scholarly journals On the Circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2352-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Spall
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Numerical Model ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Analytic Model ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract An idealized eddy-resolving numerical model and an analytic three-layer model are used to develop ideas about what controls the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean. The numerical model is forced with a surface heat flux, uniform winds, and a source of low-salinity water near the surface around the perimeter of an Arctic basin. Despite this idealized configuration, the model is able to reproduce many general aspects of the Arctic Ocean circulation and hydrography, including exchange through Fram Strait, circulation of Atlantic Water, a halocline, ice cover and transport, surface heat flux, and a Beaufort Gyre. The analytic model depends on a nondimensional number, and provides theoretical estimates of the halocline depth, stratification, freshwater content, and baroclinic shear in the boundary current. An empirical relationship between freshwater content and sea surface height allows for a prediction of the transport of Atlantic Water in the cyclonic boundary current. Parameters typical of the Arctic Ocean produce a cyclonic boundary current of Atlantic Water of O(1 − 2 Sv; where 1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) and a halocline depth of O(200 m), in reasonable agreement with observations. The theory compares well with a series of numerical model calculations in which mixing and environmental parameters are varied, thus lending credibility to the dynamics of the analytic model. In these models, lateral eddy fluxes from the boundary and vertical diffusion in the interior are important drivers of the halocline and the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean.

scholarly journals Regional sensible and radiative heat flux estimates for the winter Arctic during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment

2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (C6) ◽  
pp. 14093-14102 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Overland ◽  
S. Lyn McNutt ◽  
Joanne Groves ◽  
Sigrid Salo ◽  
Edgar L. Andreas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Radiative Heat ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Radiative Heat Flux ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Surface Heat Budget

scholarly journals Does the East Greenland Current exist in the northern Fram Strait?

Ocean Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1147-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Elisabeth Richter ◽  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Claudia Wekerle
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Shelf Break ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Current Loop ◽  
Fram Strait ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
East Greenland Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Warm Atlantic Water (AW) flows around the Nordic Seas in a cyclonic boundary current loop. Some AW enters the Arctic Ocean where it is transformed to Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW) before exiting through the Fram Strait. There the AAW is joined by recirculating AW. Here we present the first summer synoptic study targeted at resolving this confluence in the Fram Strait which forms the East Greenland Current (EGC). Absolute geostrophic velocities and hydrography from observations in 2016, including four sections crossing the east Greenland shelf break, are compared to output from an eddy-resolving configuration of the sea ice–ocean model FESOM. Far offshore (120 km at 80.8∘ N) AW warmer than 2 ∘C is found in the northern Fram Strait. The Arctic Ocean outflow there is broad and barotropic, but gets narrower and more baroclinic toward the south as recirculating AW increases the cross-shelf-break density gradient. This barotropic to baroclinic transition appears to form the well-known EGC boundary current flowing along the shelf break farther south where it has been previously described. In this realization, between 80.2 and 76.5∘ N, the southward transport along the east Greenland shelf break increases from roughly 1 Sv to about 4 Sv and the proportion of AW to AAW also increases fourfold from 19±8 % to 80±3 %. Consequently, in the southern Fram Strait, AW can propagate into the Norske Trough on the east Greenland shelf and reach the large marine-terminating glaciers there. High instantaneous variability observed in both the synoptic data and the model output is attributed to eddies, the representation of which is crucial as they mediate the westward transport of AW in the recirculation and thus structure the confluence forming the EGC.

scholarly journals Heat, salt, and volume transports in the eastern Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean, from two years of mooring observations

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Pnyushkov ◽  
Igor Polyakov ◽  
Robert Rember ◽  
Vladimir Ivanov ◽  
Matthew B. Alkire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Salt Transport ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Eurasian Basin ◽  
The Laptev Sea ◽  
Volume Transports

Abstract. This study discusses along-slope volume, heat, and salt transports derived from observations collected in 2013–15 using a cross-slope array of six moorings ranging from 250 m to 3900 m in the eastern Eurasian Basin (EB) of the Arctic Ocean. These observations demonstrate that in the upper 780 m layer, the along-slope boundary current advected, on average, 5.1 ± 0.1 Sv of water, predominantly in the eastward (shallow-to-right) direction. Monthly net volume transports across the Laptev Sea slope vary widely, from ~ 0.3 ± 0.8 in April 2014 to ~ 9.9 ± 0.8 Sv in June 2014. 3.1 ± 0.1 Sv (or 60 %) of the net transport was associated with warm and salty intermediate-depth Atlantic Water (AW). Calculated heat transport for 2013–15 (relative to −1.8 °C) was 46.0 ± 1.7 TW, and net salt transport (relative to zero salinity) was 172 ± 6 Mkg/s. Estimates for AW heat and salt transports were 32.7 ± 1.3 TW (71 % of net heat transport) and 112 ± 4 Mkg/s (65 % of net salt transport). The variability of currents explains ~ 90 % of the variability of the heat and salt transports. The remaining ~ 10 % is controlled by temperature and salinity anomalies together with temporal variability of the AW layer thickness. The annual mean volume transports decreased by 25 % from 5.8 ± 0.2 Sv in 2013–14 to 4.4 ± 0.2 Sv in 2014–15 suggesting that changes of the transports at interannual and longer time scales in the eastern EB may be significant.

