Patch Repair of Ileoanal Pouch-Vaginal Fistula with Permacol™ Collagen Implant

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-515
Author(s):  
Maurice Smith ◽  
Vendie H. Hooks ◽  
Barry Jenkins

Though uncommon, ileoanal pouch-vaginal fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy present quite a challenge. Multiple salvage procedures, including endoanal, transabdominal, and trans-vaginal, have been used. Because of high recurrence rates, multiple operations are not uncommon, and ultimate pouch failure rates have been reported as high as 45 per cent. The Permacol™ Collagen Implant is a surgical implant that has been used successfully in a variety of operations ranging from urological to maxillofacial. Its properties allow fibroblast infiltration and revascularization so that it gradually becomes permanently incorporated into the surrounding tissue, providing strength and inhibiting scarring and contraction. We report the first documented case of Permacol™ use in repair of ileoanal pouch-vaginal fistula and we feel that it warrants further investigation as an option in the treatment of these fistulas.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S682-S683
Author(s):  
Holly M Frost ◽  
Samuel Dominguez ◽  
Sarah Parker ◽  
Andrew Byars ◽  
Sara Michelson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute otitis media(AOM) is the most common indication for antibiotics in children. The primary pathogens that cause AOM have changed since the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine(PCV). The clinical failure rate of amoxicillin for treatment of AOM post-PCV is unknown.We aimed to determine the clinical failure rate of amoxicillin for the treatment of uncomplicated AOM in children. Organisms identified on culture and amoxicillin treatment failure from nasopharyngeal specimens of children age 6-35 months with uncomplicated acute otitis media at Denver Health, Denver, CO from April 2019-March 2020. Methods Children age 6-35 months seen at Denver Health, Denver, CO with uncomplicated AOM and prescribed amoxicillin were prospectively enrolled. An interim analysis of patients enrolled from April 2019-March 2020 was completed. Patients completed surveys that included the AOM-SOS©(UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA) at enrollment, days 5, 14, and 30 and had chart abstraction completed. Treatment failure was defined as: (1) requiring a new antibiotic within 14 days; (2) AOM-SOS© score on day 5 or 14 not improved by a relative reduction of ≥ 55% from baseline. Recurrence was defined as requiring a new antibiotic within 15-30 days. Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained and bacterial culture was completed. Results In total,110 patients were enrolled. Rates of treatment failure defined by AOM-SOS© were 28.4%(37; 95%CI:25.5-33.6%) at 5 days and 15.5%(27; 95%CI:17.5-24.5%) at 14 days. However, only 4.5%(5; 95%CI:2.0-4.5%) required a new antibiotic. Recurrence occurred in 5.5% (6, 95%CI:2.5-5.5%) of patients. Of patients who had not received antibiotics before enrollment(82), culture yielded no organism in 17.0%, one organism in 42.7%, and multiple organisms in 40.0% (Table). M.catarrhalis was the most frequently identified organism (53.7% of children). Of H.influenzae isolates 52.9% (9/17) produced beta-lactamase, resulting in no treatment failures or recurrences requiring a new antibiotic. Failure rates were similar between organisms. Conclusion Despite the change in otopathogen prevalence post-PCV, preliminary data suggest that while early subjective treatment failure was common, the 14 day treatment failure and 30 day recurrence rates was low when measured by need for a new antibiotic. Failure was low even among patients with organisms that would not be expected to be treated successfully with amoxicillin, such as those with beta-lactamase producing H.influenzae and M.catarrhalis. Disclosures Samuel Dominguez, MD, PhD, BioFire (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)


2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kuiper ◽  
M. S. Vlug ◽  
F. J. C. van den Broek ◽  
K. M. A. J. Tytgat ◽  
S. van Eeden ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Anzalone ◽  
Marco Essig ◽  
Seung-Koo Lee ◽  
Arnd Dörfler ◽  
Oliver Ganslandt ◽  
...  

Abstract Intracranial metastases are the most common form of intra-axial brain tumor. Management approaches to brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The management approach that is selected is based typically on algorithms that incorporate the number, size, and location of lesions. SRS is the treatment of choice when metastases detected on imaging are few (maximum, 3–5) and/or of small size (⩽30 mm) and offers the advantages of noninvasiveness and the ability to treat inaccessible lesions compared with surgical resection. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard imaging technique for determining the number, size, and location of metastatic lesions. In SRS, the capability of MRI to delineate lesion borders precisely in 3 dimensions helps reduce recurrence rates and minimize radiation necrosis in surrounding tissue. Optimization of the MRI protocol, including selection of the appropriate gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), is paramount for accurate lesion imaging. GBCAs differ in their safety, tolerability, and efficacy because of their diverse physicochemical properties. Gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine are high-relaxivity GBCAs that demonstrate superior efficacy for imaging metastatic lesions compared with other GBCAs, whereas gadobutrol additionally provides macrocyclic stability. This article reviews recent comparative trials of GBCAs and discusses their relevance for optimizing MRI protocols in the management of brain metastases, with particular relevance to SRS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Shen ◽  
Changhong Yu ◽  
Lei Lian ◽  
Feza H. Remzi ◽  
Ravi P. Kiran ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Ragupathi ◽  
Chirag B. Patel ◽  
Diego I. Ramos-Valadez ◽  
Eric M. Haas

