The Atlantic Water boundary current North of Svalbard in 2018-2019: background properties, dynamics and turbulence.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoé Koenig ◽  
Eivind Kolås ◽  
Kjersti Kalhagen ◽  
Ilker Fer
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
Turbulent Dissipation ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

<p></p><p>North of Svalbard is a key region for the Arctic Ocean heat and salt budget as it is the gateway for one of the main branches of Atlantic Water in the Arctic. As the Atlantic Water layer advances into the Arctic Ocean, its core deepens from about 250 m depth around the Yermak Plateau to 350 m in the Laptev Sea, and gets colder and less saline due to mixing with surrounding waters. The complex topography in the region facilitates vertical and horizontal exchanges between the water masses and, together with strong shear and tidal forcing driving increased mixing rates, impacts the heat and salt content of the Atlantic Water layer that will circulate the Arctic Ocean.</p><p></p><p>In summer 2018, 6 moorings organized in 2 arrays were deployed across the Atlantic Water Boundary current for a year, within the framework of the Nansen Legacy project. In parallel, turbulence structure in the Atlantic Water boundary current was measured north of Svalbard in two different periods (July and September), using a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (Rockland Scientific) in both cruises and a Microrider (Rockland Scientific) mounted on a Slocum glider in September.</p><p></p><p>Using mooring observations, we investigated the background properties of the Atlantic Water boundary current (transport, vertical structure, seasonal variations) and the possible sources of the low-frequency variations (period of more than 2 weeks).</p><p></p><p> Using observations during the cruise periods, we investigated changes in the mixed layer through the summer and the sources of vertical mixing in the water column. In the mixed layer, depth-integrated turbulent dissipation rate is about 10<sup>-4</sup> W m<sup>-2</sup>. Variations in the turbulent heat, salinity and buoyancy fluxes are strong, and hypothesized to be affected by the evolution of the surface meltwater layer through summer. When integrated over the Atlantic Water layer, the turbulent dissipation rate is about 3.10<sup>-3</sup> W m<sup>-2</sup>. Whilst the wind work exerted in the mixed layer accounts for most of the variability in the mixed layer, tidal forcing plays an important role in setting the dissipation rates deeper in the water column.</p><p></p>

scholarly journals Impact of the Arctic Ocean Atlantic water layer on Siberian shelf hydrography

2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (C8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor A. Dmitrenko ◽  
Sergey A. Kirillov ◽  
L. Bruno Tremblay ◽  
Dorothea Bauch ◽  
Jens A. Hölemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Siberian Shelf

scholarly journals Assessment of the Atlantic water layer in the Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 climate models

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 5279-5291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Shu ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Jie Su ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Fangli Qiao
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cmip5 Climate Models ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

scholarly journals Does the East Greenland Current exist in the northern Fram Strait?

Ocean Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1147-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Elisabeth Richter ◽  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Claudia Wekerle
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Shelf Break ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Current Loop ◽  
Fram Strait ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
East Greenland Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Warm Atlantic Water (AW) flows around the Nordic Seas in a cyclonic boundary current loop. Some AW enters the Arctic Ocean where it is transformed to Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW) before exiting through the Fram Strait. There the AAW is joined by recirculating AW. Here we present the first summer synoptic study targeted at resolving this confluence in the Fram Strait which forms the East Greenland Current (EGC). Absolute geostrophic velocities and hydrography from observations in 2016, including four sections crossing the east Greenland shelf break, are compared to output from an eddy-resolving configuration of the sea ice–ocean model FESOM. Far offshore (120 km at 80.8∘ N) AW warmer than 2 ∘C is found in the northern Fram Strait. The Arctic Ocean outflow there is broad and barotropic, but gets narrower and more baroclinic toward the south as recirculating AW increases the cross-shelf-break density gradient. This barotropic to baroclinic transition appears to form the well-known EGC boundary current flowing along the shelf break farther south where it has been previously described. In this realization, between 80.2 and 76.5∘ N, the southward transport along the east Greenland shelf break increases from roughly 1 Sv to about 4 Sv and the proportion of AW to AAW also increases fourfold from 19±8 % to 80±3 %. Consequently, in the southern Fram Strait, AW can propagate into the Norske Trough on the east Greenland shelf and reach the large marine-terminating glaciers there. High instantaneous variability observed in both the synoptic data and the model output is attributed to eddies, the representation of which is crucial as they mediate the westward transport of AW in the recirculation and thus structure the confluence forming the EGC.

