National Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Ovarian Torsion in Children: An Analysis of 2041 Pediatric Patients Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 844-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Sola ◽  
Blair A. Wormer ◽  
Amanada L. Walters ◽  
B. Todd Heniford ◽  
Andrew M. Schulman

The aim of this study was to evaluate the national trends in surgical management of ovarian torsion (OT) in children. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011 for females less than 18 years of age with OT. Patients were stratified into three treatment groups: oophorectomy (OO), oophoropexy, or release of torsion (RT) alone. There were 2041 patients with OT, of which 1598 (78%) underwent OO, 126 (6%) oophoropexy, and 317 (15%) RT. RT significantly increased from 1998 to 2011 (9% vs 25%; P < 0.05). At nonteaching hospitals, there were higher rates of OO (89.3% vs 79.5%; P < 0.05) and lower rates of RT (10.7% vs 20.5%; P < 0.05) compared with teaching hospitals. RT was performed at a higher rate in Northeast United States compared with the South (22.7% vs 14.2%; P < 0.05). Girls presenting at nonteaching hospitals and the South had increased odds of undergoing OO compared with those presenting at teaching hospitals and the Northeast ( P < 0.05). Although ovarian conservation for OT in children is more often performed in the Northeast United States and at teaching hospitals, this large population-based study demonstrates OO remains the most common surgical management for OT in the United States.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Hamzah ◽  
Hasan F. Othman ◽  
Murad Almasri ◽  
Awni Al-Subu ◽  
Riad Lutfi

Abstract We report on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the United States. The data were obtained from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample datasets for the years 2000–2017, which includes data from participating hospitals in 47 US states and the District of Columbia. We included pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with cardiac arrest and we excluded patients with no cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the hospitalization. Primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality after cardiac arrest. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with survival. A total of 20,654 patients were identified, 8226 (39.82%) patients survived to discharge. The median length of stay and cost of hospitalization were significantly higher in the survivors vs. Non- survivors (LOS 18 days vs. 1 day, and cost $187,434 vs. $45,811, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, patients admitted to teaching hospitals, elective admissions and those admitted on weekdays had higher survival (aOR=1.19, CI: 1.06–1.33, aOR=2.65, CI: 2.37–2.97 and aOR=1.17, CI: 1.07–1.27, respectively). Acute renal failure was associated with decrease in survival (aOR=0.66, CI: 0.60–0.73). There was no difference in mortality between patients with Extracorporeal CardioPulmonary Resuscitation (E-CPR) and those with conventional CardioPulmonary Resuscitation. E-CPR patients were likely to have congenital heart surgery (51.0% vs. 20.8%). In conclusion, we highlighted the survival predictors in these events, which can guide future studies aimed at improving outcomes in pediatric cardiac arrest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-170
Author(s):  
Gerardo Gurza-Lavalle

This work analyses the diplomatic conflicts that slavery and the problem of runaway slaves provoked in relations between Mexico and the United States from 1821 to 1857. Slavery became a source of conflict after the colonization of Texas. Later, after the US-Mexico War, slaves ran away into Mexican territory, and therefore slaveholders and politicians in Texas wanted a treaty of extradition that included a stipulation for the return of fugitives. This article contests recent historiography that considers the South (as a region) and southern politicians as strongly influential in the design of foreign policy, putting into question the actual power not only of the South but also of the United States as a whole. The problem of slavery divided the United States and rendered the pursuit of a proslavery foreign policy increasingly difficult. In addition, the South never acted as a unified bloc; there were considerable differences between the upper South and the lower South. These differences are noticeable in the fact that southerners in Congress never sought with enough energy a treaty of extradition with Mexico. The article also argues that Mexico found the necessary leeway to defend its own interests, even with the stark differential of wealth and resources existing between the two countries. El presente trabajo analiza los conflictos diplomáticos entre México y Estados Unidos que fueron provocados por la esclavitud y el problema de los esclavos fugitivos entre 1821 y 1857. La esclavitud se convirtió en fuente de conflicto tras la colonización de Texas. Más tarde, después de la guerra Mexico-Estados Unidos, algunos esclavos se fugaron al territorio mexicano y por lo tanto dueños y políticos solicitaron un tratado de extradición que incluyera una estipulación para el retorno de los fugitivos. Este artículo disputa la idea de la historiografía reciente que considera al Sur (en cuanto región), así como a los políticos sureños, como grandes influencias en el diseño de la política exterior, y pone en tela de juicio el verdadero poder no sólo del Sur sino de Estados Unidos en su conjunto. El problema de la esclavitud dividió a Estados Unidos y dificultó cada vez más el impulso de una política exterior que favoreciera la esclavitud. Además, el Sur jamás operó como unidad: había diferencias marcadas entre el Alto Sur y el Bajo Sur. Estas diferencias se observan en el hecho de que los sureños en el Congreso jamás se esforzaron en buscar con suficiente energía un tratado de extradición con México. El artículo también sostiene que México halló el margen de maniobra necesario para defender sus propios intereses, pese a los fuertes contrastes de riqueza y recursos entre los dos países.


2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-577
Author(s):  
Eula P. Tetangco ◽  
Supannee Rassameehiran ◽  
George Tan ◽  
Humberto Sifuentes

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Rehana Cassim

Abstract Section 162 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 empowers courts to declare directors delinquent and hence to disqualify them from office. This article compares the judicial disqualification of directors under this section with the equivalent provisions in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America, which have all influenced the South African act. The article compares the classes of persons who have locus standi to apply to court to disqualify a director from holding office, as well as the grounds for the judicial disqualification of a director, the duration of the disqualification, the application of a prescription period and the discretion conferred on courts to disqualify directors from office. It contends that, in empowering courts to disqualify directors from holding office, section 162 of the South African Companies Act goes too far in certain respects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document