Total restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP/IPAA) has become the standard of care for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Despite its correlation with an excellent quality of life and favorable long-term outcomes, RP/IPAA has been associated with several complications. Prolapse of the ileoanal pouch is a rare and debilitating complication that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pouch failure. Limited data exist regarding the prevalence and treatment of pouch prolapse. We present the case of a recurrent J-pouch prolapse treated with a novel minimally invasive “salvage” approach involving a robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy with mesh.


Author(s):  
Zaid Alsafi ◽  
Alice Snell ◽  
Jonathan P. Segal

Abstract Background and aims The ileoanal pouch (IPAA) provides patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) that have not responded to medical therapy an option to retain bowel continuity and defecate without the need for a long-term stoma. Despite good functional outcomes, some pouches fail, requiring permanent diversion, pouchectomy, or a redo pouch. The incidence of pouch failure ranges between 2 and 15% in the literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to define the prevalence of pouch failure in patients with UC who have undergone IPAA using population-based studies. Methods We searched Embase, Embase classic and PubMed from 1978 to 31st of May 2021 to identify cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of pouch failure in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who underwent IPAA for UC. Results Twenty-six studies comprising 23,389 patients were analysed. With < 5 years of follow-up, the prevalence of pouch failure was 5% (95%CI 3–10%). With ≥ 5 but < 10 years of follow-up, the prevalence was 5% (95%CI 4–7%). This increased to 9% (95%CI 7–16%) with ≥ 10 years of follow-up. The overall prevalence of pouch failure was 6% (95%CI 5–8%). Conclusions The overall prevalence of pouch failure in patients over the age of 18 who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy in UC is 6%. These data are important for counselling patients considering this operation. Importantly, for those patients with UC being considered for a pouch, their disease course has often resulted in both physical and psychological morbidity and hence providing accurate expectations for these patients is vital.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Wallace ◽  
Jeffrey Garner

Abstract Aims To compare post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing elective complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) alone vs. CAWR plus simultaneous intestinal surgery. Methods All patients undergoing elective CAWR over a 10-year period in our unit were identified from a prospectively maintained database and divided into those who had concomitant intestinal surgery (resection, ileoanal-pouch formation, stoma reversal, etc) and those who did not. Simple adhesiolysis, cholecystectomy and gynaecological procedures were not classed as ‘intestinal surgery’. Differences between groups were determined using the paired-t test and the (n-1) Chi-squared test. Results 59 patients underwent elective CAWR, 16 with intestinal surgery and 43 without. The two groups had similar baseline demographics with no significant differences in age, BMI, sex or hernia size. The commonest post-operative complications were pneumonia (33.9%) and wound infections (25.4%) but there were no significant differences in any complication between groups. There was zero 30 and 90 day mortality in either group. The mean operating time in the intestinal group (IG) was significantly longer compared to the CAWR-only group (5.4 +/- 1.3hrs vs 4.1 +/- 1.8hrs, p = &lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in rates of surgical site occurrence (37.5% IG vs 55.81% CAWR-only), mesh infections (0% IG vs 6.98% CAWR-only) or recurrent hernia (6.24% IG vs 9.30% CAWR-only) over a median follow up of 3.0 (0.1-7.8) years. Conclusion Performing simultaneous intestinal surgery during complex abdominal wall repair is safe and does not increase the risk of recurrence or mesh infections in a specialist abdominal reconstruction unit.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
SM Oke ◽  
J Segal ◽  
SK Clark ◽  
AL Hart ◽  
SM Gabe

Introduction Restorative proctocolectomy is a surgical treatment for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis and some cases of familial adenomatous polyposis. Intestinal failure, defined as an inability to maintain adequate hydration and micronutrient balances when on a conventionally accepted normal diet, is a rare complication of restorative proctocolectomy. We describe our experience of patients with restorative proctocolectomy who have developed intestinal failure requiring parenteral support. Material and methods This was a retrospective analysis using a database of patients referred to our intestinal failure unit from January 1998 to January 2016. We analysed the records of all those patients who had restorative proctocolectomy who developed intestinal failure. Results 807 patient records analysed, 35 patients were found to have had a restorative proctocolectomy (13 male and 22 female). Ninety-one percent (n = 32) of patients developed IF as a consequence of unpredictable complications which occurred after RPC formation. Potentially predictable complications were noted in 9% (n = 3) of patients. Discussion and conclusions Most cases of intestinal failure in restorative proctocolectomy were unpredictable. In a small number of patients, accurate assessment and measurement of the small intestine may have better predicted the adverse outcome of intestinal failure allowing improved pre-operative counseling of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document