Transformation of Atlantic Water in the Barents Sea in winter: overview of “Transarctika-2019” cruise results

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Ivanov ◽  
Ivan Frolov ◽  
Kirill Filchuk
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Feature ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Open Sea ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

<p>In the recent few years the topic of accelerated sea ice loss, and related changes in the vertical structure of water masses in the East-Atlantic sector of the Arctic Ocean, including the Barents Sea and the western part of the Nansen Basin, has been in the foci of multiple studies. This region even earned the name the “Arctic warming hotspot”, due to the extreme retreat of sea ice and clear signs of change in the vertical hydrographic structure from the Arctic type to the sub-Arctic one. A gradual increase in temperature and salinity in this area has been observed since the mid-2000s. This trend is hypothetically associated with a general decrease in the volume of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, which leads to a decrease of ice import in the Barents Sea, salinization, weakening of density stratification, intensification of vertical mixing and an increase of heat and salt fluxes from the deep to the upper mixed layer. The result of such changes is a further reduction of sea ice, i.e. implementation of positive feedback, which is conventionally refereed as the “atlantification. Due to the fact that the Barents Sea is a relatively shallow basin, the process of atlantification might develop here much faster than in the deep Nansen Basin. Thus, theoretically, the hydrographic regime in the northern part of the Barents Sea may rapidly transform to a “Nordic Seas – wise”, a characteristic feature of which is the year-round absence of the ice cover with debatable consequences for the climate and ecosystem of the region and adjacent land areas. Due to the obvious reasons, historical observations in the Barents Sea mostly cover the summer season. Here we present a rare oceanographic data, collected during the late winter - early spring in 2019. Measurements were occupied at four sequential oceanographic surveys from the boundary between the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea – the so called Barents Sea opening to the boundary between the Barents Sea and the Kara Sea. Completed hydrological sections allowed us to estimate the contribution of the winter processes in the Atlantic Water transformation at the end of the winter season. Characteristic feature of the observed transformation is the homogenization of the near-to-bottom part of the water column with remaining stratification in the upper part. A probable explanation of such changes is the dominance of shelf convection and cascading of dense water over the open sea convection. In this case, complete homogenization of the water column does not occur, since convection in the open sea is impeded by salinity and density stratification, which is maintained by melting of the imported sea ice in the relatively warm water. The study was supported by RFBR grant # 18-05-60083.</p>

scholarly journals The Arctic Ocean Seasonal Cycles of Heat and Freshwater Fluxes: Observation-Based Inverse Estimates

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 2029-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamasa Tsubouchi ◽  
Sheldon Bacon ◽  
Yevgeny Aksenov ◽  
Alberto C. Naveira Garabato ◽  
Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Bering Strait ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

AbstractThis paper presents the first estimate of the seasonal cycle of ocean and sea ice heat and freshwater (FW) fluxes around the Arctic Ocean boundary. The ocean transports are estimated primarily using 138 moored instruments deployed in September 2005–August 2006 across the four main Arctic gateways: Davis, Fram, and Bering Straits, and the Barents Sea Opening (BSO). Sea ice transports are estimated from a sea ice assimilation product. Monthly velocity fields are calculated with a box inverse model that enforces mass and salt conservation. The volume transports in the four gateways in the period (annual mean ± 1 standard deviation) are −2.1 ± 0.7 Sv in Davis Strait, −1.1 ± 1.2 Sv in Fram Strait, 2.3 ± 1.2 Sv in the BSO, and 0.7 ± 0.7 Sv in Bering Strait (1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1). The resulting ocean and sea ice heat and FW fluxes are 175 ± 48 TW and 204 ± 85 mSv, respectively. These boundary fluxes accurately represent the annual means of the relevant surface fluxes. The ocean heat transport variability derives from velocity variability in the Atlantic Water layer and temperature variability in the upper part of the water column. The ocean FW transport variability is dominated by Bering Strait velocity variability. The net water mass transformation in the Arctic entails a freshening and cooling of inflowing waters by 0.62 ± 0.23 in salinity and 3.74° ± 0.76°C in temperature, respectively, and a reduction in density by 0.23 ± 0.20 kg m−3. The boundary heat and FW fluxes provide a benchmark dataset for the validation of numerical models and atmospheric reanalysis products.

