Late Operative Rib Fixation is Inferior to Nonoperative Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 944-949
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Harrell ◽  
Robert J. Jean ◽  
S. Dave Bhattacharya ◽  
Darren J. Hunt ◽  
Donald E. Barker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Rib Fixation ◽  
Level I ◽  
Short Time ◽  
Early Fixation

Background Operative rib fixation (ORF) of traumatic rib fractures has been shown to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and mortality. ORF performed within 1 day of admission has been shown to have favorable outcomes compared to later ORF. This report examines the ORF experience over 10 years at a level I trauma center. Methods ORF patients from January 2007-January 2018 were matched to nonoperative controls in a 1:2 ratio based on age, injury severity score (ISS), chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and head AIS. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected from the trauma registry and medical records. Hospital day of ORF was identified for each ORF patient. Hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and mortality were compared against matched nonoperative controls. Results Ninety-five ORF patients were matched to 190 nonoperative patients. ORF patients had a higher number of rib fractures (9.6 vs 6.4, P < .001). ORF patients with short time to operation (0-2 days) had a shorter average hospital stay than those with delayed operations (11.8 vs 12.6 vs 13.4 vs 19.6 days, P = .003). ORF patients with operations performed 3-4 days and >6 days after admission also had statistically significant longer ICU LOS and ventilator days. Patient mortality was higher when ORF was performed after 6 days. Discussion Early ORF may improve pulmonary function, patient outcomes, and decrease LOS. Shifting practice toward early fixation may help further solidify the benefits of this procedure in the treatment of blunt chest trauma.

Does Platelet Administration Affect Mortality in Elderly Head-Injured Patients Taking Antiplatelet Medications?

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1100-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Downey ◽  
Benjamin Monson ◽  
Karyn L. Butler ◽  
Gerald R. Fortuna ◽  
Jonathan M. Saxe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Platelet Transfusion ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Head Injured ◽  
Outcome Differences ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

A significant portion of patients sustaining traumatic brain injury (TBI) take antiplatelet medications (aspirin or clopidogrel), which have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to alleviate the risk of increased bleeding, platelet transfusion has become standard practice in some institutions. This study was designed to determine if platelet transfusion reduces mortality in patients with TBI on antiplatelet medications. Databases from two Level I trauma centers were reviewed. Patients with TBI 50 years of age or older with documented preinjury use of clopidogrel or aspirin were included in our cohort. Patients who received platelet transfusions were compared with those who did not to assess outcome differences between them. Demographics and other patient characteristics abstracted included Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, hospital length of stay, and warfarin use. Three hundred twenty-eight patients comprised the study group. Of these patients, 166 received platelet transfusion and 162 patients did not. Patients who received platelets had a mortality rate of 17.5 per cent (29 of 166), whereas those who did not receive platelets had a mortality rate of 16.7 per cent (27 of 162) ( P = 0.85). Transfusion of platelets in patients with TBI using antiplatelet therapy did not reduce mortality.

Impact of Traumatic Suicide Methods on a Level I Trauma Center

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Bittner ◽  
Michael L. Hawkins ◽  
Linda R. Atteberry ◽  
Colville H. Ferdinand ◽  
Regina S. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Healthcare Expenditures ◽  
Suicide Methods ◽  
Level I ◽  
Drug And Alcohol ◽  
Related Mortality

Suicide is a major, preventable public health issue. Although firearm-related mechanisms commonly result in death, nonfirearm methods cause significant morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The goal of this study is to compare risk factors and outcomes of firearm and nonfirearm traumatic suicide methods. This retrospective cohort study identified 146 patients who attempted traumatic suicide between 2002 and 2007 at a Level I trauma center. Overall, mean age was 40.2 years, 83 per cent were male, 74 per cent were white, and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 12.7. Most individuals (53%) attempted suicide by firearms and 25 per cent died (84% firearm, 16% nonfirearm techniques). Subjects were more likely to die if they were older than 60 years-old, presented with an ISS greater than 16, or used a firearm. On average, patients using a firearm were older and had a higher ISS and mortality rate compared with those using nonfirearm methods. There was no statistical difference between cohorts with regard to gender, ethnicity, positive drug and alcohol screens, requirement for operation, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay. Nonfirearm traumatic suicide prevention strategies aimed at select individuals may decrease overall attempts, reduce mechanism-related mortality, and potentially impact healthcare expenditures.