scholarly journals Does the East Greenland Current exist in northern Fram Strait?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Elisabeth Richter ◽  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Claudia Wekerle
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Current Loop ◽  
Fram Strait ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
East Greenland Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Warm Atlantic Water (AW) flows around the Nordic Seas in a cyclonic boundary current loop. Some AW enters the Arctic Ocean where it is transformed to Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW) before exiting through Fram Strait. There the AAW is joined by recirculating AW. Here we present the first summer synoptic study targeted at resolving this confluence in Fram Strait which forms the East Greenland Current (EGC). Absolute geostrophic velocities and hydrography from observations in 2016, including four sections crossing the east Greenland shelfbreak, are compared to output from an eddy-resolving configuration of the sea–ice ocean model FESOM. Far offshore (120 km at 80.8° N) AW warmer than 2 °C is found in northern Fram Strait. The Arctic Ocean outflow there is broad and barotropic, but gets narrower and more baroclinic toward the south as recirculating AW increases the cross-shelfbreak density gradient. This barotropic to baroclinic transition appears to form the well-known EGC boundary current flowing along the shelfbreak further south where it has been previously described. In this realization, between 80.2° N and 76.5° N, the southward transport along the east Greenland shelfbreak increases from roughly 1 Sv to about 4 Sv and the warm water composition, defined as the fraction of AW of the sum of AW and AAW (AW/(AW + AAW)), changes from 19 ± 8 % to 80 ± 3 %. Consequently, in southern Fram Strait, AW can propagate into Norske Trough on the east Greenland shelf and reach the large marine terminating glaciers there. High instantaneous variability observed in both the synoptic data and the model output is attributed to eddies, the representation of which is crucial as they mediate the westward transport of AW in the recirculation and thus structure the confluence forming the EGC.

scholarly journals On the Interplay between the Circulation in the Surface and the Intermediate Layers of the Arctic Ocean

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1393-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Lique ◽  
Helen L. Johnson ◽  
Peter E. D. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Current Strength ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ekman Pumping ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
Layer System ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

AbstractThe circulation of the Arctic Ocean has traditionally been studied as a two-layer system, with a wind-driven anticyclonic gyre in the surface layer and a cyclonic boundary current in the Atlantic Water (AW) layer, primarily forced remotely through inflow and outflow to the basin. Here, an idealized numerical model is used to investigate the interplay between the dynamics of the two layers and to explore the response of the circulation in each of the layers to a change in the forcing in either layer. In the model, the intensity of the circulation in the surface and AW layers is primarily set by the ocean surface stress curl intensity and the inflow to the basin, respectively. Additionally, the surface layer circulation can strongly modulate the intensity of the intermediate layer by constraining the lateral extent of the AW current on the slope. In contrast, a change in the AW current strength has little effect on the surface layer circulation. The intensity of the circulation in the surface layer adjusts over a decade, on a time scale consistent with a balance between Ekman pumping and an eddy-induced volume flux toward the boundary, while the circulation in the AW layer adjusts quickly to any change of forcing (~1 month) through the propagation of boundary-trapped waves. As the two layers have different adjustment processes and time scales, and are subject to forcing that varies on all time scales, the interplay between the dynamics of the two layers is complex, and more simultaneous observations of the circulation within the two layers are required to fully understand it.

Topographically trapped waves along the continental slope north of Svalbard

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Kalhagen ◽  
Frank Nilsen ◽  
Ragnheid Skogseth ◽  
Ilker Fer ◽  
Zoé Koenig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchange ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Continental Slope ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
Trapped Waves ◽  
Current Time ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Lateral Exchange

<p>On the continental slope north of Svalbard, Atlantic Water is transported eastward as a part of the Arctic Circumpolar Boundary Current. As inflow of Atlantic Water through the Fram Strait is the largest oceanic heat source to the Arctic Ocean, it is important to improve our knowledge about the dynamics and processes that govern the heat exchange between Atlantic Water and water masses of Arctic origin. This includes processes that enable lateral exchange across the shelf break or into the interior of the deep basin. Here, we study the vorticity dynamics on the slope and its contribution to the water mass modifications and heat exchange. Focusing on topographically trapped waves – sub-inertial oscillations trapped to follow the continental slope – we establish their existence and properties on the northern slope of Svalbard using a free baroclinic wave model. Their dependence on background stratification and current properties is explored in sensitivity analysis. Next, we discuss their contribution to lateral exchange from the boundary current on the slope to the continental shelf, troughs, and the deep Nansen Basin in the Arctic Ocean, including exchange associated with instabilities and resulting eddy shedding off the vorticity waves. Hydrographic and current time series from 2018-19 at two mooring arrays crossing the slope north of Svalbard (The Nansen Legacy project) are used to associate the observed physical environment with model-predicted topographic waves. Analysis of the in-situ data will determine which wave mode that can exist over the sloping seafloor and the observed hydrography and flow, and the model will give the corresponding spatial characteristics for the given frequencies and wave numbers. Energetic oscillations present in the observations are analyzed in light of the model results. Of special interest are the seasonal variability in hydrography and current strength and the resulting modification of the wave characteristics. Moreover, the interaction between the vorticity waves and tidal oscillations in the diurnal band is emphasized.</p>