scholarly journals On the Circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2352-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Spall
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Numerical Model ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Analytic Model ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract An idealized eddy-resolving numerical model and an analytic three-layer model are used to develop ideas about what controls the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean. The numerical model is forced with a surface heat flux, uniform winds, and a source of low-salinity water near the surface around the perimeter of an Arctic basin. Despite this idealized configuration, the model is able to reproduce many general aspects of the Arctic Ocean circulation and hydrography, including exchange through Fram Strait, circulation of Atlantic Water, a halocline, ice cover and transport, surface heat flux, and a Beaufort Gyre. The analytic model depends on a nondimensional number, and provides theoretical estimates of the halocline depth, stratification, freshwater content, and baroclinic shear in the boundary current. An empirical relationship between freshwater content and sea surface height allows for a prediction of the transport of Atlantic Water in the cyclonic boundary current. Parameters typical of the Arctic Ocean produce a cyclonic boundary current of Atlantic Water of O(1 − 2 Sv; where 1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) and a halocline depth of O(200 m), in reasonable agreement with observations. The theory compares well with a series of numerical model calculations in which mixing and environmental parameters are varied, thus lending credibility to the dynamics of the analytic model. In these models, lateral eddy fluxes from the boundary and vertical diffusion in the interior are important drivers of the halocline and the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean.

scholarly journals Heat, salt, and volume transports in the eastern Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean, from two years of mooring observations

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Pnyushkov ◽  
Igor Polyakov ◽  
Robert Rember ◽  
Vladimir Ivanov ◽  
Matthew B. Alkire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Salt Transport ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Eurasian Basin ◽  
The Laptev Sea ◽  
Volume Transports

Abstract. This study discusses along-slope volume, heat, and salt transports derived from observations collected in 2013–15 using a cross-slope array of six moorings ranging from 250 m to 3900 m in the eastern Eurasian Basin (EB) of the Arctic Ocean. These observations demonstrate that in the upper 780 m layer, the along-slope boundary current advected, on average, 5.1 ± 0.1 Sv of water, predominantly in the eastward (shallow-to-right) direction. Monthly net volume transports across the Laptev Sea slope vary widely, from ~ 0.3 ± 0.8 in April 2014 to ~ 9.9 ± 0.8 Sv in June 2014. 3.1 ± 0.1 Sv (or 60 %) of the net transport was associated with warm and salty intermediate-depth Atlantic Water (AW). Calculated heat transport for 2013–15 (relative to −1.8 °C) was 46.0 ± 1.7 TW, and net salt transport (relative to zero salinity) was 172 ± 6 Mkg/s. Estimates for AW heat and salt transports were 32.7 ± 1.3 TW (71 % of net heat transport) and 112 ± 4 Mkg/s (65 % of net salt transport). The variability of currents explains ~ 90 % of the variability of the heat and salt transports. The remaining ~ 10 % is controlled by temperature and salinity anomalies together with temporal variability of the AW layer thickness. The annual mean volume transports decreased by 25 % from 5.8 ± 0.2 Sv in 2013–14 to 4.4 ± 0.2 Sv in 2014–15 suggesting that changes of the transports at interannual and longer time scales in the eastern EB may be significant.

scholarly journals Structure and drivers of ocean mixing north of Svalbard in summer and fall 2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Koenig ◽  
Eivind H. Kolås ◽  
Ilker Fer
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Tidal Currents ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Ocean Mixing ◽  
Atlantic Sector ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Nonlinear Relation

Abstract. Ocean mixing in the Arctic Ocean cools and freshens the Atlantic and Pacific-origin waters by mixing them with surrounding waters, which has major implications on global scale as the Arctic Ocean is a main sink for heat and salt. We investigate the drivers of ocean mixing north of Svalbard, in the Atlantic sector of the Arctic, based on observations collected during two research cruises in summer and fall 2018. In the mixed layer, there is a nonlinear relation between the layer-integrated dissipation and wind energy input; convection was active at a few stations and was responsible for enhanced turbulence compare to what was expected from the wind work alone. Summer melting of sea ice reduces the temperature, salinity and depth of the mixed layer, and increases salt and buoyancy fluxes at the base of the mixed layer. Deeper in the water column and near the seabed, tidal work is a main source of turbulence: diapycnal diffusivity in the bottom 250 m of the water column is enhanced during strong tidal currents, reaching on average 10−3 m2 s−1. The average profile of diffusivity decays with distance from seabed with an e-folding scale of 22 m compared to 18 m in conditions with weaker tidal currents. A nonlinear relation is inferred between the depth-integrated dissipation in the bottom 250 m of the water column and the tidally-driven bottom drag and is used to estimate the bottom dissipation along the continental slope of the Eurasian Basin. Computation of the inverse Froude number suggests that nonlinear internal waves forced by the diurnal tidal activity (K1 constituent) can develop north of Svalbard and in the Laptev and Kara Seas, with the potential to mix the entire water column vertically. Estimates of vertical turbulent heat flux from the Atlantic Water layer up to the mixed layer reaches 30 W m−2 in the core of the boundary current, and is on average 8 W m−2, accounting for ∼ 1 % of the total heat loss of the Atlantic layer in the region.

