A Construct Validity Analysis of Scores on Measures of Distributive Justice and Pay Satisfaction

1996 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1026-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Deconinck ◽  
C. Dean Stilwell ◽  
Baird A. Brock
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Celik

Social media users should have a critical approach and look at any of knowledge in social media environments through a rational lens outside of their personal beliefs. In the era of posttruth, the rational lens concerns the epistemological beliefs that are about questioning the source of knowledge and perceive knowledge with criticism. The purpose of this study was to develop the social media-specific epistemological beliefs scale. The dimensions for the scale to be developed in the study were determined on the basis of a theoretical structure earlier proposed in the literature. The development of the social media-specific epistemological beliefs scale consisted of five stages: creating item pool, content and face validity analysis, construct validity analysis, reliability analysis, and language validity analysis. The study group created to analyze the construct validity of the scale consists of 432 preservice teachers who are studying in the education faculty of a large state university in Turkey. As a result of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the social media-specific epistemological beliefs scale was found to be composed of 15 items as a five-point Likert-type, which was fallen under three factors. Findings on the social media-specific epistemological beliefs scale showed that the scale was valid and reliable.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanika T Bhal ◽  
Namrata Gulati

This study explores pay satisfaction-related issues of software professionals in India, specifically assessing the impact of different dimensions of pay satisfaction on intent to leave. Since satisfaction with pay is an emotional/affective reaction and is likely to be influenced by personal and environmental factors, the study explores some social psychological processes like leader-member exchange, justice, and voice that are likely to impact pay satisfaction of these professionals. Using a sample of 306 software professionals drawn from various organizations, the study tests the various hypotheses. Three broad trends emerge from the data: First, process dimensions of pay satisfaction are better predictors of the professionals' intention to leave the organization. Second, distributive justice predicts both the amount and process dimensions of pay satisfaction whereas procedural justice predicts only the process dimensions. Finally, the hypothesis that LMX leads to voice which leads to procedural justice which in turn leads to satisfaction with the process dimensions of pay satisfaction found support from the data and the strength of relationships was stronger for structure and administration dimension as compared to raises dimension of pay satisfaction. The findings suggest that though pay levels are important, the HR Department needs to make additional efforts towards the processes through which pay and raises are determined as these processes might provide the crucial advantage for retaining software professionals in an environment where salary levels are competitive. Additionally, since both the pay-related processes and procedural justice are important, these processes need to be both effective and fair. Though fairness in appraisal and pay- related processes can be built through various HR systems like participation (voice), the results show that these processes will be effective only if they are implemented well by the immediate leader. The results have implications for leadership development and training on appraisal and pay-related processes. Unless the leaders are trained appropriately and made aware of the social psychological processes that go on in a team, the design of systems by the HR Department may not be effective. Since distributive justice is an important predictor of pay satisfaction, comparison with relevant others plays an important role in pay satisfaction. The HR Departments in these organizations needs to identify pay levels that compete in the market. Indians are shown to have a familial identity and value the opinions of their kith and kin; hence, acknowledging and incorporating the inputs of social comparison person (family and friend) might provide more useful insights into how these professionals perceive distributive justice.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Alessandra Silva Michels ◽  
Maria do Rosario Dias de Oliveira Latorre ◽  
Maria do Socorro Maciel

Objective: To validate and assess reliability and understanding of the EORTC–C30 quality of life questionnaire and its breast cancer specific module, the EORTC-BR23. Methods: This study was conducted at the AC Camargo Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 100 women diagnosed with breast cancer were interviewed. Internal consistency, confirmatory factorial analysis, convergent validity, construct validity and degree of understanding were examined. Reliability was assessed by comparison of means at times 1 and 2, inter-class coefficient and Bland-Altman graphics. Results: Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.72 to 0.86 for the EORTC-C30 and from 0.78 to 0.83 for the EORTC-BR23 questionnaire. Most questions were confirmed in the confirmatory factorial analysis. In the construct validity analysis, the questionnaires were capable of differentiating patients with or without lymphedema, apart from the symptom scales of both questionnaires. Both questionnaires presented a significant correlation in most domains of the SF-36, in the convergent validity analysis. Only a few criticisms were reported concerning questions, and the mean grade of understanding was high (C30 = 4.91 and BR23 = 4.89). The questionnaires presented good rates of reliability, with the exception of the functional scale of the C30 and the symptom scale of the BR23. Conclusions: The EORTC-C30 and EORTC-BR23 quality of life questionnaires were validated, presented good rates of reliability and are easily understood, allowing them to be used in Brazil to assess quality of life among women with breast cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Scheller ◽  
Wayne Harrison

Pay transparency—open access to comparative wages—may help reduce wage discrepancies and otherwise benefit organizations. A 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design was used to test the effects of pay transparency, informational justice and distributive justice on pay satisfaction and affective commitment. Case scenarios were developed to manipulate these variables and test main effect and interaction hypotheses. Full-time employees in the United States ( N = 293) were recruited from Amazon’s MTurk. Results showed main effects of pay transparency and distributive justice on both pay satisfaction and affective commitment; an informational justice effect was revealed on affective commitment. Pay transparency had a larger effect on pay satisfaction when distributive justice was low than when it was high. Exploratory analyses revealed an interaction between pay transparency, gender and race on pay satisfaction. This study confirmed positive consequences of pay transparency policies, which are proposed to be a component of informational justice.


1995 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Stephens ◽  
Jennifer S. Wertz ◽  
Roger A. Roffman

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (23) ◽  
pp. 329-340
Author(s):  
Guillermo César Vázquez González ◽  
Iván Ulianov Jiménez Macías ◽  
Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández

La gestión del conocimiento es una capacidad que impulsa la innovación educativa en universidades, por tanto, requiere de herramientas que permitan su evaluación. Al respecto se encuentra el cuestionario “gestión del conocimiento para la innovación educativa en universidades”, el cual, en una fase inicial fue sujeto de análisis de validez de contenido, por tanto, se requiere el análisis de validez de constructo, ya que esta propiedad es considerada la de mayor importancia. Por lo anterior, el objetivo fue realizar dicho análisis y evaluar la confiabilidad del cuestionario mediante la aplicación a una muestra de profesores de educación superior. El análisis de validez de constructo se realizó mediante el análisis factorial exploratorio, y la confiabilidad se determinó con el Alfa de Cronbach. Los resultados revelaron la representación del 77% de los ítems en dos factores denominados “gerencia” y “acción” que, en conjunto, explicaron más del 70% de la varianza. La confiabilidad mostró un valor óptimo total (Alfa de Cronbach: .985 IC al 95%: .98 + .99), así como por factor (uno: .978 IC al 95%: .969 + .984; dos: .972 IC al 95%: .961 + .98). Se puede concluir que los elementos que integran el cuestionario reproducen el constructo teórico propuesto.


Author(s):  
Samantha J. Newell ◽  
Anna Chur-Hansen ◽  
Peter Strelan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document