In the Wake of Hurricane Isabel: A Prospective Study of Postevent Trauma and Injury Control Strategies

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.B. Gagnon ◽  
M.B. Aboutanos ◽  
A.K. Malhotra ◽  
D. Dompkowski ◽  
T.M. Duane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Urban City ◽  
Upper And Lower Extremities ◽  
Hurricane Isabel ◽  
A Prospective Study

Preventing hurricane-related injuries (HRI) has historically centered on the pre-event and event phases of the disaster. To date, no study has focused on injuries occurring during the postevent phase. We examined HRI that occurred after Hurricane Isabel struck a U.S. urban city. HRI presenting 1 week prior to the hurricane were collected from emergency department electronic records. HRI that presented to our level 1 trauma center were prospectively collected for 1 week after the hurricane. Nine hundred seventy-eight patients with possible HRI were identified. Fifty-one patients with trauma directly attributed to the hurricane were used for analysis. The number of HRI occurring before, during, and after the hurricane were 7 (14%), 3 (6%), and 41 (80%), respectively. The majority of HRI (37%) occurred on posthurricane day 1. Head, chest, upper and lower extremities accounted for 9 (18%), 8 (16%), 13 (26%), and 14 (28%) of HRI. More than one third of HRI patients were admitted to the hospital, and 12 (24%) underwent an operation. The average hospital length of stay was 4.7 days. Of our trauma alerts, 75 per cent had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >8, and 20 per cent had an ISS >15. Tree-related injuries (TRI) accounted for 59 per cent of HRI. Males, ages 50–60, had the highest incidence of injury (63%). Significant injuries occur in the wake of a hurricane. Optimization of disaster preparation must include prevention strategies targeted to the postevent recovery phase of disasters.

Advancing the Use of Laparoscopy in Trauma: Repair of Intraperitoneal Bladder Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
pp. 1402-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Arnold ◽  
Caroline D. Lu ◽  
Bradley W. Thomas ◽  
Gaurav Sachdev ◽  
Kyle W. Cunningham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Bladder Rupture ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraperitoneal Bladder Rupture

Traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) requires surgical repair. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, experience with laparoscopic bladder repair (LBR) after blunt trauma is limited. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased length of stay (LOS), less pain, early return to work, fewer adhesions, and lower risk of incisional hernia. The aim of this series is to demonstrate the potential superiority of LBR in select trauma patients. This is a retrospective review performed of all IBR patients from 2008 to 2016. Demographics, clinical management, outcomes, and follow-up were compared between LBR and open bladder repair (OBR) patients. Twenty patients underwent OBR, and seven underwent LBR. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or Injury Severity Score. There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Average hospital length of stay and ICU days were similar between groups. There was one patient with UTI and one with readmission in each group. There were two incisional hernias and two bowel obstructions in the OBR group, with one patient requiring operative intervention. No such complications occurred in the LBR group. LBR for traumatic IBR can be safely performed in select patients, even in those with multiple extra-abdominal injuries.

Late Operative Rib Fixation is Inferior to Nonoperative Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 944-949
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Harrell ◽  
Robert J. Jean ◽  
S. Dave Bhattacharya ◽  
Darren J. Hunt ◽  
Donald E. Barker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Rib Fixation ◽  
Level I ◽  
Short Time ◽  
Early Fixation

Background Operative rib fixation (ORF) of traumatic rib fractures has been shown to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and mortality. ORF performed within 1 day of admission has been shown to have favorable outcomes compared to later ORF. This report examines the ORF experience over 10 years at a level I trauma center. Methods ORF patients from January 2007-January 2018 were matched to nonoperative controls in a 1:2 ratio based on age, injury severity score (ISS), chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and head AIS. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected from the trauma registry and medical records. Hospital day of ORF was identified for each ORF patient. Hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and mortality were compared against matched nonoperative controls. Results Ninety-five ORF patients were matched to 190 nonoperative patients. ORF patients had a higher number of rib fractures (9.6 vs 6.4, P < .001). ORF patients with short time to operation (0-2 days) had a shorter average hospital stay than those with delayed operations (11.8 vs 12.6 vs 13.4 vs 19.6 days, P = .003). ORF patients with operations performed 3-4 days and >6 days after admission also had statistically significant longer ICU LOS and ventilator days. Patient mortality was higher when ORF was performed after 6 days. Discussion Early ORF may improve pulmonary function, patient outcomes, and decrease LOS. Shifting practice toward early fixation may help further solidify the benefits of this procedure in the treatment of blunt chest trauma.