Atlantic Water properties, transport, and water mass transformation north of Svalbard from one-year-long mooring observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoé Koenig ◽  
Kjersti Kalhagen ◽  
Eivind Kolås ◽  
Ilker Fer ◽  
Frank Nilsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Water Layer ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Water Inflow ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Short Time Scale ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Explained Variance ◽  
One Year ◽  
Counter Current

<p>North of Svalbard is a key region for the Arctic Ocean heat and salt budget as it is the gateway for one of the main branches of Atlantic Water to the Arctic Ocean. As the Atlantic Water layer advances into the Arctic, its core deepens from about 250 m depth around the Yermak Plateau to 350 m in the Laptev Sea, and gets colder and less saline due to mixing with surrounding waters. The complex topography in the region facilitates vertical and horizontal exchanges between the water masses and, together with strong shear and tidal forcing driving increased mixing rates, impacts the heat and salt content of the Atlantic Water layer that will circulate around the Arctic Ocean.</p><p>In September 2018, 6 moorings organized in 2 arrays were deployed across the Atlantic Water Boundary current for more than one year (until November 2019), within the framework of the Nansen Legacy project to investigate the seasonal variations of this current and the transformation of the Atlantic Water North of Svalbard. The Atlantic Water inflow exhibits a large seasonal signal, with maxima in core temperature and along-isobath velocities in fall and minima in spring. Volume transport of the Atlantic Water inflow varies from 0.7 Sv in spring to 3 Sv in fall. An empirical orthogonal function analysis of the daily cross-isobath temperature sections reveals that the first mode of variation (explained variance ~80%) is the seasonal cycle with an on/off mode in the temperature core. The second mode (explained variance ~ 15%) corresponds to a short time scale (less than 2 weeks) variability in the onshore/offshore displacement of the temperature core. On the shelf, a counter-current flowing westward is observed in spring, which transports colder (~ 1°C) and fresher (~ 34.85 g kg<sup>-1</sup>) water than Atlantic Water (θ > 2°C and S<sub>A</sub> > 34.9 g kg<sup>-1</sup>). The processes driving the dynamic of the counter-current are under investigation. At greater depth (~1000 m) on the offshore part of the slope, a bottom-intensified current is noticed that seems to covary with the wind stress curl. Heat loss of the Atlantic Water between the two mooring arrays is maximum in winter reaching 250 W m<sup>-2</sup> when the current is the largest and the net radiative flux from the atmosphere to the ocean is the smallest (only 50 W m<sup>-2</sup> compared to about 400 W m<sup>-2</sup> in summer).</p>

scholarly journals Does the East Greenland Current exist in northern Fram Strait?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Elisabeth Richter ◽  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Claudia Wekerle
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Current Loop ◽  
Fram Strait ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
East Greenland Current ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Warm Atlantic Water (AW) flows around the Nordic Seas in a cyclonic boundary current loop. Some AW enters the Arctic Ocean where it is transformed to Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW) before exiting through Fram Strait. There the AAW is joined by recirculating AW. Here we present the first summer synoptic study targeted at resolving this confluence in Fram Strait which forms the East Greenland Current (EGC). Absolute geostrophic velocities and hydrography from observations in 2016, including four sections crossing the east Greenland shelfbreak, are compared to output from an eddy-resolving configuration of the sea–ice ocean model FESOM. Far offshore (120 km at 80.8° N) AW warmer than 2 °C is found in northern Fram Strait. The Arctic Ocean outflow there is broad and barotropic, but gets narrower and more baroclinic toward the south as recirculating AW increases the cross-shelfbreak density gradient. This barotropic to baroclinic transition appears to form the well-known EGC boundary current flowing along the shelfbreak further south where it has been previously described. In this realization, between 80.2° N and 76.5° N, the southward transport along the east Greenland shelfbreak increases from roughly 1 Sv to about 4 Sv and the warm water composition, defined as the fraction of AW of the sum of AW and AAW (AW/(AW + AAW)), changes from 19 ± 8 % to 80 ± 3 %. Consequently, in southern Fram Strait, AW can propagate into Norske Trough on the east Greenland shelf and reach the large marine terminating glaciers there. High instantaneous variability observed in both the synoptic data and the model output is attributed to eddies, the representation of which is crucial as they mediate the westward transport of AW in the recirculation and thus structure the confluence forming the EGC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document