The Politics and Practice of New Zealand Competition Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 0003603X2110449
Author(s):  
Matt Sumpter

There is a wind of change blowing through global competition law and policy. Four or five years ago, there were signs a front was coming. Progressive commentators were fretting about years of seemingly unchecked market concentration. They were asking whether greater antitrust intervention might soothe rising inequality, prop up wages, and even disband aggregated political power. Some from the vanguard of this movement now occupy the most influential positions in the global antitrust endeavor. In this article, I locate New Zealand’s experience within the international normative debate over the law’s objectives by reference to the country’s modern economic history. And I explain how policy translates into practice at the enforcement coal face in New Zealand. In doing so, I observe that the country’s competition agency, the Commerce Commission, is failing in its duty to investigate and prosecute exclusionary conduct in the jurisdiction.

Author(s):  
Rex Ahdar

This chapter examines four distinctive features that mark competition law in New Zealand (NZ). Some of these (the first and fourth) are unique to NZ while others (the second and third) are common to all antitrust regimes. The first characteristic is the close relationship with Australian competition law and policy. Being modelled upon Australian legislation, NZ law tracks Australian developments, although the pattern is not one of slavish adherence. A second motif is the ongoing tension between competition law as law and competition law as applied to industrial organization economics. NZ courts have consistently held that economics plays an important but supplemental and subsidiary role. The concepts of “competition” and “market” are discussed. Third, there is ambivalence over the ambit of competition law. This chapter examines both exemptions from the Commerce Act 1986 and the extension of competition law to give it a limited extraterritorial effect. Fourth, another recurring theme is the prevalence of the small, isolated economy argument (NZ is a small fish in the global pond) in the development of policy, doctrine, and the interpretation of the law.


Author(s):  
Alexey Yurievich Ivanov

Evolving BRICS cooperation in Competition Law and policy provides new hope. It aims to embrace the peculiarities of globalization in its current phase. All BRICS jurisdictions are desperately searching for a solution that shortcuts the developmental track. The group’s experimentalist energy and creativity are extremely important for the current phase of global economic development. Not only is an institutional structure of the global order in transition, but also the very nature of the global marketplace. The new global competition policy should focus on facilitation of openness among global networks and value chains through the reduction of the manipulative and exclusionary potential of networks. BRICS cooperation can help make the global marketplace fairer and more equal, and can promote competition encouraging a broader dissemination of knowledge and advanced technologies, while eliminating barriers imposed on the global flows of innovation by the global technological monopolies and cartel-like technological joint ventures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document