scholarly journals Initial Trauma Database in a University Hospital in Malaysia

2019 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Affirul Chairil Ariffin ◽  
Mohamed Hajhamad ◽  
Firdaus Hayati ◽  
Nornazirah Azizan ◽  
Zamri Zuhdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Permanent Disability ◽  
Major Health Problem ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Trauma Centres ◽  
Trauma Service

Trauma is a major health problem in Malaysia. An understanding of the trauma epidemiology is important in developing a reliable trauma service. The aim of this study is to understand the pattern of trauma in our institution and to highlight the need for a dedicated trauma service. In this database, 142 cases were included. Majority were males (127, 89.4%). Most common injury types are motor vehicle accidents (87.3%) followed by falls (7.7%), and stabs (3.5%). Most Injury Severity Score (ISS) falls under moderate score with 38.7%. Mean Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) was 3 with most involving the chest and 90% of the patients have injuries involving at least 2 regions. Average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 11.4 days ±11.5 SD; with most patients (71.8%) were discharged without permanent disability. The mortality rate was 9.2% with all having ISS>16. ISS found to be strongly related to longer hospital stay and worse outcome (0.59, p < 0.0001, 0.4, p < 0.0001). This data is equivalent to the compared registries from 4 different trauma centres. However, steps need to be taken to improve this database. In conclusion, this university hospital receives a reasonable load of trauma cases yearly which is equivalent with other trauma centres. The increasing trauma cases will benefit from an implementation of a dedicated trauma service. This trauma database needs more depth in its elements and better data handling to ensure a quality and complete registry.

scholarly journals Trauma resource pit stop: increasing efficiency in the evaluation of lower severity trauma patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000670
Author(s):  
Imad S Dandan ◽  
Gail T Tominaga ◽  
Frank Z Zhao ◽  
Kathryn B Schaffer ◽  
Fady S Nasrallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Evaluation Time ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
Trauma Bay

BackgroundOvertriage of trauma patients is unavoidable and requires effective use of hospital resources. A ‘pit stop’ (PS) was added to our lowest tier trauma resource (TR) triage protocol where the patient stops in the trauma bay for immediate evaluation by the emergency department (ED) physician and trauma nursing. We hypothesized this would allow for faster diagnostic testing and disposition while decreasing cost.MethodsWe performed a before/after retrospective comparison after PS implementation. Patients not meeting trauma activation (TA) criteria but requiring trauma center evaluation were assigned as a TR for an expedited PS evaluation. A board-certified ED physician and trauma/ED nurse performed an immediate assessment in the trauma bay followed by performance of diagnostic studies. Trauma surgeons were readily available in case of upgrade to TA. We compared patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, time to physician evaluation, time to CT scan, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Comparisons were made using 95% CI for variance and SD and unpaired t-tests for two-tailed p values, with statistical difference, p<0.05.ResultsThere were 994 TAs and 474 TRs in the first 9 months after implementation. TR’s preanalysis versus postanalysis of the TR group shows similar mean door to physician evaluation times (6.9 vs. 8.6 minutes, p=0.1084). Mean door to CT time significantly decreased (67.7 vs. 50 minutes, p<0.001). 346 (73%) TR patients were discharged from ED; 2 (0.4%) were upgraded on arrival. When admitted, TR patients were older (61.4 vs. 47.2 years, p<0.0001) and more often involved in a same-level fall (59.5% vs. 20.1%, p<0.0001). Undertriage was calculated using the Cribari matrix at 3.2%.DiscussionPS implementation allowed for faster door to CT time for trauma patients not meeting activation criteria without mobilizing trauma team resources. This approach is safe, feasible, and simultaneously decreases hospital cost while improving allocation of trauma team resources.Level of evidenceLevel II, economic/decision therapeutic/care management study.