In the Wake of Hurricane Isabel: A Prospective Study of Postevent Trauma and Injury Control Strategies

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.B. Gagnon ◽  
M.B. Aboutanos ◽  
A.K. Malhotra ◽  
D. Dompkowski ◽  
T.M. Duane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Urban City ◽  
Upper And Lower Extremities ◽  
Hurricane Isabel ◽  
A Prospective Study

Preventing hurricane-related injuries (HRI) has historically centered on the pre-event and event phases of the disaster. To date, no study has focused on injuries occurring during the postevent phase. We examined HRI that occurred after Hurricane Isabel struck a U.S. urban city. HRI presenting 1 week prior to the hurricane were collected from emergency department electronic records. HRI that presented to our level 1 trauma center were prospectively collected for 1 week after the hurricane. Nine hundred seventy-eight patients with possible HRI were identified. Fifty-one patients with trauma directly attributed to the hurricane were used for analysis. The number of HRI occurring before, during, and after the hurricane were 7 (14%), 3 (6%), and 41 (80%), respectively. The majority of HRI (37%) occurred on posthurricane day 1. Head, chest, upper and lower extremities accounted for 9 (18%), 8 (16%), 13 (26%), and 14 (28%) of HRI. More than one third of HRI patients were admitted to the hospital, and 12 (24%) underwent an operation. The average hospital length of stay was 4.7 days. Of our trauma alerts, 75 per cent had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >8, and 20 per cent had an ISS >15. Tree-related injuries (TRI) accounted for 59 per cent of HRI. Males, ages 50–60, had the highest incidence of injury (63%). Significant injuries occur in the wake of a hurricane. Optimization of disaster preparation must include prevention strategies targeted to the postevent recovery phase of disasters.

Five-Year Retrospective Review of Blunt Renal Injuries at a Level I Trauma Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Burns ◽  
Megan Brown ◽  
Zakaria I. Assi ◽  
Eric J. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Renal Injury ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Exploratory Laparotomy ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Septic Complications ◽  
Level I

We report the experience of a Level I trauma center in the management of blunt renal injury during a 5-year period, with special attention to those treated using angiography with embolization. The institutional trauma registry was queried for all patients with blunt renal injury between September 1, 2009 and August 30, 2014. Each injury was graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines. Patients that underwent angiography with embolization were reviewed for case-specific information including imaging findings, treatment, materials used, clinical course, and mortality. The registry identified 48 blunt renal injury patients. Median Injury Severity Score was higher and hospital length of stay was significantly longer in those with blunt renal injury when compared with those without blunt renal injury (P < 0.001). The majority of patients with blunt renal injury were managed nonoperatively. Mortality was three out of 48 patients (5%). Nine patients underwent exploratory laparotomy. These operations were always performed for reasons other than the renal trauma (e.g., splenic injury, free fluid, free air). No patient underwent invasive renal operation. Six patients were treated using angiography with embolization. Of the six, one patient died of pulmonary septic complications. We conclude that selective nonoperative management is the mainstay of treatment for blunt renal injury. Angiography with embolization is a useful modality for cases of ongoing bleeding, and is typically preferable to nephrectomy in our experience.

The Effect of Interhospital Transfers on the Outcome of Rural Trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Wild ◽  
Jabran M. Younus ◽  
Mahdi Malekpour ◽  
Nina Neuhaus ◽  
Kenneth Widom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level I ◽  
Trauma Deaths ◽  
Detrimental Impact

Urban areas house the majority of the population in the United States but trauma deaths occur more commonly in rural areas. In this study, we aimed to investigate if direct patient admission to a Level I trauma center improves outcomes in rural trauma. We retrospectively reviewed data in our trauma database from January 2008 to the end of December 2012 to compare the overall outcomes between direct admissions (DAs) and interhospital transfers (IHTs). Of the 6118 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 59.5 per cent were in the DA group and 40.5 per cent in the IHT group. Injury severity score was similar between the two groups but severe traumatic brain injury was more common (P = 0.001) in the DA group. Hospital length of stay, complication rate, and in-hospital mortality were not different between the two groups (all P > 0.2). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in survival between the two modes of admission (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.91, 0.69–1.20, P = 0.51). We concluded that rural trauma IHTs had no detrimental impact on the outcome. Prospective studies would better elucidate factors associated with patient outcomes in rural trauma.