scholarly journals Heat, salt, and volume transports in the eastern Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean from 2 years of mooring observations

Ocean Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1349-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Pnyushkov ◽  
Igor V. Polyakov ◽  
Robert Rember ◽  
Vladimir V. Ivanov ◽  
Matthew B. Alkire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Salt Transport ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Eurasian Basin ◽  
The Laptev Sea ◽  
Volume Transports

Abstract. This study discusses along-slope volume, heat, and salt transports derived from observations collected in 2013–2015 using a cross-slope array of six moorings ranging from 250 to 3900 m in the eastern Eurasian Basin (EB) of the Arctic Ocean. These observations demonstrate that in the upper 780 m layer, the along-slope boundary current advected, on average, 5.1±0.1 Sv of water, predominantly in the eastward (shallow-to-right) direction. Monthly net volume transports across the Laptev Sea slope vary widely, from ∼0.3±0.8 in April 2014 to ∼9.9±0.8 Sv in June 2014; 3.1±0.1 Sv (or 60 %) of the net transport was associated with warm and salty intermediate-depth Atlantic Water (AW). Calculated heat transport for 2013–2015 (relative to −1.8 ∘C) was 46.0±1.7 TW, and net salt transport (relative to zero salinity) was 172±6 Mkg s−1. Estimates for AW heat and salt transports were 32.7±1.3 TW (71 % of net heat transport) and 112±4 Mkg s−1 (65 % of net salt transport). The variability of currents explains ∼90 % of the variability in the heat and salt transports. The remaining ∼10 % is controlled by temperature and salinity anomalies together with the temporal variability of the AW layer thickness. The annual mean volume transports decreased by 25 % from 5.8±0.2 Sv in 2013–2014 to 4.4±0.2 Sv in 2014–2015, suggesting that changes in the transports at interannual and longer timescales in the eastern EB may be significant.

The Atlantic Water boundary current North of Svalbard in 2018-2019: background properties, dynamics and turbulence.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoé Koenig ◽  
Eivind Kolås ◽  
Kjersti Kalhagen ◽  
Ilker Fer
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
Turbulent Dissipation ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

<p></p><p>North of Svalbard is a key region for the Arctic Ocean heat and salt budget as it is the gateway for one of the main branches of Atlantic Water in the Arctic. As the Atlantic Water layer advances into the Arctic Ocean, its core deepens from about 250 m depth around the Yermak Plateau to 350 m in the Laptev Sea, and gets colder and less saline due to mixing with surrounding waters. The complex topography in the region facilitates vertical and horizontal exchanges between the water masses and, together with strong shear and tidal forcing driving increased mixing rates, impacts the heat and salt content of the Atlantic Water layer that will circulate the Arctic Ocean.</p><p></p><p>In summer 2018, 6 moorings organized in 2 arrays were deployed across the Atlantic Water Boundary current for a year, within the framework of the Nansen Legacy project. In parallel, turbulence structure in the Atlantic Water boundary current was measured north of Svalbard in two different periods (July and September), using a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (Rockland Scientific) in both cruises and a Microrider (Rockland Scientific) mounted on a Slocum glider in September.</p><p></p><p>Using mooring observations, we investigated the background properties of the Atlantic Water boundary current (transport, vertical structure, seasonal variations) and the possible sources of the low-frequency variations (period of more than 2 weeks).</p><p></p><p> Using observations during the cruise periods, we investigated changes in the mixed layer through the summer and the sources of vertical mixing in the water column. In the mixed layer, depth-integrated turbulent dissipation rate is about 10<sup>-4</sup> W m<sup>-2</sup>. Variations in the turbulent heat, salinity and buoyancy fluxes are strong, and hypothesized to be affected by the evolution of the surface meltwater layer through summer. When integrated over the Atlantic Water layer, the turbulent dissipation rate is about 3.10<sup>-3</sup> W m<sup>-2</sup>. Whilst the wind work exerted in the mixed layer accounts for most of the variability in the mixed layer, tidal forcing plays an important role in setting the dissipation rates deeper in the water column.</p><p></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document