scholarly journals Collaborative derivation of reference intervals for major clinical laboratory tests in Japan

Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Ichihara ◽  
Yoshikazu Yomamoto ◽  
Taeko Hotta ◽  
Shigemi Hosogaya ◽  
Hayato Miyachi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadav Rappoport ◽  
Hyojung Paik ◽  
Boris Oskotsky ◽  
Ruth Tor ◽  
Elad Ziv ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The results of clinical laboratory tests are an essential component of medical decision-making. To guide interpretation, test results are returned with reference intervals defined by the range in which the central 95% of values occur in healthy individuals. Clinical laboratories often set their own reference intervals to accommodate variation in local population and instrumentation. For some tests, reference intervals change as a function of sex, age, and self-identified race and ethnicity. Methods In this work, we develop a novel approach, which leverages electronic health record data, to identify healthy individuals and tests for differences in laboratory test values between populations. Results We found that the distributions of >50% of laboratory tests with currently fixed reference intervals differ among self-identified racial and ethnic groups (SIREs) in healthy individuals. Conclusions Our results confirm the known SIRE-specific differences in creatinine and suggest that more research needs to be done to determine the clinical implications of using one-size-fits-all reference intervals for other tests with SIRE-specific distributions.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2988-2988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele M. Flanders ◽  
Ronda A. Crist ◽  
William M. Roberts ◽  
George M. Rodgers

Abstract There is a lack of reliable pediatric reference intervals for many clinical laboratory tests. In 2002, the Children’s Health Improvement through Laboratory Diagnostics (CHILDx) organization initiated a project to collect blood and urine samples from healthy children 7 – 17 years of age with the goal of establishing reference intervals for many laboratory tests. The purpose of the present study was to determine pediatric reference intervals for ten coagulation proteins associated with common bleeding and thrombotic disorders. All assays were functional except for vonWillebrand factor antigen. All were measured according to manufacturer specifications and standard methods using the STA-R coagulation analyzer (Diagnostica Stago), with the exception of the ristocetin cofactor assay, which was performed on the BCS (Dade Behring). Samples used to establish adult reference intervals were purchased from George King Bio-Medical, Precision Biologic, and also drawn in-house. At each age of life, 62 individuals (31 girls/31 boys) were drawn for a minimum of 124 individuals for each age group. Reference intervals were established based on a nonparametric method (NCCLS C28-A). RESULTS: 1. Although pediatric PTT values do not differ from adult values, the mean pediatric PT values are about 1 sec longer, 2. Pediatric FIX levels trend upward until ages 16-17 when adult levels are reached, 3. FVIII, FXI, RCF and vWFAg demonstrate higher reference values in younger ages, 4. The lower limit of pediatric AT levels is significantly higher than adults, 5. The lower limit of pediatric protein C levels is significantly lower than adults, however, this difference is not seen for protein S levels. In conclusion, a number of significant differences between pediatric and adult reference intervals have been found supporting the use of these newer reference intervals. Age N PT PTT F VIII F IX F XI 7–9 186 13.1–15.4* 27–38 78–199* 71–138* 70–138 10–11 124 12.9–15.5* 27–38 83–226* 72–159* 63–137 12–13 124 13.1–15.2* 27–38 74–205* 73–152* 65–130* 14–15 124 12.9–15.4* 26–35 69–241* 80–162 57–125* 16–17 121 12.6–15.9* 26–35 63–225* 85–175 64–160 Adult 125 12.3–14.4 26–38 56–190 78–184 56–153 Age AT RCF VWF Ag PC PS-Male PS-Female * The t-test of the means, F-test of the SD, or both is statistically different (p< 0.05) from adult reference values. 7–9 96–135* 51–172* 62–176 71–143* 64–141 58–154 10–11 92–134* 61–195* 61–201* 76–146* 68–150 68–140* 12–13 92–128* 47–183* 61–186* 68–162* 65–143 60–150 14–15 95–135* 50–215* 57–204* 69–170* 66–149 53–147* 16–17 94–131* 47–206* 51–211 70–170* 75–157* 51–150* Adult 76–128 44–195 51–185 83–168 66–143 57–131


Author(s):  
Dina N Greene ◽  
Robert L Schmidt ◽  
Gabrielle Winston-McPherson ◽  
Jessica Rongitsch ◽  
Katherine L Imborek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gender-affirming therapy with testosterone is commonly prescribed to aid in the masculinization of transgender men. Sex-hormone concentrations are routinely measured, but interpretation of results can be difficult due to the lack of published reference intervals. Methods Healthy transgender individuals who had been prescribed testosterone (n = 82) for at least a year were recruited from internal medicine and primary care clinics that specialize in transgender medical care. Total testosterone and estradiol were measured using immunoassay and mass spectrometry; LH, FSH, SHBG, prolactin, progesterone, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) were measured using immunoassay; free testosterone was calculated. Reference intervals (central 95%) were calculated according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Results When evaluating general endocrine laboratory tests in people using masculinizing hormones, reference intervals for cisgender men can be applied for total and free testosterone and SHBG and reference intervals for cisgender women can be applied for prolactin. Reference intervals for estradiol, LH, FSH, AMH, and DHEAS differ from those used for cisgender men and cisgender women, and therefore should be interpreted using intervals specific to the transmasculine population. For testosterone and estradiol, results from immunoassays were clinically equivalent to mass spectrometry. Conclusion Masculinizing hormones will alter the concentrations of commonly evaluated endocrine hormones. Providers and laboratories should use appropriate reference intervals to interpret the results of these tests.


Author(s):  
Neda Esmailzadeh Bruun-Rasmussen ◽  
George Napolitano ◽  
Randi Jepsen ◽  
Christina Ellervik ◽  
Knud Rasmussen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Yamamoto ◽  
Shigemi Hosogaya ◽  
Susumu Osawa ◽  
Kiyoshi Ichihara ◽  
Toshimitsu Onuma ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-318
Author(s):  
WILLIAM J. WATERS ◽  
SEYMOUR S. KALTER ◽  
JOHN T. PRIOR

The clinical, laboratory and pathologic findings of a series of cases of cat scratch syndrome have been reviewed. In spite of a variable clinical course, certain features associated with a selected group of laboratory tests appear to be constant enough to be of diagnostic value. A history of contact with a cat and/or scratch which is usually associated with a peripheral skin lesion, lack of lymphangitis, presence of regional lymphadenopathy with tenderness to palpation are the most constant clinical findings. Fever, so frequently emphasized as a characteristic clinical sign, may be extremely variable in type and duration or entirely absent. A skin test with cat scratch antigen has been positive in all cases. Lacking this antigen, a negative Frei skin test in conjunction with a positive complement fixation test (Lygranum C. F.) is suggestive evidence for the diagnosis. With positive evidence from the above data, biopsy of an affected gland with its relatively nonspecific pathologic picture is not considered essential for the establishment of the diagnosis of cat scratch syndrome.


1971 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-527
Author(s):  
R.M. HEINICKE ◽  
T. ITO ◽  
L. MCCARTHY ◽  
M. YOKOYAMA

1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-382
Author(s):  
Hiroshi EGAWA ◽  
Koichi YUSU ◽  
Fumio FUNATANI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document