Pediatric Blunt Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis in a Level I Trauma Center

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om P. Sharma ◽  
Michael F. Oswanski ◽  
Kathryn C. Stringfellow ◽  
Shekhar S. Raj
Keyword(s):  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Glasgow Coma Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Chest Injuries ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Level I ◽  
Vehicular Crashes

This study consisted of an 8-year retrospective trauma registry analysis of blunt trauma and comprised of 2458 children (<18 years of age) and 4568 adults (18–64 years of age). Falls and motor vehicular crashes were seen in 30.4 per cent (749) and 23 per cent (566) of children, and 25.4 per cent (1158) and 41.9 per cent (1914) of adults. Children had a higher mean revised trauma score (7.69 vs 7.66) and Glasgow Coma Score (14.5 vs 14.3), and a lower Injury Severity Score (ISS; 6.68 vs 7.83 and hospital length of stay (2.8 vs 3.8 days) with P < 0.05. Overall mortality was 1.3 per cent in children and 1.9 per cent in adults (P = 0.05). Pedestrian accidents resulted in a 3.8 per cent (6/161) mortality rate. Pediatric nonsurvivors had a 6.4-fold higher ISS than survivors compared with a 5.2-fold increase in adults. Mortality progressively increased with higher ISS; 0.09 per cent in <15, 1.3 per cent, in 15 to 24, and 17 per cent in children with ≥25 ISS. Mortality in multiple chest injuries was 19 per cent. The presence of chest trauma resulted in a 46-fold higher mortality in children. Most lethal injuries were combined head, chest, and abdomen trauma with a 25 per cent mortality in children and 28 per cent in adults. Admission Glasgow Coma Score <9 and systolic blood pressure below 100 mm Hg carried high mortality: 39 and 6 per cent in children vs 31 and 24 per cent in adults. Ninety-seven per cent of children and 89 per cent of adults were discharged home.

Early FAST Examinations during Resuscitation May Compromise Trauma Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1705-1709
Author(s):  
John Kleinman ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Emily Pott ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Demetrios Demetriades ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Outcomes ◽  
Primary Survey ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Level I ◽  
Review 2014

Focused assessment with Sonography for trauma (FAST) examination is essential to trauma triage. We sought to determine whether FASTs completed early in sequencing portend worse outcomes. A two-year review (2014–2015) of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center was performed. Patients were matched at baseline and FAST times were compared. Outcomes included resuscitation time (RESUS-h), ventilation days (d), hospital length of stay (HLOS-d), ICU length of stay (LOS-d), survival (%), nosocomial infection rate (%), and venous thromboembolism complication rate (%). ED interventions included transfusions, crystalloid, antibiotics, central line placement, intubation, thoracostomy, thoracotomy, pelvic X-ray, and binder. One thousand, three hundred and twelve patients were included for analysis (mean age = 38 ± 19 years, mean Injury Severity Score = 12 ± 11, 21% penetrating). Compared with FASTs completed after the primary survey, early FASTs led to significantly more ventilation days ( P < 0.01), longer ICU length of stay ( P < 0.01), and a greater incidence of nosocomial infections ( P = 0.03). In the ED, early FASTs led to significantly more intubations ( P < 0.01) and transfusions ( P < 0.01) compared with late FASTs. FASTs completed before primary survey portend worse outcomes, with more ED interventions and equivocal results. FAST as a true adjunct to primary survey is recommended.

