW-frequency and stratospheric biases in models can therefore also cause biases in the troposphere.</p><p>In this context this work comprises the analysis of four seasonal ensemble experiments with a high-resolution, nonhydrostatic global atmospheric general circulation model in numerical weather prediction mode (ICON-NWP). The main focus thereby lies on the variability and strength of the stratospheric polar vortex. We identified the gravity wave drag parametrisations as one important factor influencing stratospheric dynamics. As the control experiment with default gravity wave drag settings exhibits an overestimated amount of SSWs and a weak stratospheric polar vortex, three sensitivity experiments with adjusted drag parametrisations were generated. Hence, the parametrisations for the non-orographic gravity wave drag and the subgrid‐scale orographic (SSO) drag were chosen with the goal of strengthening the stratospheric polar vortex. Biases to ERA-Interim are reduced with both adjustments, especially in high latitudes. Whereas the positive effect of the reduced non-orographic gravity wave drag is strongest in the mid-stratosphere in winter, the adjusted SSO-scheme primarily affects the troposphere by reducing mean sea level pressure biases in all months. A fourth experiment using both adjustments exhibits improvements in the troposphere and stratosphere. Although the stratospheric polar vortex in winter is strengthened in all sensitivity experiments, it is still simulated too weak compared to ERA-Interim. Further mechanisms causing this weakness are also investigated in this study.</p>

scholarly journals Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1920-1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin P. Gerber ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Stationary Waves ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Sudden Warming ◽  
Annular Modes ◽  
Dynamical Coupling ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Stratospheric Variability

Abstract The impact of stratospheric variability on the dynamical coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere is explored in a relatively simple atmospheric general circulation model. Variability of the model’s stratospheric polar vortex, or polar night jet, is induced by topographically forced stationary waves. A robust relationship is found between the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex and the latitude of the tropospheric jet, confirming and extending earlier results in the absence of stationary waves. In both the climatological mean and on intraseasonal time scales, a weaker vortex is associated with an equatorward shift in the tropospheric jet and vice versa. It is found that the mean structure and variability of the vortex in the model is very sensitive to the amplitude of the topography and that Northern Hemisphere–like variability, with a realistic frequency of stratospheric sudden warming events, occurs only for a relatively narrow range of topographic heights. When the model captures sudden warming events with fidelity, however, the exchange of information both upward and downward between the troposphere and stratosphere closely resembles that in observations. The influence of stratospheric variability on variability in the troposphere is demonstrated by comparing integrations with and without an active stratosphere. A realistic, time-dependent stratospheric circulation increases the persistence of the tropospheric annular modes, and the dynamical coupling is most apparent prior to and following stratospheric sudden warming events.

Tropospheric Precursors and Stratospheric Warmings

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 6562-6572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judah Cohen ◽  
Justin Jones
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Energy Flux ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sea Level Pressure ◽  
Winter Climate ◽  
Level Pressure ◽  
The North ◽  
Tropospheric Circulation ◽  
The North Pacific

Abstract Many tropospheric Arctic Oscillation (AO) events are preceded by stratospheric AO events and even earlier in time by anomalous upward energy flux associated with Rossby waves in the troposphere. This study identifies lower-tropospheric circulation anomalies that precede large AO events in both the troposphere and stratosphere and the anomalous upward energy flux. Compositing analysis of stratospheric warming events identifies regional tropospheric precursors, which precede stratospheric warmings. The tropospheric precursor is found to vary when compositing over polar vortex displacements and splits separately. Prior to vortex displacements the main anomaly sea level pressure center of the tropospheric precursor is located across northwest Eurasia and is associated with the Siberian high. Prior to vortex splits a similar anomaly center is identified in the tropospheric precursor but is weaker and appears to be more strongly related to a shift in the storm tracks. Differences in the sea level pressure anomalies in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific are also observed when comparing the precursors prior to vortex displacements and splits. Identification of a unique tropospheric precursor to stratospheric warming and subsequent tropospheric AO events can help to improve understanding troposphere–stratosphere coupling. Furthermore, the observational evidence presented here can be compared with model simulations of winter climate variability and lead to potential model improvements.

Sensitivity of the Tropospheric Circulation to Changes in the Strength of the Stratospheric Polar Vortex

2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
pp. 2191-2207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Jung ◽  
Jan Barkmeijer
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
The North ◽  
European Area ◽  
Extended Range ◽  
Tropospheric Circulation ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation ◽  
Ecmwf Model ◽  
Strong Vortex

Abstract The sensitivity of the wintertime tropospheric circulation to changes in the strength of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex is studied using one of the latest versions of the ECMWF model. Three sets of experiments were carried out: one control integration and two integrations in which the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex has been gradually reduced and increased, respectively, during the course of the integration. The strength of the polar vortex is changed by applying a forcing to the model tendencies in the stratosphere only. The forcing has been obtained using the adjoint technique. It is shown that, in the ECMWF model, changes in the strength of the polar vortex in the middle and lower stratosphere have a significant and slightly delayed (on the order of days) impact on the tropospheric circulation. The tropospheric response shows some resemblance to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), though the centers of action are slightly shifted toward the east compared to those of the NAO. Furthermore, a separate comparison of the response to a weak and strong vortex forcing suggests that to first order the tropospheric response is linear within a range of realistic stratospheric perturbations. From the results presented, it is argued that extended-range forecasts in the European area particularly benefit from the stratosphere–troposphere link.

Understanding the Basin Asymmetry in Surface Response to Sudden Stratospheric Warmings from an Ocean-Atmosphere Coupled Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-54
Author(s):  
Ying Dai ◽  
Peter Hitchcock
Keyword(s):  
North Pacific ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Surface Response ◽  
The North ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Ocean Atmosphere ◽  
The North Pacific

AbstractThe canonical tropospheric response to a weakening of the stratospheric vortex—an equatorward shift of the eddy-driven jet—is mostly limited to the North Atlantic following sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs). A coherent change in the Pacific eddy-driven jet is notably absent. Why is this so? Using daily reanalysis data, we show that air-sea interactions over the North Pacific are responsible for the basin-asymmetric response to SSWs. Prior to the onset of some SSWs, their tropospheric precursors produce a dipolar SST pattern in the North Pacific, which then persists as the stratospheric polar vortex breaks down following the onset of the SSW. By reinforcing the lower tropospheric baroclinicity, the dipolar SST pattern helps sustain the generation of baroclinic eddies, strengthening the near-surface Pacific eddy-driven jet and maintaining its near-climatological-mean state. This prevents the jet from being perturbed by the downward influence of the stratospheric anomalies. As a result, these SSWs exhibit a highly basin-asymmetric surface response with only the Atlantic eddy-driven jet shifted equatorward. For SSWs occurring without the atmospheric precursors in the North Pacific troposphere, the dipolar SST pattern is absent due to the lack of the atmospheric forcing. In the absence of the dipolar SST pattern and the resultant eddy-mean flow feedbacks, these SSWs exhibit a basin-symmetric surface response with both the Atlantic and the Pacific eddy-driven jets shifted equatorward. Our results provide an ocean-atmosphere coupled perspective on stratosphere-troposphere interaction following SSW events and have potential for improving subseasonal to seasonal forecasts for surface weather and climate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document