Associations between recent gay-related stressful events, emotional distress, social support and unprotected anal intercourse behavior among Chinese men who have sex with men

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 659-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Yunyong ◽  
Wang Zhe ◽  
Xu Junting ◽  
Zhou Yan ◽  
An Xiaoxia ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Zhang ◽  
Hongyan Lu ◽  
Stephen W. Pan ◽  
Dongyan Xia ◽  
Yuejuan Zhao ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia N Drumright ◽  
Susan J Little ◽  
Steffanie A Strathdee ◽  
Donald J Slymen ◽  
Maria Rosario G Araneta ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. F. Lau ◽  
T. J. Feng ◽  
X. L. Liu ◽  
Jing Gu ◽  
Hi Yi Tsui ◽  
...  

Few studies compared HIV-related risk behaviors between cities with different sociocultural environments among men who have sex with men (MSM). This study investigated the prevalence of unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) and associated individual and socio-cultural factors among Chinese MSM in Hong Kong and Shenzhen in Mainland China, which were proximal to each other but experienced different socioeconomic developments. Amongst all the 535 participants, 40.2% had had UAI. Significant factors of UAI among Shenzhen MSM included being able to find someone to share one’s sexual orientation, disclosure of sexual orientation to family members, HIV risk perception, and use of alcohol or substances (adjusted OR ranged from 2.37 to 4.91), whilst disclosure of sexual orientation to family members was the only significant factor among Hong Kong MSM (adjusted OR = 1.64). Geographic variations in factors associated with UAI were observed. Future research and interventions need to take this into account.


Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Lyons ◽  
Anthony M. A. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey W. Grierson ◽  
Henry von Doussa

Background: Sex on premises venues (SOPVs) where men have sex with men have been implicated in the spread of sexually transmissible infections, but few studies have described men’s sexual encounters in SOPVs, particularly the degree to which men from different backgrounds engage in risky sexual practices. Methods: Interviewer administered surveys were conducted with 186 Australian men who have sex with men (MSM) within 48 h of visiting an SOPV. They reported their sexual practices, the characteristics of their partners and other circumstances surrounding their sexual encounters. Results: All analyses were based on the number of sexual encounters (n = 430). Oral sex was the most common practice, occurring in 74.9% of encounters, followed by massage, frottage or kissing (53.7%), solo or mutual masturbation (36.3%), and anal sex (32.1%). Multivariate analyses revealed age as a significant factor for having protected anal sex (P = 0.001), insertive anal sex (P = 0.004) and receptive anal sex (P < 0.001). These practices were more frequent in encounters among younger men, while masturbation (P = 0.03) was more frequent among older men. When men’s sexual partners were affected by alcohol, encounters were less likely to involve unprotected anal intercourse (P = 0.006) and more likely to involve massage, frottage or kissing (P = 0.009). Men disclosed their HIV status in only 7.7% of encounters. Conclusions: With the likelihood of risky sexual practices varying according to background, results from this study should be used to guide interventions aiming to promote safer sex in SOPVs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document