30-Day Outcomes for Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients With Anemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110175
Author(s):  
Jordan R. Pollock ◽  
Matt K. Doan ◽  
M. Lane Moore ◽  
Jeffrey D. Hassebrock ◽  
Justin L. Makovicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Preoperative Anemia ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Reoperation Rates

Background: While anemia has been associated with poor surgical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty, the effects of anemia on total ankle arthroplasty remain unknown. This study examines how preoperative anemia affects postoperative outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project database from 2011 to 2018 for total ankle arthroplasty procedures. Hematocrit (HCT) levels were used to determine preoperative anemia. Results: Of the 1028 patients included in this study, 114 patients were found to be anemic. Univariate analysis demonstrated anemia was significantly associated with an increased average hospital length of stay (2.2 vs 1.8 days, P < .008), increased rate of 30-day readmission (3.5% vs 1.1%, P = .036), increased 30-day reoperation (2.6% vs 0.4%, P = .007), extended length of stay (64% vs 49.9%, P = .004), wound complication (1.75% vs 0.11%, P = .002), and surgical site infection (2.6% vs 0.6%, P = .017). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found anemia to be significantly associated with extended hospital length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.07-2.45; P = .023) and increased reoperation rates (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 1.15-26.00; P = .033). Anemia was not found to be a predictor of increased readmission rates (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 0.93-10.56; P = .066) or postoperative complications (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.35-4.56; P = .71). Conclusion: This study found increasing severity of anemia to be associated with extended hospital length of stay and increased reoperation rates. Providers and patients should be aware of the increased risks of total ankle arthroplasty with preoperative anemia. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

scholarly journals 108 A Multidisciplinary Team Initiative to End PJ Paralysis Was Successful in Achieving Cultural Change on An Acute Geriatric Ward

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
J Butler ◽  
T Welford
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Change ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Geriatric Ward ◽  
Additional Equipment ◽  
Acute Geriatric Ward

Abstract Introduction Prolonged bedrest amongst the elderly causes deconditioning leading to; increased hospital length of stay, additional social costs and decreased quality of life. An audit on an acute geriatric ward in November 2018, found that over a third of patients medically fit (PMF) to sit out remained in bed all day. Therefore, a service development initiative was undertaken, addressing the misconception that keeping elderly patients in bed is safe, when in fact, unintentional harm results. Method In a root cause analysis, four main reasons for bedrest were identified: risk aversion, unknown function, widespread “bed is safe” culture and lack of equipment. The project tasked getting PMF out of bed each day and was audited daily from November 2018 to present, involving all members of the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and using a “plan, do, study, act” approach. Results Initially, the project showed an increase in percentage of PMF sitting out each day, but this subsequently decreased with winter pressures. However, for a whole year (February 2019–February 2020) a sustained and significant improvement was achieved (64.3%–89.7%). The pre-COVID19 period (February–March 2020) saw fluctuations in PMF sitting out. Data collection halted during the COVID19 peak, although observationally most patients remained in bed. Auditing resumed from June 2020 (COVID19 recovery phase) which showed a steady increase in PMF out of bed, with recent figures surpassing pre-COVID19 levels (97.8%). Conclusion Cultural change takes time to embed and needs persistent reviewing by a dedicated and engaged MDT. Improvements were made through more accessible doctor’s advice, better MDT education and communication, daily feedback of data and sourcing additional equipment. Disruption to working patterns over the COVID19 period made this unachievable and the project lost impetus. In the COVID19 recovery phase, the specialized MDT reformed and worked successfully to restore the cultural change as evidenced by audited data.