Advancing the Use of Laparoscopy in Trauma: Repair of Intraperitoneal Bladder Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
pp. 1402-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Arnold ◽  
Caroline D. Lu ◽  
Bradley W. Thomas ◽  
Gaurav Sachdev ◽  
Kyle W. Cunningham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Bladder Rupture ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraperitoneal Bladder Rupture

Traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) requires surgical repair. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, experience with laparoscopic bladder repair (LBR) after blunt trauma is limited. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased length of stay (LOS), less pain, early return to work, fewer adhesions, and lower risk of incisional hernia. The aim of this series is to demonstrate the potential superiority of LBR in select trauma patients. This is a retrospective review performed of all IBR patients from 2008 to 2016. Demographics, clinical management, outcomes, and follow-up were compared between LBR and open bladder repair (OBR) patients. Twenty patients underwent OBR, and seven underwent LBR. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or Injury Severity Score. There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Average hospital length of stay and ICU days were similar between groups. There was one patient with UTI and one with readmission in each group. There were two incisional hernias and two bowel obstructions in the OBR group, with one patient requiring operative intervention. No such complications occurred in the LBR group. LBR for traumatic IBR can be safely performed in select patients, even in those with multiple extra-abdominal injuries.

Elderly Patients with Pelvic Fracture: Interventions and Outcomes

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey A. Dechert ◽  
Therèse M. Duane ◽  
Brett P. Frykberg ◽  
Michel B. Aboutanos ◽  
Ajai K. Malhotra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Pelvic Fracture ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Level I

We examined the outcome of elderly trauma patients with pelvic fractures. Patients 65 years of age and older (elderly) with pelvic fractures were retrospectively compared with patients younger than 65 years with pelvic fractures and also with elderly patients without fracture. Over the study period, 1223 patients sustained a pelvic fracture (younger than 65 years, n = 1066, 87.2%; elderly, n = 157,12.8%). These patients were also compared with 1770 elderly patients with blunt trauma without fracture. Although the pelvic fracture patients were equally matched for Injury Severity Score (21.2 ± 13.4 nonelderly vs 20.5 ± 13.6 elderly), hospital length of stay was increased in the elderly (12.5 ± 13.1 days vs 11.5 ± 14.1 days) and they had a higher mortality rate (20.4% [32 of 157] vs 8.3% 88 of 1066]). The elderly without fracture also had a higher mortality rate when compared with the younger patients (10.9% [191 of 1760]; P < 0.03). The elderly were more likely to die from multisystem organ failure (25.0% [eight of 32] vs 10.2% [nine of 88]), whereas the nonelderly group was more likely to die from exsanguination (45.5% [40 of 88] younger than 65 years vs 21.9% [seven of 32] 65 years or older; P < 0.05). Elderly patients with pelvic fracture have worse outcomes than their younger counterparts despite aggressive management at a Level I trauma center.

scholarly journals Initial Trauma Database in a University Hospital in Malaysia

2019 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Affirul Chairil Ariffin ◽  
Mohamed Hajhamad ◽  
Firdaus Hayati ◽  
Nornazirah Azizan ◽  
Zamri Zuhdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Permanent Disability ◽  
Major Health Problem ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Trauma Centres ◽  
Trauma Service

Trauma is a major health problem in Malaysia. An understanding of the trauma epidemiology is important in developing a reliable trauma service. The aim of this study is to understand the pattern of trauma in our institution and to highlight the need for a dedicated trauma service. In this database, 142 cases were included. Majority were males (127, 89.4%). Most common injury types are motor vehicle accidents (87.3%) followed by falls (7.7%), and stabs (3.5%). Most Injury Severity Score (ISS) falls under moderate score with 38.7%. Mean Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) was 3 with most involving the chest and 90% of the patients have injuries involving at least 2 regions. Average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 11.4 days ±11.5 SD; with most patients (71.8%) were discharged without permanent disability. The mortality rate was 9.2% with all having ISS>16. ISS found to be strongly related to longer hospital stay and worse outcome (0.59, p < 0.0001, 0.4, p < 0.0001). This data is equivalent to the compared registries from 4 different trauma centres. However, steps need to be taken to improve this database. In conclusion, this university hospital receives a reasonable load of trauma cases yearly which is equivalent with other trauma centres. The increasing trauma cases will benefit from an implementation of a dedicated trauma service. This trauma database needs more depth in its elements and better data handling to ensure a quality and complete registry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document