Enzyme-Histochemical Determination of Human Bone Growth Activity in Postmortem Material

1973 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1293-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger Kjær ◽  
Uwe Prydsoe
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Incubation Medium ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Autopsy Material ◽  
Growth Activity ◽  
Enzyme Alkaline Phosphatase

Autopsy material from calvarian bones and sutures of two children, was used to determine growth activity by measuring enzyme alkaline Phosphatase activity. In the extremely active periosteum of the 2-day-old boy, differences in growth activity could be demonstrated by reduction of the temperature of the incubation medium from room temperature to 4 C.

A MnO2nanosheets–o-phenylenediamine oxidative system for the sensitive fluorescence determination of alkaline phosphatase activity

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (44) ◽  
pp. 5341-5346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xionghong Tan ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
Yanlin Du ◽  
Aixian Zheng ◽  
Yongyi Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Alp Activity ◽  
Fluorescence Determination ◽  
Oxidative System

A MnO2nanosheets–o-phenylenediamine (OPDA) oxidative system was developed for detecting ALP activity selectively, sensitively and conveniently.

Collaborative Study of Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Filter Paper Disks Impregnated with Skim Milk: Positive Control Sample

1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. MURTHY ◽  
J. T. PEELER
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase Activity ◽  
Filter Paper ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Colorimetric Test

The rapid colorimetric test was used in a collaborative study to determine alkaline phosphatase activity in filter paper disks impregnated with skim milk then dried and stored for several months at room temperature. Five samples of filter paper disks (0 to 6 μg phenol/disk) in duplicate were sent to six collaborators for analysis. Computations of analytical and analyst errors showed variations of 22.2 to 48.8%. Most of the variations were due to differences among analysts, but some were partly due to differences in the slopes of the calibration curves (a = 0.05 level) they prepared at the time of analysis. Collaborator's performance was evaluated by comparing % correct results that were positive (negative) with the expected results. About 95% of the samples were correctly analyzed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document