Placement of Surgical Feeding Tubes Among Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring Exploratory Abdominal Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-642
Author(s):  
Peter I. Cha ◽  
Ronald M. Jou ◽  
David A. Spain ◽  
Joseph D. Forrester
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify trauma patients who would benefit from surgical placement of an enteral feeding tube during their index abdominal trauma operation. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to 2 level I trauma centers between January 2013 and February 2018 requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery. Results Six-hundred and one patients required exploratory abdominal surgery within 24 hours of admission after trauma activation. Nineteen (3% of total) patients underwent placement of a feeding tube after their initial exploratory surgery. On multivariate analysis, an intracranial Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥4 (odds ratio [OR] = 9.24, 95% CI 1.09-78.26, P = .04) and a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (OR = 4.39, 95% CI 1.38-13.95, P = .01) were associated with increased odds of requiring a feeding tube. All patients who required a feeding tube had an Injury Severity Score ≥15. While not statistically significant, patients with an open surgical feeding tube compared with interventional radiology/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had lower median intensive care unit length of stay, fewer ventilator days, and shorter median total hospital length of stay. Conclusions Trauma patients with severe intracranial injury already requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery may benefit from early, concomitant placement of a feeding tube during the index abdominal operation, or at fascial closure.

Risk for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Elderly Trauma Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 1114-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Finigan ◽  
Jacqueline Pham ◽  
Rosemarie Mendoza ◽  
Michael Lekawa ◽  
Matthew Dolich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Elderly Trauma Patients

The objective of this study was to determine if elderly trauma patients are at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). A retrospective study was conducted identifying 362 patients 65 years and older in our Level I trauma center who received computerized tomography (CT) scans with intravenous contrast. CIN was defined as a 25 per cent increase in serum creatinine levels or a 0.5 mg/dL increase above baseline after CT. History of diabetes mellitus, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and age were recorded. Eighteen per cent (21 of 118) of the patients had a peak in creatinine, 12 per cent (14 of 118) peaked and returned to baseline, and 6 per cent (7 of 118) peaked and stayed high. Pre-CT elevated creatinine, diabetes mellitus, increased hospital length of stay, ISS, and age show little association to CIN. The data suggest that CIN in elderly trauma patients is rare, regardless of history of diabetes mellitus, age, creatinine, high ISS, or result in higher length of stay. Therefore, there is little justification for the delay in diagnosis to assess a patient's renal susceptibility.

scholarly journals Association between Insurance Status and Hospital Length of Stay following Trauma

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Englum ◽  
Xuan Hui ◽  
Cheryl K. Zogg ◽  
Muhammad Ali Chaudhary ◽  
Cassandra Villegas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Uninsured Patients ◽  
National Trauma ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
The Relationship

Previous research has demonstrated that nonclinical factors are associated with differences in clinical care, with uninsured patients receiving decreased resource use. Studies on trauma populations have also shown unclear relationships between insurance status and hospital length of stay (LOS), a commonly used metric for evaluating quality of care. The objective of this study is to define the relationship between insurance status and LOS after trauma using the largest available national trauma dataset and controlling for significant confounders. Data from 2007 to 2010 National Trauma Data Bank were used to compare differences in LOS among three insurance groups: privately insured, publically insured, and uninsured trauma patients. Multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounding due to baseline differences in injury severity and demographic and clinical factors. A total of 884,493 patients met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for the influence of covariates, uninsured patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (0.3 days) relative to privately insured patients. Publicly insured patients had longer risk-adjusted LOS (0.9 days). Stratified differences in discharge disposition and injury severity significantly altered the relationship between insurance status and LOS. In conclusion, this study elucidates the association between insurance status and hospital LOS, demonstrating that a patient's ability to pay could alter LOS in acute trauma patients. Additional research is needed to examine causes and outcomes from these differences to increase efficiency in the health care system, decrease costs, and shrink disparities in health outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document