Retrospective analysis of repeated dexamethasone suppression tests – the added value of measuring dexamethasone

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J de Graaf ◽  
AH Leontine Mulder ◽  
Johannes G Krabbe
Keyword(s):  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Test Serum ◽  
Selection Of Patients ◽  
Selection Of

Background In the evaluation for hypercortisolism (Cushing’s syndrome), the 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test has an important role, but false-positive results can occur due to low serum dexamethasone. Given the high intraindividual reproducibility of post-dexamethasone suppression test serum cortisol concentrations, we investigated the chance of success of repeating a non-suppressed dexamethasone suppression test if serum dexamethasone is low. Methods We retrospectively analysed the results of 1901 consecutive dexamethasone suppression tests performed in our laboratory from February 2011 to November 2018. Serum dexamethasone and cortisol were measured by LC-MS/MS, and both were reported. The 2.5 and 5th percentiles of serum dexamethasone in suppressed dexamethasone suppression tests were investigated as cut-off value. Then, we retrospectively determined the success rate of repeating an initial, non-suppressed dexamethasone suppression test in 131 patients, stratified by initial serum dexamethasone. Results At serum dexamethasone concentrations between the 2.5 and 5th percentiles (3.2–3.9 nmol/L), significantly more non-suppressed dexamethasone suppression tests were observed (27/67) than in the control group of 1357 tests having serum dexamethasone ⩾6 nmol/L (40% vs. 30%, P = 0.047), indicating that 3.9 nmol/L is the better cut-off. Overall, 40% of non-suppressed dexamethasone suppression tests were repeated, but repeat testing was performed more often when serum dexamethasone was low. In patients who had initial serum dexamethasone below the cut-off of 3.9 nmol/L, a significantly higher chance of having a suppressed repeat dexamethasone suppression test was observed compared to the control group: 57% (31/54) vs. 26% (15/57), P = 0.001. Conclusions Measuring and reporting serum dexamethasone in dexamethasone suppression tests have added value for the selection of patients who might benefit from a repeat dexamethasone suppression test. We suggest a cut-off for serum dexamethasone of ⩾3.9 nmol/L.

Are depression and denutrition good predictors of dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in anorexia nervosa?

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Massoubre ◽  
F Lang ◽  
L Millot ◽  
M Pichon ◽  
B Estour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Depression Scales ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

SummaryThis study was conducted to investigate the corticotropic axis in anorexia nervosa. In 93 female inpatients who met DSM-III-R criteria for anorexia nervosa, subsample (n = 64) with DSM-III criteria was also considered. Using stepwise regression analysis, this study examined the relationship between independent variables ie, age, body mass index, scores on depression scales and postdexamethasone serum cortisol, considered as a dependent variable. In patients who met DSM-III criteria, 16.7% of the variance of serum cortisol can be explained. The main predictors are depressive retardation, emaciation and age. Using stepwise logistic regression the main categorical predictors of the test suppression vs non suppression are of the same nature. The condition of realisation of DST are discussed.

scholarly journals Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response in borderline personality disorder without post-traumatic features

2007 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose L. Carrasco ◽  
Marina Díaz-Marsá ◽  
Jose I. Pastrana ◽  
Rosa Molina ◽  
Loreto Brotons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Feedback Inhibition ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Post Traumatic ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

SummaryHypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis sensitivity was investigated in 32 non-medicated patients with borderline personality disorder without comorbid post-traumatic syndromes and in 18 normal individuals using a modified dexamethasone suppression test (0.25 mg). Enhanced cortisol suppression was found in the patients v. controls (P < 0.05) and the percentage of participant's with non-suppression was smaller in the patient (34%) than in the control group (89%) (P < 0.01). Baseline cortisol levels in the patients were also lower than in the controls (P < 0.05). The 0.25 mg dexamethasone suppression test reveals increased feedback inhibition of the HPA in borderline personality disorder.

Interpretation of Abnormal Dexamethasone Suppression Test is Enhanced With Use of Synchronous Free Cortisol Assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Genere ◽  
Ravinder Jeet Kaur ◽  
Shobana Athimulam ◽  
Melinda A Thomas ◽  
Todd Nippoldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Total Cortisol ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Free Cortisol ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression ◽  
Positive Results

Abstract Context Interpretation of dexamethasone suppression test (DST) may be influenced by dexamethasone absorption and metabolism and by the altered cortisol binding Objective We aimed to determine the normal ranges of free cortisol during DST in participants without adrenal disorders, and to identify the population of patients where post-DST free cortisol measurements add value to the diagnostic work up. Design and Setting Cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary medical center Participants Adult volunteers without adrenal disorders (n=168; 47 women on oral contraceptive therapy (OCP), 66 women not on OCP, 55 men) and patients undergoing evaluation for hypercortisolism (n=196; 16 women on OCP) Measurements Post-DST dexamethasone and free cortisol (mass spectrometry) and total cortisol (immunoassay). Main Outcome Measures Reference range for post-DST free cortisol, diagnostic accuracy of post-DST total cortisol. Results Adequate dexamethasone concentrations (≥0.1 mcg/dL) were seen in 97.6% volunteers and 96.3% patients. Only 25.5% of women volunteers on OCP had abnormal post-DST total cortisol (&gt;1.8 mcg/dL). In volunteers, the upper post-DST free cortisol range was 48 ng/dL in men and women not on OCP, and 79 ng/dL in women on OCP. When compared to post-DST free cortisol, diagnostic accuracy of post-DST total cortisol was 87.3% (95%CI 81.7-91.7); all false positive results occurred in patients with post-DST cortisol between 1.8 and 5 mcg/dL. OCP use was the only factor associated with false positive results (21.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.02). Conclusions Post-DST free cortisol measurements are valuable in patients with optimal dexamethasone concentrations and post-DST total cortisol between 1.8 and 5 mcg/dL.

Serum cortisol concentrations during low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome

BMJ ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 290 (6462) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
L. Kennedy ◽  
D. Hadden ◽  
B. Atkinson ◽  
B Sheridan ◽  
H. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

Comparison of 1 mg versus 2 mg Dexamethasone Suppression Test in Patients with Obesity

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 854-859
Author(s):  
Sandrine Urwyler ◽  
Nina Cupa ◽  
Mirjam Christ-Crain
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Cortisol ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Cortisol Levels ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

AbstractIn this study, we compared the 2 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) with the gold-standard 1 mg DST in obese patients in order to reduce the false-positive rate for Cushing’s syndrome (CS). The primary endpoint was the comparison of serum cortisol levels after 1 mg versus 2 mg DST in patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 and at least one additional feature of the metabolic syndrome. Secondary endpoints were comparison of salivary cortisol and ACTH levels, respectively. Fifty-four obese patients were included. Median serum cortisol levels after 1 mg DST and 2 mg DST were similar [28 nmol/l (20; 36) vs. 28 nmol/l (20; 38), p=0.53]. Salivary cortisol was 8.2 nmol/l (4.7; 11.7) after the 1 mg DST vs. 6.7 nmol/l (4.2; 9.5) after the 2 mg test, p=0.09. ACTH levels were higher after the 1 mg DST compared to the 2 mg DST [10.0 pg/ml (7.6; 10.7) vs. 5.0 pg/ml (5.0; 5.1), p<0.0001]. The false positive rate after the 1 mg DST was 14.8% (n=8) and was reduced to 11.1% (n=6) after the 2 mg DST. All non-suppressors (n=8) had type 2 diabetes and most of them took a medication interacting with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). In individuals with obesity, the 2 mg DST was not superior to the 1 mg DST in regard to serum cortisol levels. However, in some patients, particularly with poorly controlled diabetes or medication interacting with CYP3A4 and without adequate suppression after the 1 mg DST, the 2 mg DST might prove helpful to reduce the false-positive rate for CS. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT02227420

scholarly journals An Optimized Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of ACTH-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome Based on Low-Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Chen ◽  
Shi Chen ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Huijuan Zhu ◽  
Xiaobo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Cortisol ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

ContextTraditionally, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) was used to confirm the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome (CS), and high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) was used to differentiate Cushing’s disease (CD) and ectopic adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) syndrome (EAS), but some studies suggested that HDDST might be replaced by LDDST. For the differential diagnosis of CS, dexamethasone suppression test was usually combined with other tests such as bilateral petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, but the optimal pathway to incorporate these tests is still controversial.ObjectivesTo develop an optimized pathway for the differential diagnosis of CD and EAS based on LDDST.Design and SettingSingle-center retrospective study (2011–2019).PatientsTwo hundred sixty-nine CD and 29 EAS patients with pathological diagnosis who underwent consecutive low- and high-dose DST.ResultsFor the differential diagnosis of CD and EAS, the area under curve (AUC) of LDDST using urine free cortisol (0.881) was higher than that using serum cortisol (0.685) (p &lt; 0.001) in head-to-head comparison among a subgroup of 108 CD and 10 EAS. The AUC of LDDST (0.883) was higher than that of HDDST (0.834) among all the included patients. With the cutoff of &lt;26%, the sensitivity and specificity of LDDST were 39.4% and 100%. We designed a new pathway in which BIPSS was only reserved for those patients with unsuppressed LDDST and adenoma &lt;6mm, yielding an overall sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 86.7%.ConclusionLDDST had similar value to HDDST in differentiating CD and EAS using the specific cutoff point. The pathway that combined LDDST and BIPSS could differentiate CD and EAS accurately.

scholarly journals Serum cortisol concentrations during low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome.

BMJ ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 289 (6453) ◽  
pp. 1188-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Kennedy ◽  
A B Atkinson ◽  
H Johnston ◽  
B Sheridan ◽  
D R Hadden
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

Agoraphobia and the Dexamethasone Suppression Test: Atypical Depression?

1984 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Whiteford ◽  
Larry Evans
Keyword(s):  
Tricyclic Antidepressants ◽  
Biological Marker ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Panic Attacks ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Atypical Depression ◽  
Panic Disorders ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

The tricyclic antidepressants and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of some patients with phobic and panic disorders. To explain this action it has been suggested that a number of these patients may have an atypical biological depression. In an attempt to test this hypothesis we used the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), which has been proposed as a state dependent biological marker of depression. We compared the non-suppression rate of agoraphobic patients suffering panic attacks with controls and with patients suffering major depression. Twenty-nine per cent of the agoraphobics showed non-suppression compared with 12% of the control group and 64% of the depressives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document