scholarly journals Working Still Harder

ILR Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 001979392097785
Author(s):  
Francis Green ◽  
Alan Felstead ◽  
Duncan Gallie ◽  
Golo Henseke

The authors use data from the British Skills and Employment Surveys to document and to try to account for sustained work intensification between 2001 and 2017. They estimate the determinants of work intensity, first using four waves of the pooled cross-section data, then using a constructed pseudo-panel of occupation–industry cells. The latter approach suggests biases in cross-section models of work intensity, associated with unobserved fixed effects in specific occupations and industries. The pseudo-panel analysis can account for slightly more than half (51%) of work intensification using variables that measure effort-biased technological change, effort-biased organizational change, the growing requirement for learning new things, and the rise of self-employment. The authors interpret the work intensification and these effects within a power-resources framework.

Nova Economia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 871-892
Author(s):  
Marcelo Piancastelli ◽  
A.P. Thirlwall

Abstract This paper measures the tax effort of a group of fifty-nine developed and developing countries over the period 1996-2015 by comparing a country’s actual tax/GDP ratio with the ratio predicted derived from an international tax function which relates tax revenue to various measures of a country’s taxable capacity such as the level of per capita income; the share of trade in GDP; the productive structure, and the level of financial deepening. The tax function is estimated using cross section data; pooled time series/cross section data, and panel data using a fixed effects estimator. The results are compared and show a range of tax effort from South Africa with the highest effort and Switzerland with the lowest effort. Implications for policy are drawn. The paper is critical of studies that include institutional variables (and other variables not related to the tax base of countries) to measure tax effort when they are really explanations of why the tax ratio differs between countries not of tax effort itself.


Econometrica ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 552
Author(s):  
V. K. Chetty

1986 ◽  
Vol 94 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 49-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Hertzog ◽  
P. D. Soran ◽  
J. S. Schweitzer

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 1656-1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Uddin ◽  
M.R. Zaman ◽  
S.M. Hossain ◽  
I. Spahn ◽  
S. Sudár ◽  
...  

ILR Review ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald G. Ehrenberg ◽  
Daniel R. Sherman ◽  
Joshua L. Schwarz

This paper develops and illustrates the use of two methodologies to analyze the effect of unions on productivity in the public sector. Although the methodologies are applicable to a wide variety of public sector functions, the focus of the paper is on municipal libraries because of the availability of relevant data. The empirical analysis, which uses 1977 cross-section data on 260 libraries, suggests that collective bargaining coverage has not significantly affected productivity in municipal libraries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Beenstock ◽  
Dan Feldman ◽  
Daniel Felsenstein

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Beck

Carter and Signorino (2010) (hereinafter “CS”) add another arrow, a simple cubic polynomial in time, to the quiver of the binary time series—cross-section data analyst; it is always good to have more arrows in one's quiver. Since comments are meant to be brief, I will discuss here only two important issues where I disagree: are cubic duration polynomials the best way to model duration dependence and whether we can substantively interpret duration dependence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document