Public Sector Independent Grievance Systems: Methods and Procedures

1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Bohlander

This research examined public sector independent grievance procedures in twenty-two agencies in the Southwest United States. Non-union grievance systems are championed as a way to equitably adjudicate employee problems while additionally fostering agency objectives and lessening the possibility of employee legal suits. Content analysis was used to determine the purpose of grievance programs, grievable issues, employee representation, neutral third-party resolution of cases, and different grievance systems and their methodologies. Based upon study findings, suggestions are offered to implement or improve a current grievance program.

Public Voices ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Tony Carrizales

Public Service, in popular culture, can be viewed through many artistic lenses. Although there has been a consistent negative portrayal of government through art forms such as film and television, this research looks to review how government institutions in the United States have used art to provide a positive portrayal of public service. Eight forms of public service art are outlined through a content analysis of the holdings at the Virtual Museum of Public Service. The findings show that government and public entities have historically and continually engaged in promoting public service through art. Many of these public art examples are accessible year round, without limitations, such as buildings, statues, and public structures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 500-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Dery ◽  
Channah M. Rock ◽  
Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein ◽  
Cathy Onumajuru ◽  
Natalie Brassill ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. DEBORAH SHILOFF ◽  
BRYAN MAGWOOD ◽  
KRISZTINA L. MALISZA

The process of research is often lengthy and can be extremely arduous. It may take many years to proceed from the initial development of an idea through to the comparison of the new modalities against a current gold-standard practice. Each step along the way involves rigorous scientific review, where protocols are scrutinized by multiple scientists not only in the specific field at hand but related fields as well. In addition to scientific review, most countries require a further review by a panel that will specifically address the ethics of the proposed research. In Canada, those panels are referred to as Research Ethics Boards (REB), with the United States counterparts known as Institutional Review Boards (